Gravity is the Elmer's glue that holds all the lies together.

After staring at the lights on the ceiling "scientists" decide Newton was wrong and Einstein is a clown. How long before they realize the lights in sky are only small bits of plasma a few thousand miles away?

---

Newton’s Law Of Gravity Was Wrong, Claim Scientists; Target Einstein’s ‘General Relativity’ Next



The world knew the famous law of gravity when an apple fell on Isaac Newton’s head, prompting him to form the earliest theory of universal gravitation. The 17th-century gravitational law is a landmark in physics and has held true up until now. The theory of universal gravity has been dismissed in the study of black holes. Scientists conducted research on a star called ‘S0-2’ which is at its closest to black hole Sagittarius A* (abbreviated to Sgr A*) that lies at the centre of the Milky Way 26,000 light-years away from the Earth. The study put the law of universal gravitation to test and it did not hold true. Not in relation to the black hole at least.

As per new findings, scientists are now placing their bets on Einstein’s theory of general relativity. Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton’s discoveries are pillars of modern physics but, the black hole has put both theories by the legendary physicists to test. The black hole study found that the intermingling of space and time near Sagittarius A* doesn’t comply with Newton’s law. According to professor Andrea Ghez of the University of California, Los Angeles Einstein’s theory, however, found fresh evidence.

“Newton had the best description of gravity for a long time but it started to fray around the edges. And Einstein provided a more complete theory. Today we are seeing Einstein’s theories starting to fray around the edges,”

Observations of light from S0-2 prove Einstein’s 1915 theory that describes the law of gravity and the relation to other forces. It proves that what we perceive as gravity is the curvature of space and time. S0-2 has a mass that’s 10 times larger than the sun. It orbits around the black hole in an ellipse taking 16 years for an orbit. Studies found that the star's light escaped the black hole’s gravitaional pull. The black hole’s mass is 4 million times more than the sun’s.

Researchers studied the particles of light that travelled from the S0-2 to the Earth. Einstein had predicted that light finds it harder to resist the black hole’s gravitational pull, expending more photons to escape it. But, scientists think it won’t take long to disprove the long-standing theory as well.

“We can absolutely rule out Newton’s law of gravity. Our observations are consistent with Einstein’s general theory of relativity. However, his theory is definitely showing vulnerability. It cannot fully explain gravity inside a black hole, and at some point, we will need to move beyond Einstein’s theory to a more comprehensive theory of gravity that explains what a black hole is.”

Black holes are extraordinarily dense and have gravitational fields so strong that light and matter cannot escape. This is why Einstein’s theory cannot fully explain the way gravity works in and around the black hole. Scientists will soon have to find a much more comprehensive theory that can be applied to the study of black holes. Ghez thinks Einstein is right but, the theory can fall apart too.

The research on S0-2 is co-led by Andrea Ghez is titled ‘Relativistic redshift of the star S0-2 orbiting the Galactic centre supermassive black hole’. The science journal is considered to be the most detailed study on the black hole.

-- https://in.mashable.com/science/5270/newtons-law-of-gravity-was-wrong-claim-scientists-target-einsteins-general-relativity-next

---

^^^ [frame 0] CGI image confirmed:



http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=8ca8c9967563c41cbb03002b4ae85f13b1c99166.47527&show=ela -- http://archive.is/kB3GV

@Cryptotourist,



(A) I have an IQ of 60 so I can't distinguish reality from fantasy movies and TV.

(B) I'm a sack of shit who knows space is fake and I'm going to gaslight notbatman with CGI images from NASA; gotta keep that $50 million USD a day in taxpayer money rollin' in ya know.

Choose one.

^^^ What do you think is more reasonable, that the nautical mile used for navigation in conjunction with the sextant, a tool that measures angles between objects using the human eye was created based on:

(A) the angular resolution limit of the human human eye,

or

(B) the radius of a globe in a time when everybody knew the Earth was flat, and it's just pure (((coincidence))) that the radius of the globe matches the 1 minute limit of the eye?

Keep in mind that the globe model breaks down and is falsified when a zoom lens with a limit of less than 1 minute is employed. We haven't even got to question of weather the "rule of 60s" applies to celestial objects yet and your claim that the Moon is a giant sphere 240k miles away (((Copernican model))) is dead in the water.

^^^ Fraud.

