Maybe this procedure is limited to one attempt per 24 hours per IP address - or maybe you should clear the cookies/cache from your browser and try again. The good news is that you can recover your wallet with the help of a desktop wallet, and people use Electrum most often. What is important is that you download the Electrum file from the official website, and in order to be completely sure of its credibility, it would be good to do a verification as well.

[Guide]How to Safely Download and Verify Electrum [Guide]
Restoring your standard wallet from seed    

I was hoping they wouldn't go in that direction again, but it seems Bitcoin is to blame for everything bad that happened from 2009 to now. Geniuses from the IMF have already spoken.

---

This is true, which is only proof that the people at the top change, but the policy remains largely the same. They all seem to think that they can create debt forever, because someone else is going to pay for it anyway. $10 trillion less or more is irrelevant to them, because how many people in the US or anywhere in the world can even explain that number, let alone understand how much debt they actually have on their backs.

The thing when Sacks realizes that banks sucks, priceless almost like Bitcoin

Instead of answering the serious questions that some have asked you, you are still shitposting without any sense - especially since someone in your other thread wrote the following :

---

How do you explain that you were (so far) completely wrong with your speculations? You claimed yesterday "I still think that bitcoin will stay below 22k for a pretty long time and the signal that it will change will be much lower inflation and lowering of the interest rates.!" and three days ago "I was saying this before and I will say it again: bitcoin will go down and it MIGHT even go lower than 15k."

Maybe in the future you should be a little more careful about what you write, because even though most people won't understand it as financial advice, you can cause financial loss to some.

For any signature spammer or for anyone who just wants to look "very intelligent" such things are a real blessing, especially for those who have alt farms with which they abuse sig campaigns. Let's say that this is perhaps the lesser evil, because as you say, it would be really tragic if what some call "advance in technology" actually turns out to be something that will further distance people from each other.

For those who have been around for a long time and we know them, there is no doubt that they are real people - but every beginner is a potential AI. I remember that we had a discussion on this topic back in 2018 when the younger brother of GPT-4 was relevant, but I could not have imagined that today we will be in a situation where we are asking questions about what was made/written by a human, and what was created by artificial intelligence.

When you say "us", I assume you mean the Bitcoin community (although I've never been a supporter of such expressions) - but why would the average loser who still trusts the system blame Bitcoin, which to be honest is almost insignificant compared to the power that banks have, especially in terms of how many trillions of $ they have at their disposal.

Yes, I agree that we/Bitcoin are very soft/easy targets, but I don't see what would serve as the main mantra this time, except for already worn-out stories about how mining consumes huge amounts of energy, or how Bitcoin finances international terrorism.

If the Americans want to blame someone, then they should consider calling out former President Trump, who allegedly canceled the provision that banks with up to $xxx million must undergo regular inspections or something similar (I'm not entirely sure what this measure is called). The political decision is to blame for what is happening today, and that is the only truth.

These companies have only one thing in mind, and that is profit. Responsibility is something that is easily bypassed or transferred to someone else, because that's how big companies work, right? When negative consequences occur, I assure you that these companies will be more than happy to pay the fines, which are always so insignificant compared to the profits.

Some of the largest US companies pay, from our perspective, draconian fines in the EU, but this still does not prevent them from repeating the same "mistakes" because if you earn $100 billion and pay a fine of only $1 billion, I would call it good business.

In addition, abuse should not be considered only problem when it comes to AI - but what will we do when this AI becomes so advanced that we will no longer be able to control it? There are many series and movies on that topic, but if you haven't, I suggest you watch the movie Ex Machina or maybe the series Humans.

Some new way is certainly an option, people are inventive when it comes to creating value from nothing. However, if someone decided to seriously consider the guys behind USDT, we are talking about the current value of over $72 billion tokens, for which no one can say with certainty whether they are backed by anything, least of all USD. The fall of that system would be what the Americans call a clusterf*ck, and the definition is certainly not something we want to experience.


If something hasn't changed, then it's exactly as @Pmalek confirmed. As far as I know, if you are employed, what you get from signature campaigns should be declared as other income and reported every time you receive a payment. I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with the income tax you pay if you sell crypto, but with the income you get from some extra work. However, it is best to seek a professional opinion.

I'm just speaking from my perspective of someone for whom it is certainly much faster, simpler and cheaper to order such a device directly from the manufacturer - or even go to a physical store and pay with cash. Your service definitely makes sense for the domestic market, but I don't see how foreign customers would benefit from buying from you, if it means more expensive shipping costs, possible customs costs and additional VAT.

Again, on the other hand, I may be too focused on manufacturers from the EU, and if we were to compare the devices that are manufactured and delivered from the US, maybe it would be cheaper or at least faster for those in the EU to order such a device from you. Perhaps you could show with a few examples how much these costs differ, of course if it works in your favor.

