Hashing away.
EDIT: Everything seems good. Climb aboard, miners.
EDIT2: Difficulty finally ramping up, pool is now a decent idea.

Yes. When it's at difficulty 1, there seems to be mostly orphans. When it switches any higher, much less orphans.

Doesn't seem to be up yet. Not that it's needed at 1 difficulty currently. I might get a P2P pool set up later on, too.

If my maths are right, rewards drop at block 700800, might be a while.

Try halving your --thread-concurrency and see if that works.
I get that issue on my 7850's if I put 8192 sometimes, but changing it to 4096 will usually fix it.

Delisting is a good idea. What are your criteria, though? Average Volume, maybe?

I'll sell at 1/10 of this if anyone is interested.
0.0005 each
100 for 0.045
1000 for 0.4

Sounds like you have an active sell order. Try going to: https://mcxnow.com/exchange/LTC , Click "Your LTC Orders" and see if anything is there?

First interest payment halved the Estimated Yearly payout. Which means (I'd assume) it'll be accurate/correct after 8 payments (2 days total = 45 hours from now).
Trade log updates, always helpful.
Confirmation count was a must.
All good stuff.

All SHA256 can be run with similar settings, i.e. Use the same settings you do for mining Bitcoin (with a different pool, obviously)

It's just load-balancing a couple pools. It'll work for any hardware, and is not actual merge-mining, it just divides the hashrate between the pools.

Cool story, giraffe-lady avatar person.

To all users of the site: If you don't use the same password as you do on other sites, you shouldn't have any worries. If you do, you should change your password to something unique.
There is also Google 2Factor Authentication for an extra layer of security, just in case.

(Going by eBay pricing)
Of the current gen, the 7950 is easily the best Price/Hash.
Of the current gen, the 7790 and 7990 both have a higher Hash/Watt (but MUCH less Price/Hash, so I wouldn't consider them)

Previous gens have some good stats, but also drawbacks. 5830, 5850, 6850, and 6950 are very cheap and produce decent hashrates, but not very power-efficient and may have compatibility issues with certain drivers.

tl;dr the 7950 is probably the best bet, being most balanced of the lot and should play well with current drivers.

EDIT: For RAM, I've had a couple rigs with 2 GB DDR2 that were fine, but it's generally advised to have 4 GB.

Was already answered. Reading's too hard.

Initial Shareholders: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=264182.msg2863465#msg2863465
Obviously the shares themselves can be bought and sold like other forms of currency, so maybe he himself bought some and has 96% of shares instead of 95% of shares. Then he'd have 96% of fees generated by his site instead of 95% of fees generated by his site.

Volume is listed underneath each chart in 24h values. It'd probably be better if it listed in 6h intervals instead, but you still could calculate from the chart above it (though it's a lot of manual work to do so). For now, it's easier to calculate based on 24 hour volume, and multiply your payout by 4 to see if they line up (which they do), though the tools are there to calculate on a per-payout basis (6 hour volume).

Fudging the numbers wouldn't make a lot of sense in this case. If the volume is hand-altered, the payout would be adjusted to those numbers, he'd get a higher payout, shareholders would get a higher payout. But where would it come from? It is paid as a percentage of fees generated by the site. To get a bigger payout, it would use more than fees have actually generated via trading and the payout would have to come out of pocket which would make no sense, especially if you're suggesting someone is paying themself out of their own pocket.

How does it not? 100,000 * 0.001% = 100%
How could there be more than that without RealSolid paying out of pocket?
There are payments every 6 hours, of which you can calculate for yourself how much volume there was in that time and what 0.001% of that volume would be (not counting withdraw fees of course).

• Each share represents 0.001% of all site-generated fees (trading fees, withdraw fees, etc.).
• Currently, there are 5,000 in circulation which represents 5% of fees.
• There will be another batch of 45,000 shares which represents 45% of fees, totaling 50% of fees.
• There are 100,000 total shares to total 100% of fees.
• The remaining will be the site's owner's to have (the other 50% of generated fees).

It is what it is sounds to be: a share of profits generated by fees from the site. Obviously, this means you can't have more than 100%, i.e. 100,000 total shares, assuming scarce amount of magicians.

Basically, instead of taking 100% of fees, RealSolid is distributing 50% of that to the members and keeping 50% for himself. Slightly simple math, but it also gives holders a vested interest in making volume increase by getting more people there, trading more, etc.

Again with Cryptsy chat drama? Take it Cryptsy. Nobody cares.

Go to beeeeer, get the miner, use your XPM address as your username, monitor stats at http://www.beeeeer.org/user/[your XPM address]

Each share is worth 0.001% of the total fees (trading, withdraw, etc), paid every 6 hours. First payout should be in about 3 hours (and a few minutes)

1) Yes. Always good to see more merge-mined coins, especially modern ones.
2) I'm not a huge fan of fast retargets, though I doubt it'd matter much if it was merge-mined.