this is a great one , following and going through previous posts. But init sync on testnet seems very slow.
|
|
|
Haha, Hazard still in business
|
|
|
looks like this is an app on top of the etherum?
|
|
|
lol, nice game coin,
|
|
|
I would not say "alive." More like undead. https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Exchange/?market=PHS_BTC is the one I have used with no problems. Earlier ITT, another user (not listed as trusted) recommended his own exchange? [ignored] http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/philosopher-stones has trade history from before Cryptopia and I think through Cryptsy, but I'm not sure btw: their info on this page is a bit off too, there are presently 539459 blocks and 4,195,985 PHS on the blockchain according to the client. Even at their current rate of 670 satoshi the market cap would be closer to 28 BTC ok good to know there are exchanges for it.
|
|
|
Interesting this old coin is still alive, any exchanges trade it?
|
|
|
lmao, proof of journey... I bet proof of ass will come out soon
|
|
|
A few red flags of the coin: (1). How can the coin limit to 1500000000?? The coin will have to be unlimited supply, because the pos will continue generate new coins, no shutdown of pos is planned (or the coin will be dead) (2). 10% premine of what? total coins of the supposedly 1500000000? This will be a huge amount, will probably 95+% of the whole coin supply in the 1st month or 2, during which time a small portion of the coin will be mined, most exist ones are premined coins. Lol EDIT: just looked the source code: a. premine = 150,000,000 coins b. total first month pow coin generation: 2 * 60 * 24 * 30 * 240 = 22,464,000 < 15% of the premined coin. Once the coin hits any exchange, wait for these premined coin to be dumped to you, lmao.
|
|
|
I hope devs can make a good job over here, this project can be a boom in a long run for investors. Don't know if I'll buy on ICO, maybe I'll wait for months to see what's happen, since this is a long run, there's no reason for rush These eth projects are with many promises and few realized. Yet to see how this will evolve...
|
|
|
It seems that all the buzz about “permissioned vs permissionless” is distracting us from the deep analysis of business problems and solutions which should be the true focus. Community members have to take sides. It feels wrong because we are talking about technology — there is no such thing as “good” or “bad”, just use cases. Here is some analysis. https://medium.com/@pavelkravchenko/ok-i-need-a-blockchain-but-which-one-ca75c1e2100because many aim at making quick $$, it's wild west there
|
|
|
No staking rewards means people are going to set their reservebalance to maximum and stop staking, which leaves your network vulnerable to attack. I wouldn't recommend it.
Hazard, you always there! lol. Nice to see you again! I think valley wants to try it for a different use case.
|
|
|
in any active network you are going to see lost coins; from people sending to incorrect addresses, to people losing their .dat files, etc, so if you have 0 rewards then it essentially means that the currency would be deflationary, and people have no incentive to stake. So all you have to do is have a staking reward that is just high enough to make up for lost coins, the overall supply won't increase but people will still have incentive to support the network. Monero's (PoW) planned tail-emission I believe is designed for this exact situation, I'm sure you could do something similar with PoS.
But I don't think you get what the original post means. If I understand it correctly, he wants to use the blockchain technology for something else, not used as a coin, but other things like to record transactions. The coin will be most likely used as an invisible token, in which case you would not worry about the lost of coins. Let's say, if I build something to record all transactions of a stock, from the IPO time to the end (maybe delisted or being bought), all transactions can be recorded in the blockchain (which acts like a distributed database - the real difference with a distributed database exist today (such as cassandra) is that it is tamper-proof, of course it is run by a bunch of nodes, say each stock dealer run a node. I think it is an excellent use-case, and I will be very interested in it if someone has further ideas with it.
|
|
|
ETH, lmao. Replacing bitcoin is every altcoin's dream, Litecoin, Ripple, Nxt, then more fun with Doge, Black etc, then ETH and all these Dapps, lol, dream is going on, but only a dream.
|
|
|
Dev, write bittrex.
They have been contacted. Do they need some BTC to add coin? 5 BTC and Developer ID verification. lol, exchanges found a quick way to make $$
|
|
|
Trump will win. After debate most online poll show Trump as clear winner. People support him, but media has been trying to talk down him, they failed miserably.
|
|
|
looks like your coin is based on a really old code branch, at least 2 years old. You should use a more recent codebase (such as protocol version > 7) to avoid all the issues that have already been fixed.
|
|
|
subject to ASIC mining...
|
|
|
Monero replace Bitcoin? I almost see every altcoin has that dream, but bitcoin is still and always the king. Monero will get zero chance to replace it, not to say "soon", lmao.
|
|
|
looks like a new campagne started for litecoin... while bitcoin is always the king, investor community seems pushing some altcoins in turns, sounds familiar with wallstreet pushing new IPOs in turns
|
|
|
litecoin will be there, but always a secondary coin.
|
|
|
|