Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 06:23:38 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
441  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: "Error opening block database. Do you want to rebuild the block database now?" on: September 14, 2013, 09:26:23 PM
What you're describing doesn't make sense except coincidentally. 0.8.4 and 0.8.5 are nearly identical, save for turning off the check that was getting tripped up by the negative version transactions.

I wonder— is everyone having frequent problems on OSX running filevault?

No, not filevault. However when I first set up the client on version 0.6.3 I moved the contents of the Bitcoin directory into an encrypted disc image and hard linked the contents back into the original location. This meant that every time I needed to run Bitcoin-Qt I had to open the disc image first.

Of course now that I have encountered this error and looked into the file structure again I realise that it has changed. Doh. Oh well, this has still worked faultlessly until now.

Since posting about the error I have restored all the files to the Bitcoin directory from a backup and also restored the 0.8.4 application. I ran it with the checklevel=2 commandline option. It is now stuck at the "Verifying blocks..." stage and has been for more than 30 hours. It seems to be creating and removing files ending in .sst in the "chainstate" directory (for example 068675.sst) continuously. This seems like a very long time, and a little concerning tbh. I'm starting to wonder if it might be better to simply delete the Bitcoin directory, re-download the blockchain, then copy the wallet.dat file back when it's finished  Huh
442  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: "Error opening block database. Do you want to rebuild the block database now?" on: September 13, 2013, 11:38:17 AM
I have just encountered this error since I downloaded Bitcoin-Qt version 0.8.5 for OSX running on Mountain Lion, having replaced version 0.8.4 which I downloaded just a few days ago, and am seeing this when I attempt to run it: "Error opening block database. Do you want to rebuild the block database now?". I did not see this error when I ran 0.8.4.

Should I click "Ok" and allow the rebuild of the block database to proceed? Or would it be wise to stick to 0.8.4 for the time being?
443  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: 0.8.5 block database error on: September 13, 2013, 11:34:58 AM
Never mind, I see this is a duplicate of the thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=155140.0 so I'll repost this there
444  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / 0.8.5 block database error on: September 13, 2013, 11:27:30 AM
I have just downloaded Bitcoin-Qt version 0.8.5 for OSX running on Mountain Lion, having replaced version 0.8.4 which I downloaded just a few days ago, and am seeing the following error when I attempt to run it: "Error opening block database. Do you want to rebuild the block database now?". I did not see this error when I ran 0.8.4.

Should I click "Ok" and allow the rebuild of the block database to proceed? Or would it be wise to stick to 0.8.4 for the time being?
445  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: September 11, 2013, 10:18:24 PM
Boom!  $144.9999

edit:  I wonder if these buy-ups lately are someone, or some group, stacking coins in preparation for an upcoming business venture? Perhaps a new financial service of some kind?
446  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: September 11, 2013, 08:48:06 PM


This reminded me of this guy's post  Smiley

wow I can't even read this thread: I'd already ignored everyone here  Cheesy
447  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Encryption on: September 05, 2013, 10:04:56 PM
Not sure this is the right thread for this but here goes anyway....

I saw this article on Zerohedge (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-05/bullrun-nsas-infatuation-back-door-penetration). The phrase that stood out for me was "What happened next is unclear, but it is safe to say the NSA can now hack virtually everything but the highest (512+ bit: assume AES-256 is now terminally violated) cipher with impunity."

I sense a degree of fear-mongering to the article but was wondering how accurate it is and if it has any bearing on the security of the Bitcoin network?
448  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [IFC] Free IFC - Infinitecoin Giveaway! 4000 IFC to the 250 first users! on: September 02, 2013, 12:04:42 AM
iFLfFG4rfreEHprT2FksnTPP6pqCYNfAS2

Thanks!  Smiley
449  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: August 27, 2013, 03:50:10 AM
trades like these do not happen out of the blue unless based on inside information. I bet we hear some big news tomorrow. Either positive or negative news may result in huge sales. The former is self-evident, as traders generally assume uptrend on positive news. The latter is more unique to gox because traders want fiat out and only way to do that is buy btc (lol).

can't wait for tomorrow

+1  exactly what I was thinking. The timing after the conference today is very interesting

The only way I think that might be wrong, is if we see a big dump on another exchange(s) soon.

That would imply the "insider" knows something bad and is packing up out of gox and dumping his coins on an exchange where he can transfer out his money.

Or they simply store the coins outside the exchanges until the storm settles
450  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: August 27, 2013, 03:37:04 AM
trades like these do not happen out of the blue unless based on inside information. I bet we hear some big news tomorrow. Either positive or negative news may result in huge sales. The former is self-evident, as traders generally assume uptrend on positive news. The latter is more unique to gox because traders want fiat out and only way to do that is buy btc (lol).

can't wait for tomorrow

+1  exactly what I was thinking. The timing after the conference today is very interesting
451  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Half of all TOR sites compromised, SR affected??? (xpost from reddit) on: August 04, 2013, 09:54:34 PM
I agree, it will be interesting to see where this goes. I think the information that TORMail was included in the compromise will be giving a few people some anxious moments
452  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread on: July 11, 2013, 03:50:59 AM
Should we tender our shares to AMCTENDER1 on btct.co now and send the email if we are transferring them to the new btct.co stock? Or should we wait until the new stock is approved? The reason I ask is because I'll have very patchy internet access for the next few weeks and I don't want to miss the deadline
453  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: July 10, 2013, 07:30:44 PM
 Shocked
454  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: July 09, 2013, 06:43:51 PM
455  Economy / Securities / Re: [AMC]-The Official Active Mining Cooperative Discussion on: July 09, 2013, 05:31:31 AM
So how many companies will we have to follow as holders of AMC, VMC, AM? Seems like all are owned by Ken and feed each other.  Why is one joining another and swapping into a different set of shares? Just to hit that adjusted IPO price? Is a new company going to be formed with each Fast-Hash unit that is made?

Why all the hoops?

I am a little confused as to why this couldn't be handled at the exchange level.  Mergers and buyouts happen on wall street all the time and the exchanges handle things behind the scenes for the shareholders.

Ken, if you need help I'm happy to help transition everyone on AMC-PT to the new issue...  That way noone gets left behind.

Cheers.


You rock burnside! Currently all of mine are on bitfunder but I'd like to have them split between the two

I just PM'd Ken and offered up the assistance of btct.co.  When the new issue is approved we would lock trading on AMC-PT and transfer over all the shares to the new issue.  It'd be painless for everyone involved.

Cheers.

I'm all for this. I'll be overseas until the 30th so will only have intermittent internet access. Just bad timing for me
456  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: July 09, 2013, 03:10:28 AM
https://i.imgur.com/aIqkFtI.png
https://i.imgur.com/mP10jxQ.png

I just noticed this while checking virwox, did this really happen?

It's odd that if you narrow the range to that day only that there is no large volume spike at that time but about 1/2 an hour later. Glitch?

457  Economy / Speculation / Re: This looks promising. on: July 09, 2013, 02:32:22 AM
ahh! didn't notice the aud but would still like to know which chart platform you use

That's a grab from bitcoin.clarkmoody.com
458  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: July 08, 2013, 11:44:28 AM
It's clear the wall served its purpose

459  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: July 08, 2013, 06:05:14 AM
460  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer - MtGoxUSD wall movement tracker - Hardcore on: July 08, 2013, 04:39:30 AM
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!