I don't think any changes are necessary. Very soon anybody will have a computer capable of GPU-mining Litecoin. Also, since eventually people will stop using GPUs to mine bitcoin, the swings in difficulty from people switching between the two chains won't be a problem.

I'm not saying they could be hacked, I am saying that they ought to be used for verification. Basic PGP, check the keyservers, and the more the merrier.

Does the TPM have access to a guaranteed-to-be-unhackable time source? If it does, then a policy like "do not approve more than X bitcoins worth of transactions in timeperiod Y" should work well enough to prevent more than petty theft, assuming you've got some other way of watching the blockchain for unauthorized transactions and shutting down the compromised machine or using an emergency offline backup key to move the funds to a non-compromised wallet.

Hyperinflation 2012 is the fifth in a series of related writings going back to 2006.  It updates and replaces the Hyperinflation Special Report (2011) of March 15, 2011, which preceded: the U.S. government’s demonstration of a lack of political will to address the country’s long-range insolvency; the downgrade of the “AAA” rating of U.S. Treasury securities; an ensuing U.S. dollar panic, dollar support operations and extremely unstable U.S. and global financial markets; a temporary shift in market focus to Euro-era issues; and growing recognition of the ongoing and deepening economic and systemic-solvency crises.  Nonetheless, the outlook has changed little.  With the passage of 10 months since the last report (updated circumstances have been covered regularly in weekly Commentaries), events just have continued to move this pending ultimate financial crisis into much closer time proximity.   
 
In turn, the 2011 report updated and replaced the Hyperinflation Special Report (2010 Update) of December 2, 2009, which preceded: the Fed’s formal monetization of U.S. Treasury debt aimed at debasing the U.S. dollar; the sharpest post-World War II annual decline in broad money growth; the pronouncement of an official end to the 2007 recession despite no meaningful recovery; passage of the Administration’s health insurance legislation; and the mid-term election.  Yet, the outlook had changed little.  With the passage of 15 months since the prior report (updated circumstances were covered regularly in weekly Commentaries), again, events just had moved the hyperinflation crisis into closer time proximity.     

In turn, the 2010 report updated and replaced the Hyperinflation Special Report version of April 8, 2008, which was published post-Bear Stearns, but pre-Lehman, pre-TARP, pre-recession recognition and pre-2008 presidential election.  The April 2008 report updated and expanded upon the three-part Hyperinflation Series that began with the December 2006 SGS Newsletter, which predated public recognition of the 2007 economic and systemic-solvency crises.

This missive includes significant new material in addition to much of the same basic text that was in the 2011 edition, along with revisions and updates reflecting the still-unfolding economic and systemic-solvency crises.

"just 10%"?

Vanitygen already runs on gpu.

let someone else reply

CryptoCoinMedia, do you also have control of the account, noagendamarket?

Why did miserydearia believe CryptoXChange was affiliated with the purchase?

Have you ever been employed by, or owned a part of CryptoXChange?

i'm sure you'll get a friendly welcome here z, plenty of aussies would be keen for a chat.

(meaning there is a huge intensive for people to provide more liquidly to to fund those positions).

+1.  USD interest rates are way above anything anyone could get anywhere in the world (without the risk of losing your money). 

What's to stop someone depositing $10k, never trading and collecting 8%pa?  High reward = high risk.  No ifs, no buts.