Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 07:22:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
321  Other / Meta / Re: Crumbs, Hashfast, and ban. on: January 12, 2014, 02:33:45 PM
...
Well, quite honestly, the mods aren't trying to gain the approval of the users, I'd say the fact that out of 200,000 accounts, there are only a handful of, "OMG MY ACCOUNT WAS BANNED WRONGFULLY" threads is actually rather impressive...

Considering that one needs to proxy/Tor, create a new account, and wait 4 hours to make a pointless thread guaranteed to do zero good, i'd say you're easiloy impressed.

And then those accounts that are doing zero good get banned, which proves my point.

If only you actually banned all of his Alts -
NickDanger
bromide
Cropcircle
DoloresMaze
webgypsy
Bambifan101
Thumper650
Dolor
DoloresHazed
AccountManagement
AccountMarketing
AccountsUnlimited
Bambilion
Truffix
450Desmo

Most of these are quite obvious, some you have to look at him defending himself in meta threads with newbie accounts.

He will likely just make some new ones but at least he has to work a little bit harder Smiley

See the problem is, in the active mining thread, people use the term "crumbs" as an insult in an attempt to discredit what someone is saying. I can safely say that 80% of those names you listed are not him.

You mean you can safely say that 80% of those names are hidden behind a VPN/Proxy.
322  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The Chili – 30+GH/s BFL based Bitcoin Miner Assembly on: January 11, 2014, 04:41:42 PM


Bringing back old memories!
323  Other / Meta / Re: Crumbs, Hashfast, and ban. on: January 11, 2014, 04:35:30 PM
...
Well, quite honestly, the mods aren't trying to gain the approval of the users, I'd say the fact that out of 200,000 accounts, there are only a handful of, "OMG MY ACCOUNT WAS BANNED WRONGFULLY" threads is actually rather impressive...

Considering that one needs to proxy/Tor, create a new account, and wait 4 hours to make a pointless thread guaranteed to do zero good, i'd say you're easiloy impressed.

And then those accounts that are doing zero good get banned, which proves my point.

If only you actually banned all of his Alts -
NickDanger
bromide
Cropcircle
DoloresMaze
webgypsy
Bambifan101
Thumper650
Dolor
DoloresHazed
AccountManagement
AccountMarketing
AccountsUnlimited
Bambilion
Truffix
450Desmo

Most of these are quite obvious, some you have to look at him defending himself in meta threads with newbie accounts.

He will likely just make some new ones but at least he has to work a little bit harder Smiley
324  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: January 10, 2014, 10:01:24 PM
If you are confident in your claim then make the bet, but since you are not you are a self admitted liar.
What bet? It's public knowledge that you did. Do you understand how betting works? Shocked

As I thought and fully expected.

Pankkake has been proven a liar

Enjoy the rest of your night. If you do ever feel like losing some money to me, take me up on those bets.

@pankkake:  Watch what you say, d00d, shit just got serious:

Quote from: #Activemining
<Bargraphics> Find out where crumbs lives and you instantly end his trolling
<Bargraphics> Once you make him responsible for what he says
<Bargraphics> he no longer will say anything
<Bargraphics> same with pankkake

If he offers a nice bounty, i might turn that crumbs character in.  Bar's got some coins, you know.  Losing them as fast as he can, but some left.
May I direct Bargraphics to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=344219.msg3954890#msg3954890

Making threats to my physical integrity, as I understand, isn't very smart, from someone who's going to be part of the eventual ActimeMining lawsuit.

This was not a threat, you read it as so because you are a troll and you expect that people will want to hurt you physically. I'm simply stating a fact, once you come out from behind your handle you will not troll very much indeed.

Now I am placing you on ignore because I have already proven you a liar and weasel. Bye
325  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: January 10, 2014, 09:53:44 PM
Defending him makes you an accomplice. "At law, an accomplice is a person who actively participates in the commission of a crime, even though they take no part in the actual criminal offense."
Trying to sell miners that do not exist make you an accomplice.

If you are confident in your claim then make the bet, but since you are not you are a self admitted liar.

"openly told people to seek legal action against the company if they wanted to", is irrelevant, of course if they want to they will do it, but you're trying to discourage it. Because you, and the whole "Advisory Board" will also go down with it.
Again if you are confident in your claim then make the bet. But you are a liar so that won't be happening.


