|
If you have absolutely no clue about the order (i.e. not only a few words swapped), it is impossible to recover your coins.
There are 24! possible combination which you need to try out (i.e. check whether valid seed, and if it is -> derive address).
That's 6.2 x 1023. Or: 6.200.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 combinations.
Unfortunately you can't bruteforce that.
If you are only missing a few words (e.g. 2 or 3), it is definitely possible.
But since it actually seems that you have no clue about the order at all.. the answer is unfortunately no.
|
|
|
|
Is there any one with stored pass in a cloud? Is this safe after-all?
I use two computers and mobile. I need something that can be synced once store a password on one device to be available on another.
With proper encryption, it theoretically is relatively safe. However, this is not recommended at all. You never know who will gain access to the encrypted file. And if later a vulnerability is found, all of your passwords are at risk. The most secure option probably would be to simply 'sync' the database files yourself (i.e. copy it to your other devices). LastPass and KeePass are both considered good. I am using (and would recommend) KeePass. LastPass is not open-source, while KeePass is. I definitely wouldn't use some browser-in-built password manager. |
|
|
|
Warning!!
This project is a scam.
The whitepaper is plagiarized: see here.
|
|
|
|
Warning!!
This project is a scam.
The whitepaper is plagiarized: see here.
|
|
|
|
isn't highlighted addresses mean that address belongs to your wallet? initially i posted the same answer but removed it because i saw that highlight and thought the 0.001 to the bc1 address ending with ...jsx was his own (change address)!
Receiving addresses are highlighted green. Change addresses are highlighted yellow. TrustedCoin addresses are highlighted blue. So, it is definitely because OP created a 2FA wallet and didn't yet pay the fee for co-signing (probably his first TX out of this wallet). @OP: If you don't want to pay for 2FA, recreate your wallet with your seed and send your coins. If you don't plan to use 2FA in the future, create a new wallet without 2FA and send all remaining funds to this wallet. |
|
|
|
using open source software is never about "you" personally having the skills to review it.
Actually.. in this case, where one wants to build an exchange.. it is. Either you or some payed security expert has to review it. the point of open source is that the source is open for everyone to see and if the project is popular enough you can be sure that others have reviewed it specially if it is sensitive and deals with lots of money, and then you can trust it doesn't have any backdoors.
Just because some open-source exchange doesn't have a sendPrivatekeysToServer() function, it doesn't mean that there is no backdoor. Do you think you (or one of the 100 others who liked/forked such an open-source exchange) do have an excellent clue about IT security ? Do you really think they would find a vulnerability which has been placed on purpose ? I mean.. hell.. OpenSSL has been reviewed by countless people.. still it took more than 3 years to find heartbleed. One of the most obvious vulnerabilities (after the discovery). Some well-hidden vulnerability definitely won't be found by some simple code reviews. The other question is.. why open-source an exchange if you can earn multiple 100k dollars with it when done right (not talking about running an exchange, but selling the software) ? What's their business model? Giving aways valuable software for free because why not? IMO, if someone wants to run an exchange.. invest multiple 10k's or 100k's of $ into a good software, get some professional security consultants and perform regular penetration tests. |
|
|
|
bob123, would you like to create a Type 1 flag for the main LiveCoin account? There is one created by a troll and linked to an accusation that seems more appropriate for a type 2/3 flag if the victim was so inclined. This thread would be a better reference for a type 1 flag and I think we need one in case izoomrud's flag gets resolved. Makes sense. Especially since both accounts are operated by the same person and/or so-called 'business'. Created a flag. |
|
|
|
You have a business. Izumrud izooomrud requires money from you his money back from you, and if you refuse, he promises to give you black PR and destroy your business tell the truth. Is it a threat or what?
Fixed your mistakes. And to answer your question.. well this could be seen as a threat. But a justified one. "If you don't return my money, i tell the truth about you" is a threat. But this doesn't make it a 'bad one'. Are you stuped or simply doing signature spam?
What is stuped ? Is this something to eat ? |
|
|
|
I don't see your goddamn point.
That doesn't mean he was lying. Livecoin's own words verified that OP wasn't lying. What are you talking about here?
You don't see it, because you don't use your had. Obviously because OP said that even lying is not against ToS (which has been brought up by livecoin), everything OP says is a lie.  If i were you, i wouldn't bother to argue with those people defending livecoin. Anyone who doesn't accept that their ToS is illegal and their legal status is somewhat unknown either doesn't want to accept it or simply is delusional. |
|
|
|
Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk
It is the correct definition, so if you are wearing Livecoin signature, trading with you is a high-risk?
That's simple. If someone promotes a scam for a few bucks, anyone dealing with this user is at risk. Especially when 'larger' amounts are involved. How shall i trust someone who would do anything for a few bucks ? For my part, i decided to distrust anyone enrolled in the campaign. I won't do any business at all with people who promote scammy shady and illegal activities. |
|
|
|
Dazu kommt dann noch mindestens ein Angestellter welcher seine ganze Arbeitszeit damit verbringt die Software zu pflegen. Also nochmal rund 60.000€ pro Jahr.
das kann halbtags ein rentner sein. sobald die kiste einmal läuft, sind maintenance usw nicht wirklich der große faktor. insofern du nicht alle arbeiten kommplett abgibst ... .. ich meine, .. du musst ja keinen bezahlen damit er dir ne wallet kompiliert und dann beim sync zuschaut. das kann man ja noch selber bewerkstelligen Ja, das war auch nicht gemeint. Ich hätte mich etwas deutlicher ausdrücken sollen. Was ich eigentlich mit "pflegen" meinte, war das gesamte System sicher zu halten. Gerade in so einem Umfeld sollte viel Wert auf Sicherheit gelegt werden. Da wird man nicht lange erfolgreich sein, wann man das einmal "sicher" aufsetzt, und dann - bis auf die Updates - sich selbst überlässt. So etwas verlangt ständige Pflege. Dazu kommen dann noch die Penetrationstests welche jedes oder alle 2 Jahre durchgeführt werden sollten. Da ist man auch gleich mit 10.000€ / 5 Tage dabei. |
|
|
|
[...]
