Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 02:55:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 104 »
521  Other / Archival / Re: . on: July 18, 2016, 09:36:42 AM
Yeah ... it seem a lowest denomination would be pleased  more users..  That's make sense..

let's see how goes the things in this poll , but apparently we walk to a 0.1BTC  face value ..  Cool

88,9 % seem prefer 0.1 BTC at the moment..
522  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 18, 2016, 07:44:42 AM
Be the bigger person, keep your feedback at neutral, and let the entire community see what a nutjob that guy is.
It is neutral and will remain like that.

(You may also want to block his PMs like I had to, or else you will get constant PMS offering to remove his negative feedback IF you leave him positive.)
I have ignored him as I'm done with this. I have put too much effort into genuinely trying to make peace with this user just to have them to back out of everything in an instant.

Lauda on the otherhand asked for a cryptocoin worth 0.25BTC for next to nothing, and threatened to damage his reputation if he did not comply. There is a very big difference between the two.  
I am starting to think that a) You are doing this on purpose; b) You have comprehension issues. The coin was not worth "0.25 BTC" unless you can see in the future(?). Even now, it is arguable if it is worth 0.25 BTC. Similarly if I offer someone ~$670 for 1 BTC now, you can't claim I offered "next to nothing" if it reaches a price of, e.g. $1k after X time.

Lutpin - I see you left him needed feedback, and he turned around and left you negative instantly.  
I even explained to him several times, during our negations, why bad retaliatory feedback should not be left.

really ? : so you should explain that to the troll ( Vod) too ..

despite the fact that the evidence that i escrowed for myself doesn't even make any sense, Lauda has said multiple times that Vods rating is valid and it is because of Lauda that cryptodevil left me  a negative rating.

Just because Lauda left me a "positive rating" for a trade we have ( and just after left a bad one ) doesn't mean that he isn't working against me behind the scenes.

Lauda should be removed as a moderator and i do not believe Lauda is able to be impartial. that's a fact.
A moderator never tried to force an user to sold him a coin under his real  valor , with menacing of detroy his reputation if  i dont do it ..
by the way , he finaly did it : look at all this shit now ..  i just applause : well done !
523  Other / Archival / Re: . on: July 17, 2016, 10:59:41 PM
I want the blue/yellow one!!
I trade a lot of coins and gift many to ppl I explain bitcoin to... Small denominations are most attractive for me... However, for personal collection, I'd get higher denominations too but in very small quantities

bro , this is just my colored avatar Smiley this  will not be the design of my new coin .... but you could expect found it in my hologram....  Wink he he he

Thanx for your vote !  Cheesy
524  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [RAFFLE] OMETEOTL ANTIQUE set #96 ! ( serie 2) + set #99 (serie 1) ! on: July 17, 2016, 10:57:21 PM
If I would have known this was for 4 coins and not 2 I would have bought all the tickets for it.  If there is anyone interested in selling me there tickets I'll take them and the last 8 spots and hope I have better luck. I want 12 of the 16 spots ho

this raffle is  for 4 coins ( 2 complete sets )  

 2 coins from serie1,  & 2 coins from serie2     Wink


there's actualy 8 slots available.

Where in my post does it say there are more than 8?

Are you buying them all? If not let us know.
No. you can play owlcatz Wink


Quote
Where in my post does it say there are more than 8? 
what do you mean exactly ?...

You said " theres actually 8 slots available" I said in my post there were 8 spots left and I would buy them all if someone sells me their 2 spots so I would have a 75% chance of winning

NO , you cant . in this raffle you can only grab 3 slots maximum by user..
525  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [RAFFLE] OMETEOTL ANTIQUE set #96 ! ( serie 2) + set #99 (serie 1) ! on: July 17, 2016, 09:50:03 PM
If I would have known this was for 4 coins and not 2 I would have bought all the tickets for it.  If there is anyone interested in selling me there tickets I'll take them and the last 8 spots and hope I have better luck. I want 12 of the 16 spots ho

this raffle is  for 4 coins ( 2 complete sets )  

 2 coins from serie1,  & 2 coins from serie2     Wink


there's actualy 8 slots available.

