|
Today there is nothing free, just like AM is not free.
I am aware that a good coin aggregator should be paid, because monthly you have to pay server and work hours of programming. That's why I do not have to pay AM or another service. I just hope that CTM take it seriously, and put an api to $ 5 a month or something similar, 7-8 $ ..... as long as it guarantees good data, because in the end, the better your service the more recommended it will be by the same AM users.
|
|
|
|
A while later, without touching any option. Everything is fine again. That's why I say something happens, there is some lag somewhere. Maybe it's hard to read the api or something similar, I speak for speaking, I only know what happens to me and what I've left in the screenshots
I'm trying to reproduce it myself, but I've not yet been successful. Are these coins only using the global exchange filter, or is there a pattern like all of them uses coin-specific exchange filters as well? Which of the views are correct - the first with many gray items or the second one with almost no gray items? If you have a number of filter settings including volume configured, I assume the first one with many gray items are what you expect - is that a correct assumption? I do want to find out what the issue can be, so could you please send me your Awesome Miner log file (via PM or mail)? Thanks! Edit: I've just implemented a small change that might resolve the issue, but as I cannot reproduce the issue myself I cannot verify. Please keep me updated if you still experience the issue in the next release. Just a hypothesis, I'm guessing that sometimes when CTM does the data collection, the exchange returned invalid data and caused the price/volume of certain coins to be set to 0, I have seen that on a smaller scale for some coins that are only on small exchanges (such that current price/volume became 0, but the 1 hour data shows otherwise, checking on the said exchanges usually revealed that there were no trades nor changes in order book, so likely the exchange API returned invalid data and was cached at CTM for awhile b4 it gets updated) CTM did a SQL maintenance / clean up today, and during that period of time, a lot of coin data probably gets borked. hopefully it's returned to normal or better now. Hello Moppidoo happy holidays. CTM has a very small VPS, no matter how much he said something in his discord, that's my specialty and I know what he said. Apart from cleaning your Mysql and caching some parts and getting your Crons order, let's hope that now you dedicate to improving the quality of your data. Many of their currencies only have a price, the one of sale, not the one of purchase. I do not care if they try to sell 200, if they only pay 50, I'm interested in 50 what they are going to pay for. In programming there are many ways to do the same. Bad programming can consume the entire VPS, and a well-planned schedule can make the VPS not suffer. It seems to me that the CTM DEV is not one of the good ones. Well, scraping the data can be the most complicated and heavy CPU. But serving API data is very light, basically it should not cost CPU. EL can make a premium data set for which we have the premium api, and you only have to do 1 every 5 minutes, cache it in a TXT and for 5 minutes serve the information of a file, without extra queries to the BAse de datos. I have had this problem on many websites and with bad programmers, and at the end giving the indications or changing the programmer we have fixed it. And even a very big web trucoteca.com we had 2 servers to be able to attend the 400,000 daily users, to have only 1 server something better, but much better optimization of caches and better optimization of the first layer, apache, "varnish" and friskings in TXT. The bad thing about a bad programmer is that he does not know it, until he sees how a good programmer does it. And the subject of those Exchanges. Apart from criticizing them I have tried them. VAlultmex I have two operations days ago two coins and without selling, in finebox the same. They have false volume and purchase offers. The truth is that it only contributes a few usable coins. On the alleged failure, I also thought that it was CTC caches, but hey, I communicated there and I reported it here |
|
|
|
I'm going to make a suggestion @patrike.
I have been a web project manager for many years, which in the end is web programming, design, etc ... Many of our data were through bot Scrape.
Right now the owner of cointomine is already saying that he has serious CPU load problems. surely use a shared VPS and without caches of any kind (memcached, varnish, do TXT every X minutes etc ...)
Knowing that the currency data is a fundamental part of your program, because without coins we can not undermine. And seeing that CTM asks for a donation, I have been the maximum donor for now. You have not considered adding a young programmer and dedicating it exclusively to scraping data from different exchanges correctly and appropriately for AM and charging a small monthly amount for serving that data in a premium plan, every few minutes.
It can not be that a program as good as AM, right now has bad data of apis that give us the prices that are not and that the owner is already saying that we are saturating his mini VPS. I prefer that you extend your service, add another programmer and that this only be dedicated to scrape data of exchanges correctly, and everything would be perfectly integrated with your program. I would pay perfectly $ 10 a month for that type of service if they offer me quantity and quality of data.
