Bitcoin Forum
July 15, 2024, 10:29:48 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 190 »
281  Economy / Economics / Re: Energy Crisis 2.0 in the New World Order era on: February 07, 2024, 03:59:25 AM
Humanity, if desired, is able to overcome any energy crisis and there are many ways to produce cheap and environmentally friendly energy.

In Ukraine, for example, an ordinary schoolboy proposed a project called “Generating electricity from the atmosphere.” The inventor proposes to extract electricity from the air, or more precisely from the atmosphere using an artificial ionized cloud due to the strong electric field that will be emitted by the ionizing tower. Samuel's invention involves the extraction of not only electricity, but also water. The estimated cost of one kilowatt of energy in this case will cost approximately one cent.
At the Olympics of Geniuses, held in Oswego (New York, USA), he won bronze among two thousand young inventors from all over the world.
And how many more similar inventions can be proposed in our time of rapid development of science and technology.

Source:
https://building-tech.org/%D0%AD%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B8%D1%8F/ukraynskyy-shkolnyk-sozdal-ustanovku-dlya-poluchenyya -elektroenergyy-yz-atmosferi---1-kylovatt-za-3-kopeyky
282  Economy / Economics / Re: The impact of war on global economy. on: February 06, 2024, 04:22:59 AM
We all know
Quote from: Sun Tsu
All warfare is based on deception.

Ukrain did not reconquer and surely it is a struggle.
I wonder how many of the foreign helpers are still alive? Any input on that? 

If you mean how many foreign citizens are participating in the war on the side of Ukraine, then it is known that after the full-scale invasion of the Russian army into Ukraine in February 2022, about 20 thousand citizens from 55 countries joined the International Legion under the Ukrainian Armed Forces at the beginning of this war. How many foreigners are still fighting in Ukraine a year later is a question to which hardly anyone today can give a definite answer. Some experts put the figure at 3 thousand people, others - even less. This is due to the fact that when such volunteers got to the front, and the situation there was very different from what they had seen before, it brought more problems than good. Since then, the Ukrainian authorities have tightened the rules for admitting foreigners.

In general, foreign fighters appeared in Ukraine long before the start of full-scale Russian aggression. Some people from neighboring countries joined the fight against pro-Russian separatists at the beginning of the war in Donbass in 2014. Among them were many Georgians who formed the Georgian National Legion. Now this is the largest foreign unit in the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

In 2014, Belarusians also appeared in Donbass. Now two units are fighting for Ukraine at once - the Pagonya regiment and the Kastus Kalinovsky regiment. The commander of the Kalinovsky regiment says that without a free Ukraine there will be no free Belarus - from the Lukashenko regime.

Another large international structure is the “Freedom of Russia” legion, which was initially formed by officers and soldiers of the Russian army who went over to the side of Ukraine. According to the command, the number of this unit is constantly growing.

Other foreign volunteer units within the Armed Forces of Ukraine are the battalions named after Khamzat Gelayev, Dzhokhar Dudayev, Sheikh Mansur and the Ministry of Defense of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria (formed by anti-Putin and anti-Kadyrov Chechens), the Normandy Brigade (consisting of Canadian retired military personnel), the Canadian-Ukrainian battalion (uniting representatives of the Ukrainian diaspora in Canada) and a number of others.

https://ru.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8 %D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0 %BE%D0%BD_%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB %D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%8B_%D0%A3%D0 %BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8B

https://www.golosameriki.com/a/ukraine-army-foreigners/6973501.html
283  Economy / Economics / Re: The Current World Financial System Is Rule Based Order, The New One Must Not on: February 05, 2024, 09:47:51 AM
A person in this world can survive only in a society of his own kind, and a society can exist only when certain rules of conduct for members of this society are established in it. This applies to any area of human activity, including financial. It is foolish to even think that there will come a time when there will be no rules of conduct. Even in the animal world, such rules of behavior were, are and will always be.
284  Economy / Economics / Re: The impact of war on global economy. on: February 05, 2024, 08:19:47 AM
Oil is the main key to a country. If war occurs, those who have a lot of oil resources and supplies will be in power and can control the market.
I think the country's economy will improve because of that, maybe it will affect other sectors but in that area they are superior.
If we apply your statements to the Russian war that it unleashed on the territory of Ukraine, then the owners of oil companies in Russia should now have large profits. But this is far from what happens in reality.