Where in my post does it say there are more than 8?

Are you buying them all? If not let us know.
No. you can play owlcatz Wink


Quote
Where in my post does it say there are more than 8? 
what do you mean exactly ?...
526  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 17, 2016, 09:06:12 PM
Looks like some unintended consequences from reporting posts?  Could look sneaky but maybe it's just unexpected result...
I can't have anything to do with this even if I wanted it (someone else would have to confirm a rule was broken in order to delete them).

you always be... the "resolution" have never  change this "fact"
you perfectly know what you have done .
Again, I apologize for the unintended mess from a chatroom. I'm at most semi-serious there unless there's a deep conversation going on. I have bought the coin via the auction and would have most likely offered you a lot more back when I offered $25 (but you refused to sell).




you have ask to minerjones to bid for you, and syncerly never mind with this ...    but, even in this auction , your friend Lutpin have acted ... read it  ( just because the price was goes too higuest for "you" ) ( 0.3 btc )


and about this post:

Breaking news: mini and I are partners in crime.

it is not less or more "inconsitent post than the ones you have reported from mine)
527  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 17, 2016, 09:01:36 PM
3: he work behind the scene against me with Lutpin , ...

I handled several if not all the reports. As already stated, Lutpin reported them and they were handled just like any other report would be. Lauda had nothing to do with it and bumps getting deleted aren't going to get you banned. Stop being paranoid.

Ok .. please explain me why should i sold a coin to Lauda for 25$ ( wich i can sold for 0.25 btc ) , and if i dont do it , have my rating painted in red ? is this normal ?

i have never scam anyone and always been honest with everyone .
528  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 17, 2016, 08:59:10 PM
i have screenshots of those deleted posts ... that's not some bumps, and nothing offensive or what in those..
Then send them to a global moderator, such as Cyrus or Hilariousandco, and ask why they were removed. Either that, or post the screenshots here and I'm sure someone will tell you what you did wrong.

by the way Lutpin have publiquely admit too ... ( i'm not so wrong) it was him ... soooo, why this hate and this mass reports since 15 jully ?
Because your post was breaking a rule, and Lutpin doesn't want posts that break the rules to be on the forum, so he reports them? Lutpin has reported over 6,000 posts, and I'm sure they're not all yours. I've had posts which are months old deleted, a few days is nothing.

it's because Lada have try to extortion for this coin , he have menace to rate me in red on my ranking if i dont sold him this coin for 25$ as i pretty well know i would sold it for 0.25 bitcoins !
That's clearly extortion/blackmail
extortion was about a coin : genesis #1 ,  not relative to these deleted posts ... scroll a bit in this thread.
Huh

@minifrij: I've captured theymos in my basement and all the mods have to answer to my askings. My plan is to take over the forum, rename it to buttcointalk and to replace all sections with either KnC discussion or ETH/Bitcoin-Ponzi FUD.
Who are you and what have you done with BadBear?

NO i will send directly to Theymos . i need to understand and to explain .
529  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: n[quote author="Bo on: July 17, 2016, 08:55:25 PM
Quote
One day I'm not an extortionist, the next day I am. I guess it changes with the weather. Lips sealed


you always be... the "resolution" have never  change this "fact"

you perfectly know what you have done .

i would like to understand why this post have been deleted:

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Quote
Regardless of what is going on between the two of you (I don't want to comment on it, I don't want to take sides, please keep me out of it),
does this really have anything to do with Lauda being a Mod and their abilities to moderate the sections under them?

