With the current conditions of the crypto market, I think there is a lot to think about before continuing to buy Bitcoin, I have unfinished belief for Bitcoin which is much more than $20,000 minimum.
Personally I'm not sure this is the lowest point, there are even more satisfying points in my opinion this year.
We'll determine the lowest point if it ever comes. But for the meantime, when it had to the lowest which was around $33k, that's already the point of others that have been probably set. And right now, it had hit $38k and trying to force itself out of that line to get into $39k. But if you think that it's not yet comfortable to buy, you really have to wait for another low price point. It will be a matter to yourself if the recovery continues to push $40k upwards. Lots had been anticipating that it would go below 30k but it didnt happen since the market had made out some recovery but not really much since we are still playing on 38k price which there would be still probability that we would going down thats why it isnt bad to take some action whether you do buy now and sell later on as long you could play out with the volatility and make profits then this do matter most. Good time to buy? Its your call but these prices are still low imho which it isnt bad for you to get in but if you do go for possible lowest price then it would be always a question. |
|
|
|
I like the odds on Thurman by KO win. I think Keith will go for a big win here and show the world that he is definitely back. Sort of sending messages to the rest of the welterweight that he is back to reclaim his title (and this is what he is saying when he is being interviewed for this fight).
So it doesn't matter what round will Thurman get the KO, maybe it going to be in late rounds.
But still, it will be a hard fight in the beginning for him, a lot of adjustments and then if the KO is there, he will go for it.
It's somehow expected that Thurman will go berserk mode in either the middle rounds or late rounds because in the first few rounds he'll probably overcome the ringrust effect first before he can fight comfortably and confidently. But sure that won't be a problem to him as he's a former world champion. Both fighters are so dedicated and determined to win this match, they have their own reasons why and we probably know that already, anyway we will see it soon. Not only that, but Thurman is a slow starter, just like in the Manny fight. He started very slow and then get's how in the mid rounds but it was not enough as Manny has build a good lead in the fight. So we will see if he will change this (but I highly doubt it), and we all know that ring rust will play a big factor for him in this fight. So probably he will just coast early trying to shake his ring rust and then if he found openings in the middle rounds then he can go and start for there. Not all the fight he is a slow starter I guess, it's just normal that he starts slowly with Pacman as he knows his power, and maybe he was hesitant to attack as he might be in trouble. This is a different fight, a different level of fighter and not even on the level of Pacman and other champions, so I expect Thurman to be aggressive from the start to the end. I think Thurman already knows what to do and that's not to be hot aggressive in early rounds as it could be really dangerous for him, and it's not that Thurman is a slow starter, in fact all boxers starts slow because they have to measure the opponent first rather than just go and be aggressive. As you said, this is a whole different fighter and a different level, so I guess Thurman will observe Barrios's movements first before he starts to dance again. When it comes to good technical fighting then Thurman does fit out into that kind of type or behavior.Of course each boxer does really have that kind of behavior on testing out on early rounds and trying out to dominate or controlling the pace and its just not right on being aggressive but there are actually fighters who do really have this kind of style but in most fighters they arent something like this.For Thurman and we have seen on previous fights that he isnt really that aggressive but really good on technicals. |
|
|
|
The likes of IMF refuse giving loans for a variety of reasons that have nothing to do with adopting bitcoin. If anything, its bad money, which doesn't even really exists and yet is used to extort whole countries.
Getting refused by the IMF after adopting bitcoin is something to be proud of. It is a clear message to the world that, no you don't have to depend on them and their schemes anymore. And this, is what that is all about, a country going independent of a despotic financial institution that everyone in Latin-America and the Caribbean hates.
The world will celebrate the closure of the IMF, WB, Central Banks, and finally fractional reserve banks. No more bubbles and crashes, just like the Austrian economists proposed a century ago, no more trash money, save your own money to invest instead of getting in debt and become a slave to them.
Bitcoin is independence and freedom.
That is very pleasing to hear. But i doubt if El Salvador is already stable enough to stand on his own without making loans from IMF or any financing companies. Because as i have read, El Salvador is the fifth poorest country in North America in 2021 so most likely, creating loans can be a good option so that this country will start to take progress. In fact, investing in bitcoin added to their previous loans and currently, Bukele is buying more 410 bitcoin to add on their investments so that only means El Salvador is in need for a huge funds to sustain the country's progressive economic condition. For sure they are already aware on this kind of thing on which this is part of the risk and they are fully aware for this thing to happen thats why they do take some shot on making this as a legal tender thats why they wouldnt be shook off that easily because they do go for the positive ones and despite of the current condition you do still have that kind of positivity in mind which is the most important but they should really be minding off about the responsibility of repaying those debts later on and of course they do have already that in mind. |
|
|
|
Thurman's boxing experience can speak of that, he's still a pretty decent fighter even if he rested for a couple of years and he still can be lethal if Barrios will underestimate him or lower his guard for a bit. Though, we can't ignore the fact that Thurman was inactive but we'll see how will he cope for that because we know that there's some effect for being inactive. We'll see it soon!