Firstly, international sanctions have been imposed on the Russian oil and gas industry, which limit both the volume of sales of oil and its refined products and the price at which they are sold. As a result, oil and gas production in Russia is declining.

Secondly, this war is entering its logical next stage, when dozens of Ukrainian drones periodically launch attacks on oil refineries and oil depots already on Russian territory. Because of this, the size of losses increases greatly. It is unlikely that Russia's war in this case will improve its economy. Rather, on the contrary, the war and the subsequent international isolation will set Russia back in economic development for many decades.

Oh, colonel, that's huge progress, you finally found courage to admit that AFU is bombing Russian civilian targets. They do attack, but what damage do they do? Are they able to reach and hit those targets?

Such attacks can't affect the outcome of this war. Ukraine keeps losing it's people, losing it's territory. Russia is winning.

Ukraine continues to destroy military installations on Russian territory, and has also begun to destroy dual-use facilities that contribute to the increase in Russian military power in its quest to conquer Ukraine.

Oil refineries and fuel tanks on Russian territory are legitimate targets for Ukraine, since oil is the export of oil - the main source of revenue for the Russian budget, covering the costs of a full-scale war in Ukraine. In addition, it is fuel for Russian military equipment. In my post, I wrote that the war is entering another stage, the stage of its transfer to Russian territory. Previously, Ukraine had limited opportunities to do this, since the allies did not allow the allies to attack the territory of the Russian Federation with the weapons provided, and there were very few of their own in Ukraine. This year, Ukraine is going to produce at least a million drones; mass serial production of high-precision long-range missiles that will reach both Moscow and the Urals is being established.

Since the beginning of 2024 alone, Ukrainian drones have attacked seven oil refineries in the Russian Federation. Thus, on January 9, in the Russian city of Orel, drones attacked a fuel and energy complex.

On the night of January 18, Ukrainian drones attacked the St. Petersburg oil terminal.

On January 19, the oil depot in the city of Klintsy, Bryansk region, was unlucky. Oil tanks at the facility caught fire.
On January 20, loud explosions were heard again at the same tank farm. The oil depot burned for two days in a row.

On the night of January 21, the Novatek fuel plant closed due to a drone attack on the sea terminal in Ust-Luga, Leningrad Region. This plant processed fuel for the Russian Armed Forces. After the SBU attack, all tankers located at the terminal moved far out to sea.

After the fire on January 25, the largest oil refinery in Tuapse, a city in the Krasnodar Territory and a major port on the Black Sea coast, was paralyzed due to a strike by Ukrainian drones. This plant annually processes up to 9 million tons of raw materials and is among the top 10 largest in the Russian Federation.

On the night of February 3, the Lukoil oil refinery in the Volgograd region was attacked. The drone hit the primary oil refining plant producing ELOU-AVT-5 fuel.

Based on the results of the first month of 2024, Russian oil companies reduced gasoline exports abroad by 37%. Sales of diesel fuel, the largest export of petroleum products, fell 23%. The Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation explained that the reduction in exports was a consequence of “unscheduled repairs” at oil refineries and the need to supply the domestic market. In the future, such “unscheduled repairs” should become more frequent and scaled up. Russia wanted war, it will get it.
285  Economy / Economics / Re: The impact of war on global economy. on: February 04, 2024, 04:14:37 PM
Oil is the main key to a country. If war occurs, those who have a lot of oil resources and supplies will be in power and can control the market.
I think the country's economy will improve because of that, maybe it will affect other sectors but in that area they are superior.
If we apply your statements to the Russian war that it unleashed on the territory of Ukraine, then the owners of oil companies in Russia should now have large profits. But this is far from what happens in reality.

