I notice the OP there isn't adressing the issue that when Blockstream received their funding, LN wasn't yet around, so it's a bit hard to see how their business plan that got them 21 million USD could have relied on pushing people towards LN...
|
|
|
Before you guys waste any more time on this, you need to realize that there's a ~95% chance that the things proposed in this thread are exactly what they want. You're being manipulated. They want us to reinstate newbie jail, they want us to crack down on multiple accounts (and account sales), they want us to be more heavy handed in moderation, etc.
Some people think the best way to get rules or policies changed is to abuse them, hoping we'll change our minds.
It's not going to happen.
So NLC is actually campaigning for stricter forum moderation? I'm not sure I buy that. (I don't care about any of the other trolls, just trying to figure out what's going on with this single one.)
|
|
|
I think if you have an account less than 14 you should only be able to post in the new user section. 14-30 you should be on probation. If you start shit posting then, you lose your account.
Can we just have a small fee to gain posting rights in speculation? It doesn't have to be much to be too much for NLC and anyone with similar "ambitions". We have a specific issue limited to a specific subforum that's mostly filled by traders or people otherwise invested in Bitcoin. I'd wager the amount of people who both can't justify making, say, a one dollar-equivalent payment to post and still have interesting things to say on the subject of price speculation is pretty low.
|
|
|
That sounds OK. 1% juice that the software keeps to run itself. Will the software pay it's own bills or will someone be administering that? I don't think we're at the autonomous software agent stage yet, so the fees will go to some humans. Might be a weak link there.
|
|
|
Known proxies and TOR exit nodes are assigned a fixed amount of units of evil to begin with by default.
To rephrase my question: Am I right to assume anyone not willing to put a lot of effort into digging up publically available proxies or blindly switching tor circuits would end up having to jump through the evil fees hoops in order to farm up spam accounts as NLC is doing? Edit: Or is it possible to create multiple accounts from a single, proxied IP, and then connect to them via a non-clean but unbanned IP?
|
|
|
I think there's enough proxies and TOR exit nodes for him to create a new account each time. When someone is IP banned, the IP doesn't just get blacklisted as that would be a nightmare for legitimate users using VPNs, proxies and TOR. It instead gets a certain number of "units of evil".
I tested account creation over tor a while ago, for me at least the exit nodes I ended up going through seemed to have all been flagged by the forum already. Same for the most obvious proxies, which makes sense. Does anyone have experience here - is it simply a matter of trying a little harder or would someone creating multiple accounts day in, day out, from different IPs need to be have better resources than tor and googled lists of proxies?
|
|
|
Right, so it seems it's a new, clean IP every time.
I'm curious - how would one accomplish that? Are there ways for any old dweeb to access tons of IPs, aside from the usual public proxies and VPNs or tor? The solutions I can come up with all seem a bit hardcore for just trolling a forum.
|
|
|
Creating a new Bitcointalk account takes ~15 seconds (captcha) when bitcointalk's server is working right, but usually ~25 secs. You should try it So how have you not been IP banned yet?
|
|
|
I know IP bans don't help against proxies, and may result in banning users who've done no harm, but I was wondering if they're used here at all?
We've got a particularly industrious troll, NotLambChop, creating several alts a day to spam repetitive junk in the speculation forum. Their latest post claims they create new accounts in 15 seconds. This suggests they're not using TOR or any widely used proxies, since those seem to require quite a bit of effort (and a bit of payment) to use here.
So is it just that IP bans aren't used? Or does this spammer have access to a pool of "clean" IPs?
|
|
|
<Snip more NLC crap>
Must be a pain in the arse to create another new email account, register a forum account, confirm it, setup prefs and stupid avatar, etc etc etc... only to immediately blow your cover by posting the exact same crap with the same obvious calling cards (fonts, language, fuckin' horsies ffs, etc) and everyone just ignores the account straight away.
What a hollow existence.
You'd think so, right? Alternatively, this is someone with sufficient motivation to automate all that. Not sure which is crazier, though.
|
|
|
Pretty new forum, as in there's a single post, by the OP.
If you want to advertise your forum, trying to be sneaky about it is just lame.
|
|
|
This thread is too damn long, could someone give cliffs please?
Roughly, you should hoard as many coins as you can, and you need to sell all of them. You should do both immediately.
|
|
|
I guess that's a good way of seeing it. Some, of course, might (due to brainwashing) get different take-away from Galt's Gulch. Especially since all similar projects (arguably due to government infiltrators and bankster saboteurs) met similar ends. Perhaps steading the sea is the answer? I would agree. I don't see how. You can't just declare sovereignty in international waters any more, so a seastead would just be a more inconvenient version of a private compound. Break any serious laws, and the cops are going to come get you. If you don't intend to break any laws, why bother in the first place?
|
|
|
It sure is good all these devilish conspiracies have catchy, google-friendly names these days! Is there a calendar with the dates for these all put together?
|
|
|
It is very unlikely that NASDAQ will build a critical software on top of a platform maintained by two random volunteers. I would expect that they copy that code, and whatever Chain delivers, and hand it over to their own software development team. OpenAssets they might easily clone. Cloning a chain is different, though, since the whole point of a blockchain is to enable potentially adversarial parties to rely on a shared ledger without trusting each other not to falsify the ledger. A fully proprietary chain, secured by a single party, would not be any better than a regular database. Either they'd have to get significant adoption for their own blockchain, or use one that is already secured by parties without a stake in whatever NASDAQ wants to do.
|
|
|
speaking of walls, the stairway on bitfinex's bid side has been a permanent fixture throughout this upward movement of late. Accumulating? Trying to shore up support? Some kind of arbitrageur?
|
|
|
Who will win... Please educate me - what am I looking at?
|
|
|
Ya 11 billion volume is not right. 3x market cap? I don't think so.
On a zero fee exchange, the only limits to how much volume you can put out by selling to yourself are set by the connection rate... Edit: I can't find that kind of volume on bitcoincharts.com, though. Is that traded volume or blockchain transactions?
|
|
|
the only thing that stops that shit is when the true believers sell at the lowest possible price point.
Are you sure a virgin sacrifice isn't better? I mean, the maiden is either in the volcano or she isn't - there's no guesswork, unlike with your ritual.
|
|
|
Re. your edit: I find that people are less guarded and much more receptive when I sprinkle my texts with misspellings and shit grammar.
Have you considered cogent arguments instead of repetitive put-downs and your trademark image macros?
|
|
|
|