Right now CTM is a tremendous mess, does not read well the apis, most profitable currencies is because it gives us the price of sale and not of purchase, is complaining about the load, which makes me think that shortly or close or charge per month, and to pay a third party who does it wrong, I prefer that you expand the service and quality, this would also give you the opportunity to bill more per month and grow your business.
When a business reaches a certain level, it can not depend on the work of third parties who do not care about the quality of their data.
Hopefully when the other aggregator arrives, it will be of more quality.
Seriously, think about it, because you are now in a good moment to be able to offer that data in two versions in the medium term yourself. Slow vrsion, every hour for everyone, and premium version of payment every 5 minutes for example, using caching techniques you would only consume bandwidth and there are very cheap CDN for that same as bunnyCDN, and serve the apis at a cost derisory.
Maybe you do not want to incorporate people to the project, but I think it's time and not depend on third parties. I would pay for the data every 5 minutes. Why let someone else take the money you can earn ?, and what is more important, give better service to your users. I do not need to be arguing with the "DEV" to call it in any way, CTM, where much of the data is wrong and where you are already complaining about the cpu load of your shared mini VPS
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately I've never seen it as a good business case to develop yet another service for providing coin statistics. It would require a significant amount of time, it would take away the main focus of what Awesome Miner is doing and it's only a few power users that actually are willing to pay extra for a service like this. Given the current market trend for mining operations, the demand for such a service would be even lower. You would need like 500-1000 customers paying extra for a service like this in addition to what they already pay for the software. Although I understand your point and do understand that it's great to have better coin statistics - it's not a good business case and especially not now. Product development is not only about avoiding third party services, it's also about focusing on the main purpose and main features of your product and try to make them as good as possible. My view is that the coin providers we have today should charge for premium services where they support customers with valid coin statistics, follow up on any issues and continuously improving their service offering. Preferably they would offer some basic API with limits (like one update per hour) for free, and then they would have premium subscriptions for the power users that they support by resolving any issues. Of course I respect your opinion, but the more complete your service, the more you can charge. You can charge for the program, for the cloud services and for the data. Good was an idea. I do not have problems paying as long as they give me quality. CTM right now is the worst currency supplier we have, and even though I paid for the premium APi, I am the biggest donor. If you read in your discord of CTM I am "porlapatria", and for more errors that you cominico, he gives me an excuse. THE truth is that most of your coins are dead in exchanges cemeteries and also gives the wrong price. I hope the owner of CTM will correct everything. AYer was talking to me about their VPS and that I had 32 gigs, I'm supposed to be a fool and I do not know about web development, when I've been running a small page development group for almost two decades and I've had very high traffic pages. And I have another job, I am Luthier, as you will see I am very versatile. I have no problem paying a small monthly amount in good apis. You have to tell the owners of those services, and that the quality of the data matters. But think one thing, in the end you are getting us to depend on third parties. We do not have a decent way to put a coin like AM CU, and if any coin service closes (CC, CTM ...) we are left without that data, if you do, those data are insured. |
|
|
|
 A while later, without touching any option. Everything is fine again. That's why I say something happens, there is some lag somewhere. Maybe it's hard to read the api or something similar, I speak for speaking, I only know what happens to me and what I've left in the screenshots |
|
|
|
 There must be some small problem. Every time what happens on the screen happens. Most cointomine coins appear in gray and are not allowed to be mined. After a while it returns to normal and they appear in black. It's something that comes and goes, without changing anything. Something happens and I do not know what it is. I have observed it several times before putting this post. |
|
|
|
|
- Improved the HTTP API for coins with a new property to set if the custom properties of a coin should be used
I have looked and I do not see any new option, it can be a little more explicit. Thank you
|
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 6.0.6 ( Development preview of 6.1 )
API
- Added API for setting the profit factor property of a coin
Attention for the users of the soothaa's coin updater. With the new API, all the currencies that you have both in AMCU and in the other suppliers are overwritten. In turn, they are marked in blue, so it is easy to identify them and maintain a cleaner CU config.json.  Disculpar si no se entiende bien, pero como buen español (modo irónico) uso un traductor This extension does not work well, I have used that extension to the full, but now it does not get the HASH due to the update of the Inquidus explorer. When this information is missing, the profitability calculation does not do it correctly. |
|
|
|
|
I'm going to make a suggestion @patrike.
I have been a web project manager for many years, which in the end is web programming, design, etc ... Many of our data were through bot Scrape.
