I disagree that it should be limited to forum links.  When a scammer is called out on the forum he could simply delete the post that proves his transgression, and linking to an off-site archive is more practical in those cases.

Even though I've joked about that review on your trust page, I totally agree that it is an issue.  Perhaps there can be a warning when a reference is pointing to an off-site link.  That would give us pause before we click on it.

As for moderating trust; I'm against it.  Moderators are human and can have ulterior motives.  

Addresses that start with 3 are p2sh addresses which can be verified using brainwallet.  

Electrum can sign and verify a message with a segwit (Bech32) address as well.  
For example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg49273240#msg49273240

Nice try, troll.  How have your insults and repeated lies helped you?  If you want to debate me put together a coherent post that doesn't have to be translated from Klingon.

BTW, if you learn to recognize sarcasm you may stop suffering from your ongoing aneurysm.  

Proof positive!  mdayonliner = cryptohunter.

Emilia Clark = Lauda?

I thought Brenna Sparks was the best crypto can do, but Emilia Clark is far more beautiful AND classy.

This was the original story I read:

https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2019/01/malware-from-pirate-bay-replaces-btc-eth

Verified with Electrum.

This is worthless without pics. 

That's exactly my point.  The ad assumes that men don't behave as you suggest they should, but that has been far from my experience.  It suggests that showing any masculinity is akin to being a misogynist or a bully.  What if the tables were turned?  What if there was an ad suggesting that displaying genuine feminine attributes was akin to being a slut?  How would you react to such an ad?  In a fully garnished dish of irony the ad portrays white men as villains and black men as the chivalrous heroes, yet the reality of popular culture demonstrates far more misogyny exists in rap music produced by black men.  Why are they not held accountable for their messages?

I know living in reality is not your strong suit, so I don't expect you to answer these questions with any coherency.

The truth is the ad panders to a millennial sense of propriety that exist only in a fantasy world.  It attempts to pander to a group of pantywaists by ridiculing the only group it's fashionable to ridicule.   It's okay to villainies men, and more specifically white, heterosexual men, but any other gender, race, or sexual orientation is off limits to scrutiny.

I like it too.  It's now quite obvious how much more active the current group of DT1 members are than the previous list.  That alone adds practicality to the system.  Scammers are getting tagged quickly and frequently.  Members who are engaging in honest trade are also getting tagged appropriately.

I would still caution new users to do their own research into potential trade partners, but it does give us a good starting point.  As long as the DT members remain active, and this isn't just a "Honeymoon" stage, we're off to a good start with the new system.

Lol, he's pissed because he got caught promoting a scam.  In order to distance himself he claimed that he was also scammed by the project, yet admitted he would still promote it because he was already paid to.  Now his Legendary account is ruined to shit.  How's he going to promote his future scams?  Poor baby.

Here's the reference to the feedback I left (no, it's not sexy.)

Here's an archive of the thread he purged: http://archive.fo/CknSp


Too late!  

Good thing I'm working from home today.  

Good question.  Possibly to ensure they are bitcoin addresses, and not LTC or ather addresses with a similar string length.  A conscientious scammer?  I'd be interested to know where the list of addresses was obtained.

There's a malware being spread by torrent movie files that targets bitcoin addresses copied to the Windows clipboard.  If you use torrent to download movies on Windows machines be very careful when copying and pasting bitcoin addresses.

More information here:
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/clipboard-hijacker-malware-monitors-23-million-bitcoin-addresses/

Unfortunately, no.  Scams are not moderate to prevent moderator abuse.  The best thing to do continue to bring awareness and encourage more DT members to leave negative feed back on the trust wall of those involved.  

You could make a career out being wrong.  

I don't fear being accountable for my actions.  I'm not a rapist, I don't harass women, I don't engage in the subjugation of women.  I've raised three daughters, well adjusted and college educated.  There's nothing to be held accountable for other than the fact that I am male, masculine, steadfast in my conservative attitude, and unapologetic about any of it.

What I fear is being held accountable for the actions of others, guilt by association, all because of my gender.

5236

You were likely banned for plagiarism.  You probably learned that you can be banned for plagiarism, which (I'm guessing) is why you went back and deleted all those posts.  Deleting the evidence of your plagiarism doesn't absolve you of accountability.


You can check here, but you can also assume all your accounts are banned because you as a person are banned from posting on the forum.

Unfortunately, they are likely alts of someone attempting to give himself a better chance of winning the raffle.

This "toxic masculinity" thing is going too far.  The attributes that make men masculine are not toxic, they are necessary for the survival of our species.  When a company who makes products for men starts insulting the very nature of their target demographic, just to appease some false sense of virtue, it makes me shudder to think how soft we've gotten as a culture.

Is this the best a man can get?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=108&v=z2rIgsPlJd0

72 - DireWolfM14

Thanks again, Krogoth.  Good luck everyone.