Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 08:22:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ... 183 »
1081  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: Will Binance Coin (BNB) reach $1K? on: January 03, 2022, 09:56:24 AM
Ofcourse, BNB now is one of the most promising coins this year and yes, not just possible to reach but BNB will undoubtly to really reach it actually next year. If you will just take a quick look on BNBs market last christmas, its value is just trading at $32 and exactly a year after, it's now worth $548.
More and more people are now investing on BNB after they launched the BEP-20 Format, and it's quite cheaper than they do on ethereum way back 2019 if I'm not mistaken.
I would like to first see what results ethereum will achieve after its Ethereum 2.0 upgrade. After all, BNB grew mainly on the background of difficulties with high costs in transactions on the ethereum network. If this problem is resolved and all other planned issues are resolved along the way, then we may see a backlash and then the current popularity of BNB will drop slightly. This will also affect the price of these two coins.
1082  Economy / Economics / Re: U.S. Contemplating Isolating Russia from SWIFT Banking System on: January 02, 2022, 07:20:17 PM
If that is what they are trying to do then that is a big mistake, Russia has nuclear weapons and regardless of whatever technological advancements the US may have fighting an aggression war against Russia is a huge mistake, Empires have gone down do die on the cold of Russia, in a way it makes sense as when an Empire is in crisis historically it tries to find an enemy to unite their people and try to gain an economic advantage, but it is too dangerous to do this against Russia.

The question is not whether the Americans are able to fight the Russians. The real question is whether they can afford such a conflict. Look at what happened in Afghanistan, which is a third world country of 30 million people. After spending trillions of USD in funds, the Americans ran back to their homeland with their tails wagging between their legs. The same thing happened in Syria, Iraq and Libya as well. And here we are talking about an adversary who is stronger by the magnitude of 100x or 200x.
If the Russian government continues to behave aggressively, threatening the use of weapons to the whole world, then the US government will be forced to fight with them. As for Afghanistan, the Americans have been there for 20 years. They trained and armed government troops there, but they cannot fight forever instead of them. Therefore, they left there, doing everything possible for the government troops to fight the Taliban further. It is not their fault that the Afghan government troops have shown cowardice.
1083  Other / Archival / Re: Are Banks afraid of Crypto adoption? on: January 02, 2022, 06:59:56 PM
Unfortunately all the indications are that banks don’t like crypto and don't want crypto adoption only if it's not CBDCs. They can’t control it and get commissions from transactions, from profit and from mining. Their expression of outrage makes sense as they lose money that must fill them. In El Salvador central bank immediately provided mobile app with obligatory KYC (to control crypto resources and people, who use them). China that seemed for me loyal to crypto, this year banned BTC mining and USA wants to do the same. What is this if not anxiety of banks that doesn’t get commissions and can’t have a total control among money their people use?
Of course, banks don't like cryptocurrency because cryptocurrency is actually a competitor to the banking system. At the same time, cryptocurrency does not pose a threat to the existence of banks. After all, the banking system is under the full protection of the state and is practically part of the state system of power. Banks can provide services in cryptocurrency, but they will not actively support it.
1084  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Will bitcoin co-exist with the current financial system on: January 02, 2022, 06:34:36 PM
Yes, bitcoin will co-exist with the current financial system. As it is co-existed for more than one decade. But in this era of decade bitcoin got much popularity in the world.No one can control its spread. The number of its joining is continuously increasing. Its meaning is that crypto is continuously going to dominate FIAT. But see what happens in the future.
Bitcoin simply has no other way than to coexist with the currencies of states. He can exist in his virtual digital world. But people can use it only in their physical world and only on the territory of individual states, where their currency has been used for a long time.
At the same time, bitcoin or other decentralized cryptocurrency cannot dominate the national currency of states. The state will not allow this.
1085  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: How reasonable is the long-term investment in Altcoins? on: January 01, 2022, 08:43:36 PM
I think it depends on the altcoin that chosen so I don't completely agree because indeed some altcoins are also good for long-term investments, and it's depend on how we can manage them too. as long as we can make a profit whether it's a long-term or short-term investment then it will still be profitable. Personally I do have crypto for long and short term investments and both will be equally profitable if they can be stored and managed properly.
Of course, investing in altcoins now is a very smart decision. Coins with a high capitalization are the least risky for this. For example, ethereum is already in the past, and in 2021 it grew by 400 percent and overtook even bitcoin in price.
Little-known cryptocurrencies can give big profits, but for this you need to know which of them are promising for investment.
1086  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Elon Musk guesses who bitcoin's mysterious creator Satoshi Nakamoto is on: December 30, 2021, 06:47:10 PM

