|
I'm almost ready to request a loan. I don't really need it, just want to learn about lightning, support this effort, and have some fun feeding chickens.
But I ran into a snag:
I downloaded and installed Eclair
I sent mBTC0.5
Tried to open a channel
I was informed I needed a minimum of mBTC1 to open a channel
I sent another mBTC0.9+ from the change address of the first transaction
I opened a channel before the first transaction (mBTC0.5) had 6 confirmations
I waited
The channel finally went to "Normal" but it still said the amount I could receive is 0.
Why can't I receive any coins? I've since closed the channel (mutual,) and now I'm waiting for that transaction to complete. Now that the funding transactions have plenty of confirmations, if I open another channel will I be able to receive? What did I do wrong? Other than not reading this thread thoroughly, and being impatient?
|
|
|
|
2 Accounts Connected:Reechealo03; Account For Sale. Proof:I will give a loan in cryptocurrency.
0.1 to 2 BTC
Term up to 12 months.
18+
Write to telegram @ vianova
[ Archive] Hello, I am engaged in issuing loans at BTC
I offer from 0.1 to 2 BTC (more than 2 BTC is considered individually)
From 2.3% per month
Up to 6 months.
18+
Write in telegram @vianova
[ Archive] Related Addresses:Miscellaneous: N/A
|
|
|
|
Daboy_Lyle so far has 8 reds already but why is TheBitcoinExplorer has zero? Daboy_Lyle may be the specific account used to default on a loan but since the person behind both accounts is the same individual, as admitted by the account owner himself, both accounts should not be trusted and therefore negged. I just tagged TheBitcoinExplorer. It looks like he was trying to use both accounts to get loans from Shasan at the same time. Both accounts are going back and deleting their loan requests. [ Archive] |
|
|
|
18+ Don't send this user your KYC either. This is could very likely be an attempt at identity fraud, the loan offer is just bait. It wouldn't be the first time something like this has been tried. |
|
|
|
We accept bitcoin! At checkout, please select "other payment method" and you will be given a Coinbase pay portal. I usually don't drink the medium roast hipster coffee, but since you accept bitcoin I thought I'd try your sampler pack. The only payment options I see are PayPal or providing contact info for follow-up. I don't see an option to pay in bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Waiting for new alias el savior del mondo Silly rabbit, that's too clever. Besides, Hungarian scammers don't speak Espaņol. |
|
|
|
Fucking 16 years old kid, right?
My youngest child is older than that. Dont you understand you fucking prick that portraits are something private and i am not going to share what previous works was.
Don't you understand that jacking copyrights is illegal? You left me negative trust saying i was trying to sell my art. Could you please show me where i was selling anything? Maybe you're just trying to collect photos to fake KYC documents. I don't know what your ploy is, nor do I care to speculate. You did something unethical, and now you have to live with the consequences. And you did ask for tips, obviously under the guise that these images represent your work. Or you are just covering your buddy who have created hat design for you? What has Homer done that needs covering? Exposing a scammer? That needs to be supported, not covered. |
|
|
|
And you fucked up everything with your damaged thinking. Gee, sorry for thinking.  So, I fucked up everything? How about taking some accountability for pretending the work of other artists is your own. Would I have fucked up everything if you had actually posted your own work? Or if you had not pretended that the work is yours, and sited a source? This is the same thing as plagiarism, which can get you banned from the forum. |
|
|
|
Obviously you are pretending these works are your own. I've seen both of these images before, my daughter is an enthusiast of charcoal drawings, and these are quite famous to those within the niche. Your words; "work example" and "another work in progress" are clearly meant to portray these images as your own art. You are a scammer, and Homer ain't no fool. Work example:  Ok ill share another work in progress...  . |
|
|
|
Humble man...
Jesus could multiply breads...
I would like to multiply merits the same way.
Lol. The irony is strong with this one. |
|
|
|
|
Are people really entertaining this scammer's deflection attempt? He gets exposed for the scammer that he is, starts with his childish, manipulative "What About You" deflection tactics, and we are actually going to waste time defending the forum from this dirt-bag's allegations? Just ignore the scamming troll, and stop wasting any more time until he comes back with a new account.
|
|
|
|
It's probably an exchange or a mixer. Blockchain is showing limited information. I looked up one of those transactions using a different explorer, and it shows a bit more. It looks like another BTC2.35 are also moving to this address: 1M8vF4gXmQwsqcGHmnTNEgXsFfuqzaGBqF |
|
|
|
I tried to verify your message on etherscan but its says "Sorry! The Signature Message Verification Failed" so please check the details given to get verified and also its better to add the post link where you staked this.
