Scam Alert!
Do Not Trust This User!
|
|
|
Scam Alert!
Do Not Trust This User!
|
|
|
Scam Alert!
Do Not Trust This User!
|
|
|
Asking users off this site is a huge red flag! No crypto option listed.... half ass scam attempt.
Scam Alert!
Do Not Trust This User!
|
|
|
82 - anonymousminer Thank you. Merry Christmas.
|
|
|
anonymousminer lot #2 0.0008BTC
|
|
|
When Anonymousminer posted: " The last couple that have traded hands have been for 5k plus. Good luck on this as there are only 30",
I think he was referring to the medium size (18"x24"), as there were only 30 of those produced (I believe) and they had an initial selling price of $3000. Here's the CryptoArt.com website https://cryptoart.com/product/protectionism The small 8 1/2" x 11" size I am STILL looking for, had an initial run of 100. What you've said above is VERY inaccurate. When I said the last couple traded hands for 5k plus, I meant the small size as you had a WTS on the small one so I thought that was pretty clear. Either way this clears it up. There were: 30 - small 8.5" x 11" 8 - medium 18" x 24" 5 - large 24" 30" The sale price you see on the website was what the owner posted the last Medium and Large for on the website LONG ago. They were initially offered on the site in the same range as the rest as far as price goes. You are STILL going to pay a HEFTY price to own one.
|
|
|
anonymousminer - 80
Thank you!
|
|
|
I’m actually not a great fan of capsulation. I had it done for some actual coins in a collection I have, and I actually regret it. You lose the chance to hold these objects in your hand which is part of the joy of owning them.
In my opinion the safety and security that comes from capsulation FAR outweighs this joy of fondling coins. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
|
|
anonymousminer * 1.222 * 1.444 * db3b69a631ae088e30962780788c4658fd9678c2f6f84e2d2a1bbbb64b19c9e8
|
|
|
0.012 Thanks
You might want to look at post #6.... it's the one above yours.
|
|
|
Hi All,
I know someone that has a Titan 1 BTC 1 oz gold coin...any idea as to what it might be worth?
Still funded? Pics?
|
|
|
OK, Thank you for your interest, both here and more substantially, by PM. So far, it is mainly the silver ten that has attracted interest - hence changing the Subject. However, nobody has offered a price yet. So what I propose to do, once I get some photos, is to hold a non-binding auction to discover a price someone would be willing to pay then to ask the owner if that is enough for her to be prepared to let it go loaded (as opposed to peeling it for the crypto value and keeping the physical peeled coin). In the meantime, there are still the ones... First, I am interested in the 10 price dependent. Second, a non binding auction sounds like a huge waste of time and Internet. Not enough people will bid, knowing it is non binding, to get a true reflection of the market price. Tell your friend to either do a WTS with the price she is willing to accept or to put on her big girl pants and do an auction starting at loaded value. Thank you too for your interest although I think your assessment is a bit harsh! As far as I recollect, it is normal, for instance in car auctions in the UK that the seller after the auction but before payment can withdraw. They just have to pay the auctioneer and they lose some credibility. I know from experience it's a downer for the 'winning' bidder but it's just life! From ebay.com "A non-binding bid is a bid that shows a buyer's interest in purchasing an item, but it doesn't create a formal contract between the buyer and the seller. All bids made in the Real Estate and eBay Motors vehicles categories are considered non-binding." I'm not saying we should just accept the standards of other auction processes but clearly, if it's standard practice for certain high-value item categories for ebay, I'm not entirely out on a limb here. We're talking about a lot of money here so I don't think it is unreasonable that both parties after the auction have a day or two to be sure they're happy before proceeding. If that is unacceptable to you then I'm sorry but that is what I will try. If people don't bid because it's non-binding and there's hardly anything over face-value offered then it's their loss. The owner will get to go with Plan A - which is to peel it and use it. The point is you will not get a REAL assessment because it's not a REAL auction, plain and simple. ....and having an auction where either party can consider it "non binding" is absolutely ridiculous. As LC said, a waste of time and internet.
|
|
|
Over 4.5 months and still going......
|
|
|
Example #1: When Bob buys a Toyota from the Toyota dealership and then years later sells it to Alice, but the manual/factory warranty/duplicate keys/service plan are not included in the sale from Bob to Alice....does Toyota owe Alice anything or is the responsibility of that sales transaction fall on Bob instead?
Example #2: If Bob loses his keys over and over, does Toyota have a responsibility to keep replacing his keys at no cost or does Bob have to pay for a copy of the keys? Bob needs to take some responsibility. (Lealana is not looking to charge anyone for a copy of their addresses, just to be clear.)
Thank you using these examples. In example #1 you are 100% accurate, Toyota owes Alice nothing.... however a good Toyota dealership would help her find/get those things she needs. In example #2 you are 100% accurate, but I think most people are not like Bob and are just looking for those replacement keys 1 time, not over and over. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯Thank you for your opinion. 1. You obviously do not know how a dealership works nor a business when it comes to liability. I do. I’ve worked at a dealership. Dealerships can’t give advice of where to get warranties, parts, spare keys, etc. due to liability purposes. They prefer to do things in-house. They also won’t waste their time giving advice to people who bought a second-hand vehicle that was originally purchased from their dealership unless this individual is willing to pay them to service the car or for the parts/warranty/manual/spare keys. 2. Bob in this example is Toyota’s customer, you are not our customer therefore your input does not really matter much. You were asked previously if you have ever bought coins from Lealana directly and failed to answer the question. 3. Anonymousminer, Be sure to start a business, and with every request you get from non-customers be sure to respond to them promptly, give them your resources, be sure to also think for your customers, and last but not least take on all of the responsibilities of people and the decisions they make who are not your customers so they will be happy. 4. You aren’t “most people”. Perhaps you should speak for yourself as opposed to others. 5. It is quite interesting to see someone be so critical of Lealana products being released, yet you appear to have no problem turning a profit by buying and reselling Lealana products. Seems quite hypocritical given your previous comments about profit motive and a “cash grab” etc. 1. You have no idea what you are talking about. I was a finance manager for over a decade and a GM for 3+ years in one of the largest car markets in the country. I can speak intelligently on the topic. Thanks. 2. No I did not ever buy directly, but as a previous collector of your coins, your unwillingness to help along with the sh*tshow release of the 0.5 and 1 XMR coins soured me on Lealana and I liquidated most of what I had. 3. I have, twice... and sold both for profit. Both are still doing well today because their customer service is great so people still go out of their way to support them in even in today's climate. You might want to jot that down somewhere. 4. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 5. Please have your facts straight here. My Lealana's have been gone for some time now.(please see #2 above) I have 2 left as they were gifts or I'd own none. I help people move their collectibles, I'm not buying and selling, but thanks for checking me out. If you want to call that a cash grab, have at it.... but I'm not the one who is releasing SEVERELY OVERPRICED coins faster than 1 a day frank was releasing prints.
|
|
|
I thought that the rest will be destroyed after 11. December 2020.
I think that deadline was for subscribers to claim theirs before theirs go to the open market. This is accurate. ...and remaining November ones will be destroyed just before the release of the December ones.
|
|
|
|