Firstly, international sanctions have been imposed on the Russian oil and gas industry, which limit both the volume of sales of oil and its refined products and the price at which they are sold. As a result, oil and gas production in Russia is declining.

Secondly, this war is entering its logical next stage, when dozens of Ukrainian drones periodically launch attacks on oil refineries and oil depots already on Russian territory. Because of this, the size of losses increases greatly. It is unlikely that Russia's war in this case will improve its economy. Rather, on the contrary, the war and the subsequent international isolation will set Russia back in economic development for many decades.
286  Economy / Economics / Re: No petrol/diesel car sales by 2035/ Reality or dream? on: February 04, 2024, 07:27:35 AM

What you say is the current reality. The main reason why electric vehicles still cannot be used en masse is that the price is still too high to be able to create these electric-based vehicles. must be necessary to provide space for recharging and repairs, which, of course, is currently limited, so there are still many who don't want to use it because there are limitations that can occur with these vehicles. So it's not surprising that there are still many countries that don't want to fully use electricity-based transportation as a mass vehicle for many people. But it is true that one day everyone will inevitably have to accept the fact that it must be used because of limited petroleum, which continues to run low, so there must be a replacement to avoid the crisis that will occur.
Electric cars appeared on the world market relatively recently. Therefore, it is quite natural that their price is still quite high. But technology does not stand still. Quite often there are reports of the invention of more efficient batteries, which will significantly reduce the cost and operating costs of using electric cars.

This is approximately the same as what happens with the introduction of alternative energy sources. It has already been calculated that over the past ten years, costs for solar panels have decreased by 90 percent, and for wind generators by 70 percent.
It is quite expected that in the not very distant future, electric cars will be much more economically profitable to use than gasoline and diesel ones.
287  Economy / Economics / Re: 2024 & Prediction of World War III - Effect on Cryptocurrencies on: February 04, 2024, 04:48:38 AM
there is no trigger for world war 3. because world wars occur in many regions. not just in one zone, for example Europe, but in many regions and involving many countries, for example world war II.
Currently there are only wars in small areas, for example in Palestine or in Ukraine. even then there are only a few involved. world war can occur if there is a war between the western bloc of the USA and the eastern block of the Soviet Union involving members of the countries that are included in the block.
It's not even a matter of the number of hotbeds of military conflict, although recently their number has been inexorably increasing. The current formation of two blocs of states, which in the end may well start a large-scale war among themselves, poses a very great danger. On the one hand are Russia, Iran, North Korea and, apparently, China, and on the other hand are the USA, Canada, Japan, South Korea and European countries along with the UK. The confrontation between these blocs of states is changing, but on the whole it is growing.

Russia is now the catalyst for military tension, because it is bogged down in the war against Ukraine, does not have the opportunity to get out of it with dignity even if the Kremlin wishes, and therefore creates military conflicts and incites other states to do so, so that the United States and its allies provide more assistance to other states , not Ukraine. The threat of World War III in this case is great, but it does not necessarily escalate into a world war.
288  Economy / Economics / Re: Venezuela vs Guyana. A new problem in the oil market ? on: February 03, 2024, 03:24:13 PM
. In the end, the Guyanese public will lose out.

Not necessarily as in some cases OIL wealth translates into more than rich elites.

Most of the time, yes you are right. The US is particularly shortsighted and earns in the form of Immigration the fruits of that behavior. Still, it could work out well. I doubt the People of Guyana would like to live under Venezuelan rule.
On December 14, 2023, negotiations between Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and Guyanese President Irfaan Ali took place on the issue of belonging to Guayana-Esequiba. The negotiations took place on the territory of the neutral state of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. The parties agreed to create a commission to resolve the issue, which will include the foreign ministers and technical specialists of the two states and will submit a report to Caracas and Georgetown within the next three months, after which the leaders of both states will hold another negotiations in Brazil. The parties also agreed that they would not use force against each other, and also refrain from escalating the conflict.

