What happened: PLAGIARIZED WHITEPAPER 34 days old
Created on 2020-08-30
Expires on 2021-08-30
Updated on 2020-08-30
Contents of the Whitepaper have been plagiarized and copied exactly from CAT.LIQUID's Whitepaper. I did not bother to screenshot every page as almost everything is plagiarized. Copied contents:
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if this is me, but whenever I try slots, I tend to gamble more of my money impulsively compared to live casino games. It's like I am not aware that I am gambling more than what I have planned for, that is why I generally avoid to play slots in the casino.
As for live casino games, I enjoy it more due to its minor strategies involve compared to slots where you just pull the lever and hope for the best. In addition, in live casino games I tend to interact with others in which I get to know them well. I have made good friends due to live casinos but most of them already retired from this addiction.
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, a world war is literally the worst thing that can happen to humanity, with or without bitcoin.
Wars happen because countries can't pay up their debts, so they "pay up" this way. (Again, in my opinion, no misunderstandings)
In a war, the fiat loses its value. I had a discussion with a friend about what could happen to bitcoin in a war. He said that it will surely collapse. I am not so sure about it.
Although, think about it for a while. In a world war, the last thing someone has is access to the internet. Would bitcoins lose their value?
History has shown that gold is the money that "reborns" fiat. At least after a war. I would like to read some thoughts.
Hmm, the sale of weapons could transacted using bitcoins to provide more anonymity but expect all economic and financial institutions to crash. Cryptocurrencies may be heavily affected especially that there is a potential danger to mining spots for miners, which would result to a decrease on its price. The effects of war would compel the people to save their resources, thus disrupting the supply and demand. Supplies would be down and prices would increase on the market. Hopefully, a third-world war won't happen. |
|
|
|
I did not see this from a mile away.. whoah! Well given that McGregor previously fought Mayweather, maybe he thought that fighting Pacquiao would draw a larger crowd given the number of fans that loves the Filipino pride! Well, I read an article online that Manny Pacquiao would accept the challenge/fight if he would be the Co-promoter of the event. He's already old I am pretty sure he already weighed his chances of winning here- but in the end, it is all about the money! Seeing that he will use his earnings and donate it to charity or the government's efforts in the pandemic is a very noble cause indeed. He has given many and has helped many in his country and his help will be greatly needed in this time of troubles and uncertainty. Manny still has power left and would still be able to execute many moves that could beat his opponent and will be able to do more to help the poor and those who need help.
We can't doubt his power especially against an MMA fighter. Manny Pacquiao might old if you look at the age, but he just beat a young fighter and he is currently the champion in that division, this is just an easy fight for Manny and easy money, that's why taking it is not hard. Well, if that is the case then we can also say that this is also an easy money for Conor McGregor since it is said that these kinds of games or matches paid so much even in professional MMA matches. Either way, I know that Manny Pacquiao would but using that huge money to support the country with the ongoing pandemic. At the end of the day, everything is all about the money and the business! Both of them would receive a substantial amount of money regardless of the result of fight as both of them are respectively legends on their own turf. |
|
|
|
| | Token Name: |
| Accusation/s: |
| Link: | | Date: | | | | 30. vSlice |
| STOLEN CONTENT |
| |
| September 26, 2020 | | | | 31. Boweiv |
| Ponzi Scheme |
| |
| September 30, 2020 | |
Added two (2) new projects on the list. There seems to be a relatively lower amounts of plagiarized whitepapers and fake teams nowadays. Keep up the good work, everyone!
Last updated: October 01, 2020 |
|
|
|
I would very much bear that in my mind the next time I encounter another fake ANNs and projects on the forum.
You are fast and since you reporting nearly i have no chance to write because you done it already  Awesome ! Thank you very much for helping and reporting buddy , really appreciate that very much ! Every helping Hand is so much welcome and yes as Rikafip has written already if you have found the fake ANN, and have written here tagg them with the reference to your post . Sometimes over the Weekend it takes some time that the Threads get deleted just for let you know. Will working on a statistic already how much and what kind links we destroyed in here for now. I very much appreciate your kind words, Lafu! Like what I mentioned to Rikaflip, I really want to make this forum a better and cleaner place and I got the inspiration because of the hard work and effort you guys made in the forum- so I should be thanking you guys! I'll be looking forward for the statistics, Lafu!  |
|
|
|
I ask this because of the corona virus where people are too scared to hold money.
The issue is that we value btc against the usd and other fiat currencies. If fiat currencies were no longer how would bitcoin be valued...inflation etc? Can't get my head around how it would work.