The debate continues...

Elon Musk appears to have a pool of smart people he works with to discuss topics like these. It appears Nick Szabo is the leading candidate in their upper tier of their intelligentsia. If it is Nick Szabo he must be one of those who avoids media attention and the spotlight. In contrast to the Craig Wright's of the world, Szabo tends to keep a low profile.


Thank god, Elon Musk did not claim himself to be Satoshi Nakamoto. You can expect anything from his tweets.
I have stopped following his tweets and words ever since he has started promoting DogeCoin. I don't believe in Elon musk guesses for Satoshi Nakamoto. No one knows who is Satoshi Nakamoto.
But already about Elon Musk they began to say that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Of course, these conversations are not substantiated by serious arguments. After Elon Musk began to criticize the energy efficiency of bitcoin, he cannot be Satoshi Nakamoto. Nobody will ever establish the real Satoshi Nakamoto. He himself could have done it, but he took all measures to remain anonymous.
1087  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What will you do if Bitcoin reaches 100,000$ on 31 Dec 2021, 11:59 PM on: December 30, 2021, 06:34:58 PM
Although it is not possible, lets suppose bitcoin all of a sudden reaches 100,000$ on 31 Dec 2021, 11:59 PM.  Wink

Will you cash out and enjoy your profits or will you keep holding? Many will be busy in New year Celebrations and will miss this price  Wink

Share your fantasy dreams if this happens overnight?
I thought it was an old branch. But then I noticed that it was started today, one day before the New Year. To fantasize that the price of bitcoin can reach one hundred thousand dollars in one day, when its current price is only about $ 47,700, is very brave or very stupid. Most likely, it will be possible to talk about such a price of bitcoin at the end of next year, 2022.
1088  Economy / Economics / Re: Digital asset is for holding on: December 29, 2021, 04:01:04 AM
Before thinking of investing in any sector what one considers is how long you are willing to hold. Let's take the history down to how investment all began. Moving from the era of Real estate to stocks to metals to oil blocks and now digital assets we would agree those who made it big in all this investment options were those who had the patience to hold.

This kept me wondering why one would even think of investing if they don't have the patient to hold. If you can't develop the hold attitude then the best option is to do a physical business where you can monitor your profit and see them come in regularly. If it must be crypto then you must be willing to hold and wait
It is unlikely that we should all adhere to this point of view. Cryptocurrency is not intended to be a store of value, but that is, in essence, a repository of digital financial assets. It is primarily a means of payment. If you think of cryptocurrency only as a storage, then it will cease to develop and ultimately cease to be profitable. Cryptocurrency should be developed in many ways, but above all as an alternative means of payment to the current payment system.
1089  Economy / Economics / Re: Why all people moan about the price of bitcoin? on: December 27, 2021, 11:34:20 AM
Without a clear usage or utility bitcoin will be dumping prices lower than of what was an all time high. It will never be reached again not unless somebody will be holding a very large volume of cryptocurrency to manipulate the price. If you have read some of the latest news about price manipulation then maybe you will understand why people are moaning about bitcoin prices goin low. Those who are holding large volume are selling it when they think they can earn profit. This result in a volatility we experienced today. So if bitcoin will be used by many price manipulation cannot create a big impact on the price.
One can hardly complain about the price of bitcoin, which is now around $ 50,000. Bitcoin only reached $ 20,000 again last December, so its current price has doubled over that period. The slight drop in demand for bitcoin now is partly due to its current significant price. From such a height, there is room to fall, and therefore the risk for investors increases. In addition, with an increase in the price of Bitcoin, it is already quite difficult to grow in price at times, as it was before. Potential altcoins look promising in terms of profit.
Well, let's see what else Bitcoin is capable of.
1090  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Will competitors defeat ETH due to ever-increasing gas fees? on: December 27, 2021, 11:05:51 AM
Developers are rolling network upgrades, yet gas fees on ETH remain the same. It's very expensive to perform transactions on the Ethereum blockchain compared to other competing chains. The ETH 2.0 upgrade will alleviate the situation but developers keep delaying the same. People are getting sick and tired of ETH's "stalling" as fees continue to rise like there's no tomorrow. If I'm not mistaken, developers will delay the difficulty bomb again (by December) in order to prolong the PoW blockchain. The longer it takes for fees to decline on ETH, the bigger its competitors will grow.

