Are your wallets secure?
I'm trying to find differences.
What do you mean by "secure" ? Encrypt Wallet I'm certain that doesn't make a difference but still... How many of you have? mine is encrypted from the start and i had a lucky start Ta. |
|
|
|
Are your wallets secure?
I'm trying to find differences.
What do you mean by "secure" ? Encrypt Wallet I'm certain that doesn't make a difference but still... How many of you have? |
|
|
|
|
Are your wallets secure?
I'm trying to find differences.
|
|
|
|
Quick update from me. 9 Servers Mining All Xeons 24hrs has passed Got 1 block from the lowest server I have (3.2hps) and received payment  ? The rest of the servers are still 0 Grrrrrrrrrrrr...... |
|
|
|
Is there any pool for this?
Not yet |
|
|
|
13 blocks found so far at 13.9hpm (I5 2500k @ 4.  Impressive. Linux or Windows ? And also, is the CPU overclocked ? Memory type ? running windows 7 x64, I5 2500k is watercooled and running at 4.8 per core, 8gb ram (nothing special but not cheap generic stuff)  Mark, send us your debug log please. Many of us are getting no blocks. |
|
|
|
Can some explain exactly how to run two instances on windows? I keep getting an invalid directory error when I try.
Invalid dir means you didnt create the dir |
|
|
|
Got an orphaned block (4318)...  Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Found Hash 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
hash 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
hash2 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
ProtoSharesMiner:
proof-of-work found
hash: 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
target: 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
CBlock(hash=00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6, ver=2, hashPrevBlock=00015256e4cdc600b182ce84ea9b338e5b063f0d4589a981fda56e633b15a614, hashMerkleRoot=b87069d59d66689866a67dc31a8bd909db09e129663fc389b7eff715c74d98fb, nTime=1383820522, nBits=1f03ffc0, nNonce=790, vtx=1, birthdayA=28499000, birthdayB=44819077)
CTransaction(hash=b87069d59d66689866a67dc31a8bd909db09e129663fc389b7eff715c74d98fb, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase 02de100101062f503253482f)
CTxOut(nValue=45.12500000, scriptPubKey=021564c638818e04a0f330f58d3d25)
vMerkleTree: b87069d59d66689866a67dc31a8bd909db09e129663fc389b7eff715c74d98fb
generated 45.125
Mysteriously, the client did not detect any more new blocks on the network after this:
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 0c924fe7dfc73e251f98f8c91ef8feae1b8c8411ae52cf886cdb3be530f0dc79
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 5e928db870f7ba293dddfca1980542ca52a1966e4a1d6fd46942cd1a715630c9
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 2e3411858bfe95bb1c3219b7475cc07ef5463e81eedbdb510da87ea734174a06
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Flushed 3947 addresses to peers.dat 50ms
testHash d26f211aff3bcdeaedb6ba83496594d5be9c4ba3347e8760cf3bf607f65f4b42
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 007f75d8caac6f6a64a123a2d944a30c5bd5d13cb02b0b4e1786efabb0a13df1
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 8369c38bd81ac79951beaa593d66b5b609ad2da47bcfa8380dbb42bbb8eaa11f
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 8d7345baf24155331055ca1d41dd9f90956f7fac3c30ef8089b82452adec1cac
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 9b76b655c0f50f4a097525a60eab4cb54efc43de3b1bd81adde7c2da0de73e99
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 6fa02922604b61e5dcbb38d08938592e6161614a870e187455fe77025fefc700
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 18556a1fc9ef96a6bddd2265963c9e9234a358b1762d3cb91d570ee5bf34639c
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 46b59a88ebddb3e5541a0741f0bc9f3d7cd8ddec926e8a63587509513b219439
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
... going on for hours. Neither did this block seem to have been submitted. Only after I restarted it did it start syncing. For a small-time miner like me, orphans are a serious blow, especially an orphan caused like this... EDIT: My other processes also stopped syncing around 4200~4400... I'm also getting allot of this on a few of my servers. Can't figure out why. Closed the wallet and reopened, then its catches up sync Thats not good. This means I have to keep checking and loosing |
|
|
|
Another noobie question..
