I also see that this user is get red trust from DT (Lauda) for plagiarism, is this even something that deserve negative feedback?
I'll undo it if he's unbanned, sig. banned and removed as a merit source. |
|
|
|
you know Lauda once asked me about someone on my trust-list, my answer was "fuck off cat" and guess what, im still here - not ded, not off DT, the cat isn't some dodgy forum deity, all you pricks having daily Lauda wanks really need to get a life.
To be fair, "fuck off" from you is roughly equivalent to "aight mate". To be fair, its also the equivalent of "you're a dodgy cunt ain't ya." His "fuck off" can mean a hundred things. You need context.  |
|
|
|
Assuming this gets added to Bitcoin Core soon, would you say that it is likely that the default connectivity would also be increased?
Maybe not at the same time because there are other things like per-connection memory usage that need to be optimized too... but eventually, sure. Probably you'll see per connection memory usage get improved, then the default inbound connection limit get increased, and only after that's well deployed would the default outbound level get increased. How far away would you say that we're from seeing this be implemented/PR made? |
|
|
|
Lauda asked him, but if LFC didn't exclude BILL from his list and didn't tagged him..... Then nothing would of happened to LFC, he got a request and probably shared opinion on the matter..... all if this is just so blown up.
Nothing would have happened to him the same way nothing has happened to others. However, pajeet joe's always need someone to blame. I'm fine with being the flying catbat witch so that the monkeys like CH have a totem to scream at.   The witch LAUDAIdentified Flying Object (IFO)
(Better than a UFO. Much better than an ICO.) |
|
|
|
This shit's definitely gone too far. If only there was something else we could do, like maybe theymos could implement a forum feature allowing us to express our displeasure or even - gasp - distrust of certain individuals so that we wouldn't need 15 threads about each one.
The ability to exclude a person from your trust list harmed the trust system. Instead of holding a person accountable for including someone who should not be in their trust list, users now have the option of excluding the person who should not be in the trust network. And the problem is........? The problem is that we can now easily kick out his alts and goons. |
|
|
|
I dare QS to list something for sale at a good price and another person buys it , see if lauda is full of shit or not.
Any member that does a transaction with QS in order to test out my rating is inherently scamming untrustworthy.  Why are you mad though? Maybe you invested in BitConnect? Too afraid to answer? |
|
|
|
Why are you mad though? Maybe you invested in BitConnect? |
|
|
|
Is transaction broadcast really a problem that needs to be solved?
Erlay reduces node bandwidth usage by 38%, or by 75% if connectivity is increased from 8 to 32 for attack robustness reasons. Assuming this gets added to Bitcoin Core soon, would you say that it is likely that the default connectivity would also be increased? |
|
|
|
Is it possible to find at least one private key from any public key from the list from the large list of compressed public keys secp256k1? Public keys: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HByDJR9Ck5CdIwTl-v_IzcaVhsG8aKaAAs I know, this list contains 15 million compressed public keys. Is it possible to use any method for such a large list of compressed public keys in order to finally find at least one private key? No and no. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't mind, but many others would. That view point is too narrow, there are many excellent people that haven't earned much merit for a plenthora of reasons. Maybe he could do it only for the users that don't pass a certain condition, e.g. earned less than 10% of total airdropped merit. |
|
|
|
Preface: By posting this, I 100% expect abusive negative trust, which further proves my point.
Nice, yet failed stategy - thinking that this will prevent you from receiving deserved negative trust. CH 2.0?  Why do you care, and where did you purchase this account from[1]? Maybe Quickscammer himself? If you deal with this user you will get burned, and I will tag you as well.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with this. It will contain the spreading of the disease and has already been applied before in many different situations. Furthermore, nobody legitimate has every said anything against this particular way of handling it. Then the one-above-a-pile-of-sh*t is liked by no one, no one cares about what he has to say and he's annoying AF, also lack of normal civilised communicating and thats a very important aspect of being in this online space.
You indulge IT by saying that. In my view, IT is insignificant to the point that IT makes no impact on anyone.
Postface: Random baboon singling me out for nonsense usually backfires dramatically. I'm guessing at some point you will go on a lying tantrum or we will discover [1] to be true. It's all about those patterns. Tick-tock.
Postface 2:Accelerate your stuck tx here!
Ok I'll do it if you put your account up as collateral with an escrow |
|
|
|
I see some people are here not involved with forum politics and I believe they have nothing with the gang however do you see some very common names who are basically ass lickers, some are very afraid to take steps against Lauda?
Then you really have no idea. |
|
|
|
Can you provide a link to the place where LFC_Bitcoin said that ? (what you have included in the "quote")
When I click on it, it brings up LFC profile.
It's a real, private PM that the degenerate gator published in order to attack me but it backfired. |
|
|
|
That's just a propaganda/scare tactic. It's not even that hard to stay reasonably anonymous today. The problem is when you get comfortable (among other things); that's when these people make mistakes and they catch them.
If you're an average user, sure. If you run a business which brings a lot of unwanted attention of well-funded adversaries, it's a significantly harder task. Not really, you just need to know what you're doing. I guess you could argue it is significantly harder when one doesn't know what they're doing. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
I don't see any legitimate reason why Hhampuz would need to obfuscate where he is holding someone else's money.
That's none of your concern. Nobody cares when a SCAMMER like you accusses him. He will not respond. A morning in the life of quickseller..........
Wake up, its 4 am but I need to be up to deal with all my Pajeet clients and make mad satoshi from flipping accounts., Mums basement is really cold at this time of the morning, so I don my fedora, comb my neckbeard, check my sword is nice and sharp.. got to look after your sword when you are a neckbeard account farmer like me, you never know when you may need to defend yourself.
Now on to the ritual act I must perform every day, down on my knees I pull out my holy grail.. the cat picture that I imagine is Lauda, so down go my leather pants as I furiously have my 1st Lauda wank of the day.. I may not have much to work with being blessed with a micropeen, but the thumb and index finger duo does me. so I work it hard - micro peen grows to 1 1/2 inches as I ejaculate into my special cup (i'll save that to drink later, it will give me super troll strength)
Now I rise, check my beard and fedora again, then Boot up my Pentium 4 machine and shitpost away on 1256 alt accounts, get bounty collecting.. all those satoshi's add up. I do 2 deals for 20 member accounts each to Pajeet and Pajeeta, fuck theymos and his forum for removing me from DT.. I could of been the best I could of been like Blazed, but ill just take it out on Lauda later.
Pajeeta comes back and moans at me due to 7 of the accounts being tied together by timelord, oh shit thats 3 months of work down the drain again.. better get ready to rage at Lauda.
Take a break from account grinding, better go and check on mum make sure she has enough chicken tendies in for me today..
|
|
|
|
If this was Medium I'd give you 50 claps and then log on to a different account just so I could give you 50 more!
Did you just admit to wanting to make alt accounts so you can give people more internet points? Wait until QS hears about this! Next up on America's Looney Tunes Gang: Hhampuz embezzeling medium claps. |
|
|
|
4. Now send me the wallet.dat file with no change addresses.
Don't do this. There's a way to prove it.
There's a better way to prove it: Don't send anything to random newbies. I've tagged your account. |
|
|
|
Constructive discussions always welcome but, "No troll & attack"
What you are looking for is called OBSERVABLE proof and OBSERVABLE facts. |
|
|
|
With mixing services closing one after the other (first Bitmixer, now BitcoinBlender), I believe we'll see a surge to GRIN as it looks to have unmatching anonymity which cannot be tempered.
This is nonsense. Don't buy this shitcoin. Thank me later. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
