Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 04:57:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
301  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 13, 2014, 10:07:04 PM
So VE by launching this complaint with the MO SEC may have set back trading for another month, or two. Doesn't bother me as I'm in this for the divs. If you wanted to trade Asap well don't forget to thank VE for his fine efforts. lol such a nice guy.

He did the rational thing. Are you actually upset with him for this?
302  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 13, 2014, 07:48:06 PM
"All anyone wants is the truth and the ability to trade shares."

This.

I know this might sound completely impossible. But maybe Ken is telling the truth. I know.. sounds a little crazy.

Hell even VolcanicEruptor verified that he informed the authorities. So Ken could be like.. not lying.
303  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ActiveMining] Active Miners Anonymous Support (AA) Thread [Heavily Moderated] on: February 13, 2014, 07:37:14 PM
For those unfamiliar with the tragedy:

Several of our brethren have invested in "AMC [...] a virtual identity totally owned by the Active Mining Corporation (Belize) that represents both itself and its profits."
Needless to say, things didn't turn out quite as they've planned.

This thread is a safe place for Active Mining "investors" to start rebuilding their lives, chat, or find a friendly shoulder to soak with tears and snot.

God Bless.

Thanks man. I decided to step outside today. Idk if I'm ready. =/

Seriously though, all these Active Mining threads are getting out of hand lol. It's the same 10 people with 4 Threads. Seems like everyone should just have their own thread at this rate.
304  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 13, 2014, 07:35:37 PM
This used to be such a fun thread.  Let's get past this trading thing, I'll tell you why:

If Ken really is being investigated by Missouri Securities folks, there's no way in hell he is going to put your shares on any exchange.  That's like being charged with rape, and before the case comes up on the docket, going out and raping again.  Even Ken wouldn't do that, and you can't honestly ask him to.

On the other hand, if he has not been contacted, and the whole investigation thing is just a hoax, begging on a forum is unlikely to change his mind.

So let's talk about something else.  

I would have to agree 100%. Don't expect shares in February.
305  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 13, 2014, 07:34:50 PM
"All anyone wants is the truth and the ability to trade shares."

This.

I know this might sound completely impossible. But maybe Ken is telling the truth. I know.. sounds a little crazy.
306  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 13, 2014, 06:28:11 AM
I await the next update on Wednesday.

Just my thoughts:

MSD doesn't sound good.

Prediction about scams & planned failure. Seems to be coming true, hope not.

Not a fan of this new moderated thread, smells of denial and pipe dreams. It's definitely going to get out of hand with pipe dreams passed left in right, only compounding the issues here.

Thanks for the update Ken.

I personally think the quicker you let people who want to pull out of the company the quicker this MSD situation goes away. Basically shares have been paid for, then taken away sort to speak. People don't have access to them, if they could have dumped them in December this situation would not have happened. It was inevitable, hopefully Ken's confidence in the situation (posted in the moderated thread) pays off.

Looking forward to April.

See ya in 7 days.
307  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 12, 2014, 11:12:33 PM
...
No reason to argue with FUD, it only brings more. Just wait till Wednesday like the rest of us.

Today's Wednesday.

Thanks, I meant on a regular basis though. But yeah, wait until the announcement. Shit, place a bet, roll some shit, relax.
308  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 11, 2014, 07:51:04 PM
For anyone keeping track at home:

392128 / 25000000 Outstanding

17K higher than yesterday. Think we'll break 450k Before the announcement tomorrow?
309  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 11, 2014, 02:03:43 AM
Who is buying these shares?

If it takes a month to dump 200k shares, imagine what happens when trading for the little people is activated and 3-4 million shares get dumped.

We all know the price will crash, so who is buying these shares?

Man this Wednesday update is gonna be fun.
310  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 11, 2014, 01:48:11 AM
Who is buying these shares?
311  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 07, 2014, 11:02:22 PM
@Mainline

He was not around long after he collected Money. Labcoin lied about his identity, had someone reputable ( I think ) on the forum hype him up and disappeared once he was called a scam. Ken collected money way before Labcoin and has been around long after Labcoin and through a bunch of scam accusations.
312  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 07, 2014, 10:04:43 PM
@KingCrimson I hear you, I was even calling Labcoin a scam. Their lack of communication was not nearly as bad as Ken's at Ken's worst points.

There are a few reasons while I'm still involved in this, some voluntarily and some not. Before I get to those I would like to thank you guys for trying to stop other new people who don't have shares already tied up in this from investing, no matter what your motive is.

I personally saw some other reasons why Labcoin was a scam that I can't really tie to Ken.