Right now the owner of cointomine is already saying that he has serious CPU load problems. surely use a shared VPS and without caches of any kind (memcached, varnish, do TXT every X minutes etc ...)
Knowing that the currency data is a fundamental part of your program, because without coins we can not undermine. And seeing that CTM asks for a donation, I have been the maximum donor for now. You have not considered adding a young programmer and dedicating it exclusively to scraping data from different exchanges correctly and appropriately for AM and charging a small monthly amount for serving that data in a premium plan, every few minutes.
It can not be that a program as good as AM, right now has bad data of apis that give us the prices that are not and that the owner is already saying that we are saturating his mini VPS. I prefer that you extend your service, add another programmer and that this only be dedicated to scrape data of exchanges correctly, and everything would be perfectly integrated with your program. I would pay perfectly $ 10 a month for that type of service if they offer me quantity and quality of data.
Right now CTM is a tremendous mess, does not read well the apis, most profitable currencies is because it gives us the price of sale and not of purchase, is complaining about the load, which makes me think that shortly or close or charge per month, and to pay a third party who does it wrong, I prefer that you expand the service and quality, this would also give you the opportunity to bill more per month and grow your business.
When a business reaches a certain level, it can not depend on the work of third parties who do not care about the quality of their data.
Hopefully when the other aggregator arrives, it will be of more quality.
Seriously, think about it, because you are now in a good moment to be able to offer that data in two versions in the medium term yourself. Slow vrsion, every hour for everyone, and premium version of payment every 5 minutes for example, using caching techniques you would only consume bandwidth and there are very cheap CDN for that same as bunnyCDN, and serve the apis at a cost derisory.
Maybe you do not want to incorporate people to the project, but I think it's time and not depend on third parties. I would pay for the data every 5 minutes. Why let someone else take the money you can earn ?, and what is more important, give better service to your users. I do not need to be arguing with the "DEV" to call it in any way, CTM, where much of the data is wrong and where you are already complaining about the cpu load of your shared mini VPS
|
|
|
|
|
safe no listed in crex24, only sate.trade and no volume
|
|
|
|
|
sorry I think that if you allow volumes less than 0. Knowing a currency in which this exchange, would be very successful.
|
|
|
|
|
Everything could be solved by letting put smaller volume 0.01 0.1
Because I have realized that if I do not activate the filter in options, then I can not filter exchange in the currencies. For example CLG is profitable but it has a volume less than 0, or BTCZ etc ... Or you separate volume and exchanges, or you allow a volume value such as 0.1 0.01, 0.001, I will use it with care.
It does not seem logical to me that if I do not activate it in options, I can not then choose exchantes in the coins. Should be separate features, but can put a smaller volume is solved.
And yes, I would like it when I go to a currency to choose Exchange, mark me in bold which is and which is not, it would be of great help
Constructive criticism, all your work is always welcome. But please allow a lower volume as soon as possible, because if I remain active I am without several coins that if I use CLG, BTCZ and many others
|
|
|
|
|
Hello @Patrike thanks for the update, only two details of it.
Separate in options, the volume and selection of Exchanges, right now they are united, I may be interested not to filter volume, or I may be interested in filtering below 0.1, but right now it is not possible. It would only be a more selectable box.
It would be very nice when choosing the exchange for a currency, when activating it, I would highlight what the exchange is, because you present me with the complete exchange list and I may not know what is in another exchange. It would be nice to know that, for example, RVN know which one they are in, they could be in bold and that's it.
Only those two small details, to separate the volume of the exchanges, and to be able to know when displaying the exchanges in a currency, in which it is, because that information has it.
Happy Holidays
|
|
|
|
@Patrike I think you commented before you would have more options or would use the same CC in the new Cointomine.today one of the big mistakes are the prices, in many currencies gives the lowest price of sale, instead of giving the price more high purchase.
For example, the STL currency is in Escodex. In AM it marks the price of 7000 satochis, which is the price that the sellers have put, but the highest purchase price is only 3000, a huge difference, which makes the mining useless in this currency. But if you do not notice, you mine it and then it turns out that you earn less than half at the time of selling.