Agree, Thurman is still a dangerous fighter even though he has been out for two years now and for me Thurman has the advantage on this fight because this is his weight while Barrios is not yet too comfortable in this division. I'm for Keith Thurman this weekend but with his inactivity for a long time i would go for that "Thurman by decision" @2.60, that is not bad at all. I'll go with the higher odds, it's Thurman by KO. Although he was inactive for years, I still believe he did not change and he is still a very dangerous fighter. Barrios lost to Davis via TKO, so it's not impossible that he will lose in the same fashion against Thurman. Win or lose that bet of mine is final. Thurman by KO is possible but i would go for ending up on a decision which 2.xx odds isnt really that bad either but for those who are eyeing on on Barrios then 4-5 odds isnt that bad but only to those who do believe that there might be some upset that would happen in this fight and believed that Thurman inactivity did really take some toll on possible performance against Barrios. |
|
|
|
Ask the projects teams they will give the best answer, bounty hunters are promoting projects to get money out if them but as for exposure it thus works many projects ended up on binance exchange and they introduced bounty campaign months back, sometimes the project team also get greedy too
The teams will give a divided answer, while some teams tend to give bounty participants a credit to the marketing of the project others will disagree. Again the fact that the former group may have been more successful to deliver the project is also worth nothing while the later may have just been a failure from the start. Hence it is difficult to judge how much impact a bounty project might have on the investors but the bounty hunters are defenitely a soft target for the blame game. Exchange listing is never a factor of determining the success of a project. It may just get delisted in a year - but nobody would care for it then. The important part is whether the MVP is being developed and at least a version of the prototype should be working. For some reason there are project fails its because first they don't have clear proper outlook towards their project. Second there team member is unknown or not transparent to show their identity and last they rely to much on the campaigns here and didn't do any follow another marketing to increase the hype of their project that's why they end up failing and blame it to the campaign and its participants. Also for thinking about listing well I can say they are success to that since meaning they are getting sales on their ICO,IDO,IPO or any words what they to conduct token sales. And those exchange listing is the prize for their investor and bounty hunters since they will get their compensations for participating their project. Everything should really be in proper place so that investors or people around would able to know on what the project is all about and the roadmap does it have so that anyone would tend to check out will definitely have the idea on what or on where the project would really be goin.Marketing does work but depending on the projects potential if its good or bad or simply copy cat in the market.Investors woudlnt really be that dumb on not to seek for the best one and this is where demands do really differ because there a projects which arent really focusing much or spending lots in marketing but still succeed because the people do see its real potential thats the case on which do really happens. |
|
|
|
I've been giving this a lot of thought lately, Which kind of business model would you prefer, will you prefer the kind of business where profit can be from both the rich and poor, that is huge profits occasionally and small profits daily?
Or the the sort that only attends to the rich, and the poor cannot afford it, that is your profit is from the rich alone and usually huge, and comes occasionally?
Please give reasons for your choice
In the business world there will be ups and downs, as you say. But if you ask about it, I'd choose a consistent business. Where the business that I do reaches all, and of course has a long-term income. Not sometimes there, sometimes not. It's fine for me to make a small profit as long as it's continuous. Wanna suppose to say the same thing on this kind of behavior which is really a very normal scenario or condition on which business couldnt really be always on good profits on which there are really times which you could really earn small or doesnt really have anything at all.Thing here is that you should be mindful on how to sustain your business despite of those conditions because if you do really able to bare those storms and challenges which basically means that your business is actually doing good and sustainable and this thing what matter most. |
|
|
|
Too bad for a casino that is considered to be reputable. Keeping promises is one of the key ways to stay on top of it. If you can't you can't be among the best. I agree that the gambler should care about his own budget himself, but this is a case where a casino should also engage.
