It's hardly trolling if the points I am raising are valid.

^^^ See, that's *exactly* what I said when I objected to the thread title claiming the coin was 'Cutting Edge of Technology'.

So it lives in TOR, woooo!

The blockchain is still going to be showing transactions from one wallet address to another. You just need an entry/exit point for an address, namely, a place where it has engaged with RL, like an exchange that has your email address or a supplier that has your actual address, and then TOR or not, you are tied to that address and every transaction in or out is just a case of following the money. Rinse and repeat.

I don't. I'd be even more of an idiot than those who are ignoring the serious issues this coin has if I were to buy some when I already know that these issues are indicators of it being scammy.


HAhahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa! Kid, really, your mask is slipping. Go ask a grown-up what 'slander' means.

Libel, which is the legal term you are actually scrabbling for, is only applicable if it can be proven I knowingly wrote false statements with the intent of harming your reputation maliciously. Given that I have already clearly stated my reasons for declaring this coin a scam, and that those reasons are more than sufficient a justification for me to believe this coin to be a scam, you don't have a leg to stand on legally.

As for asserting that any losses incurred by people who buy this coin would be my liability, well, you're living in La-La-Land if you think that's anywhere near a realistic fact.

No, it was proof you're a juvenile who believes that spouting off about having a ton of expensive suits, cars and, no doubt, a georgeous ex-model wife who is also a 'Siberian' sniper, would give you credibility. It did exactly the opposite. Particularly the fail on your spelling of Maserati, which only has one spelling, that one.

Or, say, the NSA want to run it through their systems to, automatically, link everyone up to each other who uses this coin.

Kinda makes one wonder why, then, you are even bothering with 'not-quite-Anon' at all, given the price is going to require a new blockchain every year and it doesn't even provide full Anon for that price.


You are out of your fecking gourd if you believe that assertion even makes sense. Firstly, any coin that had Iconic Expert desperately scrabbling to encourage people to prove they had bought the most, in order to 'win' a few thousand from him, is not a coin standing on its own merits and, secondly, The "Smoke Screen" is selectively Anon then, is it? Who decides to open up the Anon transactions when Law Enforcement come knocking?

Holes, holes and more holes.

Sure, I get it, I've seen this same attitude from the dev on every other coin that's ended up being outed as a scam.

Just.Buy.Coins.


You want everyone to ignore the gaping hole I'm pointing out in your credibility that has appeared as a result of your weird little rant about how rich and powerful you are.

It's official, I'm calling this coin a scam as a result of both your bizarre attitude and, as well, the utterly absurd claim you are making about your rapidly bloating blockchain-to-be providing for something equating to 'not quite Anon, but difficult, you know, as long as nobody just writes a basic script to do the drill-down from wallet address to wallet address', otherwise it'll just be reduced to 'not Anon at all'.

As for relaunching every year as a way to deal with your blockchain bloat, that is just insane and not in the good way.

Holy hell, wallet staking now showing over 16 million, that's a record, no?

I see the VRC wallet is showing over 14 millions coins being held and staked still.

Kinda puts things into perspective.

Just a heads-up, when people claim they are getting their lawyers to sue someone for slander, when in fact it would be libel, because slander refers to spoken statements, not written, it suggests there are no lawyers because the person throwing around the threats to sue is not at all the 'big man' they are pretending to be.

This statementworries me. People who own Maserati cars know how to spell it correctly.

As for
WTF? Are you 12?

Let me guess, she's also a Bikini model on the side?

Poloniex BITS wallet is fixed and functioning properly again.

^^^ Except it doesn't explain anything, that's the whole point of it being posted repeatedly, to spread FUD.

Meaningless to anyone who knows that the whole argument of it being 'not backed by anything' is just the same tripe spouted about Bitcoin by FIAT holders and the idea of it not having advantage of a coin created tomorrow is nothing new or scary to anyone familiar with this industry.

It requires a PoS to be innovative, with value-added utility, a strong dev team who deliver, you know, like a certain coin we know.

In other words, that 'article' is mostly out-dated FUD with little of relevance to what is happening today in cryptocurrency.

But it does seem to get a lot of cut-and-paste action from those who haven't actually read it and considered whether its contents really equate to anything relevant.

Yes the payouts are manually done by the dev at this time and, because of Poloniex needing to resolve their BITS wallet issues, the payouts are delayed as BITTREX require an extremely high number of confirmations on some of the coins being sold to buy BITS.

Poloniex are aware of their wallet issue and will deal with it soon.

You also have to remember the same Twitter accounts that like to pretend they are 'in the know', regarding pump & dump groups, also like to back RZR as if it is equally as promising as VRC. You just have to remember that the RZR thread is titled as it being 'cutting edge technology', yet all it is doing is basing itself within the TOR system, it isn't actually introducing any cutting edge technology.

VRC is all about introducing something the market actually recognises as having value, namely, utility. If you can use the coin, instead of seeing it as a way to just hide from the authorities through anonymous transactions, then it will have a value right now, which VRC does.

Not everyone. Only those that are trying to manipulate the market, or those who are under the mistaken impression that shapes on a graph mean something more than simply representing past data.

I don't believe Patrick has ever 'promised' to deliver the features on a set date.

Given that a new wallet is shortly to be released, it might be better to just upgrade to it as a route towards solving existing problems.

Methinks people are counting on *nobody* else noticing what is being tweeted here https://twitter.com/pnosker

What on earth are you lot talking about, you cretins.

Absolutely pathetic FUD attempts. Seriously, it's embarrassing.

 

Let me just quote you on that so you can't change it after the fact. You FUD is desperately low quality, please try harder.

@Dps23, your post history shows you to be an incessant FUD spreader after having declared that the price was going to crash last weekend and you were going to buy when it did, you have clearly been left behind and hope to capitalise on the quiet markets this weekend.

You even quoted a warning in red font that was solely related to the NSFW nature of the picture it linked to.

Pay attention now, you have to put a bit more work in than that. When you start to quote off-topic posts you just come across as an amateur.

You mean it's about damn time your repeated bold, yet utterly unsupported, assertions about how this coin was collapsing would come true so your beloved XC can have some action.