only bad that pool is 90% of network hashpower lol lets hope it will not broke the blockchain
Pool Hash Rate 62.623 MH/s
Network Hash Rate 62.912 MH/s
Actually this is 99.5% |
|
|
|
Hello, quickcoin dev.
 They should have banned all his alts |
|
|
|
This reminds me of something. Have any of you guys heard of the Beijing bikini? Look it up  Googled it. Still don't understand what is it...  Did you try Google Images like I did?  I don't get it Well ok I get it, but how is it any funny? |
|
|
|
|
I'm sure this test is to find out how many people will post and for how long they'll keep bumping
|
|
|
|
Voted. Just about to make one of these.  It's a bit too late |
|
|
|
J'ai une question pour cette page: http://bitcoin.org/en/secure-your-walletVous ne pensez pas que les titres sont à l'impératif? Genre - Faites attention aux porte-monnaie en ligne
- Sauvegardez votre porte-monnaie
pour - Be careful with online wallets
- Backup your wallet
|
|
|
|
Un truc me tracasse. De fait, il existe une certaine confusion entre bitcoin et bitcoin, i.e. entre le protocole et la monnaie.
En anglais, on utilise Bitcoin pour parler du protocole et bitcoin pour parler de la monnaie. Cette distinction me semblant importante et utile, je suggère d'établir cette même nuance dans nos traductions et sur ce forum (sans aller jusqu'à corriger les gens qui confondent, bien évidemment).
Exemple :
- Bitcoin désigne à la fois un protocole et une monnaie cryptographique. Le Bitcoin est le système monétaire gérant les bitcoins.
- Je possède 12 bitcoins.
- Bitcoin permet d'envoyer des bitcoins.
- Vous pouvez créer autant d'adresses Bitcoin que vous le souhaitez.
- Une transaction Bitcoin minimale est composée de deux adresses Bitcoin (expéditeur et destinataire), d'un identifiant de transaction (txid), d'un montant de bitcoin et d'un horodatage.
Objections ?
Hormis le fait que le dernier exemple est faux, pas du tout |
|
|
|
Just curious, do you two really consider me to be the dickwad, here?
i do. Not that I care, but why? I don't see what makes him a dickwad (I didn't go through all the pages though) |
|
|
|
We even have whistleblower protection laws to prevent any retaliation from the Feds as a result.
If Manning had stood up like a man and gone through the proper channels, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Hell, I might've even joined with you guys and called him a hero.
If he wanted to be a whistleblower, there are perfectly legal ways to do so (none of which endanger American lives).
Manning had quite a few options, but chose to betray his country out of cowardice.
Let's sum up: there were perfectly legal ways to disclose the acts and he would have been protected so this would have been no drawbacks at all for him to go through the "proper channels" Yet, he decided ("chose") to pick the riskiest way to do so So according to you, deliberately choosing the riskiest way makes him a coward Makes sense |
|
|
|
La « patate » peut se définir comme constituant une devise réelle basée sur un réseau de pair à pair (« peer-to-peer »), pouvant être utilisée en conditions réelles.
A l’heure actuelle, une « patate » vaut environ 0.09€ et circule à l’occasion de la vente d’objets entre particulier ou peut s’utiliser pour payer ses achats , en euros ou en dollars, (wtf?en « patates »!) sur certains site Internet.
Ainsi, la « patate » pourrait être considérée comme une monnaie réelle, dès lors qu’elle dispose d’une valeur en euros.
Par conséquent, un site de poker en ligne, supposant un sacrifice financier et l’espérance d’un gain, peut être en infraction avec la législation française s’il n’est pas agréé par l’ARJEL.
Attention, l'ARJEL a déjà commencé à sanctionner:  |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is open source. The information you have posted is in a free and open domain. I am open to do anything I please with it And also that's where your wrong - the name and logo are owned by me - my intellectual property. Add that on top of your extortion and threats = jail time. Please release your coin, it will only put he nail in the coffin. And believe, me, I am following through with this no matter what. Yeah, you should really apply for a patent for this. Real original, modifying the coin-script parameters...the patent office will def have your back. |
|
|
|
Have you also thought about using namecoin for timestamping? I believe that's better suited than bitcoin. Bitcoin is for payments, and every "other" use is in my opinion unnecessary spam/bloat. Namecoin on the other hand is precisely designed for storing arbitrary values. Register a name, and every time you want to stamp something, name_update its value to your hash. This costs a tiny amount of NMC in transaction fees, but not much. Well, just my suggestion - this is what I will do in the future. Its true that Bitcoin is not designed for this purpose, however if I wanted to timestamp or hash a time sensitive piece of data I would always use Bitcoin. The main reason is that at the moment the Bitcoin blockchain is the most secure timestamp system on earth and the ability for a bad actor to take over the network and modify or invalidate the data is much more difficult. Because so many people have an economic incentive to keep the Bitcoin network running correctly my timestamp is much more immortalized than if that timestamp or hash was in the namecoin chain. Its more likely that the namecoin chain will be attacked and destroyed vs Bitcoin. So you don't want to use Namecoin because not enough people use it? Also, if Namecoin has some block checkpoints then it's truely secure (I don't know if it's the case) |
|
|
|
The customer just stared at the owner for a few years until bitcoin got mainstream enough to be accepted
Oh OK |
|
|
|
No because we can't reverse time and go back and encode (load into the model) the infinite entropy from the past and because due the Heisenberg (uncertainty) principle reality is a moving target that has changed as soon as any entity does anything including observe it.
Imagine a lot of artificial brains working say 1000x times faster than "natural" human's brain. What gives ? Something scary But it started, Google X Lab |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin uses gitian? Great
|
|
|
|
I propose two new symbols too: 1 and 2 Can't be more practical: How many do I owe you?
210 How many do you owe me?
100.01 |
|
|
|
BITCOIN
Famous Potatoes What's wrong with you? |
|
|
|
Check out gitian and build your own binaries.
But how would I confirm that the official binary is compiled from the source on Github? Little point in running my own binary if 95% of all the nodes are from the official website and have a backdoor. Build with same versions of g++ and qmake, same architecture, same dependency (if any, I don't know) and compare Maybe I forget something to check |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
