A phenomenal project
With that being said, aren't you guys afraid that there's not that big of interest in Education and Science? I mean, people care more about social media and sneakers these days. Is this going to be profitable at all, in your estimation?
You are right but on the other hand, there are plenty of projects which focus on those popular things like social media and the market spreads throughout all of them. Scientificcoin on the other hand is on of the few who focus on the field of science. |
|
|
|
Any major updates and news ? or are they more active in telegram, or did I miss the post in the thread
There is no major update yet but as I know they are active here if you looked into the previous few pages. I am not visited their telegram channel yet, so don't know whether they are active in there or not. No major news but they are on the horizon. The presale will start in less than 3 weeks and the MVP should be ready by then. It looks like a good timing. Let's hope the market will be a bit up in September and more responsive to the good news. And of course the existance of an mvp is beneficial for investors. |
|
|
|
A phenomenal project.
With that being said, aren't you guys afraid that there's not that big of interest in Education and Science? I mean, people care more about social media and sneakers these days. Is this going to be profitable at all, in your estimation?
It's normal that most of the people pay more attention to social media than science intheir freee time. At the end what most want to do in their free time is to relax and be with their family and friends. I think if they launch science projects that are really useful for everyone or make everyday life easier people will get interested. Of course, good marketing is crucial for the success of the platform. The platform could also attract some people who are not interested in profit but only in science. These people would support projects only because they like them. Correct point of view definitely, because i have a lot of friends that they dont have any interest in crypto but they like funding projects in web platforms. With this you can take them on board maybe. Such people should just have an inherent pursuit for science and at least a little belief in crypto) maybe it's true that people are more interested in social media-based projects, but there are also sector investors interested in scientific projects, so marketing will be fundamental for this project... I think this is the reason why they don't have a normal ICO, they know there aren't many smaller investors in the crypto community that are interested in science projects. Especially these days, when the market is already tough as it is, investors don't have much money to invest. Not having an ICO might be actually a good idea. It is quite risky still I think, but we will see how it will work out for them. I think it is just honest for most projects not to do an ICO. Most projects will have nothing to do with the blockchain. ICOs aren't supposed to be a money grab. ICO is the fastest way to get money and it works and of course many projects are in crypto just for those purposes. I haven't actually seen many projects that are not conducting an ICO. |
|
|
|
Whatever news you give to community or potential investors in these market condition, it'll sure goes to waste. So delaying some important news that can create a hype for your project, is smart move. Every project should do that in august.
I think you have a valid point and that it seems they are kind of withholding good news and maybe they will release it at the right timing. Hopefully I'm correct with that.  You guys have a solid point. I haven't actually thought about it this way, but it sure seems a smart way to put good news aside for a while longer, because whatever good news you gonna give us now, it's not actually gonna change much. But I wouldn't make it a normal practice. |
|
|
|
I think the project is quite difficult with its technical implementation but I am confident with the team's capacity to deliver on this one successfully.
I agree, it's a massive project,complicated not only from the technical point of view, but also from the implementation side. It will require a lot of legwork, patnerships etc, but the team looks very experienced and professional to me, so with a bit of luck I hope they gonna deliver. |
|
|
|
A phenomenal project.
With that being said, aren't you guys afraid that there's not that big of interest in Education and Science? I mean, people care more about social media and sneakers these days. Is this going to be profitable at all, in your estimation?
It's normal that most of the people pay more attention to social media than science intheir freee time. At the end what most want to do in their free time is to relax and be with their family and friends. I think if they launch science projects that are really useful for everyone or make everyday life easier people will get interested. Of course, good marketing is crucial for the success of the platform. The platform could also attract some people who are not interested in profit but only in science. These people would support projects only because they like them. Correct point of view definitely, because i have a lot of friends that they dont have any interest in crypto but they like funding projects in web platforms. With this you can take them on board maybe. Such people should just have an inherent pursuit for science and at least a little belief in crypto) maybe it's true that people are more interested in social media-based projects, but there are also sector investors interested in scientific projects, so marketing will be fundamental for this project... I think this is the reason why they don't have a normal ICO, they know there aren't many smaller investors in the crypto community that are interested in science projects. Especially these days, when the market is already tough as it is, investors don't have much money to invest. Not having an ICO might be actually a good idea. It is quite risky still I think, but we will see how it will work out for them. |
|
|
|
Ethereum is dropping badly.
