Feel free to report plagiarism in this thread. But please make it easy on the moderators by checking modlog the next day (or a few days later) and edit your post when the account has been banned.
Example: username banned!

---

Update

---

Update
Theymos wrote this:
Most plagiarism from copy/pasting spambots or shitposters deserves a permban. However, Admin can make exceptions if it's better for the forum if the user in question returns.
Example: redsn0w got a 30 day ban, and 2 year signature ban. Signature bans are displayed on the profile page, and have been handed out before.
I'm quoting the image to draw attention to this update:

---

You can use Vod's BPIP.org to check if an account has been banned (thanks Veleor).

---

Update to this topic
See |LIST| Banned users for a list of 159k banned accounts. See which one suits you best, so we don't report them again.

---

I just stumbled upon a proven case of framing someone for plagiarism:

---

Users lhmrij and xca900174 deserve a permban. Update: banned.

lhmrij
I noticed this post (archived):

This is a direct copy/past from this post (archived):


I checked the post he made before this one (archived):

It's also a copy/past from someone else (archived):


Edit:
xca900174
This user does the same. Copy/paste (archived):

Original post (archived):

I doubt they speaks English. Both are Chinese, both use the same SONM ICO signature.

There is one flaw in your service: how is someone going to pay you for your service, if paying you can take just as long as the original transaction takes to confirm?

The wallet has no influence on how many inputs you received. Do you even know how Bitcoin transactions work?

On a big transaction it might not matter much, but that doesn't change the problem high fees cause for small transactions. The amount of money you send has nothing to do with the fee you pay. I can show you a $550 transaction with $27 fee, and at 231 sat/byte it's not even enough to confirm fast.

When Bitcoin was worth $200, a 0.1 BTC paper wallet was a nice $20 gift, and could be spend without fee at all (if the coins had matured enough to have medium priority). Now 0.01 BTC is (almost) $20, but it requires $1 on fees. And another $1 when the receiving party wants to spend it.

This one (and many other altcoins) goes up by many (dozens of) percents per day. You don't need cold storage to make a quick buck there.
But I think the rise of alts is mainly caused by Bitcoin's limitations. Everybody still wants Bitcoins, but it's much cheaper and faster to use altcoins.

ByteFan is posting his witness on a French server in this topic a lot. He registered his account on Bitcointalk just last month, which is no where close to being a reputable person or company. Posting it over and over again seems to be his way to get people to use his witness, but I see no reason for trusting him.
It could be he's just a honest enthousiast, but I can't know for sure.

What would be more interesting is to be able to decide how you can trust a witness. A high level green trust Bitcointalk user could work, but also exchange Bittrex could decide to run a public witness.

That can be any moment now! I'm in

1PjpEgknyKxQKXtMcYFDym8odkfohFGkui

I can do this, but let's keep it in public for the sake of discussion. After all, you're a Newbie with zero trust.

I love your last requirement

Core, Mycelium, Electrum, Blockchain.info

Say I have 1 Bitcoin, and I split it up to 3 different wallets. That barely improves privacy. If anything, it links those 3 wallets together.

I don't use the ones that call themselves mixers. I have used several other methods to "mix" coins though.

Let's put it this way: if you don't have the private key, you don't own the Bitcoins.
However, this has nothing to do with a mixer. Why do you ask?

Here too: keep this in public! If you think people will start sending funds to a random address a Newbie calls a mixer, well, you're probably right, people get scammed in many different ways.

Once again: why hiding in PM?

The signing-problem above was solved in a separate thread.

I currently have 1.3 BTC linked for the next round.
I might add Stellar Lumens to this thread, starting from the end of June.

Username : dsffdssdf
Bet ID : 16,811,162,710

Fifth click at 1.13x was red.

Congratulations Winners of Draw 467000:
#1 First Prize: somuchee wins 6 mBTC with Free Lottery Ticket #73
#2 Second Prize: natsag3 wins 3 mBTC with Free Lottery Ticket #58
#3 Third Prize: maksosip wins 1 mBTC with Free Lottery Ticket #97
Total pot: 10 mBTC

Full Lottery Results are of course public.

The next Draw is at Block 467200. As always, you can claim Free Lottery Tickets every day.
Next server seed: rncw758CkkX26H36Q63X9Li5UR3KJPL4

No need to attack me on this. We barely have bank offices anymore, most of it goes online. It simply means transactions are completely automated which makes the cost per transaction very low.
But if you insist on putting a fee on each transaction, you can look at what banks charge businesses. When I make a SEPA withdrawal from kraken.com, I pay 9 cents (0.00005346 BTC) fee.

Here internet banking is the most common payment method for bills.
The cost of a bank account varies per country and per bank. It used to be free (AKA the bank was happy to get you as a customer), some still offer free bank accounts, but most charge a few euro per month. That includes internet banking and a debit card for ATMs or to pay in shops.
We don't have a minimum balance required on bank accounts. The bank does require a legal form of ID to get an account.

I often read this reasoning. Is it an American thing? Who uses wire transfers and checks?
Within Europe I can pay anybody by bank without any additional fee.

$5000 every 10 minutes to store 1 MB data, meanwhile losing Bitcoin market share to altcoins and breaking Bitcoin for small transactions.
Miners get millions of dollars each day, for something that could basically be done by a 5 year old PC if not for the high hash rate.

