Not sure cos on mobile but ;sort=starter;desc seems to do the trick ...
That just makes it sort descending. The issue is still happening. |
|
|
|
Might not be duplicates... unless you see them on the same page.
I just assume the order is mixed when you change the page.
Let's assume your posts are from the middle on page 10 to end of page 15. Those threads might get shuffled while changing pages and some threads can be seen again on some other pages. Not certain but seems likely that this is the "bug" here.
Yes, that's what it looks like and I think the biggest issue here is that you can't work around it from the user interface. For example if you could specify multiple "sort" columns in the URL, like ';sort=replies,first_post', that would be a clunky but possible workaround. But I don't think you can do that, at least none of the "hacks" I tried seem to be working and SMF source code seems to imply that only the following options are allowed: // Default sort methods.
$sort_methods = array(
'subject' => 'mf.subject',
'starter' => 'IFNULL(memf.realName, mf.posterName)',
'last_poster' => 'IFNULL(meml.realName, ml.posterName)',
'replies' => 't.numReplies',
'views' => 't.numViews',
'first_post' => 't.ID_TOPIC',
'last_post' => 't.ID_LAST_MSG'
);
|
|
|
|
Even if you select sorting and press F5, the location of the topics will always change. This is not sorting, this is pure randomness.
It's not really random, it's probably whatever the database (MySQL?) does when you don't specify a sort order. I'm guessing that when you sort by a column, it generates a SQL query that has only that column in the "order by" clause and no fallback sort that would be used in case there are multiple records with the same column value (e.g. multiple threads with 0 replies). Something like this: select thread_id, thread_title, ...
from threads
order by replies
Technically not exactly a bug as it's doing what you want it to do (since you're asking it to sort by replies), but surely inconvenient (since you can't specify additional sort order even if you wanted). A workaround in the code should be simple, just add e.g. thread id as the last part of the "order by", so that the resulting order is always defined the same way. Like this: select thread_id, thread_title, ...
from threads
order by replies, thread_id
Not sure what the problem is because the sorting by "Replies" works for me, without some duplicates here and there. If I sort by Replies I get the first 31 pages with 0 replies and then 1 reply starts from page 32  And also the sort by "Started by" works as advertised. It orders by OP. It is true that the multiple threads opened by the same user are not sorted, but it is to be expected because there is no other keyword except ";sort=replies". I couldn't reproduce the issue with replies, but it did happen with "started by" - the ETC pool thread id 1651959 appeared on page 6 and page 7, then after a few refreshes disappeared from both, then appeared only on page 6, etc (pun not intended). |
|
|
|
Nice! At least all that flare gas burning isn't for nothing. Does this mean Bitcoin becomes the new petro-dollar?
That would be interesting. Stick a bunch of gas powered generators on top and mine with the generated power. If generating electricity this way is profitable for mining, it stands to reason that it would be even more profitable to use the generated electricity for pretty much anything else. Mining is barely profitable even with cheapest power and requires huge investments and complicated maintenance. |
|
|
|
|
If you're trying to compete with BADecker in how many stupid threads you can create, I gotta warn you: you can't win. He's got years of experience and you're just a blowhard newbie.
|
|
|
|
That's exactly correct suchmoon.. even though you were coming off as a bit of a smartass...
Sigh... my bad... I was aiming for a full-on smartass obnoxious troll  Anyway, I'm very skeptical of TA in general and I can't see any plausible use for trailing indicators in particular. I'm either hodling or not, I don't need colorful drawings to tell me that not selling at 38k (or whatever the 4h golden cross is at) was a good choice, a week after it happened. Actually I'm pretty sure I posted about it in real time using no charts, just my gut feeling and wishful thinking, so if that doesn't make me a smartass I don't know what would. |
|
|
|
~image
I've heard of the death cross before, but what's a golden cross? Sounds yummy It's the opposite of a death cross, i.e. shorter MA crossing longer MA upwards. It's a bit of a stretch to use it with a 4h chart but this is Bitcoin, we can do whatever we want, as long as we can say that the number will go up. |
|
|
|
42 again, well done buddy (some positive reinforcement to balance out everyone blaming and yelling at you). |
|
|
|
How nice all the vaccine haters could pose together for a group photo.  Well, if they're just little babies afraid of needles then maybe we shouldn't make fun of them. |
|
|
|
I know whoever created this chart means well, but honestly the idea of giving up the last shred of privacy in exchange for a 6 inch shiny screen warming your gonads is not something that Bitcoin should follow. It should not go past Nokia 3210. |
|
|
|
|
Poor Bitcoin. Like an indolent teenager with clueless parents trying all sorts of tricks, including reverse psychology.
|
|
|
|
Bearish: leveraged long accounts closing positions on this rally and taking collaterals and profit out of exchanges, not to reinstate those anytime soon.
I doubt it. There is no margin trading on Coinbase for example, and it's at the top of your list. Cheap dip coins are going to cold wallets. |
|
|
|
If you are still upset about me creating a new account and preferring to use this one over the other, I can't really help you. Just so you know, barking is associated with a dog and if you are comparing me talking to barking, it's insulting. Not that it bothers me one bit, just telling.
It's an idiom. Again, it's about an action and not about you being a dog. I'm starting to sense a trend here despite your repeated claims of how thick your skin is. I would be more glad to see CB come out clean instead. Asking questions and drawing comparisons doesn't mean I wish bad for someone. Please don't be upset if CB comes out clean because although I will share some data, I really hope and believe CB will come out clean.
I'd be disappointed in your drama for nothing, not because CB is "clean", whatever that means. CB is an upstanding member of the community. |
|
|
|
If you feel insulting me
I'm commenting on your actions, not your person. I thought we already settled that in the discussion about lying and sockpuppeting. Now that one part of the story is clear, I am moving to the other one.
If it's anything short of CB selling merits or meriting sockpuppets, I'll be very disappointed, given the dramatic setup and the cliffhanger. |
|
|
|
I'll quote just the name, that's really all you need to realize how cuckoo the user is, but if want to know the date of the end of the world - feel free to click the link: Best Regard,
The Savior Messiah Mahdi Maitreya Kalki Christ Buddha
|
|
|
|
43 words per minute? Were you typing it into a text reader?
Touché. But I did read it like 3 times, trying to understand if marcus was serious or trolling. I still don't know. Do you (suchmoon) believe that we are that gullible in this here thread?
No, not at all. It's not like we believe that hats and memes can move the price of a trillion dollar asset or anything silly like that. |
|
|
|
~
 |
|
|
|
Thanks. But from what I know CB is not short on merits and there is a group they are rotating merits except CB who spends outside too. I will post more details very soon.
That was just an example of how merits can be sent quickly, even far quicker than the examples in the OP. As usual, you're barking up the wrong tree and totally misinterpreting something mundane. If you have other "details" as to how this is abuse/misuse - that's what you should have started with, but "very soon" indicates that you're likely just trying to make shit up as you go to justify your preconceived conclusion. Not cool. |
|
|
|
Let's try to push this over 42...  Edit: ... and done, in about 20 minutes. Thanks Supergirl. Much appreciated. |
|
|
|
You can't account for unaccounted cases because they are unaccounted cases which nobody will hear about.
Yep, makes total sense - you sound exactly like a person who would never read a book because you can't read an unread book. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