If you want to discuss this situation, why not take it to a Reputation thread about Lauda?
I haven't seen any strong arguments about Laudas ability to be a mod or the lack therof in some sites now.
Lutpin : i think a moderator" should have a little something "more.." ,  and dont try to abuse of his position ... that's all ...   in this case,  the fact of i havent xant to trade with him for this specific coin  ( genesis #1 antique brass) , never should affect his judgement,  or motive i any way the bad ranking he left me for a one year old issue... )

as you can read it by yourself, we has talk about it , and this not had motived any bad ranking...
the reaction comes after i refused to sold him this shit coin, and by the way decided to auction it...




link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1544950.msg15536515#msg15536515

as you have said by yourself,: "Lauda's going to hate you .." , and you was perfectly right...


a real moderator never menaced to left a bad feedback  only for this fact ... this is not fair.

other precision:

all "these fakes" accusations against me are for an account sale related .... ( 1 account ) do you syncerly think , as i've got tons & tons of trades for so many bitcoins , with so many users, in so many deals, & will risk my btctalk reputation for only few cents ? ( escrow fees for 1 account sale ? ) ..... i let you think to this ..

530  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 17, 2016, 08:52:43 PM
extortion was about a coin : genesis #1 ,  not relative to these deleted posts ... scroll a bit in this thread.
So this is irrelevant to the extortion?

the reports ( abusives) are made by Lutpin , wich work with Lauda beind the scene , against me .
You do understand that Lauda did not delete your posts, as that is impossible, right? And that reports have to be approved by a moderator of the section before anything happens to them, so even if Lutpin did report them the reports were correct and breaking some sort of rule?
What point are you trying to make here, on this thread about Lauda? That you're unhappy a moderator, that isn't Lauda, deleted your post?

1: Lauda have tried extortion against  me for a coin ( already explained....   "25$ for this coin or i rate you in red , and launch of my troll army against you ..) ( what he did)

2:  he propose to solve this cause it start to smell bad for him...

3: he work behind the scene against me with Lutpin , ...
531  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 17, 2016, 08:45:27 PM
extortion was about a coin : genesis #1 ,  not relative to these deleted posts ... scroll a bit in this thread.
So this is irrelevant to the extortion?

the reports ( abusives) are made by Lutpin , wich work with Lauda beind the scene , against me .
You do understand that Lauda did not delete your posts, as that is impossible, right? And that reports have to be approved by a moderator of the section before anything happens to them, so even if Lutpin did report them the reports were correct and breaking some sort of rule?
What point are you trying to make here, on this thread about Lauda? That you're unhappy a moderator, that isn't Lauda, deleted your post?

i have screenshots of those deleted posts ... that's not some bumps, and nothing offensive or what in those..  by the way Lutpin have publiquely admit too ... ( i'm not so wrong) it was him ... soooo, why this hate and this mass reports since 15 jully ?  it's easy to understand:
it's because Lada have try to extortion for this coin , he have menace to rate me in red on my ranking if i dont sold him this coin for 25$ as i pretty well know i would sold it for 0.25 bitcoins !

That's clearly extortion/blackmail
532  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 17, 2016, 08:36:54 PM
i know you do that for Lauda ,  the goal is only to having me banned ... that's the goal ..


Come on man, you're better than this. You can surely understand that, due to the way moderation works around here, there is no way that Lauda could have deleted your posts to "extort" you. Unless there is a bigger conspiracy at hand that the mods don't want us to know about. Roll Eyes

extortion was about a coin : genesis #1 ,  not relative to these deleted posts ... scroll a bit in this thread.


the reports ( abusives) are made by Lutpin , wich work with Lauda beind the scene , against me .
533  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 17, 2016, 08:34:39 PM
I've reported 6k posts so far, some are yours, others are not.
None of the reports I made could have been handled by Lauda, as it's not their section to moderate and you're not a newbie.

i know you do that for Lauda ,  the goal is only to having me banned ... that's the goal .. the sad part it's it's just cause i have reported Lauda extortion ( try )

Well, a few month ago a lot of my old posts (''thread bumps'') got deleted as well. Imho totally useless to delete such old posts but I didn't care. Nothing happend so just chill. Wink
Maybe people trying to get mod in this way Roll Eyes  


we are not talkin about old bumps bro , there's no reasons for those posts to be deleted..  i would be interesting to ask why they are ? and by the way , why they are today , ( precisely since 15 jully ) , and reported by who ? ( surely interesting)
534  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 17, 2016, 08:20:26 PM
I've reported 6k posts so far, some are yours, others are not.
None of the reports I made could have been handled by Lauda, as it's not their section to moderate and you're not a newbie.

i know you do that for Lauda ,  the goal is only to having me banned ... that's the goal .. the sad part it's it's just cause i have reported Lauda extortion ( try )
535  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: July 17, 2016, 08:09:10 PM
the resolution that i  came to was to each remove our negative trust ratings, and to replace them with positive trust that was from an actual deal. ..

