Thank you, I have never known it. It's hard to believe that Satoshi come back to work with crypto, in particular bitcoin after years gone away. The story is that after a long inactivity period the account wake up and posted a message to say "Nour"
People started to think the account has been hacked since his Gmx email was compromised.
It's normal to see Lightning Network activated on Bitcoin network later, so I think that the message "Nour" won't make a lot of sense. Some others started to think Satoshi is back and "Nour" means in the Arabic language "Light" then they said it is referring to the Lightning Network
|
|
|
|
|
To stop FUDs, and their potential negative effects, I think that someone who have enough skills should collect the all-year lows of DASH to see the growth pathway of DASH over its history.
If All-Year Lows increase over years, it's a strong indicator that DASH is a good project, and got more supports and demands over time.
|
|
|
|
This part is great, and you definitely can do it well. The first part will be about the history of the forum and its components.
This part is harder to finish, and difficult to make blueprints of those interviews (ideas, contents, questions, and so on). The second part will consist of interviews with prominent members.
This part is almost unrealistic one. There are abundant new projects in the forum that launched each day, and even when you want to focus on top projects, it is unrealistic too. Why? It might cause massive discussions and/ or arguments on which ones are the best ones and should be included. It will be something like never-ending debate. The third part will be about recent ongoings in the forum: most popular projects, and where things are possibly headed.
|
|
|
|
You have an interesting idea. But will it lead to an increase in fraudsters?
I think that the system of trust in the form which it is now makes it difficult to find users with a good reputation in commerce. It would be good if the existing system were divided into two components:
- a system of trust for abuse
- a system of trust in commercial matters.
I have some ideas about it. First, it is too complicated to manage the risks of manipulations/ abusements. Secondly, if there will be two trust system (one of abusements, and another one for commercial matters - as you sugggested), it will raise the need on other systems. Why? In the forum, there are so many kinds of services run, and Escrow service is just only one of them. In my opinion, to get trust from forum community, Escrow service providers should create their CV spreadsheet on all done-Escrows, and might let the link in their profile page (in signature, in website, etc.) Of course, forum users should be responsible by doing their own research/ search on potential Escrow service providers they interested to hire. To sum up, I disagreed with the OP's ideas. |
|
|
|
Solutions for you. Closing the browser, reopen it, then type the Crypto Bridge exchange's link, and leave the browser there about several seconds to get fully access. Remember that, you should not switch to other windows, just stay with the browser and Crypto Bridge site till get access. Hope it will help you to get connections to CB. |
|
|
|
Two more user hit his/ her finish line, and ranked up to a Full Member. Congratulations, darosior! | Rank | User name | BPIP profile | BPIP Merit RECEIVED | BPIP Merit SEND | Trust | Status | Personal comment about yourself | |  | darosior | darosior | darosior | darosior | 0: -0 / +0 | active | Information expected |
Congratulations, Cryptotourist! |
|
|
|
|
As I pinpointed previously, Nikisa should fix the typo and upgrade the OP with correct form for other users.
It should be RECEIVED, not RECIEDVED!
It looks a bit weird when users keep quoting, using the form with the typo from time to time.
|
|
|
|
What shall "they" (who?) do?
Shut down the earths electricity?
Stop providing electricity supply to households/ farms which mine crypto currencies, including Monero. I am not sure, but it is likely what that guys waited for. It is a unrealistic thing, in my opinion. And, if someday, Monero network switchs to PoS/ Masternodes or service nodes, it's become harder to restrict / shut down Monero network. |
|
|
|
Personally, I will stick with Grin coin, rather than the newest two shitty clone coins from Grin. They don't serve for anything useful in crypto, but Grin coin does.  By now, Grin coin has real usecase in the forum, as one of two available payment gates, beside BTC. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Ok, fine. I just raised my opinion. For now, I locked the topic, and months or years later, just remembered that I did it in 2019 ^^. Best regards, |
|
|
|
If they are changing existing consensus rules at any point of time, then they are doing a hard fork. For the definition it does not matter whether there is consensus or not. You would say "Ethereum Advance was created by hard forking Ethereum" (or splitting from).
Thank you, Lauda, for your reply. Everyone has their own opinion, so I don't fall into arguments here. Only simple question, who create words/ terms/ definitions? Human, and what's next? All of words/ terms/ definitions can be changed/ adjusted over time.  This is why the forum has merit system, then changes in Default Trust, right? Even merit system and trust system might be changed more in the future, no one knows. It's the same for hard fork definition. |
|
|
|
Update
Added: [For merit] Why is the price of Bitcoin dropping when the fundamentals are so strong.
Section: merit contest
Eligible ranks: Mostly lower rank users .
Category: Opinion
Author: Jet cash
Please give me link to the topic of Jet Cash and some brief descriptions about the contest, merit reward rates, and rules of challenge. I guess this one is a really hard challenge, because Jet Cash tend to strictly with his own rules on posts' quality. Thank you, CryptopreneurBrainboss, for you coming details. |
|
|
|
Well.. He did apply to one of my campaigns when waking up from inactivity, only to withdraw a couple of days later. Make of that what you will.
I scan around the forum today, when I have spare time, and found the topic. It's a big surprise because recent days, I saw the account more often. For now, it seems that I known the reasons of the more regular appearance. The case, forces me to the ideas that I have to signed my BTC address to secure my account asap (I have never mind of it, honestly) |
|
|
|
~ snip ~ | Rank | User name | BPIP profile | BPIP Merit RECIEVED | BPIP Merit SEND | Trust | Status | Personal comment about yourself |
For a very long period, no known discovered the typo (highlighted in red color). It should be RECEIVED, not RECIEVED! Please fix the typo asap, Nikisa. |
|
|
|
Congratulations for promoting to a Senior Member, and welcome to the club of Senior Members, khaled0111
|
|
|
|
I can not disagree with those three reasons. - Shilling the campaign/project
- Having two or more accounts in one campaign
- Spamming
This one, I disagreed. You should know that plagiarism is the most common reasons of permanent bans. Whenever plagiarism found by admin/ mods/ user, your account will get permanent ban. No chance for saying excuse with plagiarism. |
|
|
|
Agreed with your idea. Did you mean? (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored) mostly it's a deleted thread base on my side, never encountered for ignored since I don't usually do that.
It's not. What I got after clicking on link to merited posts is: The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you. I experienced the same when clicking on topics moved to trash can by mods. I am not sure the case here, but it maybe the same (topics deleted) What happens when you click on that link? Does it open the topic like usual?
Edited:For Sent in last 120 days, it displayed as normal [full name of topics, I meant], not as what CryptopreneurBrainboss shown in the OP. After clicking on links, they worked fine all. It only does not work for received merits with the case of cabalism13. |
|
|
|
The real question is: if mods don't want regular members to know about the existence of those accounts with special privileges, why they let them wear avatars?
Maybe, they made a trial and forgot to take those avatars off. Last year, I saw a project that the team decided to wear new signature (re-designed) before opening of new wave, then they forgot to take it off. It's just an assumption, and still need official answers from theymos or staffs. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
