You also only have your opinion. If its opinions what are we even talking about? OK, So to force someone is opinion ? nice knowledge then.I am learning a lot. I bring up mexxer-2 and lutpin here, because this discussion directly lead to the "save the trust system" thread where its asked to remove them from the system. I don't know what these kids are up to and in simple words THEY NEED TIME. If someone does shady shit on the internet and later fails to get a job I have no problem with that.
No, their doxes were posted while they were trying to "force" the so called untrustworthy and not publicly available info but paid doxes.Like suchmos's. |
|
|
|
|
Only joint score should be removed from the current system.
|
|
|
|
Your critique seems to be the lack of evidence. Yup,If i find any evidence i will try to stop the scammer but not just tagging and saying hey you motherfucker come and strip right now or else enjoy the rating. Why is it a problem here, but not when ponzis are tagged? There is lack of evidence as well. I i remember right then i have opened a thread for that some months ago ? also both are different stories. Why are the two a problem, but I am not? What do you mean ? Nobody is problem to me ,anyways. Lutpin and mexxer-2 do get messages from scammers and they are not always nice. Keep them aside.We are not discussing bout them or any individual. Why does that make things more complicated? I have seen people not getting any jobs for years cause one google search for their name leads to nude photos of their's or relatives.Its a lot more complicated when it gets serious. but why attack those that are still willing to try?
If you people are going to say attack,target to every post of mine then what should i say so that you guys understand that i am speaking bout the problem and not to individual persons.
Shorena,I am not attacking or targeting anyone and there is no one who can or will forcefully remove your opinions from your own mind ,you are the master of your life but because the specialty of human's is communication and i thought we could actually discuss something but if this ends on IMO's then i am not interested,you win ,I lose.Thank You. Like Mobi said " I strongly believe forcing untrustworthy users to stop being untrustworthy is right".So how many bitches should i force to not be a bitch? and if Mobi is going to save me from the law ? because the rape was for good cause and i should not be in a jail. |
|
|
|
I just want you to repay the loan. But he doesn't wants to. You don't even have to pay anything extra He doesn't wants to pay anything. Hopefully this will get resolved.
I hope it doesn't.You wont learn the lesson otherwise. |
|
|
|
Promotion closes exactly on February 26, 2016 (Today), 10:26:40 AM UTC time (Default Bitcointalk time)
We can remove the signatures after that ? |
|
|
|
|
There is no pressure ,they don't care.
|
|
|
|
|
lol AFAIK theymos was promoting his site for free,could be wrong though.
|
|
|
|
What you are saying is, when someone is "raping a bitch" you stand aside and do nothing, because you do not force anyone. That does not make you neutral, it makes you inhumane. Not true.Yes, I agree i don't go around forum's 24x7 searching who is scamming and who is losing but ,but whenever i notice something shady then I definitely make sure that i PM any of the active DT guy,with proper evidence so that no one loses their money. If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.[1]
That makes me a Rough or not very King guy.This now gets complicated because the third party has to face the retaliation from the criminal or accuser. In simple words I will be helping or taking risks for them until the problem or revenge of their's(victim and accused) is significantly bigger than what is between the third party(me) and them. so let them make their own mistakes.
Exactly.You cannot help or explain everything to everyone and every single time. |
|
|
|
I don't know if i am an alien or what but if i am gonna get abused for sharing my opinions then i am sorry cause i expected some level of maturity in the discussion.I have a habit to imagine myself in victim as well as accusers position and come to the most fair solution ,without expecting my personal gains.Sorry if i was not supposed to do that. the drama occurs because biased scammers got tagged and than cry because they got caught.
SG defaulted his account to zazrb.How old was he and how trusted was he ? the drama occurs because biased scammers got tagged and than cry because they got caught.
So here's what's going to happen next.I shall be creating a group of my own { we DT 1 members} and negative tag everyone who is selling forum accounts.Try not to be astounded when you will be the primary part we might be negative rating.A random account messaged me you being a lender with possession of multiple accounts as defaulted loans. If you're laws to step-up to the selling of Unauthorized Goods are truthful , you should be negative trusting yourself as selling of forum accounts is a heinous crime.I would categorize it as even worser than selling of third party Goods. @Mexxer-2 You truly included a member who offers forum account sells to your trust list ? Just includes to your youthfulness {immaturity} to be on the DT. He indirectly started abusing me cause i am posting in a thread which is against him.Just LOL. |
|
|
|
I am not attacking Blazed but when i see multiple threads daily then obviously it is silly drama for nothing in return and that is what i said. While you are harassing me to accept your opinion
which opinion ? how am i harassing you ? i am talking to you and i didn't tagged you a negative to do what i want.
Now, as i see you have started trolling & i am not interested in it,you may continue.Thanks. |
|
|
|
I strongly believe forcing untrustworthy users to stop being untrustworthy is right.
Believes,right ? That's why the police forces criminals to stop and go to jail, or even just drivers not to go too fast. (Just an example).
If that is reported with proper evidence then the Cop goes inn for some years or even a decade.You cannot touch the criminal before you present him to the court.It is abuse which is what you agree to do. It was about picking up soemthing you want to change.
Yes, but not by forcing anybody but by helping.There is a difference.
