|
I have the weird feeling we will see 100 k in the next days.
Too much hype and fud at the samd time lol
@zoidberg
When will you come back?
|
|
|
|
|
In falle des energiversorgers könnte eine blockchain interessant sein weil wir uns im moment in der transition zum smart grid befinden.
Privatleute stellen strom her, verkaufen es dem netzbetreiber und werden per altcoin in sekundenschnelle direkt vergütet.
Diesen betrag könnte man dann entsprechend schnell und ohne probleme benutzen um die übrigen stromkosten o.ä. zu begleichen.
Hierbei spart der betreiber enorm zeit und zusätzliche bankkosten, welche nicht unerheblich sind wenn man millionen von kunden hat.
|
|
|
|
I am an IT guy but when I first heard about Bitcoin I was defensive because I thought gold was the answer.
To this day I have not gone through all of the source code. But I did read the white paper and that got me.
Maybe some IT people might be hesitant because they understand how vulnerable most computers are.
I think it's more your economic views than your views on digital tech.
I though you were a believer of trumponomics  |
|
|
|
Think always of long time not short time.Millions of new jobs creation will just be a dream.More manufacturing units will not move in but just move out.amazon microsoft expedia google infosys and other tech giants getting affected.
Might be he will look as hero for americans by what he is trying to do for them but this is not the correct way to do it and is going to lead only to unexpected problems.
Just know a fact our god has created a big world and US is just a small piece of land.
Might be now everybody is thinking that something good happened by donald trump becoming president but in spam of 4 yrs they will realize hard earned money wasted on wall and all techies and jobs moving away but donalds word will become true of 'lets bring back old america again' as it will happen because US will be 20yrs behind of remaining world.
Trump is just removing the unfair competition between the corporations and their unfair practices. Recently, the tech companies fired a large number of American tech professionals, replacing them with low-paid staff from China and India. This can't continue. You contradict yourself. When it comes to high-quality specialists, as they can be replaced uneducated workers from China and India? There is another reason. Low-skilled workers from America lost the competition to the Chinese and the Indians. Haleluja. I gotta tell my boss that we can replace all 100€/hour white collar workers with 1€/hour chinese and inidian peasants. Btw you call it slave labor in china not because of their wages (their avg income is 15 k $ per year) but because of very low social standards, bad worker and enviroment protection laws. The truth is the US are lying to themself. They just overslept and have a systemic problem which made their manufacturing go south. Look at germanys manufacturing. This is still one of the main job drivers. And btw currency manipulation is bullock, germany was already one of the biggest export nation under the deutsche mark. |
|
|
|
Does MA read my writings here, or do we just have a lot of similarity in our thinking: Not even Trump will be able to stop this meltdown and will most likely be blamed for it.
Actually quite a few people out there thinking along these lines, so you're in good company  Do you have any thoughts on this? Trump has started to pivot away from appeasing China (which was Obama's policy) and being more accommodating to Russia. But, he also seems to be upping the ante on Iran (opposite of Obama / kerry) - a Russian ally less interested in invasion / spreading empire but who challenges Saudi for regional dominance in Middle East. What's the play here? Classic divide and conquer. With his kind of irrational foreign policy and personality he is letting all the big players about his next step in the dark. His opponents are pretty much in a limbo now and are just reacting to his next executive order (until now nobody has the guts to face the US directly). I dont think trump is anti-war especially as his closest advisers are bannon and navarro who think a war with china is inevitable. Imho this is just the preparation for something big coming. At the lastest when the trump promises with debt and tax reduction, getting manufacturing jobs back etc pp wont work out he will need a war to distract the US population from the obvious. Edit Putin has the ambitions to make russia great again and not only economical. This is not a secret (Chechenya, crimea, syria). |
|
|
|
Looks like whales getting an alternative to XMR. Another cryptonote could be next....sometime.