Do you think competitors will defeat ETH due to ever-increasing gas fees? If not, why? Are constant delays a result of miners' opposition against reducing gas fees on the blockchain? Your input will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Smiley
Transaction fees on the ethereum network often drop to acceptable levels. For example, now it is 40 Gwei. But in general, for the final solution to this problem, of course, we still need to wait a while before the completion of the Ethereum 2.0 update. In addition, on November 24, Buterin initiated a separate improvement, which should reduce transaction costs in the network by about five times. I think that in the second half of next year this problem will be finally resolved. Ethereum's competitors are unlikely to make much headway during this time. Ethereum has been and will remain the leader in altcoins.
1091  Economy / Economics / Re: U.S. Contemplating Isolating Russia from SWIFT Banking System on: December 27, 2021, 08:43:48 AM
~

What you are saying is that Putin is lying in the media channels saying Russia doesn't want war.  Like this video?

If Ukraine will allow the US to set up a military base in Ukraine near the borders of Russia which is likely possible, this will lead to a real war. It's your country that will be ruined with such kind of action. It has to stop to avoid conflict otherwise another country will fail. The US will be there for war not building a nation just as how Biden said in Afghanistan.

Well, let's go back to reality and look at this problem in chronological order? In 2014, Ukrainians only wanted to choose a pro-European vector of development. No NATO, no missiles, nothing. But Russia just took the annexed Crimea and partly captured the Donetsk and Lugansk regions. What rockets? What is the threat?
The only threat to Russia is if, next to one of the republics from the former USSR, it suddenly starts to live well and with high quality !!! This will be the end of Russia itself, since the population of this so-called "great country" has lived all their lives as residents of a third world country. And if they suddenly realize that even a country like Ukraine, which does not have "the natural resources of the whole world" like Russia, can prosper, it will simply destroy this power of thieves and criminals. No, Putin is not afraid of missiles, not of missiles ...


Didn't Ukraine president Yanukovych have a negotiation between them that the port of Crimea is now controlled by Russia which up to 2042?
After some militants in those areas and minorities including the Russian-speaking Ukrainians there that turned that region into a war zone which is why Russian steps in to make it peaceful.

If Ukraine wants to turn that region into a bigger warzone like your whole country, be a member of NATO and you will see what's left for the country. It's never worth bringing a 3rd party that will take everything instead because after all both country was part of the USSR and your NAVY shares that Crimea sea.

Under President Yanukovych, the lease agreement was only extended to the Russians until the specified year of the base of their Black Sea fleet near Sevastopol. Crimea is a very large peninsula and it was under the jurisdiction of Ukraine.
Before the invasion of Russian troops into Crimea and its occupation by Russia, the inhabitants of Crimea lived there absolutely peacefully. What action movies are you talking about? You completely distort reality. Even after the capture of Crimea by Russia, a relatively peaceful life continues to this day, but the Russian authorities are engaged in the forced russification of the peninsula, oppressing and repressing the indigenous people, the Crimean Tatars, and resettling millions of Russians there.
Now the occupied Crimea peninsula is being turned by Russia into a military base with nuclear weapons.

