In my case I have not noticed a lack of products that I usually use, but I have noticed a rise in prices, mainly in electricity and gasoline, not so much in food, but little by little it is noticeable. Although I was recently promoted at work and I have had a considerable payraise, so between that, Bitcoin and other investments I think I will be able to cope well with inflation.

I would like to remind everybody that this is a direct consequence of political decisions; it is not like an earthquake or a storm, that you can do nothing to avoid it.

If anyone else deletes the signature in a short period of time I will change the feedback from negative to neutral. I don't think it is necessary to be angry with someone who makes a mistake, realizes it and corrects the action quickly.

I've tagged atm only those who are wearing the signature. Will tag the missing ones if they wear it in the future.

Number 4 is missing the profile number:


Anyway, I suppose more people will tag them.

It would make more sense for someone to buy Bitcoin at Baakt and then spend it with Mastercard, although for us it is not a good option. I imagine this is not intended for the average forum user, but for a user who knows little about cryptocurrencies, so buys them at the click of a button from their financial institution, such as Revolut. I won't use it but I guess people who get into this world might use it.


That would be ideal, and I created a thread about it a while ago. The current laws consider Bitcoin something similar to stock shares, and not as a currency. To consider it a currency would be at least in part to recognize the defeat of fiat currency as legal tender in the country, and to waive the taxation of capital gains.

I second the motion, although ultimately it's up to sujonali1819, obviously. As a previous participant of a campaign that paid little, especially at low tiers and one that pays quite well, with bonuses for the best posters, I can attest that being paid well, and having the possibility of bonuses, motivates you to write better. It's not that you go from being a shitposter to an exceptional poster, but it encourages you to put some extra energy into what you write.

Source for that? I don't know if you are not expressing yourself well.

I have looked at the campaign threads and Brainboss's latest posts but have seen nothing. He's waiting for funds in escrow, that's for sure, but I haven't seen anything about Lightlord not paying him.

My strategy is to continue to accumulate. DCA. You can never know for sure when the bear market is going to come, and Bitcoin is profitable enough that you don't have to go crystal ball gazing to see when you get it right.

If this cycle repeats past cycles, I may spend a little more Bitcoin at the peak, and if next year or the following years there is a deep dip, I may buy more than usual, but in general I will buy the same amount periodically. Rise rinse repeat.

Probably attainable, the question is how likely it is. You never know with Bitcoin, and it looks like the best is yet to come this year but $200k I see as too bullish. Maybe if the bull run stretches well into 2022, as some predictions point to, we will hit that figure, but if we peak in December I doubt it will be as high as $200k.

I think so. What we don't know is how long. I think things are going to continue to be measured in dollars or euros for a long time, and the scenario where the goods and services you can purchase become measured in Bitcoin and the other assets/currencies only in comparison to Bitcoin has a long time to go.

Deal.

 

I have him on ignore, but I've read the OP because I wasn't logged in at that moment.

Assuming what you say makes sense, the explanation I see is as follows:

1) He is referring to varieties of poker such as video poker where you play against the house, not other players, and they are EV-.  Here the only advice is not to play those varieties.

2) He is referring to a high rake, as noted, which would surprise me, and would imply that he is a rakeback player or mediocre winner and the rake makes him lose. As it has been said he can go to another casino that has less rake. Or maybe move down levels to at a level that is easily beatable for him, and where the rake is not likely to be as high as his earnings (this is assuming that where he plays there are lower levels and that the rake does not go up).

I believe that the most likely scenario is that in the coming months there will be no problems with withdrawals or signature campaign payments.

I don't know if it is worth creating a flag if there are no more problems at the moment, but you have much more experience than me in these matters.

Although I also think that what has happened is not from someone deserving of a good reputation. Let's look at a case:






Rereading this, I see again that they react to pressure. When psycodad gives them until the end of the month, I understand that otherwise he would have created a trust flag or something, then they pay him.

I would like to know, especially those of you who left negative feedback to Lightlord and have not changed it, what you think about whether and when to change the feedback to neutral. I have seen that yahoo62278 has changed it to neutral. suchmoon said about 10 weeks seeing that the payments were working fine.

I don't know if any of you plan to leave it negative forever?

In my case I'm open to changing it, but I'm in no hurry.

Fuck them in the ass. Assuming the news is true, I don't know if any of the miners who left there are getting the urge to go back. The energy there is cheaper, but there is such a thing as legal certainty, and going back to China to mine is playing roulette. You never know if the authoritarian government there is going to prohibit you from mining again. I would not go back.

Did you report it for low value or did you report it to be moved to another section?


AFAIK Those boards were Theymos' idea, and they don't seem to have worked very well (unlike the merit system, which in my opinion is quite good).

There is a mishmash of topics, some more interesting than others but with no common theme and little traffic.

I don't have any reports marked as bad so far, but that's not so much because I'm worried about my accuracy when reporting as because I'm quite lenient. My general rule is that if I have to think twice, whether to report or not, I don't report. As for the moderators I think they generally do a good job and clean up the forum a lot, it is inevitable that there are cases where people do not agree if their reports are not acted upon or are marked as bad, but that these cases might be questionable should not overshadow the good work they do.

Market sentiment based on social media it's not going to do much good with respect to Bitcoin, as the price is being driven up mainly by institutional demand, as can be seen in google trends. I believe retail FOMO will be unleashed at $100k and above, and there we can get into lucubration whether the sentiments seen on social media have any influence or not.

I agree with previous answers that it is not safe to the same extent that it is not safe to say that you have money or other types of financial assets, such as gold, etc. Surely years ago, when Bitcoin was more unknown and worth less, one could say one owned Bitcoin without people noticing as much and therefore if attracting the attention of criminals. But today, at $60k in price, on the way to $100k, it is very dangerous. With the difference also that the thief needs you to get them: if you have gold, the thief will take it if he finds it in your house, but your Bitcoin, the thief will need you to actively transfer it to him, unless he finds your seeds. And if you happen to have it in a multisig wallet and you can't transfer it even if you want to, I don't think he will react kindly.

I saw for the second time the other day one where Saylor appeared and they promised a giveaway where in order to get a certain amount of Bitcoin, you had to send Bitcoin first to a certain address. I guess, as with all scams, they just need a small percentage of people to fall for it to be profitable.

It is very well what you say but it seems to me that more than describing what is going to happen (will bring the chaos) you are expressing a feeling. You probably have more knowledge than in 2017 but mainly what you express are feelings.

If your hunch is right, I hope you mean that bitcoin is going to bring orderly chaos.