waiting on FC to clarify/verify div amount.
Clarify/verify my ass. Why are you keeping the divs? Having trouble repaying your loan? Friedcat should stop paying the dividend unless this is solved. |
|
|
|
But this is completely a guess based on nothing correct? The fact that we have no idea why he decided to block US customers is a testament to how untrustworthy he is. As far as I'm aware ukyo is currently managing in some where around thousands of bitcoins from "investors" or people using his site yet he is only able to communicate once every few weeks. Why people would continue to fill this guys wallet is beyond me.
QFT |
|
|
|
The profit is with low volume in bids and asks they can move the price and manipulate, you can profit doing it either direction. You try and have the public gap fill and sell high or buy low. its super easy if there are only 20 or so shares seperating .88 and 1.15 on the ask side.
It's not that easy. You always run the risk that someone with high volume undercuts you and then you're screwed. Especially when your avg share price can be calculated. |
|
|
|
Watch... havelock has almost no activity, so its easy to spot
So about 450BTC in 24h is almost no activity? |
|
|
|
|
Has anyone tried transferring his new direct shares (from BTCT) to this PT yet?
|
|
|
|
supposed to be some dividends today to one of my addresses right?
0.001161 per share? |
|
|
|
^^Note the text pertaining to entering into or SELLING positions.  Does that mean that one must submit information before Nov 1st, but needn't be verified til then? |
|
|
|
He predicted once that the fee will be 15BTC a block, how could he know? even satoshi does not know. Although I hold a good amount of share, I have to admit that I think he said it to make positive effect on AM price.
Seems reasonable to me. I think the fees could one day go greater than 50 btc per block. I don't think so, that would be insane. Off-chain transactions will get more and more popular. |
|
|
|
An Idea: If the shares are not claimed then LRM should buy back the shares at market price and put the money aside to be claimed.
But how do you claim the shares if you can't sign with the address on bitfunder? These shares are lost forever anyways. Unverifiable.
If the share holder accepts it, LabRat could sent the coins to the address. |
|
|
|
|
Sebastian, Please keep in mind that the bitcoin exchange rate may also decline. You're assuming that BTC will always raise. In that case you would even increase the expected profit.
|
|
|
|
Well, i get BTC and you get the dividends of the mined coins. Not sure what i should write mich about it...it's self-explanatory. I didn't tell its a good or bad business. Anyway if you dont want to buy anything here stay out of it  With that attitude you won't get a satoshi here |
|
|
|
|
So you're actually trying to resell your shares. I couldn't figure out your premium, are you passing thru the shares or what do you earn from it?
And why are you selling it if its such a great business?
|
|
|
|
I'm selling 130 shares cheap if anyone is interested.
I would like to know how we are going to trade the shares now.
I'm still working out the details with @Lab_Rat, but the short version is going to be that both parties will need to send an email to LR or myself, signed with the BTC address associated with the LRM shares outlining the transaction. "I want to buy 50 shares from <address> for XXXXBTC" "I want to sell 50 shares to <address> for XXXXBTC". I will provide a BTC address and will receive the funds from the buyer, and transmit them to the seller, less a 0.5% fee. (Minimum fee of 0.025 BTC.) Once I have received the payment I will update the master spreadsheet of bonds to reflect the requested sale. The above may change slightly. And @Lab_Rat needs to set up the spreadsheet yet. But that's the idea. grnbrg. And why would you do the escrow? |
|
|
|
up
Why didn't you respond? Responding to what? I dont know what you mean. The post you deleted? Someone was raising concern about the approx. 30% difficulty imcrease. |
|
|
|
|
But is the problem bitcoin related or doesn't it effect profit-sharing crowdfunded operations in general?
The problem beeing almost 100 years old laws.
|
|
|
|
up
Why didn't you respond? |
|
|
|
|
I think we would benefit from him proving his theory. Only problem is, that his funds are quite limited and thus the resulting profit is kinda small.
|
|
|
|
Now, Now Dooglus. he is on ignore, remember?
He couldn't resist the temptation. |
|
|
|
Second, and a little harder... what to do with the deposits that do not get withdrawn before the site shutdown:
In a perfect world I'd like to hold the deposits 6-12 months so that people could continue to make claims and withdraw their forgotten coins. I do not believe I am going to be allowed that luxury. Thus, despite the risks, I suspect I am going to have to process refunds back to the address of a user's last successful withdrawal. I know this is not ideal. Some portion of the withdrawals are going to go to addresses that are no longer used, or are on sites no longer in service... Can anyone think of a better alternative?
Maybe donate to the Bitcoin Foundation? I think that's a better alternative than loosing the coins to unused addresses. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