I think that Lauda was trying to extort me, that i think the price of the coin was at least .25 when lauda offered $25 for it, and i don't think that Lauda was joking when he was threatening to leave me negative trust if i did not sell him the coin


now apparently he try to push me to a ban in making removing many of my posts wich lutpin report with no valid reasons to moderators


i report as he can many of my posts ....  at least 4 since today



i have screenshots of all of those posts ...  there's no reson the were be deleted ... that's not some old bumps , and nothing offensive inside , or what...

i think i need to talk to Theymos.
536  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [RAFFLE] OMETEOTL ANTIQUE set #96 ! ( serie 2) + set #99 (serie 1) ! on: July 17, 2016, 07:54:33 PM
If I would have known this was for 4 coins and not 2 I would have bought all the tickets for it.  If there is anyone interested in selling me there tickets I'll take them and the last 8 spots and hope I have better luck. I want 12 of the 16 spots ho

this raffle is  for 4 coins ( 2 complete sets )  

 2 coins from serie1,  & 2 coins from serie2     Wink


there's actualy 8 slots available.
537  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [RAFFLE] OMETEOTL ANTIQUE set #96 ! ( serie 2) on: July 17, 2016, 06:34:24 PM
invalid slot : give me a refund adress please...
( next time , please dont play to report my posts in my raffles to moderators without any valid reason ... Thanx )
Really? Defcon, c'mon, don't be upset over that...
We've been discussing this in IRC and you had no problem with it.

OK .. found your adress in your bitcointalk profile:  1LutpinPFH8CtNoV5ShL718NA61Vqr6k1X

refund done .

https://blockchain.info/tx/f2dada9db1a13e94fcc54d7f23c9f3c8aa992a5c596c1ce177607fb30768d4bb



538  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [RAFFLE] OMETEOTL ANTIQUE set #96 ! ( serie 2) on: July 17, 2016, 05:54:14 PM

invalid slot : give me a refund adress please...

( next time , please dont play to report my posts in my raffles to moderators without any valid reason ... Thanx )
539  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [CHARITY AUCTION] Goxxed coin set (including error coin!) on: July 17, 2016, 05:31:50 PM
I just checked:

- 0.1 BTC Casascius
- Casascius Super Bowl
- 0.05 BTC Microsoul (normal + gold plated)
- Cold Hard Cash bitcoin (2014 model)

None of them have an additional marking. I even checked a few coins producted by the Royal Dutch Mint and they don't have any additional markings either. I'll check the rest of my silver coins later but I doubt any of them will have a marking. I know jewelry and gold/silver bars have them but I've never seen it on a coin before.

an exeption for physicals cryptos then ? or maybe country related ? ( in France all silver or gold pieces , even table ones , have one ... )

would be interesting to ask ognasty about his 4 oz pure gold, if he should have one or not..)

anyway , probably country differences, .. )

http://www.silvercollection.it/poinconsfrancais.html
540  Economy / Collectibles / Re: [CHARITY AUCTION] Goxxed coin set (including error coin!) on: July 17, 2016, 05:16:23 PM
False : pure silver , or pure gold ALWAYS have a punch. ( ask to ognasty ) ( an eagle for gold , dont remember what is for silver....)
I've got a 2oz minted seat by OgN right here in my hands (they are .999 fine silver), it's got no "punch" whatsoever on it, as far as I can tell.
it should be ...  look another exemple : ( precious metal as silver or gold must have it...)

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 104 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!