Argh, damn it! I'm not as famous as I expected. 
Thanks Loycy.  |
|
|
|
WAKE UP PEOPLE!
As I was initiated into a cryptic cult with rites of the goddess Hecate, the renowned paranormal researcher William Blake caught this photograph of Lauda shapeshifted to the form of a flying catbat:  The witch LAUDAIdentified Flying Object (IFO)
(Better than a UFO. Much better than an ICO.)Is any more actual proof needed to sustain a charge of witchcraft?  I've been practicing a new spell: Once I cast it, other members start agreeing with my sent ratings. |
|
|
|
But it's easy to just jump up to ideas created by someone you trust and support it without any piece of brain right?
I'm pretty sure "supporting him in the race" is not the same as giving merit to someone who creates a decent 10 minute video. Then again, maybe that's just my child brain misunderstanding things.
Ping me when you realize what you did wrong and/or do something positive for the forum for a change (other than farming up this imaginary "reputation" of yours..). Just because I reconsidered some ratings as of late, that doens't mean that everyone's rating deserves that. I'm out of this thread for now (re: serious mode). |
|
|
|
I don't see what Lauda has to do with a trust given by suchmoon?
Maybe the user is thinking of my trust rating and DT position, which have changed several times over the past two years. |
|
|
|
What should I see in that link? TELL ME PLEASE TELL ME. I already said my reason in there and here. What is the purpose of sending my old post to here again? You are saying it is a "merit trade". But you are lying. That's what I'm trying to explain in here. That's not a lie; might be a misunderstanding, but definitely not a lie. There, I've updated it with a fresh rating (based on nulliuses) that properly describes what you did and why I distrust you. |
|
|
|
Your typo made me google "rape recorder" because I was sure it's a thing. Damn it, now I'm probably on some kind of a list.
I'm pretty sure your list is not nearly as dangerous as mine  And I swear I don't know how that one got there.  |
|
|
|
You can add 25 from me, plus another 25 if I'm portrayed with an exaggerated Australian accent like Wayne Gale (Robert Downey Jr) in Natural Born Killers.
I'll pitch in too if I'm potrayed as a psycho cat with a fox on my leash.  |
|
|
|
|
IMO definitely compromismed/or alt farm. Will have to take a look through all the other accounts before tagging them too.
|
|
|
|
Seriously, we should stop this. BTCTalk forum members will die laughing or at least end up in a hospital with muscle problems.
The forum is too liberal when it comes to nonsense, thus I don't see it stopping anytime soon. Who'll pay the social security bill? Can't you airdrop some Social Security, OP?
I propose we tap into the QS self-escrow account or the TF's lawsuit payment. |
|
|
|
Lately there's so much comedy to be found in these threads. Can't we put up a vote to change the Meta forum's name to Comedy forum?
I think I've asked for the reputation section to be renamed to Lauda somewhere a long time ago. Maybe we should do it for meta too.  |
|
|
|
New members of DT2, who were not in the "old" DT2 or DT1. No user ID on the trust page, so I couldn't create profile links, sorry. Please review and make adjustments if needed. This is based on coinlocket$'s snapshot of the old system vs the current DT2 list as of a few minutes ago. Things change quickly so feel free to yell at me if something is wrong. ChiBitCTy Banned user in DT2 list, look like activity criteria need to be fit for DT2 user also? No. There is no criteria for DT2 (other than obviously being added by DT1). I have already contacted the user who has added him (and posted about it here; read all of the posts). |
|
|
|
This is starting to feel like a full time job. I thought I was almost done with my list but then started digging deeper and there is still some work to do.
Yup. I think I've changed my list more times since the introduction of this system than I have in all the previous time spent here. Former members of DT (1 or 2), who are no longer included in the "new" DT or have been excluded. Please review and if you find someone worthy - include them.
If I look at activity/inactivity, sent ratings and their trust lists, I don't see anyone else noteworthy of being re-added. Inactive accounts are now more dangerous than ever. There are some weird names, e.g. Gavin Andresen should never have been on that list. |
|
|
|
Is it possible to bring him to prison ? I think a lot of people here can take legal action against him
 Sue me for pointing out your scam. |
|
|
|
I added BadBear on depth 0, look how someone's reputation has changed: <snip> Oh, and that someone is you! Explain to me what happened there? I'm assuming he trusts someone who gave me a neg but don't know who. I'm not even sure how to check BB's trust list without modifying my own. Yep, ignorance at its finest and I've been here long enough that I should know this. It shouldn't matter to you. BadBear's list is likely unmaintained due to his inactivity. |
|
|
|
New users in DT2, who were not in the "old" DT2 or DT1. No user ID on the trust page, so I couldn't create profile links, sorry. Please review and make adjustments if needed.
-snip-
Sylon
Yuck. Excluded; first name that popped up. It seems that some DT1 people still have unmaintained lists. |
|
|
|
If I understood the system correctly, it means theymos is encouraging all of us to create our custom trust list.
This was always the case due to abuse on both layers. Some people are ego-maniacs and very petty (I'm stealing this from hilarious) but the list remained mostly static. EFS is the Turkish mod. He can be very petty sometimes and you probably just said something he (or his alts) didn't like at one point. Just check his trust list and see who he's excluded as there's many very trusted users there.
This is a valid reason to exclude him (plus the link that you've posted). He got off easy. People that have bad exclusions are likely to have bad judgement overall. |
|
|
|
Was hoping more people would have me in their trust network to be honest  You have sent a very small number of ratings. Given that number, I'm actually surprised that so many people have added you TBH. Adding someone who sends almost no ratings (regardless of whether they are positive or negative) is pointless in my opinion. |
|
|
|
- Why is maximum trust depth 4?
Probably to avoid using up too many system resources for calculation as it gets really wide later on(?). Imagine XYZ accounts switching their settings between depth 8 and 10 every few seconds. |
|
|
|
I guess the problem is - how we see the trust system. My priority is the marketplace first for trust system then forum actions. But your priority is forum actions first?
It's simple really: Marketplace first (is likely safe to deal with; does not necessarily have good judgement) -> positive feedback. Forum actions first (unknown trade safety; has shown good judgement) -> trust list. Marketplace && forum actions (is likely safe to deal with && has shown good judgement) -> positive feedback && trust list.
Given that a huge amount of trust is handed over for very small trades, I'd prioritize longterm forum activities anyday.
Most of the people that are on my trust list are people that I'd trade with using escrow. Which is fine. You should generally really only trust a very small subset of people here. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
