Elastic ICO overview (estimate): ICO List - [XEL] Elastic Project
WTB
Amount Prize User
__any x,xxxx PM metamorphin (after Release)
__any x,xxxx PM dranster
__any x,xxxx PM BTCspace (after Release)
__any x,xxxx PM provenceday
__any x,xxxx PM bakedrice
__any x,xxxx PM mr.coinzy (Buy with Head only)
10000 0,00002 PM miayama
WTS
Amount Prize User
18881 0,000053 PM juras54
12000 0,000088 PM Thefrolly
17500 0,0002 PM HomoHenning
50000 0,1 PM Evil-Knievel
__any x,xxxx PM dranster
WTS with verification in the ICO List IcoNo Amount Prize User
178 102463,1249 0,0000975 PM haggis (10 BTC)
241 57928,8268 x,xxxx PM cryptoheadd
286 34768,95853 x,xxxx PM cryptoheadd
you can remove me from the list, thanks  |
|
|
|
Hope is no longer a project finished.
you speak in riddles my friend |
|
|
|
I have a such a gut feeling that I am gonna be so sorry for selling half of my small stash of pio"s a yobit. I sold half a month ago and that was a big mistake for me.
Well, at 80k sat the valuation is fairly low. I took Liqui for for my own calculations, and it seems new exchange can get ca. 100 BTC volume daily in its early days. It would give some 7.5 BTC comissions monthly, so at BTC=$1k, and current cap of $170k, it gives P/E=22.6. If the volume will be increasing quickly, then market cap can easily end up at $1-2M. if you take 100 BTC for volume i get only 0.0000005 Btc for each token per day if you go for 0.25% tradefees, i think its overpriced atm., ofc. if it brings volume like bittrex than it would bring roi under 1 year, but that would be what in 5 years. Hrmmm - 100 BTC x .25% = .25 BTC / 207,000 PIO = .00000120 Satohis per share. So if you have 20,000 pio shares you would get - .00000120 x 20,000 = .024 BTC per day? Please check my math. I am slow in that department!  but only 40% go to shareholders |
|
|
|
I have a such a gut feeling that I am gonna be so sorry for selling half of my small stash of pio"s a yobit. I sold half a month ago and that was a big mistake for me.
Well, at 80k sat the valuation is fairly low. I took Liqui for for my own calculations, and it seems new exchange can get ca. 100 BTC volume daily in its early days. It would give some 7.5 BTC comissions monthly, so at BTC=$1k, and current cap of $170k, it gives P/E=22.6. If the volume will be increasing quickly, then market cap can easily end up at $1-2M. if you take 100 BTC for volume i get only 0.0000005 Btc for each token per day if you go for 0.25% tradefees, i think its overpriced atm., ofc. if it brings volume like bittrex than it would bring roi under 1 year, but that would be what in 5 years. |
|
|
|
|
so if i have a stake in this i get what?
|
|
|
|
|
how high was the last dividends?
|
|
|
|
So you have a 2-of-3 multisig wallet and you have 2-of-3 private keys (so main key and backup key)? If yes, then it's already implemented. If not, we could think about another alternative way to redeem - broadcast a handcrafted transaction and use this TX signature for verification. But the latter one would have to be decided by the entire community I guess. Technically, someone who can sign a transaction from a multisig wallet has access to this wallet, so from my point of you this remeed scheme might be valid. Not sure about how this scheme could be used to steal commonly owned XEL, since a signed TX is different from a signed message in terms of transparency. Yes, I have both keys. If it's already implemented, then that's a huge relief. I've been rooting for you guys for about a year and was never quite sure if I was actually going to be able to redeem my share. It's really cool to see this project keep going. Now, I just need to figure out how many XEL I have. I know the tranx #s. Anybody know how this could be done? Thanks again. |
|
|
|
No news? Is there a few days left for ICO 2.0, or is there no more? No exchange is a boring situation!  if you look back 1 or 2 pages you will find news |
|
|
|
Hi,
I run the wallet today and almost all my NXS coins were moved from Balance to Stake....what does it mean? And how can I send these staked coins to a different nexus address (I can send only the amount which is in Balance) ? Thx.
stake is something like interest, so you get depending on how long you had your wallet open 0.5% to 3% annual income and after some time your coins from staking are back in your normal address |
|
|
|
|
did dev say anything or is he gone?
|
|
|
|
My comments were directed at those who keep saying they need someone in charge (or to launch mainnet, or whatever)...neither EK or I are looking to lead this project (we see it as an open-source project where all contributors are equal peers), and I guess I don't understand why everyone keeps pushing EK to provide direction to them.
