So who else is receiving forum pm's about a new BTC based RPG game to 'test'?

I figure it'll be courtesy of the registration system of this coin.

Make sure you didn't use the same registration password that you use for anything else and be extremely cautious about any offers to download and install programs.

Oh he plans to solve it by makiejw{} dii ing sure thar paiejd%^jjpjjfs is always fsef jgog$&*1
Sorry $Tkjjt$^j going thr4"%^&^& tunnel%^J%gjpidj
Will cal$%gjj backRrTOLsd fnnrrr [piiiiiii later.

Can you post the, usually required, equivalent BTC per/MH per day rate?

Commercial miners who might not be interested in holding a coin will still mine it if the profitability makes it worthwhile. So if you want to attract higher hashing rates you have to put the figures out there.

I'd just like to point out that 0.00182 profitability is pretty good these days for scrypt. I've had three Innosilicon A2 90's running since the beginning of May and can attest to the declining returns across all pools over that time.

Given that a higher hashrate for the VRC pool will also contribute to its market price, it is a double-edged sword anyway because the payouts will be less as fewer can be bought on the market with the profits from the pool.

If you can reliably earn more BTC elsewhere and buy VRC before it has gone up in price then go for it. I just don't think the market will stay still that long right now.

Perhaps if this thread didn't have pics of hot chicks in skimpys in the opening posts. I get that some of you are still somewhat juvenile about how you express yourselves on the topic of women, but surely you can see that it's not exactly going to enhance the spread of the coin to be alienating the very people it is claiming to support.

Any chance of fitting in a link to a countdown clock on the OP for when exactly the second POW stage begins?

Is there anything else for us to do at this point?

Monkeys, don't forget we spoke about monkeys as well . . .and sticks.

Tentacle Overlord, The Deranged Genius of The Galactic Abyss

It.Has.Everything.

Oh I'm in for the IPO, so I'm not quite remaining up in the canopy. It's dull up there, far more interesting watching you choosing sticks.

Holy hell, a shit-ton of small multipool payouts just went through to an exchange address. That's going to piss them off.

Time to use a wallet address methinks.

Well given the number of deranged idiots on this forum, I guess a deranged genius will at least make for interesting reading.

Such spirit. I wager fifteen quatloos that he is untrainable.

Is it possible to get the details of who is on the full team for this project?

Given that there have been a number of IPOs recently that took the money and ran, it would certainly raise the credibility stakes if we could learn who the actual brains behind this new concept are.

Good stuff so far. Any news on when to expect VRC payouts on the scrypt multipool?

No further payouts?

That is an excellent idea.

Yeah, we can see that integrity being sprayed all over the GAW thread by sock-puppet fan-boy accounts.

As has been said, GAW must be desperate if they are having to crap all over someone else's thread. Got a valid criticism GAW, or just dropping by to fling poo at your fellow countrymen?

Classy.

@IPOMiner: FYI Bitstar (BITS) POW has ended. You should shut down that port so that the few miners on it will failover to their alternate pools, otherwise they are just wasting electricity.

Did anyone ever see a response from GAW about my enquiry regarding the temperatures their chips run at?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=529093.msg6894368#msg6894368

I got the feeling they quickly doused that question with the spray of a thousand fawning fan-boy accounts gushing about how super-duper GAW is.

Ok then, how about a compromise, say instead of rejecting the post outright, it displays a warning similar to the one you get when someone has added to a thread while you are writing your reply?

Something along the lines of asking them if they are absolutely sure they want to full-quote a post and that, if they don't need to, it would be good forum etiquette for them to edit it down to just the parts they want to reference.

Whilst some will just ignore it, I'm sure that plenty of members who are inexperienced forum users would certainly reconsider this bad habit.

Staff workload reduced somewhat, thread readability improved, nobody kicked in the nuts and thrown to the kerb. Everybody happy!

@shorena, see how I addressed you there without needing to even quote you? Neat, huh?

@hilariousandco - My suggestion is one that would allow for discussion threads to be made considerably tidier and easier to read through, fact not opinion, while, at the same time, reducing the Mods' workload by automatically preventing whole-post quoting because it is something rarely justified or needed. It would also save on having to both report and deal with whole-post-quoted-useless-one-liners, such as '+1'. You, on the other hand, don't want such a change to be made because, well you just don't.