The lie isn't about visiting them, I couldn't care less, it's about what you said. And then, deleting your post. Kinda telling, no?

Again if you are confident you can prove that I'm somehow involved with the Terrahash scam besides "cheerleading" then make the bet. I know for a FACT you won't do this as this is easily provable and I would immediately win.

PS: I explained why I deleted my posts, it makes trolls and liars like you go NUTS. It sent you all in a frenzy the moment I did it all recorded here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=198489.msg3246606#msg3246606
Since you guys continue to go crazy I'm going to assume it is still working.
326  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: January 10, 2014, 09:44:35 PM
Since you also seem to have a hard time reading, I'm betting that you are a liar. To be more precise, you lied about the following:

4 ur edification:

<Bargraphics> there's no class action on this type of case
<Vigilante> BG, are you not a shareholder?
<Bargraphics> Yes I'm a shareholder of an unregulated company in belize
<uhm> well as you see i dont have any experience in these type of stuff but i'm willing to donate to get this started
<Bargraphics> the only people that have experience in this will not start it
<Bargraphics> I promise you
<Vigilante> OK, why is that?
<Bargraphics> you have to literally understand you are putting good money after bad
<Bargraphics> to want to do this
<uhm> so you would rather wait and see your money burn?
<Bargraphics> it's burned
<Bargraphics> completely and utterly burned

Completely.  And utterly.  The Slaughter clan thanks you for your patronage.
Uh, why would you expect kslaughter's accomplices to want any action against the company? They obviously have everything to lose.

I am not kslaughter's "accomplice" in any way shape or form.
I openly told people to seek legal action against the company if they wanted to.

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
He was giving cautious updates untill he realised Bargraphics was coming and wouldn't be able to explain why theres nothing to see.
Bargraphics being both a shareholder and having already lied about his visits (cf. TerraHash), I doubt that.
He had nothing to fear from this scammer.
I did in fact visit Terrahash

Feel free to lie some more and I will add this to the list. I proposed a very simple solution. If you are indeed NOT a liar then you would have no problem coming up with evidence to a third party that would support your claims. But instead you will opt out of this, continue to quick post garbage about not understanding and continue to troll.

Since I very obviously spelt it out for you I expect you will now decline.
327  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: January 10, 2014, 09:35:12 PM
lol
I have no idea what you want to "bet" on. That you're a scammer? It's already resolved, we can see your past actions. Of course, until you delete your posts.

Another assumption correct.

You lied and weasel out of another bet.

I'm just happy that we have this thread to show the community just how pathetic you really are.

Maybe one day you will put in the effort to actually state something truthful but more than likely you will continue to lie as you have shown to be so good at.

Let me know when you would like to prove your claims and if you can get a third party involved that we agree on to agree with you then you would win the bet, if they cannot agree with you then I would win the bet. Seems fairly straightforward something that I know for a fact you will not take me up on because as I've said before and will say again you are a Liar and a weasel.

328  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: January 10, 2014, 09:29:17 PM
What is your bet? Please submit a bet that will be approved by a third-party you lowlife scammer.

I'll let you set it up because you are a known liar and weasle so naturally you will bitch and moan about anything I set up.

Please put your money where your mouth is.
329  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: January 10, 2014, 09:26:43 PM
Pankkake is now a known liar
Oh really?

You're not only a liar, you're a scammer - trying to extract money from customers when you knew damn well there were no products. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389343.0

My assumptions were correct.

Thank you for only affirming that you are indeed a liar.
330  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: January 10, 2014, 08:00:10 PM
4 ur edification:

<Bargraphics> there's no class action on this type of case
<Vigilante> BG, are you not a shareholder?
<Bargraphics> Yes I'm a shareholder of an unregulated company in belize
<uhm> well as you see i dont have any experience in these type of stuff but i'm willing to donate to get this started
<Bargraphics> the only people that have experience in this will not start it
<Bargraphics> I promise you
<Vigilante> OK, why is that?
<Bargraphics> you have to literally understand you are putting good money after bad
<Bargraphics> to want to do this
<uhm> so you would rather wait and see your money burn?
<Bargraphics> it's burned
<Bargraphics> completely and utterly burned

Completely.  And utterly.  The Slaughter clan thanks you for your patronage.
Uh, why would you expect kslaughter's accomplices to want any action against the company? They obviously have everything to lose.