I have said this before and I will say it again, bitcoin cannot be the world wide currency as of today but it may be in the far future. Due to its decentralized nature, bitcoin has high volatility. Combined with its limited supply, its price would be very unstable to be a currency in the market. You also have to consider that not all countries adapt and accept bitcoin in their respective territories fearing of its anonymity factor. I doubt that bitcoin will become currency now but if there are technological advancements or innovations that could address these issues, then it may happen. |
|
|
|
@qwertyup23 Good job with all these reports, just one small suggestion, since I see that you are on DT2 (even if you weren't it is a good thing to tag scammers) : it is not a bad idea to tag the OP of the fake thread due few reasons: - That way you will warn the others that stumble upon the thread, as even though fake threads are deleted pretty fast, in some cases it might take a day or two.
- For some reason, not all accounts get banned, so it is a good thing if account has been tagged already if scammer decides to use the same account
- It helps the others that are reporting such threads, as when I see the tag, I know that it was reported already so I don't have to check this thread.
Cheers and keep up the good work! Thank you very much for your kind words! I would very much bear that in my mind the next time I encounter another fake ANNs and projects on the forum. Again, thank you for the heads up and this was made possible because of your dedication and work! |
|
|
|
Based from my personal experience, I highly advise that you bet on small amounts but on increasing increments.
For example, if your initial bet is $5, if you lost on the round then your next bet should be at $10. The reason on why I recommend it because it has the potential of recovering your losses given that you win in a round.
What you are telling OP to do is a martingale form of betting. But you didn't provide enough details on how it should be done at least properly. Doubling the amount after a losing bet is fine but you have to take note of the odds. Not all the time, you will see a fair odds to make your martingale effective. OP can pick instead to play on parlay or make a decent single bet amount. And at some point, there's a minimum bet. It's not wise for me to do martingale form of betting in sports betting. Oops thank you for the clarification as I did not read thoroughly OP's message. I do agree with you that the martingale form of betting is not that effective when it comes to sports betting, given that the results are relatively longer to realize compared when you bet this kind of betting in a card games. Although this may be the case, I still recommend this kind of betting outside sports betting due to its odds in the long run. Again, thanks for the clarification for this. |
|
|
|
I have read a lot of theories about NBA being rigged and a little portion of me were convince, so I would like to ask you.
If you believe it's rigged, is it a disadvantage or advantage to us bettors?
Share your opinion and if you have some proof, kindly post.
Although there may be conspiracy theories behind such, I doubt that the biggest basketball association in the world would be involve into these kinds of schemes. The game is purely and mostly based on the skill and athletic ability of the player. These players work tirelessly in order to achieve the dream of winning a championship to their team. If they were to sacrifice their hard work just for the sake of money (although most of them are rich already), then they are throwing away their pride and effort. I really doubt that is the case in the NBA and if it were, then social media will be exploding by now. |
|
|
|
What happened: Ponzi Scheme - 250% after 15 daysWebsite link: boweiv.com Archive link: https://archive.fo/zJW5fANN thread: Not listed in the forum READ: A minimum withdrawal of $2,000 with 250% return after 15 days is just ridiculous and appalling. Please avoid these kinds of websites as much as possible in order to save money. 
|
|
|
|
I have been gambling a lot these days with soccer matches but I'm not enough lucky to make a profit. Howeber, I'm not into huge loss. It's very tiny amount if I check all the previous P/L.
I don't bet big amount. Usually, I bet $4/$5 worth of BTC on a lot of matches; sometimes I win and sometimes I loss. But that can't make me any profit.
Should I go for bigger amount of bets on few matches or stay with current strategy (placing many bets of small amounts)?
Based from my personal experience, I highly advise that you bet on small amounts but on increasing increments. For example, if your initial bet is $5, if you lost on the round then your next bet should be at $10. The reason on why I recommend it because it has the potential of recovering your losses given that you win in a round. But if you have limited capital, then I would not suggest this method as this would burn your resources quickly especially if you experiencing a losing streak. |
|
|
|
If by any means criminals start adopting crypto in mass (especially privacy coins), we could expect a full government crackdown on the entire industry. Which is why I think it's best for criminals to continue using Fiat for the sake of the crypto/Blockchain industry's growth worldwide. But we'll never know what will happen in the future. Thoughts?  Like what you have mentioned, a learning curve in in cryptocurrency is required when you start using the said currency. Compared to fiat which has been the conventional payment that existed since time immemorial, the convenience and accessibility is already preset unlike in cryptocurrency. Although transactions are completely anonymous in the latter, one must still have to learn the fundamentals before they start transacting. I think people with a criminal mind ready to act on and undertake illegal activities don't care whether it is fiat or crypto as long as they can obtain them with minimal effort and get away with it.
I also agree with this statement. When a criminal has already decided to commit a crime, regardless of the nature of payment it uses, as long as it achieves its goal then it would exercise all the means just to make it happen. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: qwertyup23
Current post count: 1906
Merit earned in last 120 days: 68
BTC Address: 3BMD1MTeBBm1cJDfYYrMWKxt7YZHtHcwL3
Please don't mind and count my posts in the meta section. I can post in the gambling boards to meet the requirements weekly.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