I may have learned the news from somewhere which both parties have their own version of the story. Ukraine has its own, Russia has its own, and even the spectator medias who are just watching them will assume things are done under the table. History is more than what we see and hear but the more important thing is preventing the destruction because once a shot is fired there is no turning back and so much at stake for Ukraine. The country will be crushed between the two powerful militias.


What versions from different sides can we talk about in the current situation? Ukraine did not attack Russia and did not seize its territory. It was Russia that attacked Ukraine and occupied its Crimean peninsula and part of the eastern territories adjacent to Russia. Putin's justification for these actions is that he does not want Ukraine to join the European Union and NATO. Is this a serious excuse for capturing a neighboring state and killing thousands of Ukrainians in the 21st century? Any independent state has the right to choose its own path of development and build its foreign policy, including deciding which political sides to join in order to ensure its security.
Putin behaves like a robber and a bandit on the world stage, and therefore the world community must unite and give him a good rebuff, and disconnecting Russia from the SWIFT international banking system is still a rather mild measure.
1092  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Putin believes Bitcoin has value on: December 26, 2021, 05:15:01 PM
Russia is adopting a different attitude towards cryptos than China. President Putin has come public saying "Bitcoin has value but it cannot be used in the Oil trade"

I guess Putin didn't still fully grasp the real potential of cryptos as he says
Quote
“Cryptocurrency is not supported by anything as of yet. It may exist as a means of payment, but I think it’s too early to say about the oil trade in cryptocurrency.”
But even so, it shows that Russia seems to be adopting a friendly position facing cryptocurrency and it may be having some impact on the industry. Given that China adopted a harsh position towards cryptos, is it possible that miners are relocating from China to Russia? Is it possible for Russia to step up to occupy the former place China had in Bitcoin? I guess this is what is happening, otherwise, Putin wouldn't come public with such a neutral position.
I personally do not believe a single word of Putin. His words are constantly at odds with his actions. He lies constantly and in everything. This is especially evident in Russia's foreign policy. As for the cryptocurrency, the laws that are being adopted and prepared in this country are simply draconian. In my opinion, Russia is on the verge of completely banning its movement. For a long time, many have understood that Putin is not giving the people the opportunity to use cryptocurrency to make money and profit. Probably because he understood its value, he does not even allow her to circulate in Russia.
1093  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hillary Clinton: Nation states should pay attention to the rise of crypto on: December 26, 2021, 04:56:03 PM
By itself, this is rather disturbing information and should not be ignored as almost everyone does when discussing this topic here. Hillary Clinton raises the issue of cryptocurrency due to its growing influence in the world. We remember that at one of the last summits of the G20 countries, the role of cryptocurrency was already discussed and then it was decided that cryptocurrency does not pose a threat to global financial stability. If the discussion is repeated and this time the opposite opinion is accepted, then tightening measures against the circulation of cryptocurrency may follow. Such measures have no effect if they are taken by a separate state, but if they are adopted by all the G20 countries, the effect will be much more serious.
1094  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: India plans law that will prohibit ‘all private cryptocurrencies’ on: December 26, 2021, 04:19:55 PM
Once again India plans of banning all private cryptocurrencies through the bill that is into discussion on the winter session. The bill is called the Cryptocurrency and the Regulation of Official Cryptocurrency Bill 2021. Lawmakers have been into deep discussion about the regulation of cryptocurrencies. In recent days there is massive rise in the user profiles and transactions on exchanges. It is the middle class that hasn't invested on stocks or other assets have begun to start trading. This is the fear of the government, because it is the majority group of the country. Anyhow once after the winter session on parliament we'll get a clear stand of the government on cryptocurrency usage.

Source : India plans law that will prohibit ‘all private cryptocurrencies’
for my several years here in Forum , it is always India and China in which has this kind of Issue and behavior towards crypto, and guess what ?
i am not interested anymore , because same thing happen each time , banning and unbanning talks.
India's government  will keep this for their own benefits  so why give a look?
and also Lets assume they will totally banned like what china did, isn't it is helpful so there are no other same regulatory issues will come in future?


