Bitcoin Forum
June 18, 2024, 03:11:03 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 [154] 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 ... 373 »
3061  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: May 19, 2015, 04:17:41 PM
Maybe he ran off with a mistress?  I doubt we will ever find out the truth...


truth is... FC is loaded.. and you're not.

I am not?
3062  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: May 19, 2015, 03:19:44 PM
Maybe he ran off with a mistress?  I doubt we will ever find out the truth...
3063  Other / Meta / Re: delete Investor-based games section on: May 19, 2015, 12:16:05 PM
Because ponzi is the definition of scam, you can just search on wikipedia, it will tell you its a scam, if you search roulette or dice it doesnt say its a scam.

Scams are usually where a person gets duped into something without their knowledge and Ponzis are scams because in the real world their nature is hidden, but the ones in the gambling section here aren't so people know what they're doing when they send them money.

Provably fair and odds, what are your odds on ponzies? Uncertain, no one knows, the owner could run any minute with your money.

Its like smoking, its bad and everyone knows it, yet people chose to do it, but that doesnt make it a good thing, it only makes them stupid

Just because the odds are uncertain doesn't mean anything especially when people are willingly taking the uncertain odds, and like whether someone chooses to smoke or not that is their choice and you have absolutely no say on that.

I agree if something is clearly labeled as a HIYP/Ponzi then it is not a scam at all. If the creator tries to hide that fact then yes it is bad/scam.
3064  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: May 19, 2015, 12:12:49 PM
FYI: Quickseller has been removed from BadBear's trust list, hence, default trust list.

That list keeps getting smaller and smaller. I just had to double check my personal list and noticed it was gone  Shocked  Not sure how I keep deleting my peeps......
3065  Economy / Goods / Re: [WTS] iPhone 6 64GB - brand new! 1.5 BTC - ONLY TODAY 1.5 BTC! on: May 19, 2015, 12:08:20 PM
I want invest in new altcoin so I need fast transaction. Tomorrow offer will be expired. Shipping from Germany in 24h after payment.


Pretty much sums this up...just move along people nothing to see here.
3066  Economy / Securities / Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It on: May 19, 2015, 12:03:11 PM
Is friedcat still "missing"?

He can not get "not missing" after what he has done. He will be forever missing and laugh at his victims having some beer with his pals on some beach Wink

Or rotting away on the bottom of some lake with some stones on its feets. And some random dragon head (bosses of triads, the chinese mafia) will laugh instead. I mean thats likely if you think about that bitcoins are interesting for the organized crime. If they came to that point and found out that there is a chinese company that is very rich and has no protection at all... then its not far fetched to take the possibility that he was taken by force. I mean nowadays a bank robbery will give you some measly K USD, though friedcat was a million USD target with no protection. If you think about it then its a wonder that something like that didnt happen before.  Roll Eyes

Though i really would like to know the truth. Organized crime could have gone in way before too.

Or abducted by aliens and is being probed right now  Roll Eyes I think it is pretty obvious he ran off after this last gen was a bust. I do not think that was his plan from the start, but after multiple failed gens of miners he bailed.
3067  Other / Meta / Re: Should a new section be added for trust disputes? on: May 19, 2015, 11:57:35 AM
We already have a section for that. See this thread, it obviously is used for this purpose already.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=105136.msg11169188#msg11169188

Well played sir...that was nice  Wink
3068  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [Official Seller] Silver Wallets - A New Kind of Physical Storage on: May 19, 2015, 04:58:32 AM
I appreciate the feedback and the research. I will be passing this along and see what they say about it. I have to agree with you that the reverse font does need some improvement.
3069  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Casascius Coins on: May 19, 2015, 04:52:18 AM

You do not multiply the markup times the face value. There is a 1BTC + premium for these coins. All Casascius silver coins command at a minimum of 1BTC+ of a premium. Take a look through previous sales and you will see the pricing trends.

Blazed,

First, the multiple I reference is merely a way to compare prices across different coins - 1x face, 3x face, etc.

Second, it's arrogant (and a bit naive) of you to say that all silver coins command this exact amount of premium. What makes you the authority over pricing? Why should any of us make buying decisions on what you randomly declare on some thread?

The premium is what amount over face one wants to pay (or receive). The multiple is a way to compare that premium across different coins.

And finally, it's only MY opinion when I say that X over face value is too much. The market price is whatever anyone will pay for a coin at any given period in time. I respect the good discussion and all of you (don't let my sometimes-sharp-tongue make you believe otherwise!)

Quickseller, As for my purchase of the tenth for BTC0.71, i can share proof - how do I insert or paste an image to a post? My purchase wasn't made on the forum, but I can verify date, purchase price, and the fact that it's mine.


I was speaking from my limited experience with these coins and not for everyone. From what I have seen silver Casascius coins command those premiums...I could be wrong.
3070  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Lealana sets // f*D bitcoin bars reservation! on: May 18, 2015, 09:14:31 PM
I will take 2 bars
3071  Economy / Collectibles / Re: Pre-Order - 5" Bitcoin Bar (10-packs for $300) - Only 6 out of 10 left available on: May 18, 2015, 08:45:10 PM
Will the holograms have a window like Casascius used? Any chance of a plastic case for these also?
3072  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Casascius Coins on: May 18, 2015, 01:41:55 PM
Sold to djjacket
3073  Economy / Auctions / Re: 24k gold iphone 6 plus 128gb on: May 18, 2015, 12:05:23 PM
Well my bid still stands since you are willing to ship first  Wink
3074  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Casascius Coins on: May 18, 2015, 12:02:07 PM
Nice coins. I struggle with your valuations.

