Oh I'm in for the IPO, so I'm not quite remaining up in the canopy. It's dull up there, far more interesting watching you choosing sticks.

Holy hell, a shit-ton of small multipool payouts just went through to an exchange address. That's going to piss them off.

Time to use a wallet address methinks.

Well given the number of deranged idiots on this forum, I guess a deranged genius will at least make for interesting reading.

Such spirit. I wager fifteen quatloos that he is untrainable.

Is it possible to get the details of who is on the full team for this project?

Given that there have been a number of IPOs recently that took the money and ran, it would certainly raise the credibility stakes if we could learn who the actual brains behind this new concept are.

Good stuff so far. Any news on when to expect VRC payouts on the scrypt multipool?

No further payouts?

That is an excellent idea.

Yeah, we can see that integrity being sprayed all over the GAW thread by sock-puppet fan-boy accounts.

As has been said, GAW must be desperate if they are having to crap all over someone else's thread. Got a valid criticism GAW, or just dropping by to fling poo at your fellow countrymen?

Classy.

@IPOMiner: FYI Bitstar (BITS) POW has ended. You should shut down that port so that the few miners on it will failover to their alternate pools, otherwise they are just wasting electricity.

Did anyone ever see a response from GAW about my enquiry regarding the temperatures their chips run at?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=529093.msg6894368#msg6894368

I got the feeling they quickly doused that question with the spray of a thousand fawning fan-boy accounts gushing about how super-duper GAW is.

Ok then, how about a compromise, say instead of rejecting the post outright, it displays a warning similar to the one you get when someone has added to a thread while you are writing your reply?

Something along the lines of asking them if they are absolutely sure they want to full-quote a post and that, if they don't need to, it would be good forum etiquette for them to edit it down to just the parts they want to reference.

Whilst some will just ignore it, I'm sure that plenty of members who are inexperienced forum users would certainly reconsider this bad habit.

Staff workload reduced somewhat, thread readability improved, nobody kicked in the nuts and thrown to the kerb. Everybody happy!

@shorena, see how I addressed you there without needing to even quote you? Neat, huh?

@hilariousandco - My suggestion is one that would allow for discussion threads to be made considerably tidier and easier to read through, fact not opinion, while, at the same time, reducing the Mods' workload by automatically preventing whole-post quoting because it is something rarely justified or needed. It would also save on having to both report and deal with whole-post-quoted-useless-one-liners, such as '+1'. You, on the other hand, don't want such a change to be made because, well you just don't.

I think you are confusing the word 'need' with 'want'. There is rarely any need to full-quote a post, particularly those over one or two lines long.

There's a number of ways you could improve this forum, but one of the easiest places to start would be to reject any post that includes a full-post quote.

There's rarely any need to include the full content of an existing post one is replying to, and they leave discussion threads messy as hell. Particularly the sheer number of '+1' useless-one-liners that are often the entire content of the reply added to the bottom of the full-post-quote.

Mods, you have my sympathy. This place is must be a nightmare to keep in order.

Ok, so what temp do the chips report they are sitting at when the unit has been hashing for a period of time? The A2's report 30-40c, what's the range for your miners given they are pulling so much wattage?

I don't think there's necessarily any reason to believe the coins are lost.

But, still, if you find any other auto-payout sites that routinely offer the highest payout outside of manual rig-rental services, by all means, do come back and tell us.

@nicetry

If you're only getting .05BTC per day, how come you apparently have .2BTC still owed to you? Automatic payments have been running fine up until today, why would you not have been receiving them?

Are you having to manually process Bitstar withdrawals?

If so, is there something we should do to help avoid you having to do that, like cashout before the balance exceeds a certain amount?

On the rig search page, isn't it about time you added something beyond the 'big rig' 2-5Mh/s filter to include Scrypt ASIC units?

Oh, ok, my bad in that case.

I read it as 1 week hosting fee.