What you people are saying is ,Raping a bitch is good because she is scamming, hurting many people.Sorry,I don't agree to that, Sir. |
|
|
|
Cool, tell you what, go and do so for around 5 months with no possibility of being added to DT, face 10s of pages of offensive message even when your ratings have no effect. I highly doubt you're going to do this just to prove a point On the first place you said you enjoyed that, didn't you ? and secondly i appreciated that,didn't I ? "Everything, scams, fraud , illegal stuff is cool. Government and the law is just nothing but someone trying to control you" attitude, I hardly believe you're going to tag even 10 No, I just ask people to think for a while and nothing else.That is your created agenda.I never said anything is cool or not. (of course you might now, just because this sounds like a challenge). No, I wont.I lost the challenge.  targeting a specific individual
How am i targeting ?
OK i don't want to be bitch here,but i cant agree to people getting harassed for no reason other than IMO's. |
|
|
|
I dont know what else you want.
Logic not judgment. something you consider abusive.
IMO's |
|
|
|
Guys it's good,the efforts ,the spirit.But I will NEVER EVER agree to use my position or something that is in my control to force anyone for a good or bad cause.You all know it is wrong. @Mobi, you actually proved my point in your own post,Thanks. Edit: If Heutenamos decides to do so, i am fine with it. Also if he brings back cryptsy lost funds or if he starts to push whales back into the sea. I am cool with all of it.
Daniel, nobody cares and what makes you think i am responsible for the losses of the grown up adults trading on that exchange ? they know all the loop holes and they are solely responsible for that and yes i will help if i could but not by forcing the scammer....lol It doesn't works that way. |
|
|
|
----snip----
anybody could do that,give me one day's time and i will dig 5 year old ponzi thread and tag the OP.The question the abuse. I agree they might be good,helping etc etc... but their opinions ,judgments should not be forced upon anyone and hence they should be UNTRUSTED. |
|
|
|
but that's not the only thing their doing
Yes, like giving you an extra spot in the campaign when it is already full ? Do you seriously think people don't watch ? We don't need to abide by 17 year old's judgments. |
|
|
|
So you think it's better to let people sell obviously illegal cards? Who are you to LET THEM ? who am i to LET YOU ? who are WE to LET HIM ? who is theymos to LET US ? oh fuck he is the land owner,yes he can LET or NOT LET US. Do you think it's better to let them keep doing their illegal business because it doesn't affect me directly? what affects you ? people losing thousands of coins on cryptsy doesn't affects you ? people dying in wars doesn't affects you ? what are you doing for it ,don't LET that happen ? stereotype "I won't touch bitcoin, it's only good for illegal trading" is very popular. they are not reputation.They don't define anything,they are part of typical population/Workers.Since when have stereotype become the foundation of your philosophy ? That doesn't have anything to do with anything. It is Scam,No ? We have the 51% attack then why don't we use it to stop them is my question.Lets stop and reverse the transactions. You are skipping the Logic here.If you use your DT position to stop anything and for once i assume you caught them red handed, then why do the people don't use 51% position to reverse the coins to the victims ? or why not ask theymos to do some glitch in the software and reverse the coins ? Let me tell you,even if 1 btc transaction gets reversed for a GOOD CAUSE then only mental retards will be using the bitcoin.The coin will collapse under 20 minutes.Let the cause be good or bad,one cannot force the other.It will become a vulnerable environment. |
|
|
|
Seconded.If your rating needs to be removed every alternate day then it only shows the low accuracy and how readily you leave a rating.
Regardless of the alt's, it looks like Blazed is getting pampered a lot.
Well if you're talking about me, link me to 5 feedbacks(I expect at least one rating to be a mistake, I'm human after all) that I wrongfully appeared to have given , that I later removed under community pressure. Again, if you're talking about me, I've sent Blazed 3 PMs so far. 1st, to remove his rating for "Busting spam" as many were questioning that I did it solely for gaining feedbacks. 2nd, a recommendation of devthedev and Cyrus to the DT. 3rd, recently when he asked me to reply in this thread. Mexxer, i trust you and all that ,will also go first with you for some amount of money regardless of DT.But i don't think this is going in a good direction. It's no joke & i cant agree to the (newbie)harassing,I cant bud, sorry. EDIT: I also think Blazed is simply risking his reputation or losing his respect in this drama. |
|
|
|
I am fairly certain that I know who the OP is and I don't think it is productive to make ad hominem attacks against the OP, as I would argue that he is probably one of the most trusted people around.
I would say that I agree that Mexxer-2 and Lutpin are strange choices for being in the Default Trust network. I would also say there is a high chance they are the same person.
I somewhat get the feeling that some people are trying to make a name for themselves as being a scam buster. They are doing this by stretching the definition of a scammer and leaving negative trust for people who probably do not have the drive nor motivation to defend their name/reputation, even though what they are accused of doing, even if true, is really not scamming.
I would note that a good number of the "Mexxer-2 and Lutpin" threads have resulted in no additional negative ratings being added to the accounts of those complaining, and in a decent number of instances the ratings have been removed. On the other hand, it was fairly rare that a rating that I left was inappropriate, and as a result very few ratings needed to be removed that I left and many of the "QS" threads resulted in additional people looking at the evidence and leaving additional ratings on those complaining.
Seconded.If your rating needs to be removed every alternate day then it only shows the low accuracy and how readily you leave a rating. Regardless of the alt's, it looks like Blazed is getting pampered a lot. |
|
|
|
i will be contacting the persons that have these users on their trust list,
Why would they care ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