I wonder what is the ratio of 16m $ is crypto and fiat. I hope it is all fiat with current market.
I wonder that too. Still waiting on that proof from the team. I hope the market will recover soon. Hate to see my portfolio all in red. These are some depressing times for crypto. |
|
|
|
[ Has there been any collaborations or partnership with scientific communities and organizations? I think it will boost the project if the team got any of those partnerships.
That is what they are planing for if you look at their presentation. But partnership, would like to know if they have any I haven't found any information regarding any partnerships on the website, so I guess they are still to get them in the future. I am also looking for any information with the partnerships with other science related companies because it will be a great and revolutionary project if they will find a good and reliable partners. On the other side, a crowfunding platform doesn't require many partnerships. The most important thing for them is to attract projects, so they do need a strong marketing campaign. But partnerships with other reliable companies can be a great asset to the project to attract more customers and investors. Collaboration and integration with other companies will play an important role to their success. I think that some kind of agreement with some scientific community or organization is essential for the success of the project. Yeah, you are absolutely right. Most of the customers and investors are looking for a great and strong project team and that includes the partnerships. Big part of the project will achieve by the help of those associate or colleagues. I think it would be good for the project if the team could take part in some scientific events like conferences or some seminars, maybe do some presentations. It's in our plans! By the way, we have already done in Siberia (Novosibirsk research center) That's great. Would be nice if you post some news like this in this thread or maybe in other media. What events are you planning to participate in? |
|
|
|
Actually, there was an informed update on the investment of an Indian investor and participation of such Company, something very worthy of a project with such potential as Ehealth, besides the possibility of a vast territory to work,
Such news indeed is a good news and I wish the investors number will be increased. This long term project need more support from investors and need a hard effort from the team as well. This is just the beginning. I am very confident that this project will attract many investors along the way, hopefully within next year. I think that huge countries such as India will benefit from eHealth. If you are in the hinterlands of India, doctors will be far and few between so that blockchain could help people there. yeah, hopefully this will be the project that does it all. I really believe that the potential of the project is huge, giving people access to doctors anywhere is something usefull. But you never know how the market can react to some new technologies like this one. Health care industry is a tough one, that I agree. So if eHealth team get some big partners or governmental support, that would be huge for them and also additional help in navigating the market. |
|
|
|
[ Has there been any collaborations or partnership with scientific communities and organizations? I think it will boost the project if the team got any of those partnerships.
That is what they are planing for if you look at their presentation. But partnership, would like to know if they have any I haven't found any information regarding any partnerships on the website, so I guess they are still to get them in the future. I am also looking for any information with the partnerships with other science related companies because it will be a great and revolutionary project if they will find a good and reliable partners. On the other side, a crowfunding platform doesn't require many partnerships. The most important thing for them is to attract projects, so they do need a strong marketing campaign. But partnerships with other reliable companies can be a great asset to the project to attract more customers and investors. Collaboration and integration with other companies will play an important role to their success. I think that some kind of agreement with some scientific community or organization is essential for the success of the project. Yeah, you are absolutely right. Most of the customers and investors are looking for a great and strong project team and that includes the partnerships. Big part of the project will achieve by the help of those associate or colleagues. I think it would be good for the project if the team could take part in some scientific events like conferences or some seminars, maybe do some presentations. |
|
|
|
there is a lot of competitors in this sphere, look at lockchain or airbnb and etc. What is your main advantage?
Hi spawn4ever, we are building out a ‘one-stop’ portal where users will get travel inspiration, advice, and the ability to purchase their holiday. We will be equipping travellers with just the resources they need to know exactly where and for how long they want to go, whilst spending the adequate amount of currency. We term this as the BLD predicament - Budget, Location, Duration - which we are looking to solve for travelers. From a differentiation standpoint, 3 things differentiate us from other standard tokens (highlighted in our ANN thread). Sounds like you have it mapped out. Hope you guys will succeed. I've used quite many different kinds of travel apps and platforms, but majority of them have something missing and they are not well thought through. |
|
|
|
Is there any proof for those 16 million ?