Is it better to run 2 wallets at 3 processes (total 8 hps each) or
3/4 wallets at 2 processes (results still at around 8 hps)
And also
If I stop a wallet as I need to restart a pc for any reason, does this mean the mining has lost its work and hours put it?
ta..
|
|
|
|
May I ask, how are you checking this for the rest of us? In windows?
Debug Window -> Debug Log File -> Open Ta |
|
|
|
Got an orphaned block (4318)... Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Found Hash 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
hash 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
hash2 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
ProtoSharesMiner:
proof-of-work found
hash: 00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6
target: 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
CBlock(hash=00028341b321db4386ff1e3078a49c020a56e958d83acfc45d5b6ac9fe7f29f6, ver=2, hashPrevBlock=00015256e4cdc600b182ce84ea9b338e5b063f0d4589a981fda56e633b15a614, hashMerkleRoot=b87069d59d66689866a67dc31a8bd909db09e129663fc389b7eff715c74d98fb, nTime=1383820522, nBits=1f03ffc0, nNonce=790, vtx=1, birthdayA=28499000, birthdayB=44819077)
CTransaction(hash=b87069d59d66689866a67dc31a8bd909db09e129663fc389b7eff715c74d98fb, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase 02de100101062f503253482f)
CTxOut(nValue=45.12500000, scriptPubKey=021564c638818e04a0f330f58d3d25)
vMerkleTree: b87069d59d66689866a67dc31a8bd909db09e129663fc389b7eff715c74d98fb
generated 45.125
Mysteriously, the client did not detect any more new blocks on the network after this:
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 0c924fe7dfc73e251f98f8c91ef8feae1b8c8411ae52cf886cdb3be530f0dc79
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 5e928db870f7ba293dddfca1980542ca52a1966e4a1d6fd46942cd1a715630c9
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 2e3411858bfe95bb1c3219b7475cc07ef5463e81eedbdb510da87ea734174a06
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Flushed 3947 addresses to peers.dat 50ms
testHash d26f211aff3bcdeaedb6ba83496594d5be9c4ba3347e8760cf3bf607f65f4b42
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 007f75d8caac6f6a64a123a2d944a30c5bd5d13cb02b0b4e1786efabb0a13df1
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 8369c38bd81ac79951beaa593d66b5b609ad2da47bcfa8380dbb42bbb8eaa11f
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 8d7345baf24155331055ca1d41dd9f90956f7fac3c30ef8089b82452adec1cac
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 9b76b655c0f50f4a097525a60eab4cb54efc43de3b1bd81adde7c2da0de73e99
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 6fa02922604b61e5dcbb38d08938592e6161614a870e187455fe77025fefc700
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 18556a1fc9ef96a6bddd2265963c9e9234a358b1762d3cb91d570ee5bf34639c
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
testHash 46b59a88ebddb3e5541a0741f0bc9f3d7cd8ddec926e8a63587509513b219439
Hash Target 0003ffc000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
... going on for hours. Neither did this block seem to have been submitted. Only after I restarted it did it start syncing. For a small-time miner like me, orphans are a serious blow, especially an orphan caused like this... EDIT: My other processes also stopped syncing around 4200~4400... May I ask, how are you checking this for the rest of us? In windows? |
|
|
|
|
Another noobie question..
Is it better to run 2 wallets at 3 processes (total 8 hps each) or
3/4 wallets at 2 processes (results still at around 8 hps)
And also
If I stop a wallet as I need to restart a pc for any reason, does this mean the mining has lost its work and hours put it?
ta..
|
|
|
|
I am New, why I get no block source available.., please help
Hi, You can force it to look at a node on startup. c:/YOURDIRECTORY/protoshares-qt.exe -addnode=168.63.12.227 |
|
|
|
Its a Xeon 5470 (which is a bit old) 4 cores per CPU. 24GB DDR. Its a new install (Windows . Two instances running. Should it really be allot more? When you say 2 instances, do you mean you run it with (that would be two threads) or that you run 2 separate instances of the wallet ? I'm running the wallet twice. Is this correct for my hardware: 2x Xeon 5470 which has 4 cores each. Total 8 threads (Task Manager, Performance would show 8 threads / cores). 24GB DDR 2 I've run the wallet twice selected 'Mine 2 Processors (1.74GB Required) Is this correct? I'm now confused. |
|
|
|
Morning..
