Lol, why not?  Merit abuse seems rampant in this thread, everybody's doing it.

Fuck no!  I'm sure you're right, I was just impressed by your mastery of the Jedi mind trick.

Simple mistake by Vod and actmyname, and they're not the only ones.  In fact, I had reported a your alts while you in the appeal process, and I'm sorry about that.  Send Vod and actmyname a PM, then point them in the direction of the link below.  They'll revise their review.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5135831.msg50878587#msg50878587

Lauda: It's accurate. Ignore the sheet.

DireWolfM14: <must resis...> It is accurate, I will ignore the sheet.

Lauda: These aren't the signature campaigns you're looking for.

DireWolfM14: These aren't the signature campaigns we're looking for.

Lauda: Move along.

DireWolfM14: Move along, move along.

He's still listed in the spreadsheet, so I don't think that's accurate.

This might be the strategic method to his madness.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5143155.msg51050345#msg51050345

Look, we've all engaged in petty pissing matches, most of us in real life as well as on the interwebs.  Obviously Vod isn't immune, or he wouldn't have doxed OG.  That was petty and malicious, and it was a mistake.  He shouldn't have done it, he was the first to admit that.  Credit where credit is due.

This feud is really getting to the point of petty bitchslaps and mudslinging.  Vod made a mistake, he owned up to it, apologized for it, and removed the offensive material.  We all make mistakes, it's how we handle them that's important.  Accountability, responsibility, humility, and honesty are indicators of a trustworthy person.  I had respect for Vod prior, but now I know he's a man of integrity.

Presenting your review with the 500BTC risked is quite petty and childish.  Here you are admitting it's a falsehood.  Here you are making excuses and trying to justify your false report.  That is not a display of integrity.  In fact, that's likely the type of behavior that got you removed from DT1 the first time, and is likely to result with the same affect this time.

Just my opinion, do with it what you will.

Are you posting this in the hope that you will receive your first merit?  Well, keep trying.

1miau has sent more merit to Lafu than Lafu has sent to 1miau.  And, why would 1miau buy merit, as you insinuate?  His posting habits supply him with much merit for free.

Keep kicking rocks, maybe you'll flip one over with something worth reporting some day.  I'll give you a merit when (if) that happens. 

The irony of this post is I believe the author wants it to end up here.  He comes off like angry mdayonliner, maybe?

Hi asu,
Payment received.  Thanks for choosing me as your lender.  Until next time, be well.

That did it, thanks.  Corporate is stuck on Windows 7, and I recall I used to know these tricks.  So, it's just my memory that's fading, not my wits. 

Confirmed, that works.  Here's the brainwallet verification page for that message.



@SM23031997, looks like you have plenty of offers to fill your loan.  If they don't pan out for some reason post your request in my lending thread.

I just clicked on the link you provided and it show 3.3.4.  I refreshed the page, deleted cookies, I must be going crazy.  Oh well, it was just a matter of time.  


That works, and I was able to confirm via signature.  But the main download page showing 3.3.4 is still bugging me.

I went to electrum.org today to download 3.3.5 to install on my work computer, and was supersized (and quite concerned) that the version available is 3.3.4.

I know there's a 3.3.5, the release notes takes you to the github page of spesmilo, and sure enough they are discussing 3.3.5.  I know I'm at the right electrum site, I only use my bookmark for navigating there.  I know I installed 3.3.5 on my computer at home, and I always check the signature.  And my version on my work PC informs me there's an update available.

Check for yourself, and please tell me I'm not going crazy.

Lol, no I'm not drunk and that might be the problem.  And apparently I haven't had enough coffee yet either.  Sorry for the brain fart, you are correct.

That only proves you're the same person in control of the account since March, after you came back from the inactive period.  If you are unable to prove you are the same person who held this account before June 2018 you may have trouble finding a lender.

That's a really good point, but also illustrates the differences between conservatives and progressives.  Conservatives don't try to squash the ideas and speech of those with whom they disagree.  That's almost exclusively a far-left tactic, using the isms to villainies any dissenters.  Notice I didn't use the word liberal, because I remember when liberals still valued freedom of speech.

The irony is their viewership is in the tanks.  Not even Don Lemon can resurrect their meteoric decline.  Their advertizers will end up getting the hint one way or another.  It just won't be because of a small but vociferous group of over-sensitive snowflakes threatening a boycott. 

 

Of course.  They are The Party's media sycophant.  It's so blatant it's pathetic. 



Even the lemmings are having a harder and harder time arguing the blatant lies they've been spoon-fed.  I see it on a daily basis; their eyes start glazing over when they force themselves to regurgitate The Party talking points.  They know they're repeating lies, but they keep doing it to maintain denial of their failure.

Thank you.  I knew there had to be a way to get this done, and I'm not a fan of the Trezor wallet interface.

So, another question; Can I use the same method to create multiple accounts using a single seed phrase generated by Electrum?

Thanks again.

Would you mind doing so?  You have a significant gap in your activity from June up until March of this year.  An inactive user who suddenly becomes active and then asks for a loan can be quite a risk.

Here's another address I've found, can you sign a message with this one?