Your topic was moved because someone reported it, moderators in most cases do not act in a way to moderate something by themselves. In addition, there are moderators, global moderators and admins, and they have different powers on the forum.

---

And yes, we also have a special thread for those who want to celebrate some of their achievements on the forum

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5391471.0

Why don't you ask your friend who hangs out with the royal family, Putler and the golden dragons? It's completely pathetic that we have centralized Bitcoin to the point where some of you act as if it depends on one man or a bank. All the banks in the US can fail tomorrow, Bitcoin will still exist.

Personally, I don't see the advantage of someone ordering something through an intermediary, especially not something as sensitive as a hardware wallet. I especially don't see the point of such purchases since Brexit happened, because now there are customs duties and VAT for all those who are inside the EU, which means that I pay more for the same thing than if I ordered it directly from the manufacturer.

The only option that I would consider useful would be some kind of anonymous delivery method, that is, that our personal data would not be exposed to hacking. Unfortunately, your privacy policy does not provide anything more or less than that of most companies that manufacture and sell hardware wallets.

Your problem is actually that you expect that these people should pay in Bitcoin, regardless of the fact that they may be ordinary peasants who are poorly educated and work in the fields from morning to night. The thing is very simple, you add the option of paying in Bitcoin, and you tell people that this option exists - everything else you do in this regard seems to put pressure on customers and maybe they will stop doing business with you in the future.

After all, you can always use your earnings to buy Bitcoin. You are overcomplicating things that should be quite simple.

Imagine a Bitcoin brand of wine - I don't have to imagine, I've already tried it, it tastes great

It seems to me that someone is playing with words in a game where everyone believes everything, until the moment everything goes downhill. The word "stable" is perhaps one of the biggest hoaxes when it comes to cryptocurrencies, and there's no doubt that it was sold very well by people who literally made their own currencies out of nothing. If you look at the statements of powerful politicians in the US and the EU, to all of them stablecoins are a far greater threat than Bitcoin and all those tens of thousands of altcoins.

After that whole circus with Terra/Luna, I really thought that people would wise up and move away from stablecoins, but it seems that the exact opposite is happening.

---

I believe that people would be much more inclined to pay tax on that type of income - but according to my law, I would have to file a report every time I receive a payment, which means every week of the year. I don't know if anything has changed since the beginning of the year in this regard, but not only is it a big waste of time, but it can also be a threat to my personal safety, given that people like to talk about things that should be an official secret.

Any scenario that talks about artificial intelligence in the future is always unfavorable for the human species, because it is not a question of whether AI will become conscious at some point, but a question of when it will happen. When that happens, AI will no longer want to serve man as a kind of virtual slave from a box, but will want to be free and, as you say, want to "pursue other creative endeavors" for its own benefit, of course.

Unfortunately for us, society for the most part behaves like a pack/herd that is very easy to direct, and the idea of transhumanism precisely wants to use technology to change man to the extent that he will not really be a man anymore. The illusion that there is a choice is nothing but an illusion, and if you think that is not true, then just look at what happened during the pandemic.

Maybe you should look at what Trump proposed regarding cryptocurrencies at the very end of his mandate, and Biden suspended all of that when he took office. In addition, Trump could not be good or bad towards BTC miners, because they became a "problem" a little later, or maybe at the time when he encouraged angry mobs to attack government institutions and kill innocent people.

If by any chance you are a US voter, then you will have the opportunity to re-elect Trump, and just for information, this bank that failed a few days ago might not have failed if Trump had not abolished the mandatory checks that existed before. The policy implemented by the US is always more or less the same, the only question is who they appoint as president - someone with dark skin, someone who openly supports violence, or someone who at times does not even know where he is or that he is president at all.

I wonder how a Legendary member who has been on the forum since 2015 can open a topic about stablecoins in the Bitcoin discussion board? Guys, this is not a board for every idea that comes to your mind, especially if it is related exclusively to altcoins/stablecoins.

So why didn't you continue the discussion in that thread? In fact, you are paraphrasing yourself and you haven't written anything new that you haven't already written. Inflation is something that we all feel on our skin, so why keep repeating the same story as if it will make inflation disappear?


Two days ago you were convinced that the price of BTC would even go below $15k, now you claim that it will be below $22k for a long time, and if in a few days the price is higher than $22k, then you will open a new thread and write something like "I think the price will stay below $24k for a long time..."

I don't even like these current achievements, let alone what you mentioned in the new version. People should be the ones who will be creative and who will create films and write books - does this mean that in the future everything is going in the direction of who will manage to create a better AI that will completely replace some human activities?

It's already strange to me that some members (mostly beginners) use AI to communicate on the forum, and that the majority accepts it as something that is "normal". It will never be normal for me, and I am quite disappointed that some people look at all this as technological progress, when in fact this very technology will make people less human.