Actually, an MVP would add much more credibility to the project at the moment it hits the exchanges, especially, but it's hard to predict a different scenario, since there is a crypto unpredictability and factors like the initial volume of traders. It would be wiser, indeed, to ensure stakeholder retention by following the
If a potential mvp would be open for everyone to try and would show by typying few words or describing symptoms what kind of problems you may have got with good probability. That would send the value of the project to mars. It seems to me that the development team promised to submit MVP in the beginning of autumn ... Or am I mistaken? And now September is coming to an end soon, but there is no news about it yet ... I don't remember exactly but some big investors reserved the right to give them the money based on the mvp Now when market shows some growth trend, MVP presence could be additional incentive for new investors. I hope the team will be able to implement this one of these days. I hope it's at least ready for the ICO, that would boost sales. According to the website the first round of the ICO will be in November December, wasn't it supposed to be earlier?
|
|
|
on dusk network, all transaction is going to treated as private or end user are allow to choose? Anonymity will be big thing once regulation come in to play. Like the concept of Stealth address, Ring CT signature and anonymous network layer.
isnt there too much privacy project out there ? I dont think not many fancy private transaction, if so the other privacy coins would be doing well wunt they ? example ETC vs ETH Yes, there are many privacy coins and only a few will be used. Monero is the most well known. Monero's originating from Bytecoin, and as far as I know it does not have the disadvantages and bugs of its predecessor. However, not the most used coin, right? Monero is a fork of bytcoin but, now it's way ahead of bcn in terms of usage and use cases. It's best privacy coin out there I also thing that there's too much competiton out there, they should focus in promote what make them different to others. Security and privacy of transmitted data is a very significant problem nowadays. Despite the fact that there are a lot of resources doing it, we still experience problems in this area, so maybe competition is not that bad.
|
|
|
I had the impression that the platform is oriented only to the United States. At least in the near future this is so?
It kinda goes from the headline they have a patent in the US and I think I saw somewhere they have an operating company in the US, so my guess would be that's where they will launch. Don't really know if they gonna expand from there, probably, why not. According to their roadmap they have intensions to expand and operate globally but it will take some time, it's planned for Q2 22. That is alright with me, actually most projects / platforms needs ample time to expand their operations globally and that is understandable. Imho. True, nothing can be done in a night. A long and steady development will be needed for a project to expand their operate zone. We will see for how long this can be achieved. Q2 22? thats long time to wait. what will they do before it.? This is a long-term project, the availability of a patent makes them more reliable than other projects - I'm just afraid that someone can be first - who can create a platform with a similar concept to Q2 22. Indeed, that's too much time so they can happen a lot of things in the meantime. Expansion demands a lot of time and not time only, it's not something you can do in one week or even in a month, so I wouldn't be that worried about the competition. The quality is still important.
|
|
|
Update:
a) we have received the first investment from a private investor: $250k. Considered our limited burn rate, this is a very consistent sum and will help us in the coming months
b) we are cooperating with a USA investors' network based in California: they are helping us with the project too. We are confident to strike some deals in the 1-2 months timeframe.
c) we are working strong to build an investors' network in Europe and Asia too: of course, it takes time to build strong relationships but we are already receiving positive outlooks from investors located in Malta, Cyprus, China and India
Best, Mauro
That's great news! Congrats to your first investment and you cooperation with the investors' network! Good to see that all your efforts slowly but steadily pay off. $250k is a very good amount to be just one private investor. That means that he has seen a huge potential in the project. That's good news guys! Great to see that you keep the community updated. Looking at your dedication I'm sure you will get more investors in the near future.
|
|
|
Do they have a community manager or someone else who is active here? I hope it's not the thread creator... his last post was the ANN Their team could at least conduct online sessions on the YouTube channel with questions and answers at least once a week. I think one of the devs is active in the thread, but weekly updates would be good of course. Maybe some short article from time to time. Very active communication in the telegram https://t.me/laneaxis There you can ask any question and get a quick response from the admins. Kinda strange that most ICO's put the focus on Telegram these days. All info there is so liquid.. it's almost not possible to search things there like it is on this forum. I do prefere the forum to get updates. Telegram is bound to have a flood of scammers incoming like in Slack because there's no real merit system like we have in bitcointalk. I admid that it has started already but it will get WAY worse until they'll figure something out. I still don't get why many projects prefer Telegram over Bitcointalk and why wouldn't they at least put the updates out on both resources.
