Be careful while trading CRW .. It is purely pumping dumping coin. It was HYIPED so the price was pumped . See the price tomorrow it will be around 15K -20K .. Keep watching . DUMP hard  "As I TOLD CRW ERA IS NOW OVER" ... dont know how it has 600BTC Volume .. first time OVER PUMPED and HIGH dumped ..  WTF coin is it .. yesterday was 700 BTC volume today 70BTC .. lol .. Stay way with this HYIP coin .. Whales are playing big game here .. see tomorrow will be 10 BTC volume nobody wants to buy or trade this shitt in his life Who you kidding with the hype talk? Which hype are you referring to? Meeting hype? All I've heard are complaints that we didn't talk about it enough and some people missed out... Someone came in and created lots of volume, sent the price over 300%, now it's back to over 150% of the lowest price... who knows what happened or who did It, I can assure you it's knowone I know. Why would this make you think Crown is a scam? Your arguments are so weak I'm almost certain your a whale trying to accumulate, good luck.  |
|
|
|
If you run a masternode - is it recommended to install every not mandatory client update or is it better to wait for the next mandatory?
Guess you risk some downtime if you install every update, dont't you?
If you run a VPS for your Tron the VPS side doesn't have to be updated for non mandatory updates.  mandatory updates are not necessary on the server, only on the client? really ?? Sorry but I said non Mandatory true, true ;-) I see a little confusion haha Non mandatory means neither the VPS nor the local client needs updating. It's a choice you have but I recommend updating the local client for your own benefit |
|
|
|
If you run a masternode - is it recommended to install every not mandatory client update or is it better to wait for the next mandatory?
Guess you risk some downtime if you install every update, dont't you?
If you run a VPS for your Tron the VPS side doesn't have to be updated for non mandatory updates. mandatory updates are not necessary on the server, only on the client? really ?? Sorry but I said non Mandatory |
|
|
|
If you run a masternode - is it recommended to install every not mandatory client update or is it better to wait for the next mandatory?
Guess you risk some downtime if you install every update, dont't you?
If you run a VPS for your Tron the VPS side doesn't have to be updated for non mandatory updates. |
|
|
|
Crown is currently 75% of the way towards the block halving which will occur at block 2,000,000.  Also the hashrate just keeps on rising, with around 13% of Bitcoins total hashrate  Bitcoin Hashrate  |
|
|
|
Crown Hashrate reached new all time high
620PH/s
10% of Bitcoins current Hashpower |
|
|
|
 You guy's know Helium is just an escape vehicle for Spreadcoin bag holders? Do some research. https://github.com/spreadcoin/spreadcoinWhy would a developer fork this s@*t? Only sensible reason behind it is so Spreadcoin bag holders are able to finally have a large stake in a masternode token. Spreadcoin $1 now, nearing $10 marketcap... with the prospect of above code and masternodes? Wow. Over two years Georgem lied. Read the link page to see why helium appears. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1045373.5480I know exactly what happened, I have a little history with SPR. And there's nothing wrong with what the Helium team are doing, I just personally feel that everyone should know the real reason Helium is a fork of SPR and not a completely new token (So the large SPR holders can have a controlling stake and manage the project how they want). Nothing wrong with that but the community should know the true motives here. The SPR code is old and needs serious core development work, take a look. I'm open to any reasoning as to why the Helium team would fork SPR, but it's pretty obvious from my perspective. I don't exactly know why you are coming in here and spreading misinformation. But you are highly incorrect. HLM won't be a fork of Spreadcoin. It will be a snapshot of Spreadcoin and will be a hardfork of Dash until it moves away from Dash when Service Nodes are developed. Semantics. Snapshot of the chain so you guys can import your private keys over to Helium blockchain. Why not just fork Dash and start over? It's not semantics when your main point was about the codebase being old? Coins has made a post about why the split is being done the way it is. It is in the OP. But clearly you don't care to read and instead want to spread misinformation. Sorry, this confused me Spreadcoin > HLM economic forkThe only 'Fork' is that of Dash>HLM. The only reason SPR is mentioned is to import SPR Private keys to HLM. Again so large holders from SPR can have a majority stake in the project. This isn't a Fork of SPR>HLM, HLM is a new Alt with a large pre-mine/instamine. And will propably retain "Non premined status", great. Worse than I originally thought. The Spreadcoin to Helium switch is nothing more than a community based effort to change the direction of a project. Not much different from a hardfork, in principle. Do you believe if a community wants to take a coin in a different direction (after spending loads of time, energy and money) should just leave and make their own brand new coin from scratch? Most people invested in Spreadcoin (well, at least I did) because of Coins101's ideas and whitepapers. I and a number of other people spent time and money (donating to Georgem) with the expectation that Georgem would deliver on those ideas. Alas, he hasn't, and won't, because the whitepapers aren't in line with his ideology. That wasn't made clear initially though, because until the end of last year, the community was told everything was being worked on highly diligently... I don't need to explain this to you... you know. As you have said, a hardfork is not technically feasible because the Spreadcoin codebase is so old. So the only other option without just ditching everything is to fork a working coinbase and continue the community and ideas elsewhere with a competent developement team that will work inline with what the community here has invested in (Service Nodes). I appreciate that you are allowed to have your grievances and your questions / skepticisms. But I can't respect the way you have brought them up as you made false claims and accusations from the very start. Don't disregard everything I said from a little mistake I made from being confused by the Helium OP. I also see a bit of confusion from a few guys in here so its not just me. I should have done 5 mins more research to find that SPR is not the fork but Dash. I appreciate you being open about the project and why you guys decided to do what you did. This just needs to be completely obvious to your community, probably in the OP. The method of distribution still concerns me and should others. Even Pre-mine is better than snapshit because all development funds are public. I do wish you guys good luck and hope we can work together in the future when HLM is established more |
