I don't know what more everybody would like to see in order to understand.
I have got a question: When Innosilicon, Halong and Baikal produced ALL that miners for Monero ? In the last 3 months ? Naahhh
They were selling at 10.000 $ the unit that may be it cost them 1000$ for a small profit of 9000 $. At that time a 240Kh mining with monero was producing around 1.3 $ a day/1 kh so something like 250 $ a day. So, in 18 days they made the same money than selling the goods they produced.
They did it when the words got out to some Monero Dev.
Same thing is happening here on Etash but: I haven't see a % pool distribution of etash If they really want to check, it just take to follow the same route used for Al Capone . Everything is in the Blockchain. List all the nodes, list all the nodes by value, in october 2017. And then list them now. And compare or just see all the transaction above 100 ethereum, or ask Nanopool & ethermine & supernova , there is plenty of way. Fact is, they aren't doing it And that said something
So, I agree 100 % that the 800 $ RIG is just a cover up.
I don't think I can do nothing more than mining Monero and never come back, unless they fork
|
|
|
that's the one that was doing 27.4 in the benchmarking of a couple of release back ?
|
|
|
mmm, lower that core,by 1030/875 ?
dcri 6 isn't exactly the number I got written down, are you Dual mining or not ?
|
|
|
I can sell you 300.000 turtle at 1 satoshi if you need : Beside joke, I was just advising that I've got mine sitting at exchange for 10 day ( now gone).
|
|
|
Sorry, I have to change my vote from x17 to Allium or groestl, if you believe we can come close to Nvidia performance.
To be fair: there is more money in x17, but there is more competition. On x16r there are 2 others miners based on old sgminer as well as x17 just arrived .
I'm old , and very bad as developer but I will do
1) make a Linux special edition 2)improve CN in all variant 3)Finish ( translate, make it faster x16R/S) 4) X17 ( and all the algos included give the option to mine just for that, like it was for sgminer) 5) Allium and Groestl may be smaller, but with less competition.
I will not spend 1 dollar in old high power card, buy a watt meter with the same money. People is looking at stability and power consumption, at least in europe
|
|
|
x16r works, x17 doesn't. But I "REM" it and it works with Alexis
|
|
|
I did follow the instructions,(thanks) also renaming enemy to ccminer... but it closed right 2 second after start benchmarking, probably I will need to change intensity, but isn't clear (to me !)where the script find it. I will try tonight
|
|
|
You unlocked the cu with srbpolaris ? Have you pimped your timing ?
Claymore starting with 11.4 does have a better kernel for baffin
did everything ?
ok, now you launch claymore mining ethereum only and let it figure out the intensity 8/12 that's the range
Then: you run hw info and look for no error, if no error increase the memory.
Now you dual mine xvg!
Put the same -dcr with the same number Claymore suggest for "Ethereum only"
+- 1 and TA - DA! you will get around 14.5 unless I forgot something.. got 3 baffin with micron, don't worry you will get that
|
|
|
you need an 8gb rx580, because CN heavy is different. you need a Vega 56 take a nvda 1070 8gb just because you need to beat it with an RX on X16r
|
|
|
As I stated, It happen that I have the very same configuration.Hw & sw beside Card are mod SRBpolaris- pimp straps and I have different PSU. I was unable to replicate your error resetting the card to stock(but straps still modded). That lead me to think your problem is there or in the PSUs.
- Run more instance of Claymore starting them in different orders is the only out of the box idea I can give you in order to identify if its a claymore/driver issue or not
tests and comments finished
|
|
|
Lexa or Baffin ? Mining what with which miner ? Wrote down the setting here, and may be, someone will help
|
|
|
@Inno Asic
[/quote] Hello could you please tell me what I can do for you? [/quote]
For him, I don't know
For us, Innosilicon customers, if you can tell us:
expected days of ROI for that Cryptonight Miner you have announced
Which coins you suggest to mine in order to achieve that RoI
last, can we expect a firmware update in order to support Cryptonight v7 ?
Thank you 888
|
|
|
Just to give you an update, the next version is almost done. The user interface is compact and clean, and the miner is much "lighter" now. Also, I got an extra funding of $3000 for equipment for testing. It seems like the whole thing is finally rolling...
Find some peanuts to purchase a Baffin rx 550 2gb, in addition to the Vegas a better Kernel is needed
|
|
|
I mined RVN by my own , and noticed I've been quite faster with Enemy 1.08. there is any chance to change the miner for x16r ? At list with suprminer 1.6 that is open source ?
|
|
|
Well, in theory you can do that. In reality, XMC is now at 6 $ and the total volume/day is 1200 $. I don't know the difficulty
|
|
|
I tried 12 times with 1.35 and that's enough.
Threads stuck in device driver Windows restart intensity 144 /160
I tried without overclock inside GGS, but done at the same value with Overdrive,
I think I need to repeat everything and I will remove the ubermix timing
|
|
|
Discussion initiated on 1st of february... that's why.
Anybody have a "Baffin" RX 550 and mind to share core,undervolt and memory for CN heavy ?
|
|
|
Uncle Regardless of the fact that GGS write 8---192 for intensity & for local work size as optimization . it have saved 144 and 8. That was the original one
Installing now the 1.35 on this rig, before it was 1.33 just to see if it was a bug and its been sorted out
|
|
|
Uncle: I mean what GGS is saying Thread 2----2 local_work_size 8--- 192 intensity 8---192 Actrd 25---24 Undervolting core 990 Undervolting memory 990
Zawawa, when running optimization, GGS remember it and use it (its learning ...)? I mean its say 2 threads better than one, after that, it test local work size, and then it uses 1 thread or 2 ? and at the end I have to go through all the suggestion and make myself the changes in order to be applied ?
|
|
|
I lost the page in which was stated how to make fine tuning of intensity workspace, memchunk etc. Doctor, may you place it in the readme ? Btw, you lost the logfile option in the readme as well
|
|
|
|