{
"address": "0x7663abe0164ca99c25b95594a87998fc04b97a15",
"msg": "This is Mark Clarence Aquino, owner of cabalism13 ( Account on Bitcointalk)\nI hereby verify, that I'm still the owner of the account, and never sold this to anyone.",
"sig": "0x58ad6e72fae6b8b082f33c208b5d01c3c11803e4ff9fa273cafaee19caf2a428584879631d85af55d9bb8fe6c71ed9f01c5743f273ad819b51349c1d67b0824f1b",
"version": "3",
"signer": "MEW"
}Fixed. Signed using MyEtherWallet I tried this also but can't be able to verify so I thought someone will find whats wrong with it or its on my side.Anyway still failed to verify the message from myself. My Ether Wallet does verify the message, but I don't know what this proves. I can't find any link between that address and cabalism13. @cabalism13, in April you borrowed some bitcoin from me, can you sign a message with the address used for that transaction? 3LjVmpw2wDWawaPGa8Lj5JYjYciXDAePbW |
|
|
|
...there is some merit to the outrage that is being experienced by the Turkish members who are being distrusted mainly because "If I feel that a member constructs his trust list for the sake of "awarding" his friends or countrymen simply because they are friends and countrymen, then I am likely to exclude that user."precisely because a lot of members on this forum, including Turks and all other nationalities also feel that that's exactly the same way most core forum members construct their own trust lists. They point out, correctly, that it seems to be completely ok when most of the regulars that hang out at Meta & other popular English speaking sections look out for their trusted friends and close circles on their default trust selections, and yet when a Russian or a Turk or a Filipino does it, suddenly it's a very unethical 3rd world nepotistic behavior  You gotta admit it smells a little bit of hypocrisy and double standards, so if you think it's fair to black list a user you have never even interacted with just because you assume he likes his friends a lot and trusts their judgement (or that you assume somehow he is trying to create an unfair future financial advantage by boosting his +green trust by what a couple more points), that in my opinion would be an even weaker reason to exclude someone from your trust list than "retaliation". I'll speak for myself to refute whatever part of this accusation may be levied at me: I don't know where most of the people on my trust list reside, or from where they hail. I know for fact that there are a few Eastern Europeans included, at least one Filipino. Hell, I've even included a couple of Canadians, for fuck's sake. Canadians! If anything I think Americans are the minority on my inclusion list. The other thing to notice, most of those on my inclusions haven't left me feedback of any kind. And most of those who have left me feedback are not on my inclusion list. So, where's the hypocrisy? And just so you know, I've never excluded anyone for merely modifying their own trust list out of retaliation. So that part of your argument holds no water. But when someone does use his trust list for retaliatory purposes, it says something about that individual's character, and their decision making abilities, does it not? So I completely disagree; someone who's stacking his trust list (and exclusion list) to artificially bump his trust score is not only providing a perfectly valid reason to be excluded, it also demonstrates unethical behavior. When we have people like that on DT1 the whole community suffers. Not just one local board. @direwolf
I dis-trust you because u dis-trust people without any logic
I sent u a pm, and your response isnt good for me
U are freedom to distrust ppl, like me and other
Actually you distrusted me because I had you on my distrust list. It was in fact retaliation. And I think I gave you a perfectly valid answer as to why I excluded you. hi
why u dis-trust me?
Hi Babo, Sorry for the late response. You and many others were participating in the LiveCoin signature campaign, and chose to defend them. I didn't tag or distrust anyone for defending them or their participation in the advertising their service. I understand your position, and certainly empathize with you for the loss of income you suffered as a result of their downfall. I decided to exclude you from my trust network because of the way you attacked the people who claimed to have lost money to LiveCoin. Even though I didn't necessarily support the accusers, I felt that attacking them was going too far. This gave me reason to question your judgement and therefor I choose to exclude you from my trust network. I hope you don't take this as a personal attack. It's my preference to only include those whom I believe can leave their personal feelings out of their decision making process.r And since I maintain my trust list and review my inclusions/exclusions on a regular basis, I'v since decided your contributions are more valuable than your transgressions are detrimental. Therefor I've since removed you from my exclusions. And the only reason any of this matters to anyone other than me is because I'm on DT1. Get over it, or do something about it! My trust list is for my use, and my use only. If it so happens that I get voted onto DT1 and now my trust list has some impact on the rest of the community, do something to change it if you don't like it. As all of you can see from above, I don't give a single fuck who has excluded me, and I won't use any other criteria than that which I've articulated repeatedly to continue maintaining my list. |
|
|
|