We have raise funds in fiat and crypto so team will come up with best possible way to show the proof. until then follow us on our official social media. When are you guys planning on coming up with the proof? Would be good to see it before making any investment decisions. |
|
|
|
I miss the official announcements and / or dialogues made with the Community by the Team, the movement on youtube is also smaller, I hope this is due to the work in Partners and development
Maybe they could give additional energy to the project's marketing campaign so that it could enliven the community once and for all. There is no once and for all, they need to feed the community with updates and make them happy Updates will be important to make the community keep supporting the project. Otherwise people will ignore and this project can lose the potential investors. agreed , updates need to happen regularly to keep people engaged. Ehealth updates but like their long slow roadmap, updates too are few months apart.. I hope they will accelerate in the future yes, it would be nice if they did monthly updates and a few videos occasionally I agree, being such a long term project its normal that they can't have news every day. At least they continue updating some interesting news about the project occasionally. I think it should be more updates coming when the sale is gonna be happening, also afterwards regarding partnerships and development, so we shouldn't be worried now. |
|
|
|
Yet I do not understand how each project will be able to run its ICO on your platform
It's pretty straightforward: as a project owner, you can create your own smart contract (picking from many templates) and start to raise money. In addition, your project will be listed on our platform ranked by several factors couldn't they just use existing fundraising platforms ? or this one is specially designed for research project ? I think that having the scientific projects in the same platform will make it easier to get the info about them for investors than searching in different platforms. I agree. On a platform where everything at once is available it's much harder to navigate, you also spend too much time and can't make a decision in the end. |
|
|
|
To clarify previous conversations: Initially, we will accept only ETH because it's easier. In the second stage, we will be accepting also BTC and all the major coins: FIAT is an option in place because, frankly, it's difficult to think a world without FIAT  (at the moment) Keeping FIAT with respect to other coins is a good choice as people still need a bridge for FIAT to crypto transition. Not a lot of ICO's have the FIAT option, mostly because in this space it's easier to contribute with ETH. I think it is a good sign nevertheless. It could attract more people. This is what crypto needs. Allowed people to participate on the project with fiat is make sense but at the end all of investors need to use crypto. Using fiat may attract ordinary investors to join. In the begging the fiat option may be really useful, later I think they won't need in anymore. You can use exchanges for these purposes. |
|
|
|
If everyone accepts crypto fiat will die  Studying the history of money is interesting.. It's a promised token nothing much Would be really good if everybody could accept fiat, but we're still a long way from that point. Governments are now doing everything to not make it happen. So it's a good idea for Vidy to consider exchange to fiat on their platform. |
|
|
|
To clarify previous conversations: Initially, we will accept only ETH because it's easier. In the second stage, we will be accepting also BTC and all the major coins: FIAT is an option in place because, frankly, it's difficult to think a world without FIAT (at the moment) Thanks for the update! So you are considering fiat, that's good to know. What about dividends and royalties? Can you please clarify that? |
|
|
|
I doubt dividends will be paid out in fiat. They would need their own exchange for that and that would only complicate the situation.
I think so too. Maybe they will use their own token for that. It would keep things simple for them. I've never seen any project pay out dividends in fiat. it's just too complicated and isn't worth it. They probably will pay in their own tokens but paying in fiat would be a nice option too. Even if they offered fiat, I think many people prefer to stay somewhat anonymous and would chose ETH or token payments but having a fiat option would be nice for some people. Of course it would be nice, but I don't think it's happening. Even ETH payments are not that popular amongst projects, usually it's just their own coins, that's the easiest for them. |
|
|
|
i also think they are doing so at the moment, looking for new partnerships and potential new investors, Japan could be a great place to launch the project...
Japan would indeed be a good choice imo. They are open to new technology and have great health infrastructure. Yeah, yeah, Japan is obliged to do something in healthcare because it's an aging nation. If they will accept this project, we all be in chocolate. Ok, maybe being "in chocolate" is not the best way to describe the profit we can get if all goes right But yesss... Having Japan being involved could seriously boost this whole project, and seems like the best place to start with it... They love to try new things, even to the extreme... so let's all hope Japan is the place to be ! Hahaha, good one. Asia has a lot of potential in the healthcare field. I think launching there is easier than in Europe/America and like you said, they are usually open to innovation, so I hope eHealth platform will have a great start. |
|
|
|
Is there any proof for those 16 million ?
I think there's a missed opportunity in BCT to pin certain reactions from the OP's on questions asked. It's been several times I saw this exact question pass by in here, and sure it already has been answered.. but I do understand that not all of us have the time or urge to scroll back in all the previous messages. It only keeps popping up, because it wasn't properly answered. Answers like "soon" or "we will publish it" I don't count. It will keep being asked until the team finally publishes that list of investors they promised a long time ago or give us something else instead. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