He paid Divs from his own miners for months (Or so I've heard, I've only been around since August though I have collected Divs from then).

Ken has been here for months after he collected any money. You can say "Well he just got more money off Ukyo's shares." True, but was it worth it from the amount of money he collected way earlier in 2013.?The amount of money he just collect is negligible compared to back then. Sticking around this long just for that seems rather stupid, and Ken might be lacking in charisma and communicative skills but I wouldn't go and call him stupid. (I mean this is something an elementary school kid could work out, and I know its fun to insult people but we really can't say Ken is that far down the left of the Bell curve.)

I think Ken has just been a little over ambitious, (along with some of the shareholders in here), and unfortunately a new business doesn't always sky rocket to the moon. No matter how much experience Ken could have had, he was going to run into hiccups in the road. I think he might of tried to go a little too far, a little too fast. And I see this again with his mention of (20nm).

As I stated to Mainline last week; for some of these companies you have to look at them as a gamble and not some bond that actually upholds the % it promises. I did that at the beginning and it is why I am not stressed out about this project now. It might or might not pay off, I plan to see which way it goes. I unfortunately feel bad for some of the other people who sunk quite a lot of money into this expenditure (I did not, thankfully).\

Ken is still here. Scammers slowly/quickly/try to distance themselves after they get the money, I haven't seen Ken doing that at all. I can't call him a scammer if I don't see him acting like a scammer. He might not be the best CEO in the world but he's not a scammer, and claiming he is is not only ruining his reputation but it is also ruining others. That's a very serious offense on this forum (IMHO). When Ken comes on here and ask for more money by creating more shares then we will all know he is a scammer. As that is something a scammer does.

My shares are MIA. Until I get these back I can't really sell out even if I wanted to.

I do believe he makes very bad PR and Legal decisions at times, but this is what people asked for when they got into Bitcoin. I still see "No Regulation!!!" everyday on this website. So can we scream for no regulation and then expect the people who don't want regulation to follow the laws that come with regulation? No. That's like having your cake to tomorrow and eating it today.

I still think this company can succeed in reasonable bounds. It's a startup company in a startup industry, it's not going to get all the marks correct on its first go and that is what people don't seem to understand. It's not the easiest thing in the world to run a company, even if it only employes your family. Stop treating this company like it is a "Google" or a "Netflix" or a "Apple" that has completely screwed up, this is a startup still trying to get a handle on things.

One last note. I am not defending Ken, I am only stating my thoughts on the matter and why I am still around. I do think Ken has royally screwed up with everything share related for the last 3 months and he needs to fix that as soon as possible. Again, I am not defending Ken and don't want to get into an argument about how I am defending Ken. I am just as upset as some of you guys, I've agreed with many points Mainline has brought up recently (when he's not trolling), almost all of VE's older post and a lot of Pankkake's opinions on this situation.
313  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 06, 2014, 11:35:17 PM
@Miner

Lets just see how it goes. Ken said himself that he spends some time checking the forum for FUD. Might as well make some use out of it. I think we would all rather have Ken's opinion and responses on some of the more dire concerns of the shareholders. I think this is one of those more dire concerns. Ken should tell us before he unloads certain shares over others.
314  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 06, 2014, 11:19:14 PM
How about we stop giving Ken the answers and we wait to see what he comes up with? I think this is a grand idea, and it will allow us to gain more insight on Ken's thought process and help us understand where his head is at.

We could do but you would be waiting for a long time as he's too busy running the business to be replying to every question that crops up on here. We have given him plenty of space to answer the 28nm vs 20nm question today and he hasn't shown so how long do I or anyone wait when I have what I think is the answer to a spurious allegation?

So I am 90% sure I know the answer and post it. Seems fairly reasonable to me especially as other people are posting their views (that he's secretly selling his own shares). A frankly ridiculous accusation as these figures are the official ones from our CT isting.  It does seem a lot of Drama Queens on here don't like it when there is a sensible answer to an extravagant accusation of Ken being some sort of master criminal or scammer.

Finlof - like I said I'm 90% sure this is correct. I'm sorry if simple facts annoy you so much but I'm not making excuses just informing people.

Hmm.. Good question. Maybe wait until after Ken's next update. You know, because the Wednesday announcements are supposed to answer shareholder questions and concerns.
315  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 06, 2014, 11:00:31 PM
320,600 - 232,000 (Ukyo) = 88,600.

So 88,600 must be the remaining unsold IPO shares. I thought there were 180k left unsold but it must be around 90k. It makes sense for Ken to sell them now too if he is on a fund raising exercise.

