I took back my post since someone said they we're attacking the network and not gaining >51% of the mining rate network.
Anyway millions of petahashes is rediculous.

Since US companies and wallstreet are investing in Bitcoin would a chinese attack on bitcoin protocol be an act of war against the US?

That's what you get when you SODL when you should have HODL.

Yes. I will explain:

adamstgBit said: what will they think of next
I noted that the next thing could be girl panties with HODL on it.
My sad smiley attempted to tell people that when tearing of a womens pants in a sex driven frenzy and then finding HODL on her panties would be a sad thing.

It was not a reference to my sex-life. My sex-life is fine got me some <2hours ago  

Any more questions?

Just like honey badger .... bitcoin don't give a fuck

Wilhelm
DVC: 16kSvnEeqJqJGvAaJvN3Ee7jLHo8hxU5uA
https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/63863/page/last#post-143832

P.S. See my profile footer

thank you very much!!

DSfQAM9DG3XFCvDCjbtnc9v1imwkoWcgux

MHXPLmj6jWT9bwKcfWWEs4HJbk6KEBMHJ9

Thank you!!!

The winners choice .... because gaming for me isn't casino

First of all I laughed my ass off, good read

Starting an online casino is not a parody on a parody so your argument is void. If you made a few pics or a funny program like Southpark that's a different ballgame.
You use images that depict a cartoonish version Kanye West in your casino and thus associating him with your practice. If you had a different logo that would make your case much stronger.
You are actively targeting gamblers and associating it to a parody of Kanye West and thus associating gambling with Kanye West.

Also you're fucking with lawyers who have way more money to burn. Southpark probably has a very good lawyer team too. You probably don't

In my opinion you're cutting it very,very,very close. Let's us know what happens it's an interesting case.

P.S. I couldn't even name one song of Kanye West

Girls panties with HODL on it 

Maybe it's not a manipulation but a side effect.
Quite some hacks have been done on bitcoin companies. Maybe the hackers dumped the BTC for LTC or fiat. They didn't care about the market they just wanted to convert their hacked BTC.
The effect is a crappy timed sloppy trade with big volume.

Game creators can build in a fee and grab a percentage of all stuff bought ingame and implement deposit and withdrawl fees.
I can see this happening .... even in game gambling can then be more "realistic".
Is this ethical ... good question

Very nice chart I can see this being quite right. It shows the negative and positive possibilities too.
It's not logarithmic so that would make it only work very short term.

What did you use as your origin point?

Only a few dollars off but pretty accurate

Interpolating that interpretation, $18.7 to $1100 makes their current prediction $64.7k.
(it's like interpreting women )

$64.7k is a bit high but within the realm of possibility

Don't you need volume for that to happen? I don't see any volume in the chart.

... another member talking his book ....

They find the following to be proof.... 


We can only assume they are informing about accepting it. Either some management must approve the idea or some btc merchant service must prove they can handle the load.
Anyhow there is no real news...

Use support and resistance levels from the past 

The UNHODL effect

oda atleast your avatar has a unicorn in it to accentuate the fact that you're right

But I agree with arepo that we do not know. The world is a chaotic system so a butterfly in Peru could have played a major part in the rally.

Many factors can influence the price but I stongly believe that no factor alone is responsible for a price movement.
 - A whale could have caused it by pumping or dumping.
 - News spreads and people react.
 - The way people react can have a cascading effect. (many quick big sell order makes people scared and start mirroring)
 - People that already wanted out or in.
 - Calculated traders trading in the trends
 - Trading bots reacting in the same frequency using the same parameters.
 - Hacker dumping coins they stole and buying other coins
 - etc.

We simply do not know.
The problem is that people feel the need to explain the world, but as long as you can't test it repeatedly in a lab you will never know if any of the factors have a real influence.
Even if we repeat test it, it is not certain. Many brilliant scientists have been proven wrong after more factors have been factored into the equation.

Note: Technical analysis is an empyrical tool. You do not exactly know what you are measuring. You only know that it has some correlation and you make more money than that you lose (hopefully).

But we all like trolling