Joe did not "work for" Garza. He ran the data center that had zero hashlets in it. He was the person in the best position to save everyone, including Matlack, their money by realizing that they sold more hashpower than they had, and even if they somehow kept the amount of hashpower they sold from Matlack, he damn well knew that hashlets didn't exist.

If you lost $500,000 on hashlets would your picture be on this website next to the guy who ran the data center where the hashlets were?

http://prestigeauditing.com/about-the-owner/


The fact that Matlack still associates with Mordica is a HUGE red flag.

investigations is where all real life personal info belongs, and due to an actual troll there were real names all over that thread.

Hopefully the split removed all of them so the rambling insanity can stop and the laughing at ION can continue.

I understand that is the point, but how is that going to work.

Games have enough trouble getting people to click "buy lives" on a game when it is hooked up to an account that has a credit card on file.

How much work it would take to get a random person who finds the game via an app store to be able to purchase ions to use to buy lives?

Most standard casino games are the same everywhere, there can be variation in games depending on the rules of the particular game that are used.

In roulette, games with only 0 instead of 0 and 00 are much better. Some casinos will refund half, or give a do over or something like imprisonment on the even money bets if it lands on green are better. Also, make sure the payouts are correct, and that they pay 35 TO 1 and not 35 FOR 1.

In video poker, the differences in the payouts between different games makes a huge difference, in odds and strategy. Look up a guide online to learn what is good.

Blackjack has many different rule options. Dealer Stands on soft 17 is better than dealer hits on soft 17. the less decks they use the better. Surrender is better than no surrender. Double down whenever you want is better than double down on only 10/11. Being able to resplit hands is better. being able to double after split is better. Being able to play and/or double down after splitting aces is better.

Good luck on making a difference, not sure how to do that when being lead by either an idiot or a scumbag.

Anyone that believed that hashlets existed or that Garza would pay 20 per coin is an idiot, anyone that didn't and was still involved in GAW is a scumbag. It's early, so I can't come up with anyone that lost a lot of money to Garza without fitting into one of those groups, so sorry if I'm insulting you, just calling it as I see it.

I really don't see how people in those categories will make a meaningful difference (unless robbing others to make up for their own personal losses counts) and I REALLY don't know why you guys needed to collect a bunch of XPY to make your difference, but again, good luck, stick around for more laughter at the next chapter in this saga, it's a lot of fun.

You realize that team ion is lead by a man who is currently business partners with one of the main culprits in enabling the GAW scam to rope on as many people as it did, right?

Ion and GAW would have been linked of it wasn't the band of misfits that tried (and failed) to "save" xpy, but collecting the xpy to start definitely puts them together.

sorry for shitting up the thread again, back to the strategy of laugh and report.

How was the stream of the game?

Any semblance of a clue as to how the game is going to get outsiders (or anyone really) to buy IONs?

So would everyone, but that is why Stu and Cantor need to give Ganza a lawyer and try to keep him out. They can't cut him loose and leave him on his own.

team ION already beat you to the punch by collecting a shitload of xpy and turning into a different useless coin with a new ICO and no actual point.

Why do you need the xpy to do this?

Just start xpay on it's own. I have no clue why you would want to connect that soon to be failure to this original failure.

Why on earth would the government offer a bigshot like him a deal for a scrub like Garza?

Garza is a small fish and they have him dead to rights. What could he give them on Garza that isn't in this thread? What can Garza give them on this (or anything else) in relation to fraser?

I have no problem with bittrex allowing trading, as long as they allow people to withdraw and do what they say, if people want to pay them for the ability to trade useless shitcoins, more power to them. It's on the user to figure out which coinsare worthless and for what reason.

Not caring about the honesty and integrity of the people running this operation has worked out well for these geniuses in the past, and will continue to have great results in the future, I'm sure.

If they don't have time to keep their word and do something transparently via blockchains, why on earth would you trust them to do things as complicated as they are claiming that they will do?

Not a lawyer, just a haver of common sense. If Garza can fuck over Fraser and Cantor Fitzgerald (he can because Fraser was involved with GAW, and GAW ran a 9/11 charity scam) it's in their best interest to not let garza get in a position to fuck them.

They need to keep Garza from getting into a position where the authorities can offer him a deal to save his own skin. Garza is the head scumbag who did the robbing here, but Fraser and company are much bigger fish with much more money.

I have no clue right now, but that doesn't make paycoin a good investment.

All of the "coins" or "platforms" around here just seem like absolute non-starters to me, including bitcoin. I have, do, and will USE bitcoin for various things, but "investing" in it when the price is controlled by the whims of a handful of miners, unregulated sketchy as fuck exchanges, idiots trusting those things, and an anonymous creator who has enough coins to crash the price down to zero at any point (plus who knows how many other people have enough coins to crash the price to zero).
.
If you can get beyond that, there's still really nothing that interests me. POS makes no sense to me. If 1 coin is useless, holding it and watching it turn into 2 coins is just as useless. It's expecially extra worthless if creators/whales/dummies are able to stake at a higher rate for whatever reason.

Premines are also stupid.

The whole point of all this shit is that the blockchain is supposed to make everything transparent, any attempt to obfuscate that is a giant red flag.

If you can find it in your heart to trust scumbag exchanges and still want to play, go ahead, but at least protect yourself by avoiding obvious losers like this one. There needs to be some sort of point to the coin for it to be worthwhile for anything. The "point" of xpy was to give a scumbag time after his mining ponzi started to collapse, and for him to extract more usable money from people too stupid to realize it. That seems like a pretty shitty place to start. this is a bad place to start because so many coins are in the hands of scumbags, idiots, and bagholders who will be able to, and have reason to dump on any progress you make to "save" the coin.

Actual advice would be to find a service or website that you can provide that will give people a reason to give you usable coins, stay away from situations where other people can easily fuck you over

You are not entirely wrong about bitcoin, but will be significantly harder to make progress with xpy and significantly easier for scumbags to ruin that progress.

It's your time and effort being wasted when you are "trying to contribute positively," so waste it if you must.

But remember, when you fail, it won't be because of negativity and hostile comments" from us, it will be because of the "behaviour" of the scumbags we are trying to warn you about, just like the last 2 iterations of this shitcoin.

You cannot force someone to take a bet, meaning directbet can't force you to make a bet that you don't want to, and you can't force directbet to make a bet that they don't want to.

If someone else is offering 2.0 on a bet, that is what they are offering, that doesn't mean that directbet has to offer that price also.

If you actually believe that there was mining hardware, pm me, I have an offer you can't afford to miss.

Just be careful making those bets. In my experience lots of sites take more vig/juice out of moneyline bets, especially with big favorites, than they do out of handicap/spread bets

Nitrogen actually looked better on the croatia/nigeria game, but directbet was taking even more juice on the moneyline than they were on the spread (which was high in itself, imo).

You need to worry about the people that spent time trying to "fix" xpy after GAW died. They are not bagholders because they got tons of coins for free.

There are so many outstanding coins in the hands of who knows that it makes no sense to attempt to revive this coin. Just start over fresh and steal the name if need be.