600 btc volume in 24 h at polo
In the past bbr trailed the xmr price by a ratio of 1:10 |
|
|
|
Why is this dead coin up 6x in a week? So zoidberg and other bought all the coins under 10k and started pumping it right in the Alts season? Nice scam there. I would advise caution to all BBR buyers and bagholders to research what's going on This looks like another pump and dump to make the devs rich Fake buy orders up from 15 btc to currently 200 now  Be careful guys Just sell your bag and enjoy 600%? ^^" |
|
|
|
They didn't have the same strategy to begin if, Hitler disarmed his citizens while Trump on the other hand made it clear that it was the right of the citizens to bear arms. Obama and Hillary's Gun control law seeks to punish gun manufacturers and prohibit people from getting guns, From this scenario you will know who was rather inclined to Hitler's position.
You realize that whole nazi germany was a military economy? Majority of men were soldiers and woman were working in arms production. Im pretty sure every single german family had arms of some sort in nazi germany. Hitler actually only outlawed guns for jews, roma etc (for obvious reason) and changed the laws for nazis to bear arms without a license. Look up RGBl I, 265 from march 18 in year 1938. |
|
|
|
There is not going to be any impact, the vicious circle would simply continue because the hell of global financial system was designed to create debts that would never be paid off. As a matter of fact, printing money from thin air have always been the name of the game, money backed by nothingness - where would the money to repay it be coming from?
Donald Trump had a very good idea to remove the federal debt. Before he was considering his presidential candidacy, he once said that a one time 14.25% wealth tax on the super-rich would wipe-out the federal debt. http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/11/09/trump.rich/index.html?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICSBut then I really doubt whether he would consider such a step now. I looked again at the date and that was Tuesday November, 1999, very close to being two decades afterwards! Laudable as that sounds, but why have we heard nothing in that regards after all these years and even in the run up for his election? One thing just called to my mind - is it the same 1% of Americans who controls 90% of the wealth of the country, who refused to back Obamacare that would now gladly part with 14.25% levy on their net worth for the sake of 99% of Americans? Would make a very interesting movie and can't wait to see how it all works out (if ever) especially now that Trump is the number 1 citizen. According to the CNN opinion poll, a majority of the American HNWs (high net worth individuals) supported the Democrat candidate during the POTUS 2016 elections. This includes oligarchs such as Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Tim Cook, Mark Zuckerberg.etc, who are solidly anti-Trump. Trump will enjoy taxing these folks. HNWIs love trump. Alone the corporate tax reduction saves them 280 billion $. Not to talk about the other tax reductions. Trump himself is a billionaire. It wouldnt wonder me if he would govern the US as berlusconi did in Italy. Ursury and corruption is not far - ah wait he stepped down from being CEO of the trump buisnesses; his kids are managing it now...  Like trump berlusconi used the msm to his advantage. (Berlusconi bought the msm, trump the alt-right media) |
|
|
|
Cake white, the flat earth of crypto  |
|
|
|
That's wrong. Corporate taxes are ALWAYS passed on to the consumer base in the form of higher prices for goods. Lower corporate taxes directly means lower prices on consumer goods, which means higher consumption, more manufacturing, etc.
Economics isn't always intuitive, I guess. In addition to that it means more jobs to the legal residents of the United States. Attracted by the lower corporate tax, more and more manufacturing units will move to the US. This means more jobs + more tax revenues for the treasury. No. The US has a minimum wage of 10+$, social securities and enviroment protection laws. Lowering corporate tax wont make them competitive with mexico, india, china and other emerging countries. |
|
|
|
We can see now that trumps victory was not a cheat.He was ellected by people to save the americans job which he promised.As no american likes muslim and as wanted to pull them away from country which trump promised and he did so was the reason for his victory.
Trump promised a lot of things so what? To build a wall to expel from the country migrants is more he can do, but how it will enable the Americans to get new jobs? He's lying. Not all of it is understood. It's okay if you don't understand it all. As for the jobs, we've already seen him cause IIRC a couple hundred thousand jobs to stay in the US instead of move to other countries. One deal at a time. For corporate tax reduction (35% to 15%). And guess whos gonna pay that: the american tax payer  .... That's wrong. Corporate taxes are ALWAYS passed on to the consumer base in the form of higher prices for goods. Lower corporate taxes directly means lower prices on consumer goods, which means higher consumption, more manufacturing, etc. Economics isn't always intuitive, I guess. I guess it wasnt obvious but i was talking about the financing of the tax reduction. The annual corporate tax revenue of the US is around 400 billion $. A reduction from 35 to 10% would mean an average tax revenue loss of 280 billion $. You dont actually believe everyone will start to sell 3x more (or buy 3x times more) stuff or? Economics is not that simple like donalds wants it to be - atleast if you dont have a billionaire daddy. |
|
|
|
We can see now that trumps victory was not a cheat.He was ellected by people to save the americans job which he promised.As no american likes muslim and as wanted to pull them away from country which trump promised and he did so was the reason for his victory.
