Osim vas i CMa, i dvije icopressove kampanje takodjer nemaju minimum tako da se stvari pomalo poboljsavaju. Ja sam svojedobno planirao preporuciti i BC kampanji da uvede to pravilo, iako je kod njih minimum dosta nizak, samo 10 postova.


Mislim da je ovo boldano jedini razlog zasto nema vise kampanja sa takvim pravilima.


Uzrok ovog pravila treba traziti u tome sto ima jako malo genuine gambling board postera te je vecina njih vec bila u top kampanjama pa su onda manageri novih kampanja bili primorani natjerati ljude da tamo postaju. Nakon nekog vremena i hrpe takvih kampanja naravno da sada imas dosta ljudi koji pise u gambling dijelu, iako hrpa njih kurca pojma nema o sportu o kojem pise ali jebiga, kampanje to zahtjevaju tako da su se ljudi prilagodili.


Govorim napamet, ali mislim da je 90% toga do managera i kakve zahtjeve postavi a druga je stvar sto neki manageri rade samo po spranci jer im je tako najjednostavnije voditi hrpu kampanja i mislim da je to glavni razlog zasto nema vise fleksibilnosti.

Ma naravno, bitni su i uvjeti a iskreno meni uvjeti u toj kampanji bas i nisu nesto, dosta je sve rigidno (moras napisati punu kvotu da bi bio placen+ gambling postovi) a uz to i ne placaju bas najbolje. Bar ja tako nekako gledam na tu kampanju.




Drago mi je vidjeti da je i on prisiljen zbog vas i jos par novih kampanja mijenjati malo pravila ali tesko da ce to puno pomoci. Puno bolja promjena bi bila da si placen koliko postova napises, bez tih minimalnih zahtjeva i fakat ne kuzim zasto i on ne uvede to pravilo. Da sad trazim novu kampanju to bi mi bilo na vrhu liste prioriteta jer mi se neda forsirati postanje u preiodima kad nemam previse vremena.

Well, I wouldn't say that Coinbase stock price is dropping non stop, but more that is following the crypto market which makes sense as their profit depends on the amount of people trading there. Chances are that once we enter bull market again their stock price will start rising again so yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if their founders are buying the dip.

---

Regarding the title of this thread, I am not so sure that we can say Coinbase has financial problems just because they ended one quarter in negative as probably every other exchange experienced the same thing in the last quarter, its just that others are not publicly traded so we have no idea what's going on there. One positive thing I can see from this though is that some people will get scared and  maybe start realizing that their money stored at Coinbase is not as safe as they think it is.

 

While this forum has plenty of capable scambusters and its not easy for a scam to go unnoticed (at least not for a longer period of time), its important to mention that scams are not moderated here meaning scammers aren't banned, no matter the evidence so I would suggest you to thread carefully.


Asking the right question is often more important than pretending to know it all (common newbie mistake). And yeah, welcome to bitcointalk .

For example, couple of Croatian forums (general type of forums). On one of them I am active for ~20 years and while you can't make any money via signature campaigns, people do care about their own status to a ridiculous degree. 11-12 years ago member of that forum organized the real life meeting in some club and it was hilarious to see how forum veterans were full of themselves, and even trying to pick some girls that way, thinking that they will be impressed how reputable they are on some forum lol. Situation is not as serious as here, but people generally tend to take things way too seriously if they spend a lot of time doing something, that's how it goes and I've been guilty of that in the past as well.

While this is more noticeable on bitcointalk due obvious reason (being able to make money) I noticed similar behavior in many other forums. After some time people start to substituting real life accomplishments with the virtual ones so bitcointalk is not an exception really.



Banning signature campaigns would basically mean end of this forum and theymos knows that so I don't expect it to change, no matter the negative aspects. It's just reality of this forum, whether we are like it or not. I mean, even with signature campaigns going on, number of posts (and quality new users) is consistently going down and now imagine what would happen if you remove that.

Un'ottima panoramica, come sempre!

Ho già iniziato a lavorare sulla mia panoramica mensile e prometto che sarà completata entro la fine della prossima settimana. 

Cudi me da ti ne riskiras malo i odes u neku bolje placenu kampanju, s obzirom na trenutnu situaciju 60 dolara tjedno i nije bas puno. Pa evo ova nasa "domaca" kampanja placa skoro duplo bolje, a ima ih jos par takvih tako da mislim da bi bez problema upao.



Trenutno skoro da i nema kampanje koja nema bar par shitpostera kojima ne bi dao da pisu u altcoin kampanju, a kamoli btc signature kampanju. Ali jebiga, sellers market je, hrpa kampanja a nedovoljno kvalitetnih clanova i onda se moraju raditi kompromisi da se ispuni kampanja. Uglavnom sretno, vjerujem da nije lako izabrati.

Vast majority yes, but not all. After all, bear market is when you can see a difference between those who know what they are doing and those who are just riding the bull market as I think for a pro trader bear or bull market doesn't make a big difference when it comes to profit, all they need is some volatility. That's how I though that I was a good trader back in 2017 when I was buying various shitcoins that were all pumping but then 2018 came and I realized that I have no clue what I am doing and that trading is not for me so I switched to hodl mode and never looked back.

