Why can't you post the sales ad yourself?  Craig's list allows you post ads in markets other than your own.  Something about this request seems strange to me.  How did you obtain these auto parts, are they stripped off of stolen cars?

No problem, I was just a few seconds slower than Shasan.  Don't hesitate to let me know if you need help in the future.  

Don't fall for this scam.  The only way to sell bitcoin through autobuy links is if you upload your private keys to the service.  Anybody who would do that is a fool, and knows nothing about bitcoin.  If you go through with this guy's offer through the autobuy link you will regret it.


[Archive]

Way better than this one:

@CryptoSparks

If this service that you’re offering is truly legitimate, it’s only suffering as a result of your attitude.  If you had approached the forum community with humility instead of hubris, honesty instead of deceit, generosity instead of greed you may have actually made something of this service you’re offering.

If I was to offer a service such as this I would have proposed the following:
1)   Don’t send me any money.
2)   Send the funds to your own bitmex (or whatever exchange) account,
3)   Create a trading API for your account
4)   Provide me with the API which will be plugged into my quant bot
5)   If you works for you, send me a tip

With a proposal like that, no one would have suspected you of attempting to run off with their funds, no one would have called you a liar, no one would have anything with which to tarnish your reputation.

If you actually had a quantbot that works (still a big if, because I think you’re a liar) you would have had people tripping over each other lining up for your service.  Once you’ve gotten it established that’s when you can change the structure and start charging for your service.  A subscription or some sort of arrangement that leaves the user in control of their own funds.  Honesty, openness, transparency is essential when starting a new service in the crypto sphere.  Anyone who’s been around crypto for just a few months should understand that.

He's probably talking about the negative review he left for you.  He sees it as an orange mark on your trust rating.  What he doesn't realize that he's the only one who sees it, but I promise I won't tell him.

Pmalek, it sounds like you're as cheap as I am.   

I always do that when I'm shifting funds around my own wallets.  I know I can wait, and it's just a matter of time.  The fees were crazy low this past weekend.  I used the opportunity to consolidate 17 transactions at 1 sat/byte, and had my first confirmation within a few minutes. 

I think he figured out it did come from a gambling site, he was just retelling the whole story from the beginning.

@jerry0, enter you binance address into a wallet explorer (I like https://blockchair.com) and look for that transaction you are curious about.  Once you find it you can search for the address that sent the transaction on https://www.walletexplorer.com, which may tell you what service owns that wallet.

Howdy Dev,
Thanks for repaying the old loan early with a little extra, I really appreciate it.  Your new request is approved, and has been funded, the tx is below.

Please send the repayment to this address: 35Q9V11H6v8goJaPepRwRyh8SH4Rk8wrCv 348XXjbpXwg37JYd8knLnHRSMajLbteSbJ

TxId: c5ca9f1913e6dd3a4277e06649fe9e9377b2640e5a38c5e0a5d5725e414eca87

No one gets banned for being rude either.  Which is a good, thing because I do have my grumpy days.  The account doesn't have many posts to look through, and there doesn't appear to be any plagiarism.  Maybe ban evasion?  

OP, do you have any other accounts?

You were not banned because of your race.  When you logged in with the banned account there was a message, what did it say?  Is it a permanent ban?

The low fees are a great incentive to start using bech32 addresses, but the reason for the low fees is the best reason.  The smaller transaction weights help the network as a whole.  

As more exchanges start using bech32 it'll become more and more convenient.  One big service, Coinbase already does, but (and I find this odd) Binance does not.  Right now it seems more popular for the peer to peer realm of transactions, but again as more people start using the sooner exchanges and web-wallets will implement it.

I think you just set a record for the fastest loan ever.  The repayment is confirmed.  Thanks again for choosing me as your lender, and thanks for the quickie.   

Lol, those wall posts started to make you look like cryptohunter, now you sound like him too.

You keep talking about the ignorance of others, but you've yet to demonstrate your superior intelligence to us.  If you really are a quantitative trading programmer maybe you should find a job, and stop propagating lies about bitcoin on a bitcoin forum. 

Hi masulum,
Thank you for the loan request, it has been approved and funded.  And thanks for offering a little extra, it's much appreciated.
Please pay back at this address:  0x44e39672DedFbe99A1CC7A25dedB6281303FF000


TxId: 0xae330c28e6c38e12d65975af663a9e83957481957341e259401a905cd3069063

If anyone is curious why I deleted the posts I had made in that thread, it's because I felt dirty afterwords.  It felt like wrestling a pig, I just wind up getting dirty and the pig likes it.

I haven't had time to really dig into CryptoSparks' service proposal, his service code, or his post history, but I do want to take the time to do so.  My suspicion is that CryptoSparks is no quant.  I don't know where or how he got himself a quantbot, or if there really is one plugged into his service.

What is clear and beyond dispute is that he's a liar and a troll.

That's not "control," and is completely false and misleading.  An API key is not the same thing as a private key.  If my funds are locked in your service with the only access I have being an API key, that means that I have no control.  The API key, or the service as a whole could be disabled by you at any time, and I don't see anything that  guarantees you won't do just that once the funds are deposited.

Not to mention that your service smells like a ponzi scam to begin with.

That sounds more secure than this wallet, in my opinion.  At least you wouldn't have a wallet that has (potentially) been viewed by others. 

I'm not calling Bobby Lee a scammer and no matter how ethical he's been up until now, if you use this wallet you NEED to trust that will not become one.  You must also trust that all his employees are ethical, and won't collude to log and steal the keys.  Way too much trust and risk involved.

That's a good point.  Both accounts applied for the Windice signature campaign, and in weeks 16 and 17 both sharon121212 and kingpin4321 were enrolled and show up on the spreadsheet.  So, before the potential hack the user was cheating the WinDice signature campaign with at least two alts.

Spreadsheet for the windice signature campaign:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gRabJN4r_qbpitYLsxLfDQ7H4eZw6DfIqErx2BI9A7c/edit#gid=85127512

[Archive]


[Archive]


I also find it strange that Sharon won't answer Suchmoon's very straight forward question:



This is starting to look like a scammer in our midst, and perhaps there was no hack after all.  I was afraid this might happen after the kenzawak debacle; that some shitbird would start phishing for a scam, then cry "my account was hacked" when the scam was exposed.  


That sounds like a pile of steaming donkey dung to me too.  

Right, like that's really a private key underneath that scratcher?  Pretty fucking lazy scam if you ask me.