Since then, there has been virtually no information on the Internet about further developments regarding the territorial conflict between these countries. Let's hope that the flames of war do not flare up there.
289  Economy / Economics / Re: Carbon markets and climate change mitigation, Are we in the right direction? on: February 03, 2024, 09:56:33 AM

I thought before now that there has been a clamor by international organizations and NGO's for countries to try and decarbonate themselves, which have led to the production of non-emitting carbon cars and engines and a great discouragement of usage of the fossil fuel, I hear everyday of green energy and the need to encourage green energy and stop in total the usage  of combustion engines.

I'm surprised to know that carbon is now being turned to a commodity that is being traded, however if there's a strong market for carbon and people are weighing in to get the product, then I don't see the carbon emission stopping anytime soon.

Surely the established system of carbon allowances with the ability to trade unused allowances is wrong. Caps on carbon emissions are necessary. But if a country has made some progress in reducing such environmentally harmful emissions, it should be incentivized in other ways, rather than being presented with the opportunity to sell its right to emit a certain amount of carbon. In addition, the volume of such permitted emissions must be reduced every year, thus stimulating countries to use alternative energy sources and other economical production methods.
290  Economy / Economics / Re: How do you consider the prospects of global economy in 2024? on: February 03, 2024, 04:49:54 AM

Did they never ask, or did NATO and its allies refuse requests to send troops? Because if they do so they will have to confront Russia directly. This is something even the US does not want, let alone NATO countries that are still completely dependent on the US.

The war is still going on and there is no end, we should wait until the war ends to know who is the winner and who is the loser. Stop spreading fake news about Russia weakening and Ukraine rising...I heard this a year ago and so far, I have not seen any significant achievements from Ukraine and NATO in the war with Russia.

The fact that Ukraine has been holding back the onslaught of such a “superpower” as the Russian Federation, which has the “second army of the world” for two years, is its great military achievement. Russia has now sent an army of half a million to Ukraine and is attacking it with all possible types of weapons (except nuclear), but the front is practically standing still. Moreover, stocks of artillery, tanks and armored vehicles, as well as their shells and missiles, are being depleted at a rapid pace. Another year of such intense fighting and Russia will have nothing to fight with. Despite the fact that Russia has transferred its economy to a war footing and maximally increased the production of weapons, almost everything from the assembly line is sent directly to the front. But this turns out to be not enough. Because of this, Russia begged a million shells from North Korea, has been supplying drones from Iran and China for a long time, and is violating its previously signed contracts for the supply of its weapons to other countries.

But a very interesting situation is now happening with the Russian Black Sea Fleet, which Ukraine regularly sinks with its own missiles and drones. The last to be sunk on February 1 was the missile boat "Ivanovets", (56 meters long, 10 meters wide, with a displacement of 493 tons and a crew of 36 people), which was on patrol near the occupied Crimean Peninsula and its supersonic anti-ship missiles "Moskit" P-270 range 130 km. threatened the “grain corridor” from Ukrainian seaports. She was attacked and sunk by several Ukrainian-made surface drones and sunk after forty minutes of battle.

Ukraine, having practically no fleet of its own, is actively defeating the Russian fleet and has already driven it out of the north-west of the Black Sea, thereby resuming pre-war trade volumes on the international market, which Russia had previously blocked with its fleet and aircraft.

From the very beginning of Russia’s attack on it, Ukraine did not ask for military assistance from other countries, while at the same time NATO countries were really afraid of engaging in direct military action with their troops against Russia. But already now, at the level of individual politicians, some situations are being discussed in which NATO will be able to provide assistance with its soldiers on the territory of Ukraine in its war against Russia.
291  Economy / Economics / Re: How do you consider the prospects of global economy in 2024? on: February 02, 2024, 09:00:21 AM
✂✂✂✂
If NATO enters into a war with Russia, it will end very quickly, and not in Russia’s favor.