Its always interesting to hear people being kinda disappointed with current bitcoin adoption as I think its quite the opposite and that we should be very happy with the current rates. I am pretty sure that Satoshi and handful of enthusiast and early adopters  couldn't imagine this success in their wildest dreams. Keep in mind that bitcoin has been around for barely more than decade and went a long way from being traded among few cyperhunks for a fraction of  a cent, to situation that we have now. On top of that, big percentage of people are not interested in self-governnace and everything else that bitcoin represents.

I haven't really bothered to check their rates as I stopped using PayPal 4-5 years ago after couple of my friends got their account banned due buying/selling crypto, but do other exchanges like Kraken or Coinbase offer better rates? I mean, what's the difference, percentage wise?


I am not so sure that's the reason as I read somewhere that approximately 20% of the Paypal users in the United States bought/sold crypto. That number seems a bit too high, but even if its only 1/4 of that its still a big amount as PayPal has ~230 million users there. I think its more about PayPal realizing that majority of people won't withdraw bitcoin to their wallets, so why not offering that option for some good PR.

Why don't you disable that option to be invited in other groups without your consent in Telegram settings and change it to your contacts only?





I used to do that as well, thinking that I am saving someone by wasting scammer time, but the amount of scam messages I receive on Telegram is so big that eventually I stopped. I may still play that game if I see an interesting approach, but in 99% of the time I just use block&ignore. The big difference between phone scammer and Telegram scammer is that latter can chat with many people at the same time (and they probably do) so its questionable how effective that stalling technique actually is.

To be honest, it makes way more sense to me that you actually have to do something in order to get the tokens, instead just giving tokens without any requirement other than giving your address. I know that approach was very popular during 2017 ICO craze, but the way I see it, only the absolute shitcoin project would give tokens for nothing in return.



That's what people are doing nowadays, they trade on all those DEX that haven't had airdrop yet, hoping that one day there will be one, like Uniswap had. I have a friend who made pretty decent amount of money that way. Its not easy though as you often have to use some obscure exchange on not so popular blockchain and that is usually pain in the ass.

Poorest will always suffer the most in the situation like this. That's why wealthy EU bureaucrats that have 10k+ euro monthly salary call for even harsher sanctions and telling crap how all of us have to make a sacrifice, perfectly knowing that they won't have to sacrifice anything and that won't achieve nothing.



Hah yeah, some people think that in case of a global crisis people gonna hold their hands and sing kumbaya, while in reality its gonna be every man for himself when/if shit hits the fan.

Good to hear that you are willing to go extra length for a quality lower ranked member, even though finding another member of n0nce quality won't be an easy task.


Can't say that I noticed someone extraordinary lately, but if I do I'll let you know.


Kudos for the effort. Since you are on the lookout for a quality members, have you tried doing the same for lower ranked ones via The future of Bitcointalk: Low Ranking Top Merit earners in the past 30 days. Majority of names there are probably merit farmers, but there might a couple of genuine talents.

Looking at the rules of the campaign that you are already running, you covered almost every complain that I have when look at many other campaigns (no minimum quota, no forcing to write in certain boards etc) but one thing that I think would improve your next campaign is to open it for lower rank members too, more specifically Member and Full Member ranks.

I know that there are no many quality new members that are climbing up those lower ranks, but I am sure that there would be at least few good ones that you could get on board. You don't have to set up a specific quota on how many of those can join, but it wouldn't hurt to keep it open for them, just in case some hidden gem appears. Tbh, I am surprised that more campaigns are not allowing lower ranks, seeing how hard is to fill campaigns with quality high rank members.

First of all, "accurately predicting" is nothing but a guesstimate. There are thousands of those predictions for any possible price and someone will simply end up predicting the correct price but that doesn't mean he knows what he is talking about or he knows more than the average person. I am not actively trading, but what little I know about is that it's all about possibilities and not about predicting the certain price.


Some people are just so good and only want to help others

Joke aside, there are legit companies that are trading for you and are very successful at it but those are certainly not contacting random people on the internet giving them price predictions.

On the contrary. If it comes to a global food shortage, countries will be less willing to help other countries simply because "global" food shortage means that whole world is affected by it  and not only a specific region like it usually is. With that being said, I don't expect a global food crisis. Sure, some regions will be affected for sure ( mainly the poorer ones, as always) but I don't expect more developed parts of the worlds to have big issues.

I agree, and I think that's the main reason why PayPal introduced this change as they know their users and they concluded that even if they allow people to move crypto to their own wallet, majority will still keep it on PayPal, as usual.


I remember when PayPal first introduced thing thing, many people complained how that is not really good news as people couldn't move their crypto, but I've always seen PayPal as an useful idiot who will help the bitcoin adoption.


That's for sure, especially considering the fact that majority of their users are probably not tech savvy enough to check what's the actual fee, and that PayPal is ripping them off.

Because majority of people will never want that responsibility, to be their own bank. The more crypto goes into mainstream, the more people will use centralized exchanges and custodial wallets. It sucks, but that's reality and anyone who thinks that people will suddenly open their eyes and ditch all that centralized stuff is extremely naive.


I don't think that people who are buying Bitcoin via Paypal care much about that, as if the do they certainly wouldn't use PayPal to buy Bitcoin in the first place.


PayPal used to be quite useful back in the day when you didn't have much options, but situation is completely different now so I guess they have to introduce some changes to stay relevant.