Most of us have never before seeded anything with a genesis block and don't really know how to do so. I like to think I can figure out anything with time. But I may be slow at learning how to do it, also having no reputation to ensure enough others flock to whatever I attempt. The net result would likely be a mess. All would go so much better with a technically skilled and reputable lead person for the mainnet launch. The bystander effect has been the subject of studies. Most of us are like a bunch of people without technical skills, seeing someone lying with a broken spine on a sidewalk. We have a vague idea that a skilled doctor needs to help him and also tell us how to safely load the patient into a stretcher. But if we all charge forward, trying to intervene in every way at once, with no skills, it wouldn't go well. It would go a whole lot better if a doctor stepped up. Doctors = coders and experts, in the above analogy ... especially those with a prior reputation on Elastic. If both EK and you are unwilling, that is really unfortunate, as that takes out two of the top three Elastic coders. I have been trying to assemble a list to aid in candidates for an organized effort (as well as recent volunteering of Selsonblue and Clivemy). The following users have particularly contributed to development in the past, AFAIK: Evil-Knievel coding the client, Elastic Language, etc. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=159191unvoid debugging, testserver, faucet, etc. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=98343coralreefer coding the miner, design suggestions https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=320483ttookk website, suggestions https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=765856ImI frequent commenter and tester https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92361Other testers: josegines, trader19, hagie, BigBoom3599, provenceday ... and probably a number of others who I'm missing Possibly the slack channel was created by Thefrolly. The above is based on imperfectly browsing through various parts of the thread. Inaccuracy in missing some contributions is unintentional but nevertheless practically guaranteed, considering the length of the thread and history involved. Feel free to add corrections. I did not create the slack, it was someone called "leifeng" |
|
|
|
i searched for melonenpot and found this  i dont know if thats a good investment :O |
|
|
|
Question: Why would people buy crypto funds from shady Middlemen in Slovenia (Iconomi), while they can skip these middle men and buy identical crypto funds on a decentralized platform like MelonPort or TaaS where everything from trades to performance is transparent, and especially since these other platforms can also hold funds safely in Cold Storage which eliminates DAO-like hacks?
Why would it be shady? Are you even capable of pointing where is that without googleMaps? If you try to spreed FUD, sell your stash and buy some shitcoins. Or open your own platform if you know it better  because: . No expense report for the past 6 months since the end of ICO.
. They solicited funds from US citizens, now they say US citizens are not allowed to use Iconomi
. They failed to release Legal Part 2
. Their legal guy just disappeared.
. They failed to do bi-weekly AMAs, after promising they will do so.
. They avoid all serious questions on Slack.
. They postponed the launch on same day after competitors released videos of their working prototype: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJP7HPF8rOc
. They're delaying ICNX & ICNP funds on purpose to time the release with the end of 6-month lockup period to access their ICN Dev share.
Now you tell me how investors are supposed to trust them with millions of dollars if ICN holders are ever going to see any dividends. - Expense reports will be done as soon as dividends will be paid and investments in ICOs have been declared.
- US citizens are allowed to buy and own ICN, they only mustn't participate in funds. If you invested in their ICO, all you did was buy ICN. Also, they are working towards making Iconomi usable for US citizens.
- Legal part 2 will come out, too. Do you have literally no patience?
- Their legal guy disappeared? What? Lolol
- They will continue doing AMAs, they never said they would be 100% bi-weekly. Expect bi-weekly AMAs to happen once platform releases.