Trump promised a lot of things so what? To build a wall to expel from the country migrants is more he can do, but how it will enable the Americans to get new jobs? He's lying. Not all of it is understood. It's okay if you don't understand it all. As for the jobs, we've already seen him cause IIRC a couple hundred thousand jobs to stay in the US instead of move to other countries. One deal at a time. For corporate tax reduction (35% to 15%). And guess whos gonna pay that: the american tax payer Import tariffs are just a distraction because he would need to quit the WTO. Also dont talk about taking debt. Donald wants to half the 20 trillion debt in his term |
|
|
|
Take a look at the costs, you'll find it's absurd. Going up and down the gravity well is expensive as all hell. You'll never make that back no matter what you find on Ceres or the Moon. Even if it were already stacked in refined bars waiting for you to pick them up!! OK as a fully subsidized mission with no profitability other than a technology subsidy, sure. But as a proper business? No way. At least not until we get that space elevator built There are several projects to build a space elevator until 2050. I think cost estimates were around 50-100 billion $ with usage of graphene or similar super materials. It's hard to put a cost estimate on something that doesn't exist. No material has been found which has anywhere near the required strength to weight ratio. This is wrong. Super materials that have a a high enough tensile strength already exist. One of them is graphen. With a taper ratio of 1 and at GEO (around 36.000 km) the burden on graphen would only reach 87% of its tensile strength. Edit the energy balance sheet of a space elevator doesnt have to be negative. You could use gravity on the way to back to earth to recollect the energy needed to move the elevator upwards. |
|
|
|
|
The US was always the land of extremes.
Freedom, democracy, science in one hand - racism, wars and religion on the other.
Maybe much higher social standards in europe do play a roll?!
|
|
|
|
Take a look at the costs, you'll find it's absurd. Going up and down the gravity well is expensive as all hell. You'll never make that back no matter what you find on Ceres or the Moon. Even if it were already stacked in refined bars waiting for you to pick them up!! OK as a fully subsidized mission with no profitability other than a technology subsidy, sure. But as a proper business? No way. At least not until we get that space elevator built There are several projects to build a space elevator until 2050. I think cost estimates were around 50-100 billion $ with usage of graphene or similar super materials. |
|
|
|
... And btw. You just need to check my post history if you want to know my field of expertise ... Skimmed a few posts for shits-n-giggles. Altcoiner from Merkelistan. An ALTCOINER? Criptix, let's stop this politics shit and help you with this serious fantasy problem. Yup besides havin 3 digits of bitcoins i have holdings in xmr, btcd and BBR. And if you two werent retards who have neither brain nor money you would have bought into altcoins before the bitcoin rise  Skimm trough more of my post and troll yourself lol |
|
|
|
Are trump apologist retarded? Since when are there only 7 muslim majority nations? What about saudi arabia for example? Dont they finance isis and salafi extremism? No ban because  |
|
|
|
|
Its kinda funny hoe trump supporters talk so much about the black jesus - you could think obama got a 3rd term lol
|
|
|
|
According to Russian government statistics from the Interior Ministry, 40 per cent of all violent crimes are committed within the family. The figures correlate to 36,000 women being beaten by their partners every day and 26,000 children being assaulted by their parents every year.Last year's revised law, when it took in effect in July, quickly drew opponents, notably ultra-conservative Russian lawmaker Yelena Mizulina, who called it "anti-family" and said it undermined the "right" of parents to beat their children.Good stuff that wodka cost nothing in russia. Synergies. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