LOL.. NATO has so far failed to defend Ukrainian territory against Russian invasion, and you are saying that they will be able to do that in Russian territory? The biggest advantage with Russia is that they have a pool of several million reserve soldiers who are not afraid to go to the battle. The same can be said about Ukraine as well, but the numbers are in hundreds of thousands and definitely not in millions. None of the NATO nations have this advantage. If the UK or Germany lose a few thousand of their soldiers, then there will be a lot of hue and cry, and the governments will be toppled.
NATO does not protect and did not intend to protect the territory of Ukraine. NATO countries only provide assistance to Ukraine financially, materially, including with weapons, so that Ukraine has the opportunity to defend itself against an aggressor that is superior to it in all respects. But Ukraine never asked for help from Europe or NATO countries with troops.

Now the Russians have been attacking Ukraine for four months along the entire front, which exceeds a thousand kilometers, and every day they are losing about a thousand of their soldiers. To date, according to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense, Russian casualties amount to 387,060 people. According to the Russian Federation, which on January 29 was reported to Patrushev, and not to Putin, who may no longer be alive, Russia has irretrievable losses of 392,614 military personnel and 76,000 Wagner troops, and a total of 468,624 people. Yes, Russians are still going into battle and dying. But humanoid rams will also end someday. Many will then wonder why they should go to another country and die. Ukraine has never represented and does not pose a potential danger to Russia. Moreover, Ukraine voluntarily abandoned the third largest arsenal of nuclear weapons in the world and transferred it to Russia along with numerous aircraft and missiles that are now being used on Ukrainian territory.

These questions are already being asked, especially on the outskirts, which the Kremlin uses as expendable material much more. Then big problems will begin in Russia itself.

In addition, the current war in Ukraine shows the great advantage of high-precision weapons and the presence of a large number of soldiers ready to go into battle offsets this. It seems that in the future it will be precision weapons that will have a significant impact on the outcome of this and future wars. And in Russia there are already problems with this in front of the weapons of NATO countries and in connection with its international isolation, these problems will only deepen.
292  Economy / Economics / Re: Will the world soon become tired of the US dollar? on: February 02, 2024, 08:09:27 AM
Fiat will eventually fail. The problem is they're trying to use inflation to "inflate away" the debt, but actual markets can only deal with that for so long. They have the money printer; we don't.
Fiat, that is, the national money of each state, will exist as long as the states themselves exist. Fiat may change, experience difficulties, strengthen or fall in purchasing power, but it will exist.
If someone is tired of the dollar, they can always use national money. Nobody forces anyone to use the dollar. But if the majority chooses the dollar, it means it is more competitive compared to other world currencies.
293  Economy / Economics / Re: Food security in the world has been shaken by Russia's actions on: February 02, 2024, 04:39:47 AM
Ukraine has reached pre-war levels of agricultural sales from its Black Sea ports thanks to the successful destruction of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, which previously blocked Ukraine's international trade.

Thus, on February 1, 2024, naval drones of the Group 13 unit of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine destroyed the Russian missile boat Ivanovets in the Black Sea near a protected naval base on Lake Donuzlav in temporarily occupied Crimea.

The Project 12411 missile boat, with a displacement of 493 tons, with a crew of 40 people, is armed with supersonic anti-ship missiles "Moskit" P-270 with a range of 130 km, artillery of various calibers and an anti-aircraft missile system "Igla" or "Strela" has a length of 56 meters and a width of 10 meters and is designed to destroy enemy surface combat ships, landing and transport vehicles and ships at sea, bases, naval groups and their cover, as well as to cover their ships and vessels from surface and air threats.