I have a question please..
I'm mining 3x Instances and I'm still not peeking 100% usage on 2x Xeon 3.3. Its on 88%.
1) Shall I run another instant and peak it?
2) Or its better to not peak and allow it to work through?
Are you memory limited ? I was getting 2.3 hpm running a single instance on a i3, so this is pretty bad for a dual xeon. Xeons seem to perform kinda bad, i get 44 hpm on 32 cores (2.2 ghz each) in 32 threads (getting less with 64) thats 1.375 hpm per thread vs 2.5 hpm per thread on an ivy i3 Interesting.. Its a Xeon 5470 (which is a bit old) 4 cores per CPU. 24GB DDR. Its a new install (Windows . Two instances running. Should it really be allot more? |
|
|
|
Morning.. I have a question please.. I'm mining 3x Instances and I'm still not peeking 100% usage on 2x Xeon 3.3. Its on 88%. 1) Shall I run another instant and peak it? 2) Or its better to not peak and allow it to work through? Ta very much. PS: Does this look right: {
"blocks" : 4800,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00000382,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : 3,
"hashespermin" : 4.32148659,
"pooledtx" : 1,
"testnet" : false
}
|
|
|
|
|
Can admins of this forum help? Eg: provide ips and associated usernames?
|
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I have a question for some of you who have PM'd me and is helping dig some info.
After my Chinese investigators fired a few questions at me, it got me thinking.
How easy would it be, to pose as Fab and family to push more blame on them yet, Labcoin is driven by someone else from for eg, South America?
Why are we certain its Fab and family?
Show me and I'll debate with you and see if we can help my investigators.
Why because your investigators found the person named Sam Noi from Africa on Linkdin? If that's the case I would hire some new investigators. Look at my thread: click on the links also, that should provide more than enough info for your investigators, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322149.0There's more than enough information linking Alberto and Fabrizio directly, even if they aren't the ones running the company now, they damn well know who is. But given the fact that "Sam" deletes everything related to Alberto on this thread, and goes and deletes profiles with his old phone number that link him to Labcoin is more than suspicious. I raised the questions due to a story I got told by my guys. Basically, scams can be done by gangs who plant the blame on other scammers. Yes Alberto and Fabrizio exists and yes we can track them, but my spys claims it feels too easy and clumsy how they've left trails of their names and IP's EVERYWHERE.. Either they are dumb as shit or its allot more then whats on the surface. My question I'm posing is yes we know Alberto and Fabrizio exists and Howard has met them, but was it really them? Can Howard ID that person? That's what my investigators want to know. And, what guarantee can I have that its Alberto and Fabrizio? Cause the next step gets nasty. Only some of your research can answer this. |
|
|
|
Hi guys,
I want to dive in and buy hardware of my own. I've chosen the KNC and I'm willing to splash $4,995.
My question is:
1) I'm an IT engineer and as a novice miner who hasn't mined before, will I struggle?
2) I've done some calculations and it seems I'll re-earn what I spend in around 6-8 weeks even is the difficulty increases by 20%
3) Or, rather then buying hardware and hoping for the best, invest it into something like CEX.io?
Your opinions are greatly appreciated.
Ta.
Here is my advice . In a few more diff changes SHA256 will be under a paradox of difficulties. KnC are a reliable company becaue of the reasons I said they were previously, that was proven correct. KnC will the be faced with a paradox of diminishing returns. But They will have something that is hard to buy, a good reputation. So indeed what to do ......? Scrypt ASIC is ultimately the answer , as the selling potential is far greater than SHA256. Scrypt will own the ASIC market in just a few short years. So your dillema , chase this diff run or wait , I say do what you do but , keep some powder . Cryptocurrency isnt just BTC. Interesting.. Shall read about Scrypt BTC |
|
|
|
|
The prob is that I'm facing is allot of info thats gathered can be faked real easy. Including IP's.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