Pankkake is now a known liar -

Since you are so keen on "betting" I would like to wager one that I am not kslaughter's "accomplice" in any way shape or form. I would also place a wager that I openly told people to seek legal action again the company if they wanted to. Might as well throw in a wager that I did in fact visit Terrahash as well.

Assumptions:
You will either decline and come up with an excuse as to why you are declining
You will not reply to this at all and continue trolling
I guarantee you will not accept any of these bets because you cannot "put your money where your mouth is".

Good day Madam.
331  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 10, 2014, 06:00:46 PM
<Bargraphics> there's no class action on this type of case
<Vigilante> BG, are you not a shareholder?
<Bargraphics> Yes I'm a shareholder of an unregulated company in belize
<uhm> well as you see i dont have any experience in these type of stuff but i'm willing to donate to get this started
<Bargraphics> the only people that have experience in this will not start it
<Bargraphics> I promise you
<Vigilante> OK, why is that?
<Bargraphics> you have to literally understand you are putting good money after bad
<Bargraphics> to want to do this

Bargraphics is completely right - let's discuss the potential outcomes.

1. you run out of money before you get a verdict, then have to cover the other sides costs (most likely)
2. you lose, and have to cover both sides costs (very likely)
3. you win, but all the winnings only cover legal expenses and put your investment out of business. (least likely)
4. you sit back, and see what happens, and you might get rich, or your shares might be worth nothing.

Options 1,2, & 3 look great. Good thinking team. /sarcasm

If people only filed rape reports when it was financially advantageous for them, rapists would be free to continue with their rapings.
You have been raped, punked, what have you.
I applaud you for "sitting back and seeing what happens."
*There are people who actually believe in things like justice, and don't enjoy surprise butsecs of the Slaughter variety.

Thankfully this is the difference between criminal and civil - although Bargraphics rightly points out that if things don't get sorted then there may be a criminal case to answer for, but trying to get that ball rolling would end us all up with nothing, whereas I'm still confident ActM will eventually come up with something. We aren't particularly overdue and we don't know the extent of the problems.

Business != Rape

Risk != Rape

Profit != Risk Free

Please stop responding to crumbs if at all possible.
332  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 10, 2014, 06:00:03 PM
freenode irc?  what channel?


Freenode #ActiveMining

Any chance the reCAPTCHA can be made accessible for humans? What a joke!

lol you can click on the audio button!
333  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 10, 2014, 05:50:38 PM
freenode irc?  what channel?


Freenode #ActiveMining
334  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 10, 2014, 05:48:41 PM
Springfield, Mo – May 22, 2013 – AMC has announced today that they have started the process of porting their Bitcoin mining code to a FLip Chip 672 45nm. The port of AMC's code to this chip is expected to provide over 6 GH/s of hashing power per chip. AMC is a hybrid mining and development cooperative and a business unit of VMC.

45nm chips really?? who is AMC? and how long have you been working on this project?
Can you provide us some real pictures?




AMC is a hybrid mining and development cooperative and a business unit of VMC.

We have been working on this project for a little over a year.

Not yet,  but we are working on it.


So in May 2013 we were close to having hashing 45nm chips? We never saw the pictures I guess (I wasn't around then) but could this be what the shipped products are based around? Or was Ken making it up in May?

Obviously he didn't have a full business plan put together yet and figured he could only get away with 45nm with an IPO on here. So once he struck a deal with eASIC 28nm he then put that plan into action instead of a 45nm. Also based on his post he was going to do a 45nm Standard-Cell not FPGA Copy. It would cost just about the same as the 28nm eASIC (Probably more if he was planning on doing a flip-chip as that packing is not cheap)

To answer the Bold, the answer is NO, porting anything over is the very first step once you contact a backend design company. Then you get to wait around 12 weeks for them to finish that, 8 weeks for the mask, 8 weeks for the wafers.
335  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 10, 2014, 05:42:49 PM
<Bargraphics> there's no class action on this type of case
<Vigilante> BG, are you not a shareholder?
<Bargraphics> Yes I'm a shareholder of an unregulated company in belize
<uhm> well as you see i dont have any experience in these type of stuff but i'm willing to donate to get this started
<Bargraphics> the only people that have experience in this will not start it
<Bargraphics> I promise you
<Vigilante> OK, why is that?
<Bargraphics> you have to literally understand you are putting good money after bad
<Bargraphics> to want to do this

Bargraphics is completely right - let's discuss the potential outcomes.