How about we stop giving Ken the answers and we wait to see what he comes up with? I think this is a grand idea, and it will allow us to gain more insight on Ken's thought process and help us understand where his head is at.
316  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 06, 2014, 10:01:41 PM
From ACTM details on CT.

320600 / 25000000 Outstanding

How many shares did Ukyo own?
Has Ken been selling some of his on the sly?
Those are all the shares ActM issued - 15000000 won't have dividends till 0.0025 dividends reached on the other 10000000. This is just the CT presetting in order to have all of our shares transferred.

Ukyo had 2XX,XXX shares. So where did the extra 100,000 Shares come from is the question. Not the 25,000,000 that are listed.
Maybe Ukyo had 320600 or even more. The second possibility is Ken testing the transfer system. The third possibility is Ken start trading with his own shares, but I don't think he can get away with it, so if he don't have a good explanation the big holders will file a case immediately. There are just 124605 in sell orders, so no one still trading with those.

Ken has no right to trade Ukyo's shares or his private shares before anyone else. He has benefitted from not having anyone else able to sell shares to reap the highest profit possible. This has to be extremely illegal and when or if this company eventually crashes and burns this alone can cause Ken to see jail time.

I am not saying these extra shares are Ken's shares. But if they are it is definitely not a good idea for him to continue selling them without allowing everyone else access to their shares.

Whatever you are possibly doing Ken it does not matter, you should put it on hold for 1-2 Hours a day and manually transfer people's shares everyday.It seems that whatever automated process you planned to introduce is taking up too much time and a manual process is the way tot go now. This is the best course of action right now and is definitely the most important thing you should worry about.

PS: I think we should stick with 28nm as said before unless going for 20nm is a sure as hell, no way to fail process. If whatever engineer says, "Oh there is a 5% chance that this will not work out." or "It will cost $$$ more" or "You will have to wait a little longer for the finished product". That 5% is too high, that price point is too high, and that date is a little to late and we should go with 28nm. 
317  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 06, 2014, 09:53:06 PM
A story......

Years ago, I worked as a software engineer for a large company which at the time was rather well known and which, and because of many bad decisions both before and after the death of its founder went bankrupt.

One of the reasons the company failed was because some manager got the brilliant idea of only releasing products that had no bugs at all. He insisted that software be tested, tested again, and then retested over and over, until there were no bugs. He could not understand why it was not possible to bug free software. Often he would talk about how if a car or refrigerator  was sold with as many bugs as our software, no one would buy a refrigerator.

We tried to explain to him that there was a balance between bugs and delivery date. You could not wait so long making a product so perfect that it never gets delivered, because there is always a window of opportunity past which, the product won't be able to capture any market share.

In the most recent PR announcement, Ken gave us a date of April to be in the heart of production and mining.

It seems as if with each PR announcement, the start of trading gets delayed again. Ken has made many promises which he has broken.  Continuing to do that just breaks any remaining confidence the community has in him. 

At some point, let's say December of 2014, if there is no trading, and no product being produced, there will be many angry, very angry "share holders". 

Did you work on Duke Nukem Forever? I wouldnt be surprised when they are bankrupt after years of debugging.

Don't give him a deadline like December 2014. Shares better be out to us before this month is over. Hell we should have them before Valentine's Day.

318  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 06, 2014, 09:34:57 PM
From ACTM details on CT.

320600 / 25000000 Outstanding

How many shares did Ukyo own?
Has Ken been selling some of his on the sly?
Those are all the shares ActM issued - 15000000 won't have dividends till 0.0025 dividends reached on the other 10000000. This is just the CT presetting in order to have all of our shares transferred.

Ukyo had 2XX,XXX shares. So where did the extra 100,000 Shares come from is the question. Not the 25,000,000 that are listed.
319  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 06, 2014, 09:17:31 PM
From ACTM details on CT.

320600 / 25000000 Outstanding

How many shares did Ukyo own?
Has Ken been selling some of his on the sly?
320  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 06, 2014, 02:11:24 PM
IMO, if the 20nm can absolutely positively be online WELL before the 55nm stuff is useless, with room for error. Then 20nm is a better move than playing catchup on 28.

We seem to sort of "own" a chip team as part of the 55nm deal and some IP involved with that, if they think they can do 20, and we're not losing much since 28 seems back to scratch anyway because eASIC seems to have failed us, then let's do 20.

It might be a longer term thing than some shareholders would like, but next year, 28 might look stupid when we could have had 20. 20 might keep us earning into 2015, 28 might crap out in Q4 this year.

Lets reach to get out of the hole we find ourselves in before we start reaching for the moon again.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!