It's kinda annoying and a serious limitation that I can't see back open trade orders I made in the past.
Once in a while it now buys something I don't need anymore. I could move my balance to another account, but even that doesn't close the open orders, so if I move back my Waves the orders can still process.

I was hoping this bug would be fixed soon, but it still exists. How can DEX be any serious exchange if I can't even see my open trade orders in the Waves Lite Client to respond to market changes?

A big transfer like that could still be handled on-chain, you just pay the normal fee.

I've read many "bits and pieces" about LN and SegWit, and seen some videos. Franky has a nice explanation too.
But still, it's not entirely clear to me how it works. I see some benefits, but it also seems like a lot of extra (programming) work for something that is as simple as adding a few bytes to a block now.

Couldn't this be abused by spam? Join all payment channels, then close all. Do this over and over again, and the 1 MB blocks are full again.
I hope I'm wrong though. Is there anything in LN that prevents a spam-attack on channels?

The following Rollin users received Free Lottery Tickets (Ticket number(s) shown behind the name):
2x Anais_58xi 11,12
2x BitLab 13,14
6x CASIO 15,16,17,18,19,20
Drait 21
2x Dress 22,23
2x Humbertin19_ 24,25
IIO 26
Naoko 27
3x RefbackTeam 28,29,30
3x SergiuS 31,32,33
2x Ton 34,35
6x aRp 36,37,38,86,87,88
allanr 39
2x cryptos 40,41
3x cukup2 42,43,44
3x hitava 45,46,47
2x israelmiami 48,49
3x logged 50,51,52
4x maksosip 53,54,55,56
mpopo 57
natsag3 58
3x psonowa 59,60,61
rajapalak 62
3x shakie0901 63,64,65
2x shanem 66,67
singpays 68
9x somuchee 69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77
2x star2343 78,79
2x vavilon 80,81
4x visions 82,83,84,85
10x maksosip 91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100

If you posted your name but didn't get tickets, one of these options is most likely the cause:

• You used the wrong format in your post. Use this format: Username: Loyce
• The username you posted doesn't exist on Rollin.io
• You never talked in Rollin Chatter Box
• You have Red Trust on Bitcointalk
• You are Blacklisted for abusing this giveaway
• You have already claimed Free Tickets today
• You posted shortly before I posted this, and your post wasn't there yet when my Scraping Bot checked for new posts. If this happened, your post will be included in the next run.

You can always send me a message.

Happy Hour:

Remaining ticket(s) donated in Rollin Chatter Box:
PvP 89,90

Next Draw is at Block 467000.
Lottery pot: 9 mBTC.
Good luck!

I first saw Favour's Lending Service thread when he had already realized he was going to lose his money loaning more than the "sales value" of the accounts that took a loan. I was surprised a thread like that existed, that whole thread was almost an invitation to get scammed.
I was expecting mainly people who don't value their account to join, and indeed, most of them don't care about red trust after taking the money.

Usually I only read the Reputation-section/trust-fights with a big bag of popcorn, but since you asked for opinions, I'll give you mine.

I got some time to spare, let me make a timeline first:

• You took the loan on April 2, and had to pay back within 7 days. Interest on 0.05 BTC should have been 0.0105 BTC for 7 days.
  12 days later you said you didn't pay back yet and "asked for more time" without getting a respons. This means you didn't get more time, but you took it anyway. You did not pay here. 5 days later favours says you didn't discuss anything.
• On April 17 you got alerted by trust on your profile, once again saying you'll "repay in a few days". You did not pay here.
• On April 22 you made a "public apology" asking if it's okay to send the payment right away. favours accepted. Right after this you mentioned you agreed for 0.055 BTC, lower than what would be expected based on the thread, but I can imagine favours agreed to this only in the hopes to get at least something back. You did not pay here.
• After favours opened a Scam Accusation thread, on May 9 you asked for 24 hours to repay the loan. You did not pay here.
• On May 10 you argue the lender is happy so you should get more time. What made you think he is "happy" chasing his money for 5 weeks? Minutes later favours says "your time is up" and - as expected - he doesn't sound happy. You got yourself another 12 hours to repay. You did not pay here.
• On May 11 you ask for the address to send the bitcoins "right away". So all this time, when you were claiming you would pay back the loan, you didn't even know the address to send it to.
• On May 12, you paid back 0.0625 BTC

I might have missed some details in the timeline, but the overall picture is clear. This leaves me to conclude you only paid back because of the red trust, hoping it will disappear again. And although that's entirely up to Lauda, I think you deserve it. You have shown many times you don't keep your word. If you would have done this to me, I would never trust you again. Your personal vendetta against Lauda doesn't make your case look any better either.
How would you feel if you have to beg someone for 5 weeks to get your own money back?
This thread once again confirms you only paid back to get the red trust removed.

Favours, can you remove this line from the OP?

It confused me while looking into this thread, as clearly he's an innocent here:

If you receive Bitcoins from a source you don't trust, the statement above is not enough. A transaction with proper fee (but still a bit under the minimum required for near-instant confirmation at that moment) can easily take hours or days to confirm. That gives more than enough time to double spend it (by sending the same Bitcoins with a higher fee to another address).
If you trust the source it's not really a problem, unless you need the Bitcoins urgently. But the whole point about Bitcoin is being able to make trustless transactions.
Remember Satoshi recommends to wait for 6 confirmations before accepting a transaction as being confirmed.