1. you run out of money before you get a verdict, then have to cover the other sides costs (most likely)
2. you lose, and have to cover both sides costs (very likely)
3. you win, but all the winnings only cover legal expenses and put your investment out of business. (least likely)
4. you sit back, and see what happens, and you might get rich, or your shares might be worth nothing.

Options 1,2, & 3 look great. Good thinking team. /sarcasm

As usual crumbs misquotes by only taking a snippit of the IRC conversation (I recommend all shareholders visit the IRC regardless if this troll is in there (He never talks so it's all good)

Vince does a good job at explaining the steps.

There are a few people in the IRC chat that want to take legal action to try and get their money back and I have told them that they should do it and report back to us but also told them what to expect so they are not just throwing good money after bad. All the Pre-orders would have to be refunded to customers, since Ken only took "$1M supposedly" just for the NRE for eASIC that means he would have most likely had to dabble in Pre-order money. So once all the pre-orders get refunded (and I imagine that there is probably lack of money to do even this) then shareholders would get the remainder split based on shares and still likely have to pay legal costs for the case.

That leaves two options in my mind, a criminal case by contacting the SEC and letting them do all the work and pretty much be guaranteed to never see any money again but it would likely result in anyone involved within management to be in serious trouble which might feel good for some of you seeking revenge or since we know there is an eASIC contract we can just wait and see if there is a recovery of this project from the new teams and potentially recover some money that way.

Basically do whatever you guys feel needs to be done as no one else is going to do it for you.
336  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: January 10, 2014, 04:17:32 PM
http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/16qwSTqZq2Uv8WeNvCGhetVDkdU1a8QfC5

Did it die after 9 days? I am seeing zeros for over 3 hours. I guess at least it is still under warranty ... barely.

Nah! Probably moved it, along with 500 others, to another pool. In Bitcoin-speak, it's called a three-prong attack. Search the term on this forum if you're not familiar with the reference.

Luke said that his Colo PC is down and he can't get to it right now. So it appears to not be the unit.
337  Economy / Securities / Re: Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC (LabRatMining) Official Announcement on: January 10, 2014, 02:56:49 PM
Buying GH on CEX is a bad idea, imo.

A better idea would be for LR to buy LRM bonds from people selling them. And deleting the acquired amount from the list of outstanding bonds.


Currently based on the "Trade-book Thread" LabRat would only be able to buy around 400 Shares for 26BTC (What I estimate he would get for the Alt Coins currnetly)

This means our shares would be worth 0.8% more.

My recommendations would be to wait til we have a trading platform to do this as there will likely be more people willing to get out lower once it's on an actual exchange.

I also recommend to not tell the community you are doing this until after it is done.

My final recommendation is to just give out dividends on the Alt Coins in one lump sum currently and then cash them out weekly at the current going rate and add it to the dividends.
338  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 08, 2014, 11:26:35 PM
Who was it that was suppose to fly out to AMC and visit Ken for a few days?  Anyone know when that was suppose to happen?

I am,

It will be next week and I'll report what I can as soon as I can.

The same boy who visited Terrahash & told everyone it was 100% legit.

I know right and two weeks later was trying to sell off his orders.

Really Flashman? I expected better of you. At least do some research and try not to quote crumbs next time.
339  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 08, 2014, 10:41:34 PM

For sure, I'll be doing whatever I can to shed some light on what's going on Smiley

Do you have an actual invitation from Ken as in "yeah come 'round and visit the subterranean assembly and production center"?

Yes I do
340  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: January 08, 2014, 10:11:06 PM
Who was it that was suppose to fly out to AMC and visit Ken for a few days?  Anyone know when that was suppose to happen?

I am,

It will be next week and I'll report what I can as soon as I can.

Take plenty of pictures

For sure, I'll be doing whatever I can to shed some light on what's going on Smiley
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!