Die Karten von MCO sind pre-funded.
Das ganze Geld was man auf die Karte einzahlt, landet nicht auf Konten von Wirecard. Es wird auf anderen Konten (auf die Wirecard keinen Zugriff hat) gelagert.

Wirecard ist einfach nur der Issuer der Karten (so wie bei vielen anderen Prepaid Visa Karten auch).

Jegliche Problematik (i.e. das fehlen von Geld) hat keinen Einfluss auf die MCO Karten.

Kleine Anmerkung:

Die Strength gibt an wie viele mehr Inclusions man im Vergleich zu Exclusions hat.
5 bedeutet in dem Fall, dass 5 Leute mehr einen in die Trustliste aufgenommen haben, als ausgeschlossen.

10 Inclusions und 5 Exclusions oder 30 Inclusions und 25 Exclusions ergibt beides eine Strengh von 5.

In addition to that, make sure to use an USB cable with data pins. Not your regular cheap charging cable.
An USB cable which can be used to transfer data from your mobile, does have the data pins. A 1$ charging cable, mostly doesn't.

There are no "fake" transactions.
If they are fake, they are not real and therefore are not accepted by the network.

What do you think did you see in this video? What effect did it have?



THE video.

What you have shown is "just" a reflected XSS, not a persistent one.
You would need to send the URL with the injected code as a parameter to a person. That person would need to click on that link and have JS enabled for the script to be executed.

You can't inject a script into the server this way. And you definitely can't steal data from the server with this method.




This still depends on whether and how the same-origin-policy is implemented.

Auf gleichem Wege kann auch jegliche andere Malware verbreitet werden.
Generell gilt sowieso, dass man keine nicht vertrauenswürdige Software ausführen sollte.

Aber viele lernen das leider nur auf die harte Tour.



Und sich verbreitet wie ein Wurm meintest du wohl. Würmer verbreiten sich automatisch. Trojaner ist ein Begriff, der nichts über die Verbreitungstechnik aussagt 

Ja. Du kannst grundsätzlich von jeder Adresse zu jeder Adresse senden.
Das Netzwerk und das Protokoll lässt alles zu.

Das Problem ist nur dass manche Services veraltete Software nutzen und es nicht zulassen an bech32 zu senden. Deren Prüfung ob die Adresse eine gültige BTC Adresse ist, liefert einfach ein "Nein" zurück, weil die seit Jahren nicht upgedatet worden sind.

Von solchen Services würde ich die Finger lassen.



Nein.



Definitiv, ja.



Korrekt.

Torrents are fine. A lot of software is distributed this way.
You just have to make sure to verify the signature.




There are free alternative available for almost any software.
You don't need to pay if you don't want to. There are only very few software where you actually can't find a free alternative which is as good as the paid version.
But this mostly is some statistics and business software. And if you are actually working with that, you should have the money to buy it. For anything else (especially not work related), free software is just as good as the paid one.

That's the most important part here.

You are able to enter an URL into the bar of another website. Congratulations.

With that, you are almost as technically experienced as the guy who claimed to have found an incredibly dangerous vulnerability on a betting site.
This was a XSS on the (community hosted) forum instead of the actual betting site.


But don't worry. Read a few more tutorials and watch a few more youtube videos, and you'll also be able to find a huuuuuge vulnerability. I believe in you.

You could try using pywallet.
And create a copy of your file before doing anything with it.

P.s. If you bought the wallet.dat, you got scammed.

Obviously, yes.
But which sane person would do that? 

Read the pinned thread: [READ BEFORE POSTING] Tech Support Help Request Format

You didn't provide any information at all.

If you are looking for proper help according to your specific problem, you need to give us more information.
We don't have a crystal ball where we can see what your problem is as well as the solution for that.

Shamirs secret sharing scheme is a N out of M scheme, which means you can not only divide it into 2 shares, but a (somewhat) freely chosen amount of shares.
The reason such a scheme is used, is that having N-1 shares does reveal any information about the secret at all. You inevitably need all N shares to learn the secret.




Emails are unencrypted.
If you not explicitly encrypt the content, the mail server (i.e. your mail provider) can read the content.

Which use case? Browsing the web?

Not like there are browsers available already..

To troubleshoot, first check whether windows is actually recognizing the device (i.e. by looking in the hardware manager).
Depending on whether this is the case, you can slowly localize the problem (e.g. its the HW <-> Windows connection or electrum related).

On a side note.. stop using windows 7. It is an unsecure piece of sh*t.
If you care about security at least a little bit.. don't use it. That's like an open barn door with a huge sign stating vulnerable.

The update to windows 10 was free for a very long time. It might still be possible to update it for free.
If you want to continue using windows, at least update to a version with more security features which at least somewhat protect you.

Actually, electrum is one of the wallets with the most (standard but useful) features available.

A lot of wallets still don't let you select which Inputs to spend. Or to freeze inputs.
Fee estimation using the size of the mempool is not included in a lot of wallets too.

You can adjust a lot in electrum, which then offers quite some features.

Features like coinjoin and paynyms are still missing tho. However, a lot of features which aren't included in other wallets are included in electrum making it a feature-rich wallet IMO.

They do get combined if you send them in one transaction, but won't if you send them in multiple.


OP, the address received multiple transactions and therefore accumulated multiple UTXO's.
Then later, he sent some of them (but not all).

So everything is fine here. Every transaction works on a UTXO basis, from the very first transaction.

You always have to fully use an UTXO. But you don't have to spend all UTXO's associated to the same public key.

If you care about privacy in terms of no link between where you received your coins from and where you send them to, yes.
That's what a mixer is for.

However, i would suggest to use a more reputable one.


Regarding the other cryptos mentioned here.. ZCASH, Dash, etc.. are not anynomous.
They claim to be.. but they aren't.
The only crypto which is private by design, is monereo. Everything else is just faking to be anonymous.

Its less a "Bitcoin Clipper" than a clipboard hijacking malware.



AV's won't detect it.




That's actually something you should always do.
And don't download shitty unknown software.

You won't mine 1k$ BTC per hour with this new high-end_miner.exe which is free.

Use your common sense.

No.
No AV will detect properly written malware.
They can just detect already publicly known malware by checking the signatures.

Another approach would be to use runtime analysis, which also can be circumvented.

Do never trust an AV to determine whether a file is malicious or not. You can never be sure.




You can't run resource heavy software on a cheap VPS.
Additionally, if the VPS is compromised your PC can easily get compromised to by logging into it using ssh.

So that's not an option either.