When you do make yourself self exclude then you should completely stop and wont tend to make out more deposits since you do know that you've been blocked or banned. They might missed up on doing so since you could still able to play but with due common sense then you shouldnt have done that and the worst you had played again on the amount you had deposits.What if you had won and then the site had blocked out that withdrawal because you are self excluded? For sure you would reallybe making some complaints again but if you do able to pull those winnings then you would really making no complaints which is a common human being behavior.  |
|
|
|
Oops this means we will add a new code in our signature  VIP Level is another way to attract players they will choose which one is more profitable Especially if we have a weekly/monthly rakeback program it means we are ready to compete hopefully we see it in the near future or at least next month Yes and is better with some promotion. Why is better? because most off promotion deposits have something people really hate, is because stupid wagering with more than x30-x40. VIP Level Reward, Rakeback, Race Contest, Gambling Contest is better rather than promotion. Hoping we have a good VIP Level on BJ Fun. Actually you can peek at it now it's just not activated https://blackjack.fun/vip from what I see VIP here requires more wager at least 1 BTC to reach the first VIP But this is not final there may still be updated before it is actually activated may the little player also enjoy it not only for whales  The desire to reach the VIP level may be delayed for some of the small bag holders as the wagering amount is the tier to 1btc but then I know the blackjack fun team always listen to feedback and always take actions that will serve the interest of their player and as a new gambling site reducing the VIP level wagering amount will help to attract more players to the site. But dont expect that they would really be following on that because even though how much reputable a site is, they would really be still having that kind of standards and preference and they wouldnt really just listen everytime when the community do say or tell this and tell that.Of course they are running off a business and it would really be just be still on their own final decision whether they would made out such changes or not in the end of the day. |
|
|
|
A $100 investment isn't really capable of providing a decent return if the bitcoin price doesn't rise beyond 1 million.
This is how people thinking when they started bitcoin and then coming back mostly when they nearly or probably forget about it investing way back years ago at least 6 years. Thinking bitcoin will increase for the next 5 years, a $100 will probably doubled in that time pan. Well, I could be wrong since this is typically a speculation but who knows, if there's nothing wrong happen in the future bitcoin is probably working like that, increasing only. Nothing is assured that everything would increase and that you should really put up into your mind so that you wouldnt really be expecting that much because not everytime we would really be hoping into something would really happen in the future.Yes, bitcoin does have potential but it wouldnt really be giving out any assurances that it would really be heading there.Invest on what you can afford to lose and then its better to have that fiat savings if you are really minding about your new born son and on the future that he/she could possibly benefit out with those savings you had made. It would be better if you do save up on both fiat and crypto which would really be ideal. |
|
|
|
So in this fight, if Barrios has the power and speed then he can do the say. Score a knock down and shoot for Thurman's body because that is a weak spot.
Sorry but I don't see that happening, he cannot even beat Gervonta Davis who is smaller than Thurman, how can he knock out a big guy like Thurman. Barrios still has a lot to learn in boxing, Thurman is already on the top level, if he can beat Thurman, then I would believe that one day he will be a champion in the Welterweight division. It's not about the size, have you forgotten that Manny Pacquiao was smaller than Thurman and yet he won against him? Man, this is boxing, every boxer has an advantage and weakness and being a smaller fighter could also be use as an advantage. ^ Size does not matter in boxing as long as grip strength is there, it's very important when grappling and delivering punches. When it comes to strength, weight, and height are different things, it has always an advantage when you have this strength even though you are not taller and that is right size does not matter. However, in this match, I will go to Thurman's side, I know he has the capability to defeat Barrios with his strong punches very quickly. Barrios is quick as well but Thurman has been in many fights with different great fighters. It's his division, so it's just right that people will lean on him in this fight. In terms of experience, Thurman is way more mature and though both came from a loss Thurman's loss was a very close one, and it was a big fight. When it comes to experience they arent really too far off. Keith Thurman29 1 0
Mario Barrios26 1 0 3 fights ahead of Thurman and both does have 1 loss.KO% might be differ but not much. Wont really be surprised if Barrios would give some shot. |
|
|
|
Binance and Kucoin are both exchanges with large trading volumes and both have been the best exchanges so far, I have previously used Binance exchange for trading and withdrawals but after Binance was asked to verify identity information (KYC) for its users and I finally decided to switch to Kucoin exchange because I don't want to risk my personal information.