There seems to be a lot of drama in the Turkish local board resulting from this one event. A similar situation erupted not too long ago with many members of the Russian local. In the past week I've been excluded by a couple of members who are active in the Turkish local board. Since I've had no interaction with these particular members I suspect that it's retaliation for excluding them, ekiller, and possibly others who are active in that board. One member opined that my exclusions are based on nationalist sentiment. Nothing could be further from the truth. Although I am unabashedly a proud American, it's also fair to mention for the sake of this argument that my ethnicity is Palestinian Arab, and I was raised in a Muslim household. I harbor no animosity towards anyone due to their national origin, ethnicity, religious beliefs, sex, gender, or any other immutable trait. I don't know how many times I've said this, but it's worth repeating a million times more: The only factor that I consider when adding members to, or excluding members from my trust list is that member's own trust list and the reviews they've left for others. If I feel that a member constructs his trust list for the sake of "awarding" his friends or countrymen simply because they are friends and countrymen, then I am likely to exclude that user. If I feel like a member is building his trust list to elevate his own trust score by adding members who've left him positive reviews, then I am likely to exclude that member. If I feel a user is actively trying to make the community a better, safer place for trading and exchanging ideas, that user is likely to get added to my trust list. It's really that simple. It's been my observation that users who kvetch and writhe because they get excluded from someone's trust list are usually the ones who don't belong in DT to begin with. Just my opinion and I'm entitled to it. Below is a list of the members who have me excluded, and I'd be willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that they all (except the anti-Lauda bunch) excluded me due to retaliation. Not once have I PM'd any of them to try to get them to reconsider my exclusion, not once have I shown any care whatsoever that I've been excluded. If I get bumped off of DT1 tomorrow, life will go on, and I'll keep maintaining my trust list with the same approach I've used all this time. ~DireWolfM14 is Distrusted by:1. babo ( Trust: +6 / =2 / -0) ( 208 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 2. cryptohunter ( Trust: +1 / =3 / -4) ( 155 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 3. buckrogers ( Trust: +26 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (4) 46 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 4. bamb ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (1 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 5. zazarb ( Trust: +26 / =0 / -1) ( DT1 (-3) 482 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 6. Vadi2323 ( Trust: neutral) ( 84 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 7. WhiteManWhite ( Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (1) 64 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 8. TheFuzzStone ( Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) ( DT1! (6) 559 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 9. endlasuresh ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) (3 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 10. kenzawak ( Trust: +2 / =1 / -13) ( 840 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 11. Bazinga442 ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -7) ( 24 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 12. chickinini ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) ( 11 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 13. cryptorgasm ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) (4 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 14. Pablojob ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -4) ( 10 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 15. PiningGarcia ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -4) ( 10 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 16. PingGermoco ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -4) ( 10 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 17. cryptopov ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) (4 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 18. poypototoy ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) ( 10 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 19. Zin-Zang ( Trust: +0 / =1 / -7) ( 11 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 20. S_Therapist ( Trust: +0 / =2 / -2) ( 271 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 21. H8bussesNbicycles ( Trust: +0 / =1 / -11) (8 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 22. ito-marketing ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -3) (0 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) 23. gwsukabokepjepang ( Trust: +0 / =0 / -10) (0 Merit earned) ( Trust list) ( BPIP) |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Today is 8/26/19 Forum Time
Username: asu
Loan Amount: 0.1 BTC
Purpose: Trading
Collateral: None
Repayment date: 2 Months
Repayment Amount: 0.115 BTC
Funding Address: 3ByTmVLLd6hrjtT6trwG9C1aziEmbTkZAH
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 1Asu1mGNkLctuTmCebzwPpdRfMemZzobWA
G/e8UXYSdOUFmp8+ydAU3zNFiIZw68tyVub2xtI4xnRURTOYCOc9RJkO7TkTdEd3DcGeceyjyuSMfU2jIeVK+ys=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Hi asu, Thanks for giving me the opportunity to be your lender. Your loan request has been approved, and your loan funded. Please send your repayment to this address: 3MiRqZZ3y1dNqWqi4e1jkSYYPprTzns41b Thanks again, DireWolfM14 TxId: 32040b599fca8b14307e22d317f8c4caa84086a2f9c30d7a5a676286d6d9bad6 |
|
|
|
First you say "Security deposit amount: 6500 EUR or USD" then you say "I, The FuzzStone, will never ask you to transfer any money to me!" And? And people are asking legitimate questions about your offer. Being sarcastic and arrogant is likely to prevent you from making a deal, while being open and transparent may help. Our people are meeting with the buyer, taking his insurance deposit and leaving him document/receipt for this amount of money.