- They do not avoid any questions on slack except for "when is release?" They like to argue with everyone on Slack and answer each question very professionally.
- Postponing just because a competitor that hasn't even had their ICO puts up a vid? Take off your tin foil hat.
- They delayed platform because they want to make sure to deliver the best product possible. The devs ICN shares are vested and will not be paid out all at once.
I remember you. A couple weeks back you said Iconomi would moon and made you rich. Now you FUD like there's no tomorrow lol.[/list] prob. fell for the FUD and now joined it |
|
|
|
Did anyone yet see coin market cap. See the third position. Digibyte comes on third position. In 24 hours it showed a growth of 22485500.00 %.  He he, now see the daily volume, its less than $300. Don't worry, it's just another yobit scamcoin... its not yobit coin you can not see there dude ICN is not available on yobit, ICN only listing at kraken. According to coinmarketcap ICN is listed on Kranken, Liqui and Mercatox. http://coinmarketcap.com/assets/iconomi/#marketsYou probably have mistaken this, because there is a coin on Yobit with the same name. they were talking about digicube and Not about icn |
|
|
|
I don't understand what is the purpose of ICN token and why it was necessary to run a Fund Management Platform. Isn't enough to use Bitcoin and pay dividens to the participants of the project? I may be wrong but in my opinion the real goal of Iconomi project is to get as more Bitcoins as possible and leave investors with useless tokens.
did you read the whitepaper? |
|
|
|
|
decided to grab some more icn, but a bit lower. PLS sell some more i need around 390
|
|
|
|
Hey Guys
Thank you for an amazing swing. I am now more bullish on this than ever. Lets look at the facts.
1) Pure VIDZ is a legitimate project. The ICO was done properly with the escrow. The DEV has followed through with development and updates for over 2 months now. The project is going according to timeline and plan. The website is completely functional and is as good as the beta was proposed to be.
2) The market cap at 1k sats is only 1 million. I can show you 10 coins that are over 10m+ marketcap with 0 development
3) Every single demographic community now knows about PUREVIDZ. I have seen it being mentioned in the Russian, Romanian, Chinese, etc. groups. This is the first time I have seen a coin at this marketcap get this much publicity.
4) We have broken the all time high record for legitimate market activity on Yobit. Yobit has never before seen a coin go 500 btc+ on legitimate volume. And me and you both know at least 30% of the crypto world wont even consider making an account on Yobit. Wait till trex or ccex.
5) The new dev is completely transparent well spoken and looks to have great integrity. There are a thousand scam coins which have ended worse than this one with the devs dumping and running. If the devs controlled as much as they do they could have sold out $200k USD on the market and crashed it completely but this run down was minutes AFTER the post was made and the chat box started realizing.
6) THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT - The new coin will be swapped and burned with VIDZ. So what does that mean? PUREVIDZ is already in plan to be rolled out by the 15th. Now the new dev seems completely competent and we are waiting for his proposal - but if his project gets a lot of demand, THE ONLY WAY TO BUY INTO THE NEW PROJECT IS BUY BUYING VIDZ.
So wait.. we have a legit coin at just a 1m marketcap that the whole community knows about, and its supply is about to get burned even more?? And theres a new project with great potential and the only way to buy into it is through buying the limited supply VIDZ??
FROM A TECHNICAL STANDPOINT
If you guys pull up the logarithmic chart on Blockfolio in the maximum timeframe (1MONTH), you will see that this run down was pre-empted by two shooting stars which showed pressure above 2k however this is an extreme bullish hammer and the uptrend on the long term timeframe is still perfectly maintained.
Best of luck guys. We are buying. We are watching. 400 -900 is discount. Watch what happens by FEB 15.
did you calculate everything in regards of buybacks? in my opinion its not worth holding vidz. I like the site yes but the coin i dunno, i calculated how buybacks will affect the coin and stuff and i dont see any grow in value soon |
|
|
|
May i know whats the ICO price for this?
ICO is over was ~400 sat I believe lol ico was under 100 sat |
|
|
|
So how much did you fuckrz make on this scam?
6 btc out of 1 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