Judging by the video, a group of at least five naval drones of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense attacked the missile boat one after another between 03:00-04:00 hours, apparently carrying out combat patrols and defense of the base. It should be noted that Russian intelligence did not notice the approach of the drones. The crew of the missile boat, judging by the video, noticed the approach of the drones visually only before the attack. The boat was on the move at the time of the attack and could maneuver. The missile boat can reach speeds of over 30 knots and simply get away from the drones. But “Ivanovets” did not have time to pick up speed.

The bow 76-mm anti-aircraft artillery mount AK-176, apparently, was in the stowed position, that is, it did not turn on and did not open fire. It is also not noticeable that the Russians had time to bring into battle two 30-mm AK-630 anti-aircraft artillery mounts, which are capable of delivering dense fire at moving targets at close ranges. But, obviously, machine gun fire was opened on the drones at close range by the duty watch. However, due to the small size, speed and maneuverability of the drones, the Russians were unable to hit them.

The well-chosen attack tactics of the Group 13 commanders is admirable - the first drone hit the stern of the boat from the starboard side in order to disable the propellers. The boat was unable to reach full speed, but did not stop. Then the second drone also hit the propellers, but from the left side. With these two blows, the boat was reliably deprived of movement and maneuver. After which the ship was successfully finished off. The third drone struck the middle of the hull under the Mosquito missile launchers and caused a large hole in the port side. But the results of the hit are visible from the camera of the fourth drone, which the operator directed directly into the crater from the third drone in the same place. The explosion from the fourth drone was fatal for the ship. As a result of the impact, four Mosquito missiles detonated, each with a total mass of four tons. After about 40 more minutes, the Russian ship sank and sank.

This is a fairly significant loss for the Russian Black Sea Fleet, given the presence of only three such Project 1241.1 boats in its composition.
https://news.liga.net/amp/politics/video/v-krymu-unichtozhen-rossiyskiy-raketnyy-kater-ivanovets-video-operatsii-ot-razvedki
294  Economy / Economics / Re: How do you consider the prospects of global economy in 2024? on: February 01, 2024, 08:44:52 AM

All wars end with a negotiation but for NATO (which is basically US dictating everything of it) to enter negotiation phase they have to have some advantage or have some wins on the battlefield. So far they have none otherwise they've been trying to get there. In fact the largely advertised "counter attack" months ago was supposed to be that "win" they needed. Ukraine was supposed to gain some ground defeating Russia in some fronts then they could start negotiating a truce and hope to stop the invasion by having some advantage over the Russians.

What can they do now though? What advantage does NATO have over Russia? The counter attack failed because Ukrainians listened to US/NATO and postponed it so much that Russia fortified its positions making any counter attack impossible.
And at the same time Russian advances is getting faster these days (some say at 2x the normal speed and it is winter). They can't negotiate anything with Russia at this point since they have nothing to bring to the negotiation table. Russia will demand a lot and the smallest one would be complete withdrawal of NATO from Russian borders. That term alone means they can't end the war with Russia regardless of who is the POTUS!

You say that as if NATO is directly at war with Russia. So far, Ukrainians are fighting with the Russians, defending themselves from attack, and NATO is only providing rather weak assistance to Ukraine. There are no NATO military units in Ukraine. At the time of the Ukrainian counteroffensive last summer, Ukraine did not have air superiority, and was also inferior in the number of artillery, armored vehicles and the number of troops. With such a balance of forces and means, one cannot count on the success of a counteroffensive. And then, out of fear, the Russians mined entire territories on the contact line, placing up to eight anti-tank and anti-personnel mines on every meter. Not a single army in the world would agree to launch an offensive in such a balance of power. But Ukrainians fight not with numbers, but with ingenuity and skill. As a result, almost the entire professional army of the Russian invasion of Ukraine was destroyed.

Now the occupiers have also been carrying out their offensive along the entire front since the beginning of October, that is, for almost four months. As a result, figuratively speaking, they captured several houses and one garbage dump, killing several tens of thousands of soldiers and several hundred armored vehicles.