|
|
|
You guy's know Helium is just an escape vehicle for Spreadcoin bag holders? Do some research. https://github.com/spreadcoin/spreadcoinWhy would a developer fork this s@*t? Only sensible reason behind it is so Spreadcoin bag holders are able to finally have a large stake in a masternode token. Spreadcoin $1 now, nearing $10 marketcap... with the prospect of above code and masternodes? Wow. Over two years Georgem lied. Read the link page to see why helium appears. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1045373.5480I know exactly what happened, I have a little history with SPR. And there's nothing wrong with what the Helium team are doing, I just personally feel that everyone should know the real reason Helium is a fork of SPR and not a completely new token (So the large SPR holders can have a controlling stake and manage the project how they want). Nothing wrong with that but the community should know the true motives here. The SPR code is old and needs serious core development work, take a look. I'm open to any reasoning as to why the Helium team would fork SPR, but it's pretty obvious from my perspective. I don't exactly know why you are coming in here and spreading misinformation. But you are highly incorrect. HLM won't be a fork of Spreadcoin. It will be a snapshot of Spreadcoin and will be a hardfork of Dash until it moves away from Dash when Service Nodes are developed. Semantics. Snapshot of the chain so you guys can import your private keys over to Helium blockchain. Why not just fork Dash and start over? It's not semantics when your main point was about the codebase being old? Coins has made a post about why the split is being done the way it is. It is in the OP. But clearly you don't care to read and instead want to spread misinformation. Sorry, this confused me Spreadcoin > HLM economic forkThe only 'Fork' is that of Dash>HLM. The only reason SPR is mentioned is to import SPR Private keys to HLM. Again so large holders from SPR can have a majority stake in the project. This isn't a Fork of SPR>HLM, HLM is a new Alt with a large pre-mine/instamine. And will propably retain "Non premined status", great. Worse than I originally thought. |
|
|
|
You guy's know Helium is just an escape vehicle for Spreadcoin bag holders? Do some research. https://github.com/spreadcoin/spreadcoinWhy would a developer fork this s@*t? Only sensible reason behind it is so Spreadcoin bag holders are able to finally have a large stake in a masternode token. Spreadcoin $1 now, nearing $10 marketcap... with the prospect of above code and masternodes? Wow. Over two years Georgem lied. Read the link page to see why helium appears. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1045373.5480I know exactly what happened, I have a little history with SPR. And there's nothing wrong with what the Helium team are doing, I just personally feel that everyone should know the real reason Helium is a fork of SPR and not a completely new token (So the large SPR holders can have a controlling stake and manage the project how they want). Nothing wrong with that but the community should know the true motives here. The SPR code is old and needs serious core development work, take a look. I'm open to any reasoning as to why the Helium team would fork SPR, but it's pretty obvious from my perspective. I don't exactly know why you are coming in here and spreading misinformation. But you are highly incorrect. HLM won't be a fork of Spreadcoin. It will be a snapshot of Spreadcoin and will be a hardfork of Dash until it moves away from Dash when Service Nodes are developed. Semantics. Snapshot of the chain so you guys can import your private keys over to Helium blockchain. Why not just fork Dash and start over? |
|
|
|
You guy's know Helium is just an escape vehicle for Spreadcoin bag holders? Do some research. https://github.com/spreadcoin/spreadcoinWhy would a developer fork this s@*t? Only sensible reason behind it is so Spreadcoin bag holders are able to finally have a large stake in a masternode token. Spreadcoin $1 now, nearing $10 marketcap... with the prospect of above code and masternodes? Wow. Over two years Georgem lied. Read the link page to see why helium appears. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1045373.5480I know exactly what happened, I have a little history with SPR. And there's nothing wrong with what the Helium team are doing, I just personally feel that everyone should know the real reason Helium is a fork of SPR and not a completely new token (So the large SPR holders can have a controlling stake and manage the project how they want). Nothing wrong with that but the community should know the true motives here. The SPR code is old and needs serious core development work, take a look. I'm open to any reasoning as to why the Helium team would fork SPR, but it's pretty obvious from my perspective. |
|
|
|
You guy's know Helium is just an escape vehicle for Spreadcoin bag holders? Do some research. https://github.com/spreadcoin/spreadcoinWhy would a developer fork this s@*t? Only sensible reason behind it is so Spreadcoin bag holders are able to finally have a large stake in a masternode token. Spreadcoin $1 now, nearing $10 marketcap... with the prospect of above code and masternodes? Wow.
|
|
|
|
Finally after weeks and months Apple approved the wallet. Well done! |
|
|
|
Such an insane amount of hash.... Impossible to say for sure, but this makes me imagine that a mining farm in the China has pointed a heap of merge-mining power at UNO & BTC.
Crown and Terracoin are also undergoing similar crazy hashrates. If you find anything out please let me know |
|
|
|
Crown Atomic Pre Alpha
Is being prepared for release today.
Please be on standby for the new testnet client. |
|
|
|
Is there a telegram channel for Crown at all?
mm.crownlab.eu |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