About "running away". The people I work with have an excellent reputation, they have been working on the OTC-market of Ukraine, Russia and Belarus for many years. I have no reason to doubt the legitimacy of this proposal, but this statement above gives me the willies. All business propositions have inherent risk, and it's usually expected that both sides enter an agreement willing to assume some of that risk. Here it looks like the potential buyer must assume all the risk, and the seller wins either way. And the concern of "running away" still remains. I must take your word that these people (whom I don't know) have an excellent reputation (which I can't confirm.) So I'm expected to trust this "document/receipt" is going to prevent people I don't know, with a reputation I can't confirm from running away with $6500 of my money? What's so special about this "document/receipt?" Does it include the seller's KYC? 300 EUR? That's is really funny. I'm really wondering how you imagine it. Our people will travel to Portugal for 300 EUR? And if the deal is disrupted by the buyer? And after Portugal, a schoolboy with 300 EUR will offer a deal in Greece, and what, go to Greece? For 300 EUR? If you can work with such conditions, at a minimum of 20k USD/EUR, without KYC/AML/proof-of-funds -- then I am truly happy for you. By this statement I can conclude that you expect the potential buyer to pay the wages of your people whether a deal is reached or not. Am I correct? |
|
|
|
I have succumb to the pressure as well. I'm also charging 0.1% daily for collateralized loans, and 0.33% for non collateralized loans. shasan took on much larger risks and as a result, the more trustworthy users had to pay a higher rate to essentially pay for the defaults of the risker users. I still think that someone could make a profit charging lower rates than what I'm currently charging. That's the problem with the non collateralized loans, they need to provide incentive to the lender to take the risk, and they must remain profitable despite the occasional default. You've done a pretty good job weeding out the deadbeats, and I've had a good run as well. Even with one default I made a reasonable return in the given time frame I've been offering loans. When offering non collateralized loans the lender's security is really up to the lender. Diligence in researching your client is key, and therefore non collateralized loans require more time invested. Another legitimate reason the lender can expect them to be more profitable. And the lender really owe's it to his trustworthy clients to keep his defaults to a minimum so he can keep his rates reasonable. I've been using a checklist to expedite the process, while still investigating a potential borrower thoroughly. The checklist is always in progress, and I've been thinking about adding values to certain member attributes to help generate a sort of "credit score." My plan is formulating a "risk" level to help calculate a reasonable, but not too risky amount to lend. As I get better at spotting riskier borrowers, and I could mitigate the risk of non collateralized loans, lowering rates would be an obvious next step. |
|
|
|
Quite interesting that you're looking to sell $3000 worth of bitcoin, yet simultaneously looking to borrow $300 worth. Why would you want to borrow some of you already have a bunch? hello I want to exchange bitcoin for paypal instruction : 1- let me know how mach are you buying . 2- make your paypal payment and send me your btc adresse 3- I will send your btc instantly ones I check yor payment 4- give me a feed back for seriouse buyer only I can get up to 5k btc every week my telegram ; https://t.me/lockledg welcome . hello I know an exchange web sites that a few of members know that you can turn 0.03 btc to 0.04 each 3 or 4 days if ther is any one ho can trust me and loan me this 0.03 I will send back 0.04 in to 4 days as maximent or I can show you the web site and show you when to buy and when to sell and you send me a share after earning any seriouse member welcome to contact me at my telegram : https://t.me/lockledg. |
|
|
|
I love the "Make America Grateful  Again" hat. Being a fan of the Grateful Dead, Trump, and being a self-described patriotic, gun-totin' hippie myself I find that really cool. I really had no exposure to Patrick Byrne, and have never used OverStock.com. I'm quite empathetic to his plight, he genuinely seems scared and concerned for his own safety. I hope he doesn't become a statistic in #clintonbodycount. We need more business leaders with this guy's moral compass. No, we need more business leaders to shut the fuck up and run their businesses. I don't care if you are on the Left running Ben & Jerry's or on the right running Snapper. Your job is to run your company and make it money. Every word that comes out of your mouth and every email that you send you should think long and hard about. It sucks to be you making millions of dollars but have to walk on eggshells about what you say. Tough shit, deal with it. You want to be Mr. or Mrs. nobody in middle management, fine talk your head off. You are running a big company, does not matter what side you are on left or right. You know what. There are other big companies that are run by people WHO ARE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE THAT YOU ARE ON. And you have to consider how they may or may not react. That's your fucking job as CEO. Don't like it. Quit and go flip burgers. When he stepped down Overstock stock went up and was looking much better (until this entire tariff thing). Why because guess what, big institutional investors like CEOs and boards that shut the fuck up and run the business. -Dave Sorry, this is just one of those things that annoys the crap out of me. In case you could not tell from the number of fucks in the above post. Number of fucks observed is estimated at zero.  But I don't think you've quite got the grasp of the words coming out of his mouth. As Tecshare mentioned this much more than some entitled douchebag blabbering about his exalted, and well funded opinions. This man has evidence of the corruption in our government. I'll only briefly mention the point of your post, because I feel it is off topic; I disagree on shear principal. No human should feel compelled to remain silent due to his occupation. I say that knowing fully well that on most matters of governance I tend to disagree with most of the outspoken, wealthy CEO's. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
