The CDC doesn't create the data. It collects data from states. If there was any significant discrepancy in the way you're suggesting, it would be very obvious.

Yes, I know your next argument (being very generous here) would be "how do we know that" states and funeral homes and doctors aren't all in on the conspiracy.

Wait, I had a point?

Well, if I did it's that shitcoiners are quite capable at shitcoining, which is mostly various elaborate and deceptive ways of separating wannabe shitcoiners from their hard earned bitcoins and fiat.

There might have been some of that but it wouldn't match the COVID-19 numbers and waves if there was a significant increase of deaths elsewhere.

At any rate, mortality data is publicly available (e.g. on the CDC site) so you should be able to find such anomalies if they exist.

Again, the numbers couldn't be "boosted" without creating a mismatch with excess deaths, and there is no such mismatch so your hypothesis here is fundamentally incorrect.


LOL indeed - there were no COVID vaccines in 2020. And I doubt that "suicides, overdoses, homicides, etc" were reported as COVID-19 comorbidities to any significant extent but feel free to prove otherwise.

No, not "like". Comorbidities don't make the numbers false. For example among some types of cancer, deaths come with 80%+ comorbidities. That doesn't mean cancer deaths are overstated. People die with otherwise manageable chronic conditions because cancer (or COVID-19) kills then, not because those comorbidities suddenly for no reason whatsover kill them. Same when people die of conditions caused by cancer (or by COVID-19, such as pneumonia). It's still cancer (or COVID-19) that killed them.

There is always a margin of error but it's nowhere near 18000 vs 9 and it may go both ways, so not "like" at all.

Again, take a look at the excess deaths and try to explain that away without resorting to fallacies. Number of excess deaths in 2020 in the US was actually higher than the official COVID-19 death count so if anything the COVID-19 numbers were possibly under-reported.

It's not all or nothing. There are uses for the data but not for determining the number of deaths caused by the vaccines. The disclaimer quite clearly describes the data being used by CDC as signals for further investigation.


Being not fit for a certain purpose doesn't make it true or false. It's just not fit for a certain purpose. However claiming or implying that VAERS shows 18,000 deaths caused by the vaccines is false, because VAERS doesn't and can't show such a thing.


Except it has been:


That's out of ~12000 (not 18000) reported to VAERS.

You forgot to supply the data or even a screenshot from twitbook.

It's almost as if distancing and masks may slow the spread of some infections.

And if you had bothered to pay attention, you would have seen that the projected number of deaths has seasonal spikes including the flu from previous years, and excess deaths are above that. I know that you can't verbalize your own statements so perhaps you meant to say that there is no COVID but there is a very bad strain of flu going around?

These numbers are meaningless. Do yourself a favor, find numbers per capita by vaccination status, better yet if it includes age group as well.

I wouldn't be so harsh on them. Given the massive incentives for them to get "hacked", some of them can probably code well enough to implement subtle bug-shaped backdoors.

Excess death numbers matched or exceeded reported COVID-19 deaths throughout 2020-2021, and also matched the spikes. This means that if COVID-19 numbers were inflated, these people still died of something that they wouldn't have died of otherwise... so is there another pandemic that we don't know about?

Not for me to judge what's offensive to someone else, but I always found the Native American themed team names weird to the point of cringy among other teams named after animals or abstract concepts. Never sure if the idea was to imply that "Indian" is a type of animal or a made up thing.

Keeping with the animal theme, Kansas City Cocks should be the next NFL name change.


https://www.mlb.com/news/cleveland-indians-change-name-to-guardians

I liked "Football Team" better. "Commanders" being losers will be cringy.

Let's make it like this:



... for QB's only, and when their flags are pulled they're "dead" - can't play until the end of the game. That should spice things up.

Noise suppression stuff (also mostly repurposed from weed growing equipment) was one of the first things to get installed along with cooling. The sound didn't completely go away but turned into sort of a mellow white noise that didn't travel far.

Having said that, noise was a significant factor in choosing mining equipment. It's much harder to solve than e.g. heat or power, since it doesn't neatly follow ducts and wires. Sadly Bitcoin ASICs these days are nearly impossible to use at home, even underclocked.

Technically true, at least on this forum. 3rd example is very sketchy though. I can't think of any good reason to do this. Since the person doing this is would be most likely already aware of how plagiarism is treated on this forum, they should just put in a proper link/quote and not run the risk of moderators misinterpreting it. For example, what if the link is dead and moderator doesn't realize it was supposed to be a link to the source of the text and not some random link about the underlined word?

And for a casual observer who doesn't want to click links it's not really obvious that it's a source link for the entire following paragraph (or multiple paragraphs? where does it end?), therefore the user who posted such a link may be incorrectly assumed to be the author of the text by merit senders etc... not entirely ethical I think. So yeah maybe I can think of a (bad) reason to do this - merit whoring.

Put it in quote tags and remove all doubt.

The fact that moderators are extremely lenient in such cases doesn't make it a good or even acceptable practice.

Most of the cooling equipment (fans/vents/ducts/etc) I bought for my mining farm was being marketed for grow tents. I bet my garage would light up on a drone infrared camera like a damn volcano. My electric bill was probably higher than the rest of the street combined. I'm quite surprised no fuzz came knocking during all those years.

Eventually I decided to put that excess heat to good use (tomatoes and strawberries and stuff). So I bought grow lights and the whole thing was glowing pink-purple. Still nothing.

It clearly says "VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness". Which is directly contradicting what all those muppets using VAERS data are doing - assuming that VAERS data is showing the number of deaths caused by the vaccines. It's not.
 

No, it doesn't say that the data "may or may not be valid" (for determining the number of adverse events caused by vaccines). It clearly says that the data is not valid for that purpose - "cannot be used", doesn't get any more definitive than that.

We're at peak cancel culture apparently. A business deal falls apart - yep, that's because people just want you cancelled for no reason whatsoever, definitely not because your sleazy useless "service" is not wanted or needed. What a bunch of petulant children.

They should implement this shit on the web3nftdefimetamask stuff if they haven't done so yet. It will be welcomed with open arms and no pesky privacy concerns.