Martin Armstrong Discussion

[bitsilvergold]

Gold going up again. Armstrong will make an update shortly pretending he forecasted it.

[1715531549]

1715531549

[1715531549]

1715531549

[1715531549]

1715531549

[r0ach]

The high is probably in.. good time to short if you want to make money... take some leveraged shorts for 6 month options and buy bitcoin with that profit in 6 months.

You just said in another thread like 2 days ago that "bitcoin is going to $600".  Are you pulling an Armstrong on us?

Gold going up again. Armstrong will make an update shortly pretending he forecasted it.

lol

[sidhujag]

The high is probably in.. good time to short if you want to make money... take some leveraged shorts for 6 month options and buy bitcoin with that profit in 6 months.

You just said in another thread like 2 days ago that "bitcoin is going to $600".  Are you pulling an Armstrong on us?

Gold going up again. Armstrong will make an update shortly pretending he forecasted it.

lol

What when? Ive said 400ish or lower actually but this chinese thing might be a wrench.. anyway if you read my post i was talking about dow btw and since then its what like 300 pts down

[r0ach]

What when? Ive said 400ish or lower actually but this chinese thing might be a wrench..

Why not 0?

[iamnotback]

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/big-data-cambridge-analytica-brexit-trump

[sidhujag]

What when? Ive said 400ish or lower actually but this chinese thing might be a wrench..

Why not 0?

hmm just because I'm still bullish on it...0 would mean the cryptography breaks somehow that is unmanageable for the network (which I doubt)

[OROBTC]

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/big-data-cambridge-analytica-brexit-trump

A  very interesting article there, Mr. iamnotback.

Big Data is likely to open up all kinds of interesting cans of worms.  Interesting subtle correlations, etc.

But, another reason to stay off Facebook?


EDIT: There may be interesting things that Kosinski and Armstrong could share or discuss (what to do with big data sets)?

[tabnloz]

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/big-data-cambridge-analytica-brexit-trump

A  very interesting article there, Mr. iamnotback.

Big Data is likely to open up all kinds of interesting cans of worms.  Interesting subtle correlations, etc.

But, another reason to stay off Facebook?


EDIT: There may be interesting things that Kosinski and Armstrong could share or discuss (what to do with big data sets)?

Interesting article.

I know there is a lot more to it and it is nuanced, but as our lives are completely online, this kind of drilled down detailed analysis is obvious.

Apps have been selling their data / user info for years as an exit model.

[iamnotback]

I am inviting y'all to revisit the slightly off topic discussion that got moved:

Why CoinCube is incorrect.

And I am inviting CoinCube to come back and defend his stance, despite him pledging to stop in this thread.

I know CoinCube will say that is why we need religion, but again the 160 IQ genius Eric Raymond has pointed out that religion has failed to rectify such issues. Sorry there are no absolute solutions. We have the diversity of nature and competing strategies.

[iamnotback]

Again I nailed upthread the reason Trump will not turn the tide and civil war and the breakup of the USA is coming per Martin Armstrong's cycle model prediction:

Elections are a way of not having civil wars. Ideally the election result should be indicative of who would win a civil war, so you can get to the outcome a civil war would produce without all the killing and destruction. If you allow women and blacks and people without property etc to vote, then the election result is likely to fail to reflect the likely outcome of a civil war. If women and people without property get too grabby, a civil war then is incentivized, in that white men of property would be substantially better off with the civil war outcome than the election outcome

If one faction or the other then burns the Reichstaag, providing a schelling point on which a civil war can be started, the incentivized civil war becomes likely.

These videos reaffirm why women (and effeminate men who couldn't fight effectively in a civil war) should not be allowed to vote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C57vNg_9vUw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYrruB2oLd0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wckKDCs9WPM

[OROBTC]

...

Armstrong's piece of today will interest some.  Here he discusses central banks:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/banking-crisis/the-coming-crisis-in-central-banking/

Overly briefly, Europe's central banks will likely fail first (before our Federal Reserve).

He ends his piece:

"OWN NO GOVERNMENT PAPER PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

No faith in our central banks..., LOL!

[r0ach]

"OWN NO GOVERNMENT PAPER PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Well, my $1148 gold position feels good.  Feels good man.

[bitsilvergold]

Armstrong has updated his gold forecast in his private blog. Anyone care to tell what he says so we can all substantiate his being correct? Or is it more of the same quatrain type speech we are all used to?

[iamnotback]

Does MA read my writings here, or do we just have a lot of similarity in our thinking:

Not even Trump will be able to stop this meltdown and will most likely be blamed for it.

[tabnloz]

Does MA read my writings here, or do we just have a lot of similarity in our thinking:

Not even Trump will be able to stop this meltdown and will most likely be blamed for it.

Actually quite a few people out there thinking along these lines, so you're in good company 

Do you have any thoughts on this? Trump has started to pivot away from appeasing China (which was Obama's policy) and being more accommodating to Russia. But, he also seems to be upping the ante on Iran (opposite of Obama / kerry) - a Russian ally less interested in invasion / spreading empire but who challenges Saudi for regional dominance in Middle East. What's the play here?