(((coincidence)))

^^^ The salt makes the sea water electrically conductive allowing for it to be pumped via magnetohydrodynamic pumping action.



Sleep well.

^^^ Yeah, The Truman Show just about sums it up...

We're inside a high-tech engineered structure with artificial lighting created by giants. The tides are probably caused by the ocean being used as coolant, it's pumped around the solenoids that are used to project the Sun, Moon and stars. The water current is periodically reversed to keep the channels from clogging up.


If you don't like this idea just take two of these before bed and when you wake up, you'll believe everything the (((government))) tells you.


Image source: Pfizer

^^^ The Earth is stationary, it does not move. The Earth is also covered by a steel dome, so there is no "universe" out there, just a solid barrier. "Planets" are just stars that "wander", small close lights made of plasma.

We are on a motionless plain not a "planet". You have to throw out the entire Copernican model, it's all garbage.

"two weeks" -- Josh Zerlan, BFL



@BADecker,

   This discussion of bouncing a LASER off of the Moon (I purpose it's actually bouncing off the firmament) has me thinking this is the ticket to accurately measuring the distance to the Sun.

I theorize that the Sun is a projection made of plasma, scalar waves (a type of radio wave with a negligible transverse component) are produced in the polar region by a Tesla coil type device (cooled by sea water) and are transmitted to the firmament where they're reflected, and converge on a layer of dense liquid crystal gas to create a plasmoid (the Sun).

I think the distance to this liquid crystal gaseous layer can be measured with a specially tuned MASER that will create an "artificial" plasmoid. It's then simply a matter of measuring the return trip of stimulated photons to get the distance.

I believe the faggots at HAARP have all the equipment needed to perform this experiment.

^^^ What's wrong comrade, you don't like me posting proof of Russian collusion with the US government?

^^^ It's a ratio based on the angular resolution limit of the human eye (1 minute), when an "eye" other than human is used the ratio changes.

I'll try and simplify this (what's known as gravity) as much as possible...

There is a force, the Coulomb (electrostatic) force known as Coulomb's inverse-square law.

The ground has a negative (-) electrical charge and firmament (the dome above us) has a positive (+) charge. Electrons being the lightest negatively charged particle flow from the ground to the firmament and they push the heavier particles down as they move up. A similar phenomenon can be experimentally observed in the lab with "electromigration".

This is the force (as I understand it) behind density and buoyancy that causes objects in and being displacing the atmosphere to sink/fall.

No, no I can't find any info in your wiki link on this so-called signature imbued by the retro-reflector. In any case how could anybody independently verify any of these claims?

---

---

@Astargath,

   I have proven 1 minute = 1 nautical mile with the angular resolution limit of the human eye, game over cock smoker.

---

---

Need proof of Russia collusion?

Yuri Gagarin Vs. Neil Armstrong:

Image source: https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/300333868898982420/

Communist conspiracy confirmed!

^^^ I only need an approximate value for the distance to the Sun to prove my point. However, since all of you Satan worshipping degenerates keep harping on about accuracy I'll give it some thought, perhaps I can devise a more accurate measure with modern equipment.

^^^ Oh what a tangled web you weave...

So tell me, since "Certain beams of light, such as laser beams, can get very close to having one frequency", how does a LASER that's as close to monochromatic as physically possible get a distinctive monochromatic signature from this reflector NASA claims to have put on a Moon that's nothing but plasma?

I should note that nobody but NASA or a Vatican faggot run observatory can actually verify any of these claims, so this so-called lunar reflector isn't actually "proof" man (son of) or machine have actually landed on a solid sphere Moon.

However, I'll have to give you credit for finding a quasi-credible source (with a big picture of fake globe Earth at the top) that describes LASER light as not being 100% monochromatic.

These satanic homosexuals sure bend over backwards insisting that our completely subverted and corrupt governments are telling the truth. Too bad they can't back up any of the lies with anything but loads of more bullshit.

Hey spendy, still waiting on a source for your claim that LASER light is not monochromatic...

Two credible sources I've quoted in the last few pages:

1. Yanoff, Myron; Duker, Jay S. (2009). Ophthalmology 3rd Edition. MOSBY Elsevier. ISBN 978-0444511416.
2. Encyclopedia Britannica.

^^^ You should just stick to frothing at the mouth over the Bible, I actually back up my claims with evidence and credible sources.