If NATO enters into a war with Russia, it will end very quickly, and not in Russia’s favor.
295  Economy / Economics / Re: Energy crisis? What energy crisis? Oil dips to 3 months low despite OPEC cuts! on: February 01, 2024, 06:57:04 AM
Disastrous campaign is US getting their ass kicked in Afghanistan. 


Leaving a country is one thing, judging it as a defeat is another.
What has the US done to you?

US military forces withdrew from Afghanistan on August 31, 2021, ending NATO's Operations Freedom's Sentinel and Operation Resolute Support. The US and its allies invaded the country in 2001, following the September 11 attacks, resulting in the war becoming the longest armed conflict in US history. But the United States could not permanently keep its troops in Afghanistan. They helped create and train the Afghan armed forces and national police, and left them $85 billion worth of weapons. Among those left in Afghanistan were 200 planes and helicopters, as well as 600 thousand small arms. But the Americans could not fight for the Afghan national forces forever. And the fact that they offered very little resistance to the Taliban and quickly surrendered to them is not the fault of the United States.
https://m.gazeta.ru/army/2021/10/01/14042869.shtml

The United States and its allies have not yet transferred a single aircraft to Ukraine, several dozen tanks were transferred only recently, but the Ukrainians caused colossal military damage to the “second army of the world.”
296  Economy / Economics / Re: USA Economic and power status will go lower new Country will take over on: February 01, 2024, 04:42:31 AM

The Putin will join with france very soon...  And Germany will be also france biggest allies.

Will Putin join France very soon? This cannot be even theoretically. Putin, as the president of Russia, wants to have geopolitical influence on European countries, including France. He started the war against Ukraine ultimately for this purpose. Now France and Germany are very actively helping Ukraine defend itself from Russian aggression. Therefore, there can be no alliances between France and Russia in the near future, especially in the military sphere.

As for the United States, in my opinion, it is unlikely to lose its position as a world leader in the near future. And France is not a very strong rival for the United States in this regard.
297  Economy / Economics / Re: Tell me who own the current banking system? on: January 30, 2024, 07:25:46 PM
The banking system serves a specific state and belongs as a whole to this state. This system is directly administered by the government of that state. Also, most states allow the existence of banks on the basis of private and collective ownership. However, the work of these banks is also carried out on the basis of state laws and government instructions.
In addition, for efficient operation, banks of different states are united into a single network so that payments can be made between states.
Thus, banks can be owned directly by the state, or be privately or collectively owned.
298  Economy / Economics / Re: Russian Gas ban - A problem for Europe or suicide for Russia? on: January 30, 2024, 02:32:38 PM
It is now completely obvious that Russia’s plan to blackmail European countries by cutting off gas supplies to these countries has completely failed. In the end, Russia only made things worse for itself. Europe, although experiencing certain difficulties, is quite successfully switching to other gas suppliers. But for Russia it is much more difficult to find markets for gas in such large quantities.

Russia hoped to freeze Europe. But this winter there are big difficulties with heating only in Russia. Near Moscow and in other regions, entire settlements are freezing in their houses and apartments due to problems with housing and communal services. People warm themselves in the streets near the fire.

What plan? There was no plan. US and EU sanctioned Russia and refused to buy gas and oil and many other stuff. So what plan are you talking about?  But if you're unaware EU keep buying Russian oil and gas up to this day via proxies.

Russia hoped to freeze Europe? Really? They never sanctioned oil and gas exports, whereas US together with some NATO states blew up Nord Stream pipelines. So, who hopes to freeze Europe?  Grin  
Since April 2022, already on 57 pages, we have been discussing the topic of Russia’s ban on gas supplies to Europe and therefore, as can be seen from the title of the topic, we are discussing the question of whether such a decision is suicide for Russia, and you state that, it turns out, this is the USA and the EU imposed such sanctions against Russia by refusing to buy gas and oil from it.