[OROBTC]

Does MA read my writings here, or do we just have a lot of similarity in our thinking:

Not even Trump will be able to stop this meltdown and will most likely be blamed for it.

Actually quite a few people out there thinking along these lines, so you're in good company 

Do you have any thoughts on this? Trump has started to pivot away from appeasing China (which was Obama's policy) and being more accommodating to Russia. But, he also seems to be upping the ante on Iran (opposite of Obama / kerry) - a Russian ally less interested in invasion / spreading empire but who challenges Saudi for regional dominance in Middle East. What's the play here?

Trump has a lot of enemies, and they fear & hate him enough so that they might prefer to have a mini-meltdown (or worse) so that Trump gets blamed -- even if America's economy goes down hard.

The Left is getting tiresome and dangerous.  Time for them to stop their crap.

[criptix]

Does MA read my writings here, or do we just have a lot of similarity in our thinking:

Not even Trump will be able to stop this meltdown and will most likely be blamed for it.

Actually quite a few people out there thinking along these lines, so you're in good company 

Do you have any thoughts on this? Trump has started to pivot away from appeasing China (which was Obama's policy) and being more accommodating to Russia. But, he also seems to be upping the ante on Iran (opposite of Obama / kerry) - a Russian ally less interested in invasion / spreading empire but who challenges Saudi for regional dominance in Middle East. What's the play here?

Classic divide and conquer.
With his kind of irrational foreign policy and personality he is letting all the big players about his next step in the dark.

His opponents are pretty much in a limbo now and are just reacting to his next executive order (until now nobody has the guts to face the US directly).
I dont think trump is anti-war especially as his closest advisers are bannon and navarro who think a war with china is inevitable. Imho this is just the preparation for something big coming.

At the lastest when the trump promises with debt and tax reduction, getting manufacturing jobs back etc pp wont work out he will need a war to distract the US population from the obvious.

Edit

Putin has the ambitions to make russia great again and not only economical. This is not a secret (Chechenya, crimea, syria).

[iamnotback]

I agree with criptix's comments.

Remember Rothschilds said they historically decided who goes to war and when, and I had documented upthread that they put Trump in office.

Re: War between US and China

Posturing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raPlbnr2dCI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dt24oxcKUJc (Note China also moved ICBMs into firing position to reach the USA West coast)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNHReXfZFRg (Trump planning a missile defense system)

North Korea is a proxy which China controls and uses for leverage.

[iamnotback]

Armstrong has updated his gold forecast in his private blog. Anyone care to tell what he says so we can all substantiate his being correct? Or is it more of the same quatrain type speech we are all used to?

I haven't inquired yet (been too ill to do much of anything) with my source who subscribes to Armstrong. Also I had stated last time, that I wouldn't again reveal private subscriber info during the week it is intended to predict. I might reveal it after the fact, since this does not harm Armstrong subscribers.

Interesting to me is that gold seems to move up whenever there appears to be the case that Trump is destabilizing the world order in a way that might lead to war. Or any pause in the stronger dollar move.

Yet then the reality is this strong USA stance drives the dollar up, so gold has to move back down.

I think we are likely to get a strong dollar before we get any war and believe any war going hot with the major players will be due to economic devastation of the coming strong dollar vortex. So I still see gold down as the general direction until (late or after) 2018, in spite of deadcat bounces. Will be interested to read Armstrong's perspective.

Armstrong (and I concurred) has always said gold could go as high as $5000 (not higher!) after this strong dollar interlude. Again I have my doubts about whether you will be able to cash in your physical gold at that price.

[iamnotback]

War, war, everywhere...

Oh my:

http://blog.jim.com/war/after-the-flight-93-election/

If you are not in a condition to fully read and process my replies then this conversation is a poor use of both of our time.

JAD is well and I urged you to attempt to debate him.

My disagreement with JAD is that I think Trump was put in power by Rothschilds and for the specific purpose of divide-and-conquer. I don't think we strong men win with a top-down collective. We can only win with an Apache decentralized paradigm reinvented with stronger knowledge and principles of cultural evolution. So although I appreciate JAD's knowledge and perspective, I will have to lead because I don't think he is leading effectively. And he is censoring me and refusing to let me post on his blog. Ditto Eric Raymond who in spite writing about the damned facts, continues to not admit the truth about for example woman's suffrage and besides he has no kids and thus no skin in the game. And he also continues to censor me and not allow me to post on his blog.

Here's further confirmation, fast forward to 10:15 and watch this "professor" short circuit: https://youtu.be/wzFS1qLlULc

Come on CoinCube, you are out of your league in terms of analysis. You were the one who argued that the breakup of the USA couldn't happen because every one of the 50 States has people on welfare.

The reality of what happens when we give women suffrage is then the right to peaceful protest becomes intolerable for the society, because it threatens the very existence of the society as evidenced by the above quoted video clip. Tie that back to the comments upthread about how we avoid civil war by not letting women and weak men vote.