Try those 3 things:
Use the other version of SGminer!, the one that got the bounty as first amd miner Be sure you Select the Platform correctly
If not
rename ( or delete ) the temporary bin file has been created in the directory.
If not
reset to stock all the card:
and then rename ( or delete ) the temporary bin file has been created in the directory.
|
|
|
Spoke too soon...
1.2.2
Rx 580, with intensity set at 124 ( but it was 0 in the config) working
Rx 580, with intensity set at 121/122/123/124 ( but selected by gpu) NOT working ( I was trying to find a better one)
I triple check the sintax, there is no parsing problem, it simply give no hashing.
|
|
|
and it work with rx 580.
Not sure about Baffin, but I will test it
|
|
|
at CnCwt.
1) change your name!Very hard to remember 2) which sgminer are you using Brian or ?
then try the other!
|
|
|
V1.2.1
rig of 4 rx 580.
mining xmr at nanopool
3 card hash, 1 not
tried with : stock ethereum setup
1150-850 core/2050 /850 memory
with intensity: 0 with intensity: 28 with intensity 56 ( the one suggested when input is 0)
no way:
Also: pci id for this card is 2, the other are 5, 7 and 9 However is seen as GP2 and not as 0
I am lost with all the version, but somewhere was said that index was following PCI bus id
|
|
|
here:https://github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak/releases
|
|
|
So, there are 21 billions.
And when a token is issued together with the Raven, the Raven will be destroyed ?
Any idea +- how many token have been issued on ether ?: Eos = 1 Billion...
|
|
|
@Omegaoracle: first of all doesn't make sense to dual mine eth + SIA. Look for a pool with Smartcash (keccak) or XVG (Blake2s) Sia is Asic right now, so, what you earn is less than the energy you use (on top of ethereum). The only two coins that I know where ist make sense are those two- Second: Vega is working with Claymore dual for sure. Not so sure if its ASM 1 or ASM 2 as I don't have one Vega. Quite sure the option Allcoin isn't needed, as you mine Ethereum Last: the "Awesome" babysitting become more and more "strict" every thing you learn. Its maybe time to take your motorbike and run. In other words, I don't know if Awesome setup is ok for you as I don't use Awesome
|
|
|
is the only pool not working ?
|
|
|
I don't like the idea of having my day to day transaction based on Bitmain.
I don't believe that developers at Etash and even Monero are doing something strong enough to have a decentralize network. The problem is a complex problem and need complex and structured answer
There are huge holes leaving the door open to Asic: for example, to name a few:
1) Mining solo: nobody does that in the normal mining. But allowing to do that open the door to Asic.
2) the developer of the coin MUST have direct relationship with the pool. Where is written that anybody can open a pool ? And distribute coins? If a developer want he can decide to send money ONLY to pools that are registered and that follow the rules indicate. It doesn't make sense that Monero, among others, realize that 1/3 or more of their hashrate is coming from nowhere.
It's like Tesla saying that anybody can sell their car. They are not doing that. The channel ownership is what define a business.
3) Do we want really 10000 pool spread across the globe in which 2M people mine ? Then algos must be choosen in order to do so.
4) do we want the lower energy for transaction ? well, Algos must be chooosen for that, difficulty increase / block reward need to be stable .
I like and mine Ubiq. They decide what they want and just trying to have the network follow them. I like the idea of RVN( well, pigeon idea is better). And I will wait to see what they would like to do with "an asic resistant" blockchain
|
|
|
I think so "Radeon HD 7730"; } "Radeon HD 7750"; } "Radeon HD 7770"; } "Radeon HD 7790"; } "Radeon HD 7850"; } "Radeon HD 7870"; } "Radeon HD 7870 XT"; } "Radeon HD 7950"; } "Radeon HD 7970 GE"; } "Radeon HD 7970"; } "Radeon HD 7990"; } "Radeon R5 240"; } "Radeon R7 240"; } "Radeon R7 250"; } "Radeon R7 250E"; } "Radeon R7 250X"; } "Radeon R7 260"; } "Radeon R7 260X"; } "Radeon R7 265"; } "Radeon R9 270"; } "Radeon R9 270X"; } "Radeon R9 280"; } "Radeon R9 280X"; } "Radeon R9 285"; } "Radeon R9 290"; } "Radeon R9 290X"; }
you will have to play with the specific algoritm setup (i.e. intensity, worksize) as the default value are not aggressive or, wait for the next version, that will probably come with an automatic optimizer
|
|
|
Probably one of your card hang up
|
|
|
at least in previous version it was mandatory to have a log file in the logfile ""
|
|
|
Baffin RX 550 2 gb polaris 21. oneclick timing strap with Polaris. ( don't ask me why but the same with SRBpolaris doesn't work) Shaders unlocked with SRBPolaris Works with XMR stak, Claymore but not with SRBminer No hash either with one thread or two. Btw, running it without any intensity and with one thread intensity is set at 58, with two at 25 Lexa (polaris 12) work even at those intensity Baffin: no way and even at 12 doesn't hash I will try later with the original bios
|
|
|
Ok, I was unable to mine a single share with 4 AMD Rx 580
sgminer -k skein -o stratum+tcp://stratum-eu.coin-miners.info:4933 -u wallet -p c=XDRA
with the SGMiner download from the 1st post produce:
Nothing because -k isn't a command accepted
But --algorithm skein is working
-- gpu-platform 2 is needed
but it gives:
Hw error: invalid nonce in all the GPUs even without setting Intensity
so, its seem that nobody even try to mine it with AMD
or that is too late and I made some stupid mistake
|
|
|
Name: VSA token – a business smart contract of Vesa's fund Issue: 40 000 000 VSA Initial rate: 1000 VSA = 0.20 - 0.35 ETH Exchange rate: 1 ETH - $1000 Since the additional issue of tokens is technically impossible and unsold tokens will be disposed of.
Starting on tuesday
|
|
|
@bylevani.
Are you sure you have a 60 GB SSD with 8 GTX 1080 ti ?
you spent a lot and you saved on the ssd ?
Well, the virtual memory is supposed to be at least equal to the sum of the GPUs memory.
And windows10 take minimum 20 GB..
|
|
|
Is it just me or NLpool is not working?
its you probably. I have 4 rigs there and in termo of XVG , results are in line with WTM.
|
|
|
Mining- x16r isn't hard with the current hardware, some of the 16 algos stresses the core, other the memory. I don't see how Dual mining can be achieved and making sense.
|
|
|
|