I advise you to read the third page of this thread, where it is discussed that on April 27, 2022, Russia itself stopped gas supplies to Poland and Bulgaria, because they did not want to pay in rubles, as Russia began to demand. Russia arbitrarily, unilaterally changed the essential terms of previously signed contracts and was looking for a reason to reduce or even temporarily refuse gas supplies to Europe, in order to ultimately force European countries, in exchange for continued gas supplies, not to provide adequate assistance and support to Ukraine in its defense against military Russian aggression.

Russia hoped that by winter Europe would be more accommodating, when gas reserves there would be minimal, but Europe did not succumb to crude blackmail and, of course, not without problems, switched to other suppliers. Yes, there is still some import of gas from Russia by some European countries until they finally switch to other suppliers. But at the end of this year, the contract for the supply of gas from Russia to Europe via pipelines through Ukraine expires and Ukraine does not intend to renew this contract. This means that from the end of this year, Russian gas will no longer flow through pipelines to Europe. Russia will completely lose the European market for its gas.
299  Economy / Economics / Re: Russian Gas ban - A problem for Europe or suicide for Russia? on: January 29, 2024, 05:01:37 PM
It is now completely obvious that Russia’s plan to blackmail European countries by cutting off gas supplies to these countries has completely failed. In the end, Russia only made things worse for itself. Europe, although experiencing certain difficulties, is quite successfully switching to other gas suppliers. But for Russia it is much more difficult to find markets for gas in such large quantities.

Russia hoped to freeze Europe. But this winter there are big difficulties with heating only in Russia. Near Moscow and in other regions, entire settlements are freezing in their houses and apartments due to problems with housing and communal services. People warm themselves in the streets near the fire.
The efforts made by Europe toward Russia will, of course, be rewarded with something that Europe really needs and that Russia has, but perhaps the scenario that was created did not work out as you said because it did not go according to the desired scenario; it ended up happening to ourselves. Of course, this is beyond predictions. and this is not taken into account; this is all because Europe can look for other alternatives to meet its needs.

But for me, this is a lesson for all: war and the impact of embargoes do not always apply; no one benefits from this kind of method, and gradually it will make things difficult for everyone. It is to be able to find the best way for the common good. Remember,  when COVID hits, everyone can unite to solve it, and it can be done because there is cooperation and mutual understanding.

Of course, the international economic sanctions imposed against Russia are not the most effective option that would force Russia to abandon the military takeover of the neighboring state of Ukraine. These sanctions hit both the state against which they are imposed and those who accept them. In addition, there are many ways to bypass them. But the point is that sanctions hit the sanctioned state much more painfully.

It would be much more effective if the UN had rapid-reaction peacekeeping troops and they were deployed to quickly end the military conflict. The very presence of such forces would cool the violent heads of the current potential conquerors. But unfortunately, we don’t have this, and we don’t have more effective ways of influencing the aggressor either.
300  Economy / Economics / Re: A person that is against the creation of CBDC. on: January 29, 2024, 03:55:59 PM

Do you agree with him to not allow the creation of CBDC or you just don't care about this?
The creation of CBDCs is meaningless. It won't make any difference at all for us, unless the government enforces its usage and forbids the adoption of decentralized currencies such as Bitcoin.

I know that it is non of my business but I just want to know, is there really a need to create CBDC?
For governments, yes, because they want the monopoly of cryptocurrencies for themselves. It's interesting for them to impose the usage of a centralized cryptocurrency they control for the masses, while discouraging or forbidding the usage of Bitcoin currency, for an example. But for us, average crypto enthusiasts, living on our own, independent from parties, ideological groups, land lords and politics, it's not necessary the existence of CBDCs. I would avoid it, like I avoid fiat.
In any case, the creation of a CBDC makes sense and will bring many benefits for both the state and the people. After all, CBDC is an improved form of current government banking. Compared to the current cashless payment system, CBDCs will be much faster and more efficient. But both of them are under the complete control of banks and governments. But there is still a benefit in terms of improved functionality. Therefore, Trump's statement about the need to boycott CBDC sounds very stupid and is purely populist.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 190 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!