Say you are not in your apartment/home and leave your nano ledger there for many months. There still should not be issue where you cannot update firmware anymore like the OP right?
I mean to me... that doesn't sound good that someone could leave their nano ledger s untouched for years... then you can't update it anymore.
You keep asking the same questions over and over again.. 1) [...]I assume unless you don't check the updates for at least 6 months, only then you might have a problem? That to me is a concern because imagine someone has their nano ledger s and just store put it somewhere and never touch it for years. Then they cannot update it due to old firmware. That is not good to hear.
2) I mean if someone doesn't touch their ledger in a long time... i mean not being to access in their coins because of firmware... that is kind of ridiculous. So basically unless its a paper wallet, this will always be an issue?
3) So every month, you should connect it to the computer just to make sure the firmware is up to date?
Your question has already been answered repeatedly: [...] in the future this should NOT happen again, since ledger live is doing incremental upgrades if a full upgrade isn't possible.
This means, if you can't update directly to the newest version, it will first upgrade to the highest possible version and afterwards to the next highest possible version.. etc.. until you reached the latest available version etc..
[...]
|
|
|
|
Ja komm das lassen wir in Indien für ein paar Hundert zusammenklimpern. Was soll schon schief gehen?  naja, vertrauen musst du auch dem deutschen team ^^ ich glaube es schützt dich nicht um den faktor x10 nur weil du 10x so viel bezahlt hast für den job Ja stimmt. Das zu quantifizieren wird schwer. Der Unterschied ist halt, dass man zum kompromittieren entweder ein ganzes Team an hoch professionellen Blackhats braucht, oder eben nur einen Informatikstudenten im 3. Semester. dann nochmal tausende Euro für die Programmierung
nahhhh, das kann man ihm auch günstiger besorgen Für 1000€ kriegst du auch nur irgendeinen Pfusch oder Copy/Paste Code. Ne richtige exchange software, welche nach guten standards geplant und implementiert wird, inklusive genügend Sicherheitsanforderungen, Tests und Zertifizierungen kriegst du nicht für unter 15.000 - 20.000 €. Dazu kommt dann noch mindestens ein Angestellter welcher seine ganze Arbeitszeit damit verbringt die Software zu pflegen. Also nochmal rund 60.000€ pro Jahr. |
|
|
|
I have supported that flag and will do so until they resolve the first claims against them.
I believe the type 1 flag is appropriate even if they return the funds being held in hostage to the affected user. All points mentioned in this topic still apply. Just because they paid back one affected customer, this is still something to consider when dealing with them (especially for newbies) and the remaining points still stay valid. Overall, everyone is at high-risk when dealling with them in any way. Regardless of whether the affected user receives his money back or not. |
|
|
|
Let's see if this is enough to get him banned for plagiarism: Copy: * No negative Trust.
* Minimum 8 Post & Maximum 50 to be eligible for payment.
* Minimum 90 characters
* If any participant removes signature during the campaign, will not receive payment.
* Users may not advertise any other site.
* Post in following boards will not count - Games & Rounds, Economics, Off-topic, Politics & Society. Original: * No negative Trust.
* Minimum 25 Post to be eligible for payment.
* Minimum 90 characters
* If any participant removes signature during the campaign, will not receive payment.
* Users may not advertise any other site.
* Post in following boards will not count - Games & Rounds, Economics, Off topic, Lending, Auctions, Meta, Politics & Society, Beginners and help, Archival, Investor based games, Local boards, or Micro earnings. new: 58 Words 52 89% identical 3 5% inserted 3 5% changed
People have been banned already for way less than 89% being identical. |
|
|
|
After receiving negative ratings and the flag against them being valid, there is a new account ( Livecoin Manager) which hosts a new signature campaign. Reasons the (type 1) flag is appropriate: - Livecoin holding customer funds hostage after he complained about them: Topic (archived)
- No reference to owner / operator of the site. Almost impossible to take legal actions against them: Post (archived)
- TOS which breake law. They make it impossible to file a police report without losing your funds: Post (archived)
- Extremely shady behavior by letting customer trade assets they can't and never will be able to withdraw at all: Topic (archived)
- Using a fresh account instead of their old one to not have their bad reputation being seen in their new signature campaign thread.
- And much more ...
Link to flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=475
Edit: Since Livecoin Manager and LiveCoin are operated by the same person / business, the same flag is necessary for the account LiveCoin. Link to flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=489 |
|
|
|
We do not argue whether it is technically possible or not.
There is nothing to argue. It is (and has to be) possible. Period. We know how Bitcoin works.
Obviously not as detailed as you should. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