Over the past few years, there have been about a dozen different threads on this forum about which cryptocurrency bans are planned to be adopted in India. But for some reason, lawmakers and the country's government are in no hurry to pass laws regarding cryptocurrency. Therefore, most likely, I simply will not react in any way to these intentions. We need to wait until real laws are adopted there, and then we will discuss them.
1095  Economy / Economics / Re: The Danger of Local Economy. on: December 25, 2021, 08:10:36 PM
There is such a trend, but it is unlikely to become widespread. If we consider the still small experience of El Salvador, then there was no national currency at all. Therefore, it was much easier to accept bitcoin as the national currency there. In countries with strong economies and hard currencies, this is hardly possible. But we really need a similar experience of crowding out the national currency in weak developing countries, and preferably a positive one.
1096  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: It's never too late to start on: December 25, 2021, 07:57:59 PM
Of course, it's never too late to enter the cryptocurrency market. We do not know in which direction the market will develop and what surprises it may present to us. However, those people who only want to work in this market have certainly lost a lot. Not only in terms of profit, but also in terms of gaining that knowledge about cryptocurrency and this market in general, which other participants have gradually acquired and gained rich experience. After all, this market is multifaceted and it is impossible to study it in a short time. Therefore, the earlier we join the cryptocurrency market, the easier, safer and more efficient our work on it will be.
1097  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why do we need a bull market blow off top ? on: December 25, 2021, 07:36:16 PM
Participants in this market need high price volatility in order to sell high and buy low. This is the basic law of this market. The sharp drop in prices also allows one to get rid of the weak hands of doubters who immediately start selling their assets in cryptocurrency. Therefore, we always want to see a high price rise in our cryptocurrency and do not mind falling prices in the market after taking profit. Such a surge in prices allows us to make a decent profit.
1098  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: 🧞💜[BOUNTY ALADDIN] 🔴Bitcoin 2.0 (XBTC2)🔴$100 000 Pool/Escrow🤑🔥 on: December 24, 2021, 09:20:22 PM
Proof of authentication:
- Azbit registration Email: GaydayVasily@gmail.com
- XBTC2 address on Azbit : 0x80b710d8283e2f3f11ac80ac582ab8a285fda3ce
- Telegram Username: @argo12
- Campaigns applied for: signature, article.
1099  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Tell one good reason why Satoshi should come back on: December 17, 2021, 05:24:27 PM
I don't see any reason for him to come back. It would do more bad than good imo. It would hurt the decentralized image of bitcoin. Look at ETH for example. Most people see ETH as a company with a CEO (Vitalik). When you ask people the current owner of bitcoin, they can't answer. Everybody knows that Vitalik manages ETH though.
Yes, Buterin runs ETH with other co-founders. This allows you to quickly make decisions, and find a way out of difficult situations and be updated in a timely manner. However, there is no close-knit team behind Bitcoin; consensus is rarely reached on any issues. Therefore, complete decentralization gains in some way and loses in some way.
In this situation, Satoshi Nakamoto is hardly worth publishing himself. In the absence of a creator, no one can apply for a patent on the invention of bitcoin and it remains completely decentralized.
1100  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Will competitors defeat ETH due to ever-increasing gas fees? on: December 15, 2021, 09:36:13 PM
Kadena blockchain has no transaction fee, yea you heard me right and this is why I believe that this project will be the most talk about pretty soon, no other projects will be like Ethereum that's for sure but many will solve problems that can't be solved on ETH blockchain, still this doesn't mean they are better than ETH
It seems that it is impossible to create the perfect cryptocurrency, although it should be striving for it. If a particular coin has free transactions, then it is losing somewhere else.
Ethereum has been around for a long time and has a strong team and community that supports it. Yes, with a long-term update, ethereum loses a little and weakens its position, but if the update is successful, then this coin will not only restore them, but also significantly increase both its popularity and price. Better to wait and see.
Pages: « 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 [55] 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 ... 183 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!