|
|
|
Ok, just had a look at the comparisation-sheet.. wow.. If you guys pull this off.. well.. count me in as investor. but like some other ideas on the blockchain, waiting to see the first results / proof of existance That is what everyone in here though i suppose. Very interesting and valuable idea for a project, but we need to see and try at least some of the fetures of the product. Are they planning to release any demo or mvp? Would be very good indeed to test it and see how it works.
|
|
|
Since the community manager is not really active here, maybe Laneaxis team can think of doing a Q&A session, every place is ok, slack, reddit, I don't care as long as they would host one
You are right, when the community manager is active - in theme more detail explained all information that can't be found in whitepaper. Right? Because whitepapers aren't always very clear and this one seems outdated to me (because again, it's stated that ethereum mining is CPU friendly when we know that right now there ethash asic out there) So much already has been said about the importance of the community managers and keeping community up to date with important information. Especially since quite some projects decide to go for the private sales only, you gotta keep your materials updated. Do they have a community manager or someone else who is active here? I hope it's not the thread creator... his last post was the ANN Their team could at least conduct online sessions on the YouTube channel with questions and answers at least once a week. I think one of the devs is active in the thread, but weekly updates would be good of course. Maybe some short article from time to time.
|
|
|
Wow! Congrats to the team and community on this wonderful project! Already reached 100 pages of healthy discussions with regards to the SCIENTIFICCOIN. Keep it up! Yeah, it shows that the community has grown and this achievement shows that ScientificCoin is interesting project - all questions have answers, due to community manager. The community has grown and the only thing that prevents the breakthrough of such a project is the market. Many at the end of last year were ready to work, but now everything has changed and the market has become more demanding. If the project will provide quick profits as promised by patents, then im think the growth will be exactly stable and fast. Yes, we are investing time and resources on the community aspects! If anyone wants to help, please vote us https://twitter.com/TokensMarketpl1/status/1042384899825709057Done! at the moment 81% voted for ScientificCoin - I hope that your project will win, and become hot ICO at this week. In fact is winning quite easily. It looks like they are not going to have to many problems to win it. Few voters, it's easy to change the final result Let's vote up guys! Extra exposure is always good for a project, will attract more people.
|
|
|
Wow! Congrats to the team and community on this wonderful project! Already reached 100 pages of healthy discussions with regards to the SCIENTIFICCOIN. Keep it up! Yeah, it shows that the community has grown and this achievement shows that ScientificCoin is interesting project - all questions have answers, due to community manager. The community has grown and the only thing that prevents the breakthrough of such a project is the market. Many at the end of last year were ready to work, but now everything has changed and the market has become more demanding. If the project will provide quick profits as promised by patents, then im think the growth will be exactly stable and fast. I agree, now investors are waiting for the market to recover, as many of them have money frozen in other projects. Let's wait when all weak hands sell everything that they have, and then there will be growth. Let's hope this december will be the same as the previous december, so we all could finally earn something
|
|
|
Since the community manager is not really active here, maybe Laneaxis team can think of doing a Q&A session, every place is ok, slack, reddit, I don't care as long as they would host one
You are right, when the community manager is active - in theme more detail explained all information that can't be found in whitepaper. Right? Because whitepapers aren't always very clear and this one seems outdated to me (because again, it's stated that ethereum mining is CPU friendly when we know that right now there ethash asic out there) So much already has been said about the importance of the community managers and keeping community up to date with important information. Especially since quite some projects decide to go for the private sales only, you gotta keep your materials updated.
|
|
|
It is always very good to have someone from the team that could answer all of the community's queries. Regular interaction among the community is ideal for this project. Imho. that's true of any project really. community interaction should be a priority Yes, agree. I think they handle communication here really well, being here every day and anwering questions. It's nice, compared to many other projects, to have an active team member here. Agree too, in recent months i participated or followed a lot of projects neglecting bitcointalk thread. They hired a person just tells " go for the telegram group they will answer you in there" so after these projects, following a project like this like a dream. I guess we could not underestimate the power of this thread / forum to transform projects into successful ones. There are plenty of well known projects that are borne from this forum. We are very confident on Bitcointalk power, that's why we are investing resources on this channel. Of course, the environment mood is very different now than 6-7 months ago I really hope it's not misplaced considering the state of the market. If I think about it, I don't really know which other social network or forum is worth investing time in. Telegram is only good for getting members, because people still are somehow impressed by big numbers. Otherwise, Twitter? Facebook? Not really. YouTube is good for informing people via short explanatory videos. Nothing much is left.
|
|
|
Why there is no information about the algorithm they are using. I found none in the white paper also.