Many people would like to keep themselves anonymous and they don't prefer for having a KYC and its nothing wrong with it one of the exchanges suitable for them is the Kucoin also even though you dont have a KYC you can access their good feature security like 2FA too. But of course, people would like to choose the known and reputable exchange already so most of the newbies and newcomers prefered the use of Binance over the Kucoin. Also, is crypto.com another good exchange too. Some do really take anonymity seriously on which they would really be exchanging on dealing with the current top exchange into another one which is also known as legit but couldnt really be sure if it would give on the same experience that they could possibly get or experienced in Binance.I dont have any experience on using Kucoin though since ive been a long time verified user in Binance for a while before that mandatory KYC is been asked but speaking with real experience and stuffs then i dont really have any complaints from this one. |
|
|
|
If you are talking about the gambling experience itself, then I would say it's almost the same regardless of whether you're playing with fiat or cryptos. Fiat and crypto casinos have practically the same games and offer the same features.
When it comes to crypto and fiat gambling, there are no differences, except that in some casinos you can play anonymously for cryptocurrencies. When it comes to fiat, verification is always required. Besides that, the games and features are almost identical. The differences are between gambling in a casino and betting on sports results at a bookmaker. Almost identical which i do really agree and they do really differ in terms of payment options plus having that verification/KYC which do most people do really hate and this is why they do much prefer on using or playing here on cryptospace.Gambling in crypto does offer some several games which are unique or cant be seen on fiats which you could choose wide variety of them specially on crash and other luck based ones which you cant find in fiat which it do really make me switch up whether dealing on a fiat casino or crypto one wouldnt really matter as long you do enjoy then thats already considered good. |
|
|
|
Why not?
Whats your predicts ?
Just a random price prediction and nothing behind it? I think no one can predict this one. It will be could with economic influence as well this time. I actually think it's a perfect storm in that crypto, stocks and housing and real estate will get hammered this year. Will bitcoin drip to $8k I don't think that far probably bottoms out mid to high teens. Anyone could really make out their price prediction since this had been a speculative market.They could neither say those values or numbers neither having some backed up information or analysis or doesnt really have nothing at all which it is really just common sense that we would really just simply ignore but we cant really deny that there would be some sort of probability from time to time but basing with experience and awareness then its really hard to believe that we would be heading back on 8k.There might be dumps and slumps but doesnt mean that we would really be going that bad even though its not an assurance but basing up with the current adoption and recognition then its really hard to believe on. |
|
|
|
correct mate why would a gambler in this forum will check their site when the OP does now give any interest about the possible questions here?
denied this site and those who has similar attitude.
we have tons of gambling site here that actively engaging in conversation and answering all questions for the players safety.
Therefore, prioritizing casinos that already have good judgment and guarantees will give us much more comfort in solving problems if something happens that makes us feel there are obstacles in gambling. I always prioritize this rather than trying to put money into it without any certainty from casinos that are still vulnerable to fraud. We have often come across this kind of incident because beginners are tempted by the bonuses offered but do not consider what the consequences will be in the future. Thinking on always ahead which should be always the case on where you could possibly able to save yourself on problems but its not really bad to try out something new and you could really able to say if its somewhat shady on first impressions basing on some few factors which you could really observe initially and this one doesnt really give out any activity or response for a long time which is a solid indication that it would be better not to make out any deposits (well it didnt really launch since from the beginning) So it should really be finalize first before they would really be making out some announcement thread on here. |
|
|
|
In any case, the government will not be able to ban cryptocurrency and will have to adopt appropriate laws so that I can only regulate the circulation of cryptocurrency, but also protect companies that will work with the blockchain in their country. In addition, society is moving towards cashless payments using platforms such as Crat d2c, which is an e-commerce platform with its first digital utility token. thus, cryptocurrencies only legalize this issue.
Government could able to ban crypto? How you would take about China crypto ban? Of course they would really have the capability in doing so if they wanted to even if you do talk about being dumb on not to consider taxation with those businesses attached to it but its their choice to make.Its true that we are going cashless society but to think off sensibly on where fiat had already been existed for a while when it comes to this manner.Lets just accept that adoption couldnt really be possible on every corner but somewhat at least we do still have few countries does have these kind of jurisdictions. |
|
|
|
Even if we have mandatory KYC it is more convenient in crypto casino when it comes to deposit and withdrawals because we don't have to wait for the banks to approve our transaction or ask the source of funds when it comes to deposit. Apart from that everything is similar but in future more crypto casino then it will give better choice for the gamblers to pick.
