I would never trust this project - the team is completely anonymous and that doesn´t look good. After Ethereum NOWA and Ethereum Classic Vision scam fork, we have Monero Rings scam fork.  Don't forget Stellar Force, Stellar Activity, and WavesX - all perpetuated by the what looks to be the same team. Can see some similarities between the launch and announcement of this fork with the other scams |
|
|
|
Congratulations!!!
Great news for BQT!
ICO Research has successfully listed BQT on its website with brief Review.
You will be able to catch Pros, Cons and competitor brief introduction in this review.
Rating --- 3.83 Stars out of 5.
Hype - Neutral
( We find that Project has fair social media presence but not having big community as we expected )
Risk - Medium
( We do consider competitors adoption rate from last year and than given this score )
Site score - High
( It is site score which consider social media link, website traffic, team, product and many things. )https://icoresearch.in/icolisting/bqt Thanks for the add and sharing. Would have loved to have a breakdown of the Hype ratings though like how big a community needs to be and is the size of the community evaluated based on the sector the blockchain product is addressing? |
|
|
|
I wanted to join your Bounty Campaign, but after reading the White Paper and website I doubted everything. Too everything is anonymous, it smells like a scam.
Something like what happened with Ethererum Classic Vision that found not too long ago. I want free money, but I think it will be more safely for me to stay away from it. I don't want to get red tags from DT members, LOL.  It is too early to judge the Monero Rings is a scam one, but it's safer to be careful. Going to give the WP a thorough read, but have started seeing a few red flags and can almost visualize the approach to this "fork". Yes, it evokes memories of ETCV, ETHAD, and those XLM forks, but this is MO is a bit different. Feels like a copycat, but feelings are not proof. Wouldn't be hard to find something less circumstantial and more concrete... |
|
|
|
Since you will be focusing on lower cap cryptocurrencies and creating a launch pad for currencies with low development fund or starting out, does that mean you will have mechanisms for reviewing and filtering so call "shitcoins" and similar dubious cryptos? Does it also mean a scenario can arise where you can completely waiver listing fee for certain cryptos based on their prospects or ongoing development? What are your delisting policy?
We do have a specific thread for such questions as this one is mainly for the ALTM currency itself, however (Altmarkets BCT https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101680). However, Yes, in a retrospective way to answer your question. How would one define a coin under that phrase. We of course would do an initial review on the coins we list, block explorer, working chain, community. We fully expect coin teams to support the listing of there currency we dont however have any volume limitations as of yet we ask basically for there to be a market there so trades are possible when the demand for that project comes along - if the market looks dead for example. We'd place coins on a delisting notice that do not have a fully funcational or moving blockchain where suited, dead links to websites or communities. In relation to the listing fee, it's somewhat waivered anyway the amount we ask for is nominal compared to other exchanges as we simply cover the hours to build and prep a coin and it's markets and it's slot in the servers. Also tried out the site, but couldn't find anywhere to generate referral. Is this something that's going to be implemented Yes, we have this on a roadmap it's something we plan to implement. For now, we have refferals via Discord. Does that mean the referral will have to join Discord first in order to have the system register the referral before proceeding to creating an account on the platform? Sounds like quite the hoop to jump |
|
|
|
Wish the article was in English. Google translate is iffy at best and tends to mangle thoughts. Is there any likelihood of an English language version sometime soon? Based on what I could gather so far, this has been quite enlightening |
|
|
|
Since you will be focusing on lower cap cryptocurrencies and creating a launch pad for currencies with low development fund or starting out, does that mean you will have mechanisms for reviewing and filtering so call "shitcoins" and similar dubious cryptos? Does it also mean a scenario can arise where you can completely waiver listing fee for certain cryptos based on their prospects or ongoing development? What are your delisting policy?
We do have a specific thread for such questions as this one is mainly for the ALTM currency itself, however (Altmarkets BCT https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101680). However, Yes, in a retrospective way to answer your question. How would one define a coin under that phrase. We of course would do an initial review on the coins we list, block explorer, working chain, community. We fully expect coin teams to support the listing of there currency we dont however have any volume limitations as of yet we ask basically for there to be a market there so trades are possible when the demand for that project comes along - if the market looks dead for example. We'd place coins on a delisting notice that do not have a fully funcational or moving blockchain where suited, dead links to websites or communities. In relation to the listing fee, it's somewhat waivered anyway the amount we ask for is nominal compared to other exchanges as we simply cover the hours to build and prep a coin and it's markets and it's slot in the servers. Thanks for the thorough explanation. Looks like this is going to become quite the spot of low cap coin listing. Also tried out the site, but couldn't find anywhere to generate referral. Is this something that's going to be implemented |
|
|
|
Wonder what the reason on why they are extending the sales since they have already reached $37.8million dollars. Just imagine, you can buy anything with that money but why they taking so long time?