I hope you can use the same more or less CC options because they are ideal for CTM
Both CoinCalculators and CoinToMine already have settings for Default (Last) / Highest Bid / Lowest Ask. For some coins I've noticed that all these three are identical and in some cases it can be that the exchanges doesn't provide all these values. Looking at STL, all these three properties are reported the same: https://cointomine.today/calculator/coin/STL/the good thing is to include it, the currencies that can not be done well, with deactivating them and I fix it. I am being very insistent in the channel of discord of CTM, because I can understand many things, but not that they obtain the data in different ways without any order. I will be happy with the options are, currency that can not be included within those options and not interesting will be left out. Add the latest version of t-rex, as always thanks for your attention |
|
|
|
|
There is some option to change the difficulty of the strato. I only get an average of 4 or 5 shares per minute, and I think they are few. I think the optimum would be between 10-15 shares per minute
But I do not see documentation
|
|
|
|
I do see three different ways for this implementation:
1) Show the coins, even those not matching any Exchange Filter or Exchange Volume settings, but set the Revenue to zero
2) Show the coins, even those not matching any Exchange Filter or Exchange Volume settings, but set the Revenue to zero for the profit switcher and when mining, but show the reported Revenue (although it might be unrealistic) on the Coins tab and indicate it with a gray color
3) Simply hide the coins that doesn't match the Exchange Filter or Exchange Volume settings. It will not be visible on the Coins tab and not possible to select for a mining pool.
Which one would be preferred? Highlight color (gray / red) but leaving prices I concur (method (2)), since it's a new feature, and we might need to refer to the original (potential unrealistic) data to tweak the filtering value to each one's own liking - globally or individually. The highlighting will make it easy for us to pickup and gauge if the filtering are too aggressive or otherwise too relaxed. Thanks for the comments. This is another preview of what it looks like at the moment:  I have Binance enabled for BTG only and TradeSatoshi enabled globally. XSG doesn't exist on TradeSatoshi and for this reason, the exchange with the highest price, Stex, is displayed in gray because it doesn't match the exchange filter. The minimum volume is configured to be 5 BTC in this example. For this reason ZEL and BTCZ are displayed with gray color for the exchange volume. If either the exchange filter or the minimum volume didn't match for a coin - the Revenue and Profit columns will also be gray. These three coins with gray Revenue/Profit will have a Revenue of zero when considered by the profit switcher and when mining. A simple observation. A box to activate deactivate, so that it shows those currencies invalidity according to our filters. In your example if I mark it, those coins in gray would not come out in the list. Ideally, you should always see everything, as seen in your capture, but sometimes we may be interested in having the list clean and see if it meets the standards of the two filters, only to use from time to time, but it would be interesting clean the list of results in gray instead of when. It's just a suggestion. |
|
|
|
I do see three different ways for this implementation:
1) Show the coins, even those not matching any Exchange Filter or Exchange Volume settings, but set the Revenue to zero
2) Show the coins, even those not matching any Exchange Filter or Exchange Volume settings, but set the Revenue to zero for the profit switcher and when mining, but show the reported Revenue (although it might be unrealistic) on the Coins tab and indicate it with a gray color
3) Simply hide the coins that doesn't match the Exchange Filter or Exchange Volume settings. It will not be visible on the Coins tab and not possible to select for a mining pool.
Which one would be preferred? Highlight color (gray / red) but leaving prices I concur (method (2)), since it's a new feature, and we might need to refer to the original (potential unrealistic) data to tweak the filtering value to each one's own liking - globally or individually. The highlighting will make it easy for us to pickup and gauge if the filtering are too aggressive or otherwise too relaxed. Thanks for the comments. This is another preview of what it looks like at the moment: I have Binance enabled for BTG only and TradeSatoshi enabled globally. XSG doesn't exist on TradeSatoshi and for this reason, the exchange with the highest price, Stex, is displayed in gray because it doesn't match the exchange filter. The minimum volume is configured to be 5 BTC in this example. For this reason ZEL and BTCZ are displayed with gray color for the exchange volume. If either the exchange filter or the minimum volume didn't match for a coin - the Revenue and Profit columns will also be gray. These three coins with gray Revenue/Profit will have a Revenue of zero when considered by the profit switcher and when mining. It is well presented, understandable and simple. I like it |
|
|
|
|
@Patrike I think you commented before you would have more options or would use the same CC in the new Cointomine.today one of the big mistakes are the prices, in many currencies gives the lowest price of sale, instead of giving the price more high purchase.
For example, the STL currency is in Escodex. In AM it marks the price of 7000 satochis, which is the price that the sellers have put, but the highest purchase price is only 3000, a huge difference, which makes the mining useless in this currency. But if you do not notice, you mine it and then it turns out that you earn less than half at the time of selling.
I hope you can use the same more or less CC options because they are ideal for CTM
|
|
|
|
|
@patrike will launch the exchange filter before the holidays?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