Indeed, some casinos have been required to KYC according to their procedures as a condition, but it will still be the cryptocurrency of choice compared to fiat, we are easier to use in transactions called P2P so there is no other party and our deposits or withdrawals will remain anonymous, that's what becomes my choice. Honestly, that's what is doubtful about depositing Fiat when later you are asked where the source of the funds will come from, then this will be more difficult to explain and of course it will take time to provide an explanation. Well, there is a behavior of the casino that they will always ask KYC if the amount you deposited is a large amount. I think the casino will never care where it comes from a small amount that you deposit and it will always ask a KYC when you deposited a large amount even if it is where it comes from. I don't think also as a p2p transaction is good for the gambling casino it usually has a problem. The normal transaction would be better in my own opinion. If thats the case, then how about those people or whales who had been playing on the site but havent been asked out a single thing? Ex. Rollbit (my signature) on which i dont see that there are some verifications been asked or needed for them to play on the time that they do deposit big amounts.Well, there might be some time or probabilities but it would be good if there would be no hassle nor strings attached whether you do deposit big or withdrawn big. |
|
|
|
Why bitcoin is valuable?
Bitcoin is valuable because it as a limited supply and there is a demand for it. There is a demand because people can use bitcoin as a means of exchange( an act of giving one thing and receiving another).
DEMAND!This is the main reason because it wouldnt really get any value if it doesnt have this thing.Although there are lots of criticisms on which bitcoin had able to get but considering that we are on decade plus now on its existence then it do proves out that there's really a potential that it could really go into further years to come.This isnt only talking about profit making but also into its real use case relevance which most people do really been eyeing on. |
|
|
|
Hello am new here and am interested in gambling but with the rate of scams casino I am finding it difficult to know the right site that don't scam players?
No one can decide the best casino for yourself. Everyone has different preferences, likes and dislikes. Even if we know about the best features for the casino, there will be many which will fit in those criteria and final decision will be ours on where to play. I usually stick to a few casinos and do not switch the casino often. It doesn't work this way. A player may like or dislike a gambling website for various reasons. But before you fundraise for a gambling website, it is important to research the website as much as possible. This is because there are many gambling websites that block their customer's accounts with various excuses and do not refund the player's funds. So community member reviews play an important role in many cases for selecting a gambling website. Reading up real experiences and feedbacks would be the best thing you should search first and with this forum alone would really fit out on that criteria where you could really see this to be helpful specially if you are really having some hard time on choosing which casino you should play on. Being new casino doesnt automatically means that it is not trusted because everything starts on being new, it do matters on how they would really be giving out real good gambling experience in the market. Choosing would be common sense most of the time. |
|
|
|
This is similar to parking before; the problem with this is that if there are a large number of users, how do they pay them all at the same time. My knowledge of staking is limited, but I believe it has potential while still in its infancy. However, as time passes and more users stake their coins, it may have an adverse effect on your profits due to a decrease in the value of the coin and the uncertainty as to whether the owner will be able to keep up with payments to those stakers.
Common or main factors that would affect interest rates or growth would really be depending on how many people do stake out their coins which it is really just common sense that APY would be mainly affected.The thing i do like the most in some platforms is that you could stake/unstake instantly and anytime compared into those having lock time period which i dont really like the most since you could really able to pull out your investment anytime you do see some market changes or something attached to it. |
|
|
|
Hey guys,
I have created this poll to see what your ideas are in this.
So what do you say, what are the most important features for you in an online crypto casino?
Please choose five, and if you think of something else I haven't covered, please let me know.
Thanks,
Karl
Bitcasino.io
I pick Responsiveness to complaints this is very important and define casino how they valued their customers, and not only Responsiveness to complaints but giving and honest decision on every complaint I hate seeing casinos that just ban account because they violated their terms of service and rules without showing any proof, Responsiveness to complaints will define a casino's reputation. I cannot agree more. In any platform actually not only in gambling, responsiveness to complaints is one of the leading things customer look up. This is because as much as something works so good and smooth, there will certainly be a time that a client will experience some troubles and unfortunate circumstances that could need some form of help or resolution. If a gambling site won't be able to perform this instantly or as soon as they can, I would definitely be turned off. Definitely other people would be too. Because being responsive to issues and concerns show how the casino cares for their clients. It would be a sign that the casino is not solely after for the money, but has a goal also to satisfy their customer and make the most out of what they have paid for as well. People would have definitely could really have that kind of impression whenever they do get almost instant response from the team/company itself which they would immediately resolved the issue which is really a big factor which most gamblers do really look upon even though we dont like issues to be experienced but its an inevitable thing in most cases.Next would be the instant withdrawals and less fees because people would really be minding off about their finances and anytime they do decide to make out some withdrawal then having instant processing would be the most preferred one. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
