Overall things going very well. Net hashrate has multiplied by 5, price seems to be stable at around 3K Satoshi which is brilliant for a coin which has only just reached a major exchange:)
|
|
|
block explorer not working?
No seems to be down. Hopefully Brokkir can take a look tonight. Was working fine last night.
|
|
|
The next thing also is to get some plans for new developments. Despite everything that happened with SC - they had some great ideas with the wallet. We should definitely look at adding a block explorer, exchange integration, and possibly an exchange platform.
|
|
|
I will switch some of mine over when I get a chance.
|
|
|
Also guys get the message out to friends who are also miners. With summer in the Northern Hemisphere - I've got MNR going on most of my computers and they are runnning pretty cool! The diff is still relatively low so well worth mining. The more people we have the more secure the network is.
|
|
|
Guys don't sell your MNR too cheap. Remember block rewards are low for a reason - this is a scarce coin that is designed not to flood the market but grow in value. Once the network hashrate is sky high you will regret it:)
|
|
|
Guys we all go screwed. I'm lucky I sold most of my coins at the beginning of the last dump but the coins i have left are worthless. It's best to go for a coin that has an honest developer. At the moment I have high hopes for Mjollnircoin but the problem is honest developers aren't the best at marketing or getting noticed. I suppose it's always a gamble in crypto.
All we need is a hero will save SC Nothing can save it. It's over and anyone who thinks there is a way back is in denial. There are a shitload of real coins with real developers that aren't doing well. Why would anyone invest in a revived scam versus a genuine coin?
|
|
|
Already there is one positive example of code corrections and revival of the coin after stopping trading on Mintpal and Cryptsy. I'm talking about Asiacoin and its strong community.
Really? Asiacoin - REVIVAL - you must be on some serious drugs.
|
|
|
Guys we all go screwed. I'm lucky I sold most of my coins at the beginning of the last dump but the coins i have left are worthless. It's best to go for a coin that has an honest developer. At the moment I have high hopes for Mjollnircoin but the problem is honest developers aren't the best at marketing or getting noticed. I suppose it's always a gamble in crypto.
|
|
|
Hey people! Can please help me out on this one: trying to start 1Gh cgminer and getting this:
"...OCL522C.tmp.cl", line 1467: error: can't enable all OpenCL extensions or unrecognized OpenCL extension #pragma OPENCL EXTENSION cl_amd_media_ops2 : enable
What is wrong here? Can't find anything sensible on the net about this...
Probably cgminer wrongly detects one of your cards as AMD while it is not: disable mining on that card by using -d switch. This, or you have a really, really old Catalyst version installed, like from 2011. All AMD cards, running driver 13.1 on Win7. Have you tried reinstalling your drivers and/cgminer. See if you can find an updated version - of both might help.
|
|
|
I've seen your coin on xhash for some time now. Glad to see the thread is still active.
Quietly hashing from overseas...
Adrian is in talks right now with Bittrex.
|
|
|
Whatever the truth - this coin has nothing over a multitude of other coins which have much lower valuations. It rose because of hype and novelty and has now come crashing down because there is nothing to support it's value. All this weak hands stuff is just bullshit. People got the crypto equivalent of gold fever and bought lots of it. The price had to crash at some point because there is not (yet at least) the substance to back up that kind of price. A few days ago it was Cloakcoin and Cryptocoin a little before that. In a few days probably another coin will do the same. It's the same pattern. As for whether this fall was triggered by the dev being a scammer and dumping a premine remains to be seen. If it's not a scam it can come back but not at the same rate (which is unsustainable) - it all depends on how the coin develops. I've watched these same meteoric rises and falls for the last several months starting with one of my first coins, Vertcoin, I watched it go from less than a dollar to $14 in one day (before quickly following back to less than ten and then eventually less than a dollar again). I was left bagholding that coin for several months before I learnt my lesson and gave up on it ever coming back to the same level. I should just have sold it when it rose up. You never know what's going to happen in crypto but one thing is certain - these sudden overnight rises are fake and ultimately bad for any coin because they can severely slow down genuine growth - just look what happened with Vericoin. It's also quite difficult to make money from them. If you hold a decent amount of the coin then you risk stalling or even reversing a rising price if you sell too quickly. If you hold on you risk ending up with shrinking value. If you sell too early then you miss out on potentially earning a lot more. Seems any way you proceed you lose somehow. Crypto is tough.
|
|
|
I don't think it necessarily means the pools are colluding to protect their profits. A lot of this may stem from a fundamental misunderstanding of the purpose of Minerals and perhaps a knee-jerk response based on partial information which got out of hand. This is understandable in light of the recent catalogue of crypto scam coins. A lot of people had questions about the Minerals formula. The issue is not just about fair mining but about the centralisation of mining that is encouraged by the way it was launched. This makes it easier for scammers to take advantage of people. That doesn't mean it is is or was a scam though. I think a lot of people are still undecided for now. So far the developer seems above board and legit. I honestly think that exchanges (and earlier pools) could foresee that this would be a big hit and if it turned out to be a scam the backlash and fallout against them would immense. They therefore took the stance of assuming it was a scam rather than take the risk. They were not protecting profits by not participating, if anything they were losing out on easy money. However the fear of being tricked over-ruled their logic in this regard. Again I don't think the developer did anything wrong and I don't think the concerns of exchanges or pools were wrong either. The crypto world has become a lot more cynical and paranoid and everyone is afraid of being scammed. It is sad that Minerals got caught up in this but I believe it will still succeed. It would be a lot better for the community if people just try to see things from both sides. Most exchanges and pools are not run by mega-bucked gazillionaires who don't care about the community.
|
|
|
Sorry you left it too late. Just making vague comments about good news was too much like stalling tactics. It's dead now.
|
|
|
Sold now to spend on real coins that don't just make vague promises without delivering. This is SO over.
|
|
|
I'm also giving three votes every hour at Comkort.com (beautiful interface on this exchange BTW): https://comkort.com/vote
|
|
|
This is awesome! speaking of which... I sponsored Fitch! Me too! Brilliant idea:)
|
|
|
GBC submitted to coinwarz to be included in their voting system - another tab to pin next to the other voting pages ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
What innovations does this coin have? If any, I may invest.
None. Just a name change. The coins supply is 11 million which is less than some.
|
|
|
Well I'm out of GRK now and pleased about it. There just isn't anyone viable behind this coin and there is nothing to encourage demand.
|
|
|
|