Token sale extension is only for institutions, private funds, and large token investors with a minimum purchase of 10000 BQTX. So technically, it's not an extension. It's limited to certain parties who have expressed interest in having this option |
|
|
|
|
No WP, no team info, no tokenomics, no roadmap, nothing to guage what this product really does, how it does it, and why. Also, this thread should be in the bounty section since clearly what's contained here is a giveaway
|
|
|
|
When Binance listing?
When delisting? |
|
|
|
We contacted Binance to get answer for their decision. We think this decision is a mistake. Asap we ahve answer from Binance we will publish these news.
Delisting is probably due to item #7 on the list of Binance "reasons". #7 - not to be confused with 007, but just as lethal - is a euphemism for daily volume transacted, or how else do you to a healthy and sustainable crypto ecosystem? And whose ecosystem are we talking about? |
|
|
|
|
ModulTrade has come a long way from nothing more than a prototype to a full operational marketplace with high-quality products and guarantees. Looking forward to more offerings and choices - like that Nintendo Switch someone snagged before I could. Enjoying the phones though
|
|
|
|
|
Since you will be focusing on lower cap cryptocurrencies and creating a launch pad for currencies with low development fund or starting out, does that mean you will have mechanisms for reviewing and filtering so call "shitcoins" and similar dubious cryptos? Does it also mean a scenario can arise where you can completely waiver listing fee for certain cryptos based on their prospects or ongoing development? What are your delisting policy?
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but I don't see any advantages compare to existing Dexes like Idex or forkdelta... Please link to MPV.
Existing DEXs do no support hedge trading. Here's the link to the MVP for you to have a feel for it too: http://www.bqtexchange.com/registerFeel free to pop in on telegram and drop your feedback/suggestion for the team. Team is always available 24/7 to communicate Thanks for the information, it will really be useful for newbies. Many people visit this topic, but for some reason they cannot immediately find the necessary information. The team need to be more active in here, so more of its action be have a good information provided for the community. Something like this that the BQT supporters are still looking for more information regarding the platform of the BQT. And for this, I am looking forward to what the response of the team for this manner. The team is always available here and across all supported social media platform to address any and all concerns, update the community on development, and take on suggestions and feedbacks. So, feel free to discuss |
|
|
|
This is amazing! Reads like the plot of an incredible movie just made all the more jawdropping by all the elements that seemed to have conspired to make it all a reality. What are the chances?! But then, here we are with Zano... |
|
|
|
|
Looks like cool head and saner minds have prevailed. Still of the opinion that the team should just rebrand. While grateful for granting permission, the fact that a permission had to be granted is to grey a legal area for comfort. Conjures up the image of centralized authority that this decentralized movement was birthed to render obsolete
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but I don't see any advantages compare to existing Dexes like Idex or forkdelta... Please link to MPV.
Existing DEXs do no support hedge trading. Here's the link to the MVP for you to have a feel for it too: http://www.bqtexchange.com/registerFeel free to pop in on telegram and drop your feedback/suggestion for the team. Team is always available 24/7 to communicate |
|
|
|
|
Why not factor the cost of KYC into the token rather than having investors pay for KYC? I know the FAQ says you are factoring KYC cost into discounts, but 50% discount is not unheard of in the industry. Paying for KYC just takes the loathsomeness of getting KYCed to a whole new level
|
|
|
|
This is good news. I think that the majority here are not against testing the platform. Waiting for the opening of the platform.
Yeah, indeed. Im pretty sure they would not rather wanted to test the platform because its still on the beta period, it would be better if we test it once it public. Preferably, you'd like to test a product in a controlled environment and fix any and all issues before throwing it out in the public where a single issue to need to massive losses to all or has anybody forgotten what is happening to cryptopia? |
|
|
|
You can use the word zano for restaurant etc depend on what class you have registered My friend already reg the word zano for this 4 class IC 009, IC 035, IC 036, and IC 042He also reg the domain name since 2000.  Sorry about that. nothing I could do. and btw why you need to use ZANO? It sound like NANO . 0% uniqueness. Got Google Alert for this thread for my trademark name "ZANO". I own a programming company that has my last name as company name. Also i own trademark ZANO for computer software since 2007. You mate look like a scammer because you have not revealed any trademark documents or the domain name (which i guess is something like zano.pro) Hereby I grant a legal right to use this trademark to the Zano team. Zano team can contact me for details in case of any legal issues with those scammers. Regards, Rodrigo Zano They look like scammer and you hereby grant legal right to them. Come on mate, get your act together and just say you're trying to cash in on the name. Nobody's disputing whatever right you have, but at this rate, easier to just rebrand the product that continue to put up with all this drama |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