We will publish soon an article on this subject Can't wait to see it. I hope it is dpos or similar thing which can bring more tokens to holders. new blockchain ? I support any project not ethereum erc20 As far as I know they are using BOINC algorithm which I don't think any other project has used til now in crypto space I checked the website of it and didn't understand a bit. And couldn't find any project using this algo either to check. Could somebody maybe elaborate a bit about this algorithm? I'm not familiar with it, would like to learn some.
|
|
|
It is always very good to have someone from the team that could answer all of the community's queries. Regular interaction among the community is ideal for this project. Imho. that's true of any project really. community interaction should be a priority I'd say they are doing pretty good in this department, especially compared to some projects out there. Majority of our questions get answers pretty fast, so I'm satisfied myself.
|
|
|
I agree if you work in the field and you are kind of known, it's quite hard to vanish, but is simpler if anybody never heard anything about you. Many people of the team are known professionals on their domain, this doesn't guarantee however they can pull this off.
Well, if they can't their reputation is on the line. So it's in their best interest to do their best in order this project is successful. Yeah exactly. They are not some young guys just working on a project. They are very respected people in their domain. that's what give me hope for this project. the names of the people involved. Exactly, I think they are doing it purely to create something new and helpful for human health. As a medical doctor you are usually very well set financially. It depends where you live. In some countries doctors don't earn that much. I hope this projects will help to make health services more accessible even in those countries where medical services are expensive.
|
|
|
Are Healthmonitor and Scientificcoin projects are linked to each other?
No, I don't think they are directly linked to each other. Just the team of developers is the same. Otherwise, I think those two are independent projects.
|
|
|
Despite the high visibility achieved by the project, we have something at an early stage yet, the next steps, especially the development that is underway now, can bring new investors and even more attention, along with expected news
Development is the key, I totally agree here. Even if a marketing strategy is super good, but the product is average at best, the project will attract attention, but it won't likely be successful.
|
|
|
I seen this tweet: On August 21, we was successful present our projects: Scientificcoin and Healthmonitor at BlockShow Americas. Also, we became winners of BlockShow Oscar. https://twitter.com/scientificcoin/status/1037311784867319809Can anyone explaine me? This 2 projects both from same developers? What with previous project (Healthmonitor)? They finished developed them or this in ICO stage as well? According to information from Icobench rating platform: Health Monitor ICO was end 31st Jan 2018, they raised: $562,680 value of tokens sold in ICO. But why this tokens dont trading at exchanges? I cant see at coinmarketcap? ICO finished a half year ago. How going development? It is probably work in progress. They have a limited amount of funds and probably don't want to pay for high listing fees. It was a decision taken with main investors... to wait for HM to generate revenues. Being on exchanges now, would be like sure death If investors are on board with this, then I don't see a problem. If I'm not mistaken you said that there were only big investors, right? You have to do what you have to do in order to survive these times.
|
|
|
Well a certain amount of regulations and procedures is a good thing, it ensures that project and our investments have some kinda a guarantee that they will offer the value for our money.
I agree! The community will be the deciding factor for the future of the project. Some regulations and procedures will make the community more trustworthy about the project. Community support will increase the value of the currency. It is no secret that the community determines the progress of the project in the crypto world, investors are not one of the determinants of success but indeed the big community is more than a supporter and can even become friends. Well, I would argue that investors mean less than having a strong community. If this community doesn't support the the project financially, then the projects won't even be given a chance. So investors are pretty important as well.
|
|
|
I hope Scientificcoin has a good time also at the World Blockchain Congress on September 27th, these project exhibitions are certainly bringing great visibility, and the work done on them will be rewarded soon
So far, there is no sign that this project will attend the event but who knows, maybe they are interested and will plan to participate on the event soon. There is a press release on their website that states that they'll gonna attend World Blockchain Congress in Malta on September 26th and 27th and will present the project on that event. That's great news, looks like the team is keeping busy. Do you guys think it's hard to get to participate in events like that?
|
|
|
Those are good articles, but they are quite old, from May, right? Would be nice if you guys were updating the blog from time to time. I realize that the project was probably already explained in great detail in previous articles, but some updates or news from events would be good.
|
|
|
|