Correct me if I am wrong here fellas, but if everyone creates their own custom trust lists Default Trust will have little to no meaning....
There are only a few thousand users that have a custom trust list. This is not something that you have to worry about. If you don't trust someone's judgement, you shouldn't include him in your trust list.
I don't think technically it's correct. Actually it is the only kind of correct. That's what the trust list is for. You trust their judgement (as loyce pointed out), you do not necessarily trust them with e.g. money. |
|
|
|
I sometimes wonder whether I'm the biggest forum celebrity though.  Well, you certainly have at least ONE new fan following you around... and I bet Quicksy will resurface soon. I thought you gang members were also my fans |
|
|
|
I think that you are abusing it
Yes, I'm literally the daughter of Satan and theymos is my master of the dark arts. |
|
|
|
90 Lauda, or Olav if possible.  |
|
|
|
Lauda for me is not fair and not honest people, so I do not share joy with you ..
Merit abuse. Accounts Connected: Dimas245, Ksjywe4ka.
I must apologize, that is definitely my fault. |
|
|
|
I think krogothmanhattan confused those, and added users to his trust network after a trade.
Correct. He was adding pretty much anyone he had some succesful deals with. He's not the first person to have made this mistake. |
|
|
|
I think the current system do not need DT2 level since it is a dynamic list. Only DT1 level should be enough and this will encourage people to create their own custom trust list. Default trust > DT1. Any thought?
No, and I have no idea why you'd even recommend something like that. Why should we have moderators when everyone can be a global mod. or even admin?  List cleaned up. Removed almost everyone with the exception of 11 people
When you cleaned up the list what was your motivation? And when you were adding those people in your list then what was your motivation? He was using the system wrong; people pointed this out to him. |
|
|
|
Do you know of any other client other than Bitcoin Core that allows for this? (Legacy amd Segwit address in 1 wallet)
Not sure about desktop clients, but Samurai has this capability (Mobile). You can turn Segwit address generation on/off with 1 checkbox. |
|
|
|
is account selling tolerated again ? because i don't see any of them tagged For future reference: Avoid wasting your own time on low ranked members (especially those that have no merit). They are throwaway accounts. |
|
|
|
Have just come across this thread. Who do I have to thank for removing or excluding me from DT2?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full shows: hilariousandco, Lutpin, DarkStar_, Tomatocage, EcuaMobi have you excluded. I don't think it's an exclusion problem, but rather an inclusion one. Whoever had you included, removed the inclusion from what I can tell. Wrong thread though? |
|
|
|
Lauda Launda laudanum Laura As DT
This has my vote.
I sometimes wonder whether I'm the biggest forum celebrity though. |
|
|
|
How know who are add me on their trust list, I think only admin can check it.
You could parse the trust system dumps or check individual user's trust list (by adding them to your trust list and temporarily removing everything else). Wouldn't it just be better to not worry about it? Some of these users have no idea how shitty being on DT can be at times with all the bickering we catch from a rating we left users. I would rephrase 'some' to 'most'. If you tag someone you get blamed, if you don't tag someone you get blamed, the same goes if you remove a rating or don't remove a rating. Quite the nuisance at times. I'd say all users engaging in trading will have to look past a persons trust score(now more then ever) and actually go into the persons profile you are trading with and check all the feedbacks. As well as make use of the active escrows
This should have always been the case as there were plenty of bad DT ratings. |
|
|
|
|
In the first case DT1 users have Depth 1 vs. in the second case they have Depth 0? I'd assume that in the later case another layer is included in what you see as trusted.
|
|
|
|
How know who are add me on their trust list, I think only admin can check it.
You could parse the trust system dumps or check individual user's trust list (by adding them to your trust list and temporarily removing everything else). |
|
|
|
Roughly a third of new DT1 members are in the same "clique" / "trading circle" and another 15% closely associate with this group.
The clique part is a lie (albeit the "trading circle" may be true, but that is rather a positive thing - it shows that there is still a high volume trading section); there are many extensive disagreements between the members of the current DT list on my issues/individual users. That's all I had to say on this (expected) thread. This group just so happens to collectively give out many controversial ratings
Just because you think something is a controversial rating, that doesn't mean that it actually is that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'm grabbing some popcorn for this thread. |
|
|
|
ChiBitCTy already banned for plagiarism in April 2018 but he was in DT2 list since new trust system implemented,so DT1 members exclude him from your trust list,also please go through your trust list for similar cases if any. There's nothing wrong with his sent ratings (a ban isn't that relevant) though. Who exactly added him? BitcoinPenny have ChiBitCTy in his trust list,I am not sure a banned member is eligible to be a DT member or not.  There's nothing against it, the same way that there is nothing against adding inactive users which pose a greater risk. I've sent Penny a PM. |
|
|
|
That's what I was planning to do but I wanted to collect proofs during the next days otherwise it's just an accusation
PM'd. ChiBitCTy already banned for plagiarism in April 2018 but he was in DT2 list since new trust system implemented,so DT1 members exclude him from your trust list,also please go through your trust list for similar cases if any. There's nothing wrong with his sent ratings (a ban isn't that relevant) though. Who exactly added him? |
|
|
|
Being a moron doesn't necessarily make someone a scammer.
We don't hand out negative ratings only to confirmed scammers now, do we? If OP does end up changing it to negative, at least some of the fiery walls of text will be directed away from me.  |
|
|
|
There are several users now in the dt1 and dt2 who use multiple alt accounts (bought or created themselves)
I would not call them trusted that"s why I was saying the old system was better
There are cases in which an alt account is acceptable (e.g. a collectible store/product account). How about you list who these people are and which accounts are allegedly theirs? |
|
|
|
|
Sir how can I vote on this poll?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