You're pricing the error coin at 6x face value?!? You realize that it's the most second common coin issued by Mike, right? Over 5,000 of these error coins remain funded (of a 6,000 mintage).

And the "tenth" coin is going for 15x face value? I guess I see your rationale for the higher valuation, because only 800 where minted, but 15x is way too much.

I look forward to seeing what these coins go for. My opinion is only my own but I believe the rationale on some of the offer prices for these coins are just insane and, worse, without logic. I think it's an important discussion for us all to have.

Cant speak for the error coin but if you find a casas tenth below 1 BTC please let me know.  Would buy em at that price point all day.  1.55 btc is not too far fetch.  They have been selling in and around there for awhile now.

Why should the tenth be 15 times more expensive than other coins with similar mintage? Just because people want that much doesn't mean people should be paying it. I bought my tenth for BTC0.71.

If we want fair prices we have to agree to only give fair bids and only accept fair offers.

You do not multiply the markup times the face value. There is a 1BTC + premium for these coins. All Casascius silver coins command at a minimum of 1BTC+ of a premium. Take a look through previous sales and you will see the pricing trends.
3075  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Casascius physical coins on: May 18, 2015, 11:58:02 AM
Jesus 75btc for a 25btc coin that's unreal Shocked.

Actually, given that BTC1 casascius coins go for 2-3 times the value of the bitcoin loaded on the coin, the BTC75 price tag isn't that far off for a BTC25 coin. I wish we had more information on what these coins have sold for in the past.


Quickseller stated it above.  Loaded 1BTC casascius coins that sell for 3BTC are receiving a premium of 2BTC for the coin.  The premium is the amount over the face value loaded and not a multiple of the face value.  This coin has to be exceptionally rare, especially in the buyers eye to gain a price of 75BTC with a premium of 50BTC.

I was just reading the casascius threads where the 1BTC coins were sold at 1.25BTC + 1BTC for shipping and 25BTC coins were sold at 28BTC + 1BTC for shipping.  I'm not saying such a premium isn't warranted for this coin as I don't know the specifics of the backstory and previous ownership, but I'm guessing a 3BTC premium back in the day was probably like $30-40?  Right now a 2BTC premium is around $475 which means there is quite a difference and we can just imagine what happens to a 50BTC premium, eh?   Wink (approx. $12,000)

How many of these coins were produced that make them this rare?

I disagree. A valuation multiple is how one arrives at the premium. You or Quicksilver or anyone can say - all casascius coins should be sold for the same nominal amount over face value - it could be BTC1, BTC2, BTC10, whatever. The relationship between that amount and face value is the valuation multiple.

You're right that the premium isn't a valuation multiple (they're different things). But I disagree with how you guys are approaching this. I believe the premium paid over face shouldn't be the same. E.g., by your rationale every Casascius coin should be sold for BTC2 over face value, so a BTC1 coin should sell for BTC3 and a BTC0.10 coin should sell for BTC2.10. That doesn't make any sense!

One thing I do agree on is getting the conversation and debate out there. Here's a link to the mintage -> http://www.spotcoins.com/bitcoin/casascius

It depends on the coin 100%

2013 Brass command hardly any premium due to supply and desirability. Some coins command huge premiums while others do not regardless of how many were minted. Take a look at the 2011 brass singles for example. The 2011 Series 1 (error hologram) has one of the largest premiums while the 2011 Series 2 (much less minted) command no where near the same. 








3076  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Casascius Coins on: May 17, 2015, 07:55:48 PM
Trying to take a picture of it next to other brass coins. It is one of the cleaner coins of the 2011 - 2013's I have, but pictures are so hard to get with multiple coins  Huh
3077  Economy / Auctions / Re: 24k gold iphone 6 plus 128gb on: May 17, 2015, 06:52:24 PM
I will bid 1BTC if you will send first to me. Feel free to check my feedback and either agree or disagree with my bid.
3078  Other / Meta / Re: "Quickseller" marked my account red rating with no evidence in ANGER, UNETHICAL on: May 17, 2015, 04:29:16 PM
Quickseller and Vod will die soon enough.

Thank you blazed out for providing me with the drop address u sent quickseller's coin to.


Here I will state it publicly to keep it fair...


Barack Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Northwest, Washington, DC 20500

Deliver notes: Oval Office - Leave on desk


3079  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [WTS] Casascius Coins on: May 17, 2015, 04:19:36 PM
Very nice Blazed, You have quite the collection Wink

Best of luck on the sale!

Thanks! It is amazing the difference with this MS-66 compared to others I am surprised it is not an MS-67.

I should toss up a picture of it next to a 65 to show the amazing diff between the 2..
3080  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Bitcointalk Escrows [Updated Daily] Trade Safely! on: May 17, 2015, 02:27:45 PM
Well for what it is worth...

TomatoCage and OgNasty are in my opinion the most trusted escrow guys here. I have personally trusted both of them with good amounts of coin. I think the "big 5" are all pretty legit and I would trust any of them with some of my coins...some with more than others. I would also trust some of the guys not in the big 5.

Overall I think this list is pretty good and I am glad it is being maintained! I have been doing some escrows lately (never asked/wanted to) and it can be sort of a hassle, so their fees/tips are warranted imo.



Pages: